Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T13:27:00.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Fracture Fixation

from Section II - Orthopedic Apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

By
Tim B. Hunter
Edited by
Tim B. Hunter ,
Mihra S. Taljanovic  and
Jason R. Wild
Tim B. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Mihra S. Taljanovic
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Jason R. Wild
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Radiologic Guide to Orthopedic Devices , pp. 19 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and Useful Links

AAOS. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Locking plates for extremity fractures. A technology overview. PDF (2008) available at: www.aaos.org/research/overviews/LockingPlates.pdf.Google Scholar
Ajmal, M, O’Sullivan, M, NcCabe, J, Curtin, W. Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Injury 2001; 32: 692–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Althausen, P L, Hak, D J. Lower extremity traction pins: indications, technique, and complications. Am J Orthop 2002; 31: 43–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Beaman, F D, Bancroft, L W, Peterson, J J, et al. Imaging characteristics of bone graft materials. RadioGrapics 2006; 26(2): 373–388.Google Scholar
Beevers, D J. Metal vs bioabsorbable interference screws: initial fixation. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2003; 217: 59–75.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J B, Lund, P J. Orthopedic devices. In: Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994; 348–385.Google Scholar
Berquist, T H, ed. Imaging Atlas of Orthopedic Appliances and Prostheses. New York, NY: Raven, 1995.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R A, Rozental, T D. Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clin 2012; 28(4): 457–468.Google Scholar
Collinge, C A, Sanders, R W. Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000; 8: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, N J, Sivaji, C, Maffulli, N. Subtrochanteric fractures: a review of treatment options. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2001; 60: 35–46.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A A, ed. The Radiology of Orthopedic Implants: An Atlas of Techniques and Assessment. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.Google Scholar
Frigg, R, Appenzeller, A, Christensen, R, et al. The development of the distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury 2001; 32: SC24–SC31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hak, D J, Mauffrey, C, Seligson, D, Lindeque, B. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2014; 37(12): 825–830.Google Scholar
Herbert, T J, Fisher, W E. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66: 114–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillock, R, Howard, S. Historical review. Utility of carbon fiber implants in orthopedic surgery: literature review. JISRF Reconstructive Review 2014; 4(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Taljanovic, M. Overview of medical devices. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2001; 30: 94–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, T B, Taljanovic, M S. Glossary of medical devices and procedures: abbreviations, acronyms, and definitions. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 195–213.Google Scholar
Jebson, P J, Adams, B D. Wrist arthrodesis: review of current techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keramidas, E G, Miller, G. The Suzuki frame for complex intraarticular fractures of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116(5): 1326–1331.Google Scholar
Kregor, P J. Distal femur fractures with complex articular involvement: management by articular exposure and submuscular fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33: 153–175, ix.Google Scholar
Kregor, P J, Stannard, J, Zlowodzki, M, Cole, P A, Alfonso, J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the less invasive stabilization system (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury 2001; 32: SC32–SC47.Google Scholar
Kurien, T, Pearson, R G, Scammell, B E. Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice: the evidence for their use. Bone Joint J 2013; 95B(5): 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurosaka, M, Yoshiya, S, Andrish, J T. A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15: 225–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, A L, Pliam, N B. Use of bone graft substitutes in distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7: 279–290.Google Scholar
Larsson, S, Bauer, T W. Use of injectable calcium phosphate cement for fracture fixation: a review. Clin Orthop 2002; 395: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manaster, B J, Remley, K, Newman, A P, Mann, F A. Knee ligament reconstruction: plain film analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 150: 337–342.Google Scholar
Martin, S D, Martin, T L, Brown, C H. Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33: 685–696.Google Scholar
Melville, D M, Taljanovic, M S, Scalcione, L R, et al. Imaging and management of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44(2): 165–177.Google Scholar
Oh, C W, Park, B C, Kim, P T, et al. Retrograde flexible intramedullary nailing in children’s femoral fractures. Int Orthop 2002; 26: 52–55.Google Scholar
Parikh, S N. Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 1301–1311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M J, Handoll, H H G. Pre-operative traction for fractures of the proximal femur. Cochrane Database System Review 2001; (1): CD000168.Google Scholar
Parker, M J, Stockton, G. Internal fixation implants for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database System Rev 2001; (4): CD001467.Google Scholar
Pena, F, Grontvedt, T, Brown, G A, Aune, A K, Engebretsen, L. Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws: influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 329–334.Google Scholar
Petruskevicius, J, Nielsen, S, Kaalund, S, Knudsen, P R, Overgaard, S. No effect of Osteoset, a bone graft substitute, on bone healing in humans: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 575–578.Google Scholar
Porrino, J A, Maloney, E, Scherer, K, et al. Fractures of the distal radius: postmanagement radiographic characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 846–853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puddu, G, Cipolla, M, Cerullo, G, Franco, V, Gianni, E. Osteotomies: the surgical treatment of the valgus knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 2007; 15 (1): 15–22.Google Scholar
Resnick, D L, Kang, H S, Pretterklieber, M L. Internal Derangements of Joints: Emphasis on MR Imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, D, Alk, D, Sandbank, J, Farber, R, Halperin, N. Inflammatory reactions associated with a calcium sulfate bone substitute. Ann Transplant 1999; 4: 91–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Ruedi, T P, Buckley, R E, Moran, C G, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2007.Google Scholar
Sherry, E, Boeck, H, Warnke, P H. Percutaneous treatment of chronic MRSA osteomyelitis with a novel plant-derived antiseptic. BMC Surg 2001; 1: 1–4.Google Scholar
Steinberg, E L, Rath, E, Shlaifer, A, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima – a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composities for orthopedic trauma implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013; 17: 221–228.Google Scholar
Stover, M. Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury 2001; 32: SC3–SC13.Google Scholar
Tiren, D, van Bemmel, A J, Swank, D J, van der Linden, F M. Hook plate fixation of acute displaced lateral clavicle fractures: mid-term results and brief literature overview. J Orthop Surg Res 2012; 7: 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, R M, Kelly, C M, Giusti, D E. Bioassayed demineralized bone matrix and calcium sulfate: use in bone-grafting procedures. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1999; 88: 180–185.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiss, D A, ed. Master Techniques in Orthopedic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 2013.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×