Berlin 140. Berlin, Staatsbibliothek 140. Ashkenaz, dated 1335.Google Scholar

Berlin 514. Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Or. Qu. 514. Italian script, dated 1289.Google Scholar

Bodleiana 186. Oxford, Bodleian Library 186 (Oppenheim 34). Ashkenaz, early thirteenth century.Google Scholar

Bodleiana 2440. Oxford, Bodleian Library 2440 (Corpus Christi College, MS 165). Ashkenaz, late twelfth century.Google Scholar

De Rossi 175. Parma, Biblioteca Palatina, de Rossi 175. Spain, dated 1305.Google Scholar

De Rossi 181. Parma, Biblioteca Palatina, de Rossi 181. Ashkenaz, thirteenth or fourteenth century.Google Scholar

Karlsruhe 10. Karlsruhe, Badische Landesbibliothek, Cod. Reuchlin 10. Ashkenaz, fourteenth century.Google Scholar

Leipzig 1. Leipzig, Universitätsbibliothek B.H. 1. Ashkenaz, thirteenth century.Google Scholar

London 26917. London, British Library. Add 26917. Ashkenaz, dated 1273.Google Scholar

Munich 5. Munich, Staatsbibliothek 5. Ashkenaz, dated 1273.Google Scholar

St. John’s College 3. Cambridge, St. John’s College 3 (A3). Ashkenaz, dated 1238.Google Scholar

Vienna 220. Vienna, Nationalbibliothek 23, Hebr. 220. Ashkenaz, thirteenth or fourteenth century.Google Scholar

The Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds are cited according to the traditional printed editions. Other rabbinic texts are cited either from the standard printed editions or, where available, from critical editions, as enumerated below, each according to its own paragraph system and/or pagination, as applicable.Google Scholar

Avot de-Rabbi Natan, ed. Schechter, Solomon. New York: Feldheim, 1967.Google Scholar

Genesis Rabbah, ed. Theodor, Julius and Albeck, Chanoch. Jerusalem: Wahrmann, 1965.Google Scholar

Leviticus Rabbah, ed. Margulies, Mordecai. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, 1953–1960.Google Scholar

Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael, ed. Horovitz, Saul and Rabin, Israel A.. Jerusalem: Bamberger et Wahrmann, 1960.Google Scholar

Midrash Tehillim, ed. Buber, Salomon. Vilnius: Rom, 1891.Google Scholar

The Mishnah of Rabbi Eliezer or The Midrash of Thirty-Two Hermeneutic Rules, ed. Enelow, Hyman G.. New York: Bloch, 1933.Google Scholar

Pesikta de-Rav Kahana, ed. Mandelbaum, Bernard. New York: JTS, 1962.Google Scholar

Qohelet Rabbah (Midrash Kohelet Rabbah 1–6), ed. Hirshman, Marc. Jerusalem: Schechter Institute, 2016.Google Scholar

Ruth Rabbah (“Book of Ruth in Aggadic Literature and Midrash Ruth Rabba”), ed. Myron B. Lerner. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1971.Google Scholar

Song of Songs Rabbah (Midrash Rabbah Shir ha-Shirim), ed. Dunski, Samson. Jerusalem: Devir, 1980.Google Scholar

Tanḥuma ha-Qadum, ed. Buber, Salomon. Jerusalem: Ortsel, 1964. (Midrash Tanḥuma is cited from the standard printed editions.)Google Scholar

Abelard, Peter. The Letters of Abelard and Heloise, trans. Betty Radice. London: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae, ed. Caramello, Pietro, 5 vols. Turin: Marietti, 1952–1956; English trans. in Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas, ed. Anton Pegis, 2 vols. New York: Modern Library, 1945.Google Scholar

Augustine, . Enarrationes in Psalmos, ed. Dekkers, Eligius. Turnhout: Brepols, 1956; English trans. St. Augustine: Exposition on the Book of Psalms, trans. A[rthur] Cleveland Coxe, vol. 8 of A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1886.Google Scholar

Select Letters, trans. James Houston Baxter. London: Heinemann, 1930.Google Scholar

Bekhor Shor, Joseph ben Isaac. Pentateuch Commentary. Perushe Rabi Yosef Bekhor Shor ʻal ha-Torah, ed. Nevo, Yehoshafaṭ. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1994.Google Scholar

Bruno the Carthusian. Psalms Commentary. Expositio in Psalmos. PL 152: 637–1420; French trans. Commentaire des Psaumes attribué à saint Bruno, trans. A. Aniorté. Le Barroux: Sainte Madeleine, 2017.Google Scholar

Commentary on the Pauline Epistles. PL 153: 9–565.Google Scholar

Cassiodorus. Expositio in Psalterium in Magni Aurelii Cassiodori senatoris opera. Turnhout: Brepols, 1958; English trans. Cassiodorus: Explanation of the Psalms, trans. P. G. Walsh. New York: Paulist Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Eliezer of Beaugency. Kommentar zu Ezechiel und den XII kleinen Propheten von Eliezer au Beaugency, ed. Poznanski, Samuel A.. Warsaw: Mekize Nirdamim, 1913.Google Scholar

Gregory the Great. Moralia in Job, ed. Adriaen, Marcus. Turnhout: Brepols, 1979; English trans. Moral Reflections on the Book of Job, trans. Brian Kerns. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press/Cistercian Publications, 2014.Google Scholar

ben Manoah, Hezekiah. Pentateuch Commentary. Hizkuni: Perush ha-Torah, ed. Chavel, Hayyim Dov. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1981.Google Scholar

Horace. Ars Poetica. In Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica, ed. and trans. Fairclough, H. Rushton, 450–489. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hugh of St. Victor, Didascalicon, ed. Buttimer, Charles Henry. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1939; English trans. The Didascalicon of Hugh of St. Victor: A Medieval Guide to the Arts, trans. Jerome Taylor. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ibn Bal‘am, Judah. “Rabbi Judah Ibn Bal‘am’s Commentary on Numbers and Deuteronomy” (Hebrew), ed. and trans. Maaravi Perez. MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 1970.Google Scholar

Ibn Barun, Isaac. Kitāb al-Muwāzana, ed. Kokozoff, Paul. St. Petersburg, 1890; repr. Jerusalem: Kedem, 1971.Google Scholar

Ibn Ezra, Abraham. Pentateuch Commentary. Perushei ha-Torah le-Rabbenu Avraham Ibn Ezra, ed. Weiser, Asher. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1977.Google Scholar

Safah Berurah, ed. Lippmann, G. H.. Fürth, 1839; partial annotated ed., Michael Wilensky, Devir 2 (1924): 274–302.Google Scholar

Sefer Moznayim (Spanish), ed. and trans. Paton, Lorenzo Jimenez and Sáenz-Badillos, Angel. Cordoba: El Almendro, 2002.Google Scholar

Yesod diqduq, ed. Allony, Nehemia. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1985.Google Scholar

Yesod mora ve-sod Torah [The foundation of piety and the secret of the Torah], ed. Cohen, Joseph and Simon, Uriel. 2nd ed. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Ibn Ezra, Moses. Kitāb al-Muḥāḍara wa-l-Mudhākara/Sefer ha-‘iyyunim we-ha-diyyunim [Book of Discussion and Conversation] (Hebrew), ed. and trans. Halkin, A. S.. Jerusalem: Mekize Nirdamim, 1975.Google Scholar

Ibn Janah, Jonah. Kitāb al-Luma‘ (Le livre de parterres fleuris: Grammaire hébraïque en arabe d‘Abou’l-Walid Merwan Ibn Djanah de Cordoue), ed. Derenbourg, Joseph. Paris, 1886; Hebrew trans. Sefer ha-Riqmah, trans. Judah Ibn Tibbon, ed. Michael Wilensky, 2nd ed. Jerusalem: Academy for the Hebrew Language, 1964.Google Scholar

Isidore of Seville. Etymologies (Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive originum libri XX), ed. Lindsay, W. M., 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1911.Google Scholar

Jerome. Commentarii in Prophetas Minores, ed. Adriaen, M., 2 vols. Turnhout: Brepols, 1969–1970.Google Scholar

Hebraicae quaestiones in libro Geneseos, Liber interpretationis hebraicorum nominum, Commentarioli in Psalmos, Commentarius in Ecclesiasten, ed. de Lagarde, Paul. Turnhout: Brepols, 1959.Google Scholar

In Hieremiam Libri VI, ed. Reiter, Siegfried. Turnhout: Brepols, 1960.Google Scholar

Jerome’s Commentary on Daniel, trans. Gleason L. Archer. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1958.Google Scholar

Sancti Eusebii Hieronymi Epistulae, ed. Hilberg, Isidore, 3 vols. Vienna: Tempsky, 1910–1918.Google Scholar

Kimhi, Joseph. Sefer ha-Galui, with the Corrections of a Certain Benjamin, ed. Mathews, Henry J.. Berlin: Iṭtsḳoṿsḳi, 1887.Google Scholar

Maimonides, Moses. Book of the Commandments: Sefer ha-Mitzvot, ed. and trans. Kafih, Joseph. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1971.Google Scholar

Guide of the Perplexed, trans. Shlomo Pines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar

ben Saruq, Menahem. Maḥberet (Spanish), ed. and trans. Sáenz-Badillos, Angel. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 1986; older ed. Herschell E. Filipowski. London: Ḥoveret Yeshanim, 1854.Google Scholar

Mizrahi, Elijah. Commentary on Rashi. Perush le-perush Rashi, ed. Phillip, Moshe. Petah-Tikvah: Moshe Phillip, 1992.Google Scholar

Nahmanides, Moses. Hassagot (Sefer ha-Mitzvot ‘im Hassagot ha-Ramban) [Critique of Maimonides’ Book of the Commandments]), ed. Chavel, Chaim D.. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1981.Google Scholar

Qara, Joseph. Commentary on Former Prophets. Perushei Rabbi Yosef Qara li-nevi’im rishonim, ed. Eppenstein, Simon. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1972.Google Scholar

The Commentaries of Rabbi Joseph Qara on the Book of Job (Perushei Rabbi Yosef Qara le-sefer Iyyov), ed. Ahrend, Moshe. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1988.Google Scholar

Quintillian. Institutio Oratoria, trans. H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Rashbam (ben Meir, Samuel). Pentateuch Commentary. (1) Perush ha-Torah asher katav Rashbam, ed. Rosin, David. Breslau: Shottlender, 1881. (2) Perush ha-Torah le-Rabenu Shemuʼel ben Meʼir ʻim shinuye nusḥaʼot, tsiyune meḳorot, heʻarot u-mafteḥot, ed. Martin (Meʼir Yitsḥak) Lockshin. Jerusalem: Horev, 2009.Google Scholar

The Commentary of Rabbi Samuel Ben Meir (Rashbam) on the Book of Job, ed. Japhet, Sara. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000.Google Scholar

The Commentary of R. Samuel ben Meir (Rashbam) on Qoheleth, ed. and trans. Japhet, Sara and Salters, Robert. Jerusalem and Leiden: Magnes and Brill, 1985.Google Scholar

The Commentary of Rabbi Samuel Ben Meir (Rashbam) on the Song of Songs, ed. Japhet, Sara. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2008.Google Scholar

Dayyaqut me-Rabbenu Shemuel [ben Meʼir (RaSHBaM)], ed. Merdler, Ronela. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1999.Google Scholar

Rashi (Rabbi ben Isaac, Solomon) Pentateuch Commentary. Raschi: der Kommentar des Salomo B. Isak über den Pentateuch, ed. Berliner, Abraham, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: J. Kauffmann, 1905.Google Scholar

Rashi’s Commentaries on the Prophets and Psalms. Parshandatha: The Commentary of Rashi on the Prophets and Hagiographs, Edited on the Basis of Several Manuscripts and Editions, ed. Isaac, Maarsen, 3 vols. Amsterdam: Hertzberger, 1930–1936.Google Scholar

Rashi’s Commentary on the Book of Proverbs, ed. Fredman, Lisa. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies, 2019.Google Scholar

Rashi’s Commentary on Psalms, ed. Gruber, Mayer I.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Rashi’s Commentary on the Song of Songs, according to JTSA MS Lutzki 778. In Secundum Salomonem: A Thirteenth Century Latin Commentary on the Song of Songs, ed. Kamin, S. and Saltman, A., 81–99 (Hebrew section). Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Remigius of Auxerre. Commentum in Martianum Capellam, ed. Lutz, Cora. Leiden: Brill, 1962.Google Scholar

Saadia Gaon. Beliefs and Opinions (Kitāb al-Mukhtār fi-l-Amānāt wa-l-I‘tiqādāt; Sefer ha-Nivḥar be-emunot we-de‘ot) (Hebrew), ed. and trans. Kafih, Joseph. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1970.Google Scholar

Tafsīr (translation of the Torah). In Oeuvres complètes de R. Saadia ben Iosef al-Fayyoûmî, ed. Derenbourg, Joseph. Paris: E. Leroux, 1893.Google Scholar

Saadya’s Commentary on Genesis (Hebrew), ed. and trans. Zucker, Moshe. New York: JTS, 1984.Google Scholar

Samuel ben Hofni Gaon. Rabbi Shmuel B. Chofni: Liber Prooemium Talmudis (Hebrew), ed. and trans. Abramson, Shraga. Jerusalem: Mekize Nirdamim, 1990.Google Scholar

Scholia vindobonensia ad Horatii Artem poeticam, ed. Zechmeister, Joseph. Vienna: C. Gerold, 1877.Google Scholar

Servius Grammaticus. In Vergilii carmina commentarii, ed. Thilo, G. and Hagen, H., 2 vols. Hildesheim: Olms, 1961.Google Scholar

Thierry of Chartres, De sex dierum operibus. In Commentaries on Boethius by Thierry of Chartres, ed. Haring, Nicholas M., 553–575. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1971.Google Scholar

ben Eliezer, Tobiah. Leqaḥ Ṭov Commentary on the Song of Songs, ed. Greenup, A. W.. London: n.p., 1909.Google Scholar

Leqaḥ Ṭov Commentary on the Torah, ed. Buber, Salomon. Vilnius: Romm, 1884.Google Scholar

Abulafia, Anna Sapir, and Evans, G. R.. The Works of Gilbert Crispin, Abbot of Westminster. London: Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Ahrend, Moshe. “The Concept Peshuto Shellamiqra’ in the Making” (Hebrew). In Japhet, ed., Bible In Light of its Interpreters, 237–261.Google Scholar

Qara on Job. See under Qara, Joseph, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Allen, Judson Boyce. The Friar as Critic: Literary Attitudes in the Later Middle Ages. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Allony, Nehemia. “Vistas caraistas en el Mahberet de Menahem” (Hebrew). Tesoro de los Juios Sefardies 5 (1962): 21–54.Google Scholar

Alster, Baruch. “The ‘Forlorn Lady’ in the Interpretation of the Song of Songs” (Hebrew). JSIJ 5 (2006): 101–122.Google Scholar

“Human Love and its Relationship to Spiritual Love in Jewish Exegesis on the Song of Songs” (Hebrew). PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University. Ramat Gan, 2006.Google Scholar

Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Poetry. New York: Basic Books, 1985.Google Scholar

Andrée, Alexander. “Laon Revisited: Master Anselm and the Creation of a Theological School in the Twelfth Century.” Journal of Medieval Latin 22 (2012): 257–281.Google Scholar

Ankori, Zvi. Karaites in Byzantium: The Formative Years, 970–1100. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Bacher, Wilhelm. “The Title הקורא Given to Joseph Kimchi by the Commentator of his Sepher Ha-galui.” JQR 5 (1892): 167–168.Google Scholar

Baer, Isaac. “Rashi and the Historical Reality of his Time” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 20 (1949): 320–332.Google Scholar

Banitt, Menahem. “Les Poterim,” REJ 125 (1966): 21–33.Google Scholar

Rashi, Interpreter of the Biblical Letter Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Bar-Asher, Meir M. Scripture and Exegesis in Early Imāmī Shiism. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Bar-Asher, Moshe, Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, Tov, Emanuel, and Wazana, Nilil, eds. Shai le-Sara Japhet: Studies in the Bible, its Exegesis and its Language. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2007.Google Scholar

Basch, Rivka. “Peshuto shel Miqra and Sensus Litteralis: A Comparative Examination of Jewish and Christian Interpretations in the Twelfth Century” (Hebrew). MA thesis, Baltimore Hebrew University, 2003.Google Scholar

Baswell, Christopher. Virgil in Medieval England: Figuring the Aeneid from the Twelfth Century to Chaucer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Becker, Dan. The Arabic Sources of R. Jonah Ibn Janāḥ’s Grammar (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ben-Shammai, Haggai. A Leader’s Project: Studies in the Philosophical and Exegetical Works of Saadya Gaon (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2015.Google Scholar

“On the Mudawwin – Editor of the Biblical Books – in Judeo-Arabic Exegesis” (Hebrew). In From Sages to Savants: Studies Presented to Avraham Grossman, ed. Hacker, Joseph R., Kaplan, Yosef, and Kedar, B. Z., 73–110. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center, 2010.Google Scholar

“The Tension between Literal Interpretation and Exegetical Freedom.” In McAuliffe et al., eds., Reverence for the Word, 33–50.Google Scholar

Ben-Yehuda, Eliezer. Dictionary and Thesaurus of the Hebrew Language. New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1960.Google Scholar

Benson, Robert L., and Constable, Giles, eds. Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Benton, John F. “The Court of Champagne as a Literary Center.” Speculum 36 (1961): 551–591.Google Scholar

Berger, David. “From Crusades to Blood Libels to Expulsions: Some New Approaches to Medieval Anti-Semitism.” In Berger, , Persecution, Polemic, and Dialogue, 15–39.Google Scholar

“Mission to the Jews and Jewish–Christian Contacts in the Polemical Literature of the High Middle Ages.” In Berger, , Persecution, Polemic, and Dialogue, 177–198 (originally appeared in American Historical Review 91 (1986): 576–591.)Google Scholar

Persecution, Polemic, and Dialogue. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2010.Google Scholar

“Study of the Early Ashkenazic Rabbinate” (Hebrew; review of Avraham Grossman, The Early Sages of Ashkenaz). Tarbiz 53 (1984): 479–487.Google Scholar

Berger, Yitzhak. “The Contextual Exegesis of Rabbi Eliezer of Beaugency and the Climax of the Northern French Peshat Tradition.” JSQ 15 (2008): 115–129.Google Scholar

Berlin, Adele. Biblical Poetry through Medieval Jewish Eyes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Poetics and Interpretation of Biblical Narrative. Sheffield: Almond Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Berliner, Abraham. Pletath soferim: Beiträge zur jüdischen Schriftauslegung im Mittelalter. Jerusalem: Maqor, 1971 [1872].Google Scholar

Raschi. See under Rashi, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Beyer, Hartmut, Signori, Gabriela, and Steckel, Sita, eds. Bruno the Carthusian and his Mortuary Roll: Studies, Text, and Translations. Turnhout: Brepols, 2014.Google Scholar

Brandin, Louis. Les gloses françaises (Loazim) de Gerschom de Metz. Paris: A. Durlacher, 1902.Google Scholar

Brin, Gershon. Reuel and his Friends: Jewish Byzantine Exegetes from around the Tenth Century CE (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Studies in the Biblical Exegesis of R. Joseph Qara (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies, 1990.Google Scholar

Brody, Robert. The Geonim of Babylonia and the Shaping of Medieval Jewish Culture, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sa‘adyah Gaon, trans. Betsy Rosenberg. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2013.Google Scholar

The Textual History of the She’iltot (Hebrew). New York: American Academy for Jewish Research, 1991.Google Scholar

Brown, Francis, Driver, S. R., and Briggs, Charles A.. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Buber, Salomon. Leqaḥ Ṭov. See under Tobiah ben Eliezer, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Sekhel Ṭov. See under Menahem ben Solomon, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Burnett, Charles. Adelard of Bath: An English Scientist and Arabist of the Early Twelfth Century. London: Warburg Institute, 1987.Google Scholar

Burnett, Charles, and Ronca, Italo, eds. Adelard of Bath, Conversations with his Nephew: On the Same and the Different, Questions on Natural Science, and on Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Burnett, Stephen G. Christian Hebraism in the Reformation Era (1500–1660): Authors, Books, and the Transmission of Jewish Learning. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

“The Strange Career of the Biblia Rabbinica among Christian Hebraists, 1517–1620.” In Shaping the Bible in the Reformation: Books, Scholars and Readers in the Sixteenth Century, ed. McLean, Matthew and Gordon, Bruce, 63–83. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Butin, Romain F. The Ten Nequdoth of the Torah: Or, The Meaning and Purpose of the Extraordinary Points of the Pentateuch (Massoretic Text). A Contribution to the History of Textual Criticism among the Ancient Jews. Baltimore: J. H. Furst Co., 2009.Google Scholar

Castaño, Javier, Fishman, Talya, and Kanarfogel, Ephraim, eds. Regional Identities and Cultures of Medieval Jews. London: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2018.Google Scholar

Chance, Jane. Medieval Mythography: From Roman North Africa to the School of Chartres, AD 433–1177. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1994.Google Scholar

Châtillon, Jean. “Sainte Anselm et l’écriture.” In Les Mutations socio-culturelles au tournant des XIe–XIIe siècles, ed. Foreville, Raymonde, 431–442. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1984.Google Scholar

Chazan, Robert. “Rashi’s Commentary on the Book of Daniel: Messianic Speculation and Polemical Argumentation.” In Rashi et la culture juive en France du Nord au moyen âge, ed. Dahan, Gilbert, Nahon, Gérard, and Nicolas, Elie, 111–121. Paris: E. Peeters, 1997.Google Scholar

Cohen, Gerson D. “Esau as Symbol in Early Medieval Thought.” In Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies, ed. Altmann, Alexander, 19–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Cohen, Mordechai Z. “The Aesthetic Exegesis of Moses Ibn Ezra.” In HBOT I/2, 282–301.Google Scholar

“Eliezer of Beaugency.” In Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception, VII:674–677. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar

“Emergence of the Rule of Peshat in Jewish Bible Exegesis.” In Cohen and Berlin, eds., Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, 204–223.Google Scholar

“Maimonides’ Attitude toward Christian Biblical Hermeneutics In Light of Earlier Jewish Sources.” In New Perspectives on Jewish-Christian Relations: In Honor of David Berger, ed. Carlebach, Elisheva and Schacter, Jacob J., 455–476. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

“Malbim: Rabbinic Scholar, Biblical Exegete.” In The YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe, ed. Hundert, Gershon D., 1145–1147. New York: YIVO, 2008.Google Scholar

“A New Look at Medieval Jewish Exegetical Constructions of Peshat in Christian and Muslim Lands: Rashbam and Maimonides.” In Castaño et al., eds., Regional Identities, 93–121.Google Scholar

Opening the Gates of Interpretation: Maimonides’ Biblical Hermeneutics in Light of His Geonic-Andalusian Heritage and Muslim Milieu. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

“A Poet’s Biblical Exegesis.” JQR 93 (2003): 533–556.Google Scholar

“A Possible Spanish Source for Rashi’s Concept of Peshuto Shel Miqra” (Hebrew). In Rashi: The Man and his Work (Hebrew), ed. Grossman, Avraham and Japhet, Sara, 353–379. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center, 2008.Google Scholar

“Rashbam Scholarship in Perpetual Motion.” JQR 98 (2008): 389–408.Google Scholar

“Rashbam vs. Moses Ibn Ezra: Two Perspectives on Biblical Poetics.” In Bar-Asher et al., eds., Shai le-Sara Japhet, 193*–217* (English section).Google Scholar

“Reproduction of the Text: Traditional Biblical Exegesis in Light of the Literary Theory of Ludwig Strauss.” The Torah U-Madda Journal 17 (2015/16): 1–33.Google Scholar

The Rule of Peshat: Jewish Constructions of the Plain Sense of Scripture in their Christian and Muslim Contexts, c. 900–1270. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Three Approaches to Biblical Metaphor: From Abraham Ibn Ezra and Maimonides to David Kimhi. Leiden: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Mordechai Z., and Berlin, Adele, eds. Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Overlapping Inquiries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye D. “Does Rashi’s Torah Commentary Respond to Christianity? A Comparison of Rashi with Rashbam and Bekhor Shor.” In The Idea of Biblical Interpretation: Essays in Honor of James L. Kugel, ed. Najman, Hindy and Newman, Judith H., 449–472. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Colish, Marcia L. “Psalterium Scholastocorum: Peter Lombard and the Emergence of Scholastic Psalms Exegesis.” Speculum 67 (1992): 531–548.Google Scholar

Collins, Ann Ryan. Teacher in Faith: and Virtue Lanfranc of Bec’s Commentary on Saint Paul. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Coolman, Boyd Taylor. “Pulchrum Esse: The Beauty of Scripture, the Beauty of the Soul, and the Art of Exegesis in Hugh of St. Victor.” Traditio 58 (2003): 175–200.Google Scholar

Copeland, Rita. “Rhetoric and the Politics of the Literal Sense in Medieval Literary Theory: Aquinas, Wyclif, and the Lollards.” In Interpretation: Medieval and Modern. The J. A. W. Bennett Memorial Lectures, Perugia, 1992, ed. Boitani, Piero and Torti, Anna, 1–23. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1993; repr. in Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in our Time, ed. Michael Hyde and Walter Jost, 335–357. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Copeland, Rita, and Sluiter, I.. Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language Arts and Literary Theory, AD 300–1475. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dahan, Gilbert. “Les Commentaires bibliques d’Étienne Langton: exégèse et herméneutique.” In Étienne Langton: prédicateur, bibliste, théologien, ed. Bataillon, Louis J., 201–239. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010.Google Scholar

“La Connaissance de l’exégèse juive par les chrétiens du XIIe au XIVe siècle.” In Rashi et la culture juive en France du Nord au moyen âge, ed. Dahan, Gilbert, Nahon, Gérard, and Nicolas, Elie, 343–359. Paris: E. Peeters, 1997.Google Scholar

Les Intellectuels chrétiens et les juifs au Moyen Âge. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1990.Google Scholar

Lire la Bible au Moyen Âge: essais d’herméneutique médiévale. Geneva: Droz, 2009.Google Scholar

“Thomas Aquinas: Exegesis and Hermeneutics.” In Reading Sacred Scripture with Thomas Aquinas: Hermeneutical Tools, Theological Questions and New Perspectives, ed. Roszak, Piotr and Vijgen, Jörgen, 45–70. Turnhout: Brepols, 2015.Google Scholar

de Lange, Nicholas R. M. “An Early Hebrew–Greek Bible Glossary from the Cairo Genizah and its Significance for the Study of Jewish Bible Translations into Greek.” In Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. Baasten, M. F. J and Munk, Reinier, 31–39. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar

Greek Jewish Texts from the Cairo Genizah. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1996.Google Scholar

de Lubac, Henri. Exégèse médiéval: les quatre sens de l’écriture. Paris: Aubier, 1961.Google Scholar

de Visscher, Eva. Reading the Rabbis: Christian Hebraism in the Works of Herbert of Bosham. Boston: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

del Valle Rodríguez, Carlos. Die grammatikalische Terminologie der frühen hebräischen Grammatikern. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Francisco Suárez, 1982.Google Scholar

Dönitz, Saskia. “Josephus Torn to Pieces: Fragments of ‘Sefer Yosippon’ in Genizat Germania.” In Books within Books: New Discoveries in Old Book Bindings, ed. Lehnardt, Andreas and Olszowy-Schlanger, Judith, 83–95. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Dotan, Aharon. “Niqqud Rav Seʿadya: Fact or Fiction?” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 66:2 (1997): 247–257.Google Scholar

Sefer Diḳduḳe ha-ṭeʻamim: ʻal pi kitve yad ʻatiḳim. Jerusalem: Academy of the Hebrew Language, 1967.Google Scholar

Dove, Mary. “Literal Senses in the Song of Songs.” In Nicholas of Lyra: The Senses of Scripture, ed. Krey, Philip D. and Smith, Lesley, 129–146. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Dronke, Peter. The Medieval Lyric. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

“Thierry of Chartres.” In A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, ed. Dronke, Peter, 358–385. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Dutton, Paul Edward, ed. Glosae super Platonem of Bernard of Chartres. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1991.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths we Never Knew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Eisenstat, Yedida. “Taking Stock of the Text(s) of Rashi’s Commentary: Some 21st Century Considerations and the Case for Leipzig 1.” In To Fix Torah in their Hearts: Essays in Biblical Interpretation and Jewish Studies in Honor of Barry Levy, ed. du Toit, Jacqueline S., Kalman, Jason, Lachter, Hartley, and Sasson, Vanessa R., 199–232. Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Elbaum, Jacob. “The Anthology Sekhel Ṭov: Derash, Peshaṭ and the Issue of the Redactor (the Sadran)” (Hebrew). In A Word Fitly Spoken: Studies in Mediaeval Exegesis of the Hebrew Bible and the Qur’ān Presented to Haggai Ben-Shammai, ed. Bar-Asher, Meir M., Hopkins, Simon, Stroumsa, Sarah, and Chiesa, Bruno, 71–96. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute, 2007.Google Scholar

Medieval Perspectives on Aggadah and Midrash (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2000.Google Scholar

Eldar, Ilan. “The Grammatical Literature of Medieval Ashkenazi Jewry.” In Hebrew in Ashkenaz: A Language in Exile, ed. Glinert, Lewis, 26–45. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Elford, Dorothy. “William of Conches.” In A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, ed. Dronke, Peter, 308–327. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Elon, Menachem. The Principles of Jewish Law. [Jerusalem]: Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1975.Google Scholar

Enelow, H. G. “The Midrash of Thirty-Two Rules of Interpretation.” JQR 23 (1933): 357–367.Google Scholar

Eppenstein, Simon. “Fragment d’un commentaire anonyme du Cantique des Cantiques.” REJ 53 (1907): 242–254.Google Scholar

Eppenstein, , Qara. See under Qara, Joseph, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Evans, Gillian R. “Godescalc of St. Martin and the Trial of Gilbert of Poiters.” Analecta Praemonstratensia 57 (1981): 196–209.Google Scholar

The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Fenton, Paul. Philosophie et exégèse dans le Jardin de la métaphore de Moïse Ibn ‘Ezra. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Fishbane, Michael A., ed. The Midrashic Imagination Jewish Exegesis, Thought, and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Fishman, Talya. Becoming the People of the Talmud: Oral Torah as Written Tradition in Medieval Jewish Cultures. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Flusser, David. Sefer Yosipon. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 1980.Google Scholar

Frank, Daniel. “Karaite Exegetical and Halakhic Literature in Byzantium and Turkey.” In Polliack, ed., Karaite Judaism, 529–558.Google Scholar

Search Scripture Well: Karaite Exegetes and the Origins of the Jewish Bible Commentary in the Islamic East. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Frappier, Jean. Chrétien de Troyes, the Man and his Work, trans. Raymond J. Cormier. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Fredman, , Rashi on Proverbs. See under Rashi, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, Paula. “Allegory and Reading God’s Book: Paul and Augustine on the Destiny of Israel.” In Interpretation and Allegory: Antiquity to the Modern Period, ed. Whitman, Jon, 125–149. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “Mi-tosafot Rashbam la-Rif” [From the Tosafot of Rashbam on Alfasi]. Qoveṣ ‘al yad 8 (1975): 187–226.Google Scholar

Fudeman, Kirsten Anne. Vernacular Voices: Language and Identity in Medieval French Jewish Communities. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ari. “The Commentary of Nicholas of Lyra on Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy” (Hebrew). PhD dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 2006.Google Scholar

“A Student and an Opponent: Nicholas of Lyra and his Jewish Sources.” In Nicolas de Lyra, franciscain du XIVe siècle, exégète et théologien, ed. Dahan, Gilbert, 167–203. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar

Gelles, Benjamin. Peshat and Derash in the Exegesis of Rashi. Leiden: Brill, 1981.Google Scholar

Gerstenberger, Erhard S. Psalms, Part 1, With an Introduction to Cultic Poetry. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.Google Scholar

Psalms, Part 2, and Lamentations. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Gevaryahu, Hayyim. “Nusḥa’ot Rashi le-Tehillim we-ha-ṣenzurah” [The text of Rashi on Psalms and censorship]. In Haim M. I. Gevaryahu Memorial Volume, ed. Luria, Ben-Zion, 248–261(Hebrew section). Jerusalem: World Jewish Bible Center, 1989.Google Scholar

Gibson, Margaret. “The Artes in the Eleventh Century.” In Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge, 121–126 and 148–153. Paris: Vrin, 1969.Google Scholar

“Lanfranc’s Commentary on the Pauline Epistles.” Journal of Theological Studies n.s. 22 (1971): 86–112.Google Scholar

Giraud, Cédric. Per verba magistri: Anselme de Laon et son école au XIIe siècle. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010.Google Scholar

Gleave, Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Goldziher, Ignaz. Schools of Koranic Commentators, trans. Wolfgang Behn. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2006.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Deborah. Take Hold of the Robe of a Jew: Herbert of Bosham’s Christian Hebraism. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Isaac. Order in the Bible (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 2009.Google Scholar

Grabois, Aryeh. “The Hebraica Veritas and Jewish–Christian Intellectual Relations in the Twelfth Century.” Speculum 50:4 (1975): 613–634.Google Scholar

Graves, Michael. Jerome’s Hebrew Philology. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Green, D. H. The Beginnings of Medieval Romance: Fact and Fiction, 1150–1220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Moshe. “The Relationship between Rashi and Rashbam to the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). In Isaac Leo Seeligmann Volume, ed. Rofé, Alexander and Zakovitch, Yair, II:559–567. Jerusalem: E. Rubinstein, 1983.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. The Bible in Arabic: The Scriptures of “The People of the Book” in the Language of Islam. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Gross, Avraham. “Spanish Jewry and Rashi’s Commentary on the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). In Rashi Studies, ed. Steinfeld, Z. A., 27–56. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Grossman, Avraham. “The Commentary of Rashi on Isaiah and the Jewish–Christian Debate.” In Studies in Medieval Jewish Intellectual and Social History: Festschrift in Honor of Robert Chazan, ed. Engel, David, Schiffman, Lawrence H., and Wolfson, Elliot R., 47–62. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

The Early Sages of Ashkenaz: Their Lives, Leadership and Works (900–1096) (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 1981.Google Scholar

The Early Sages of France (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 1995.Google Scholar

“The Impact of Rabbi Samuel of Spain and Reuel of Byzantium on Rashi’s School” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 82 (2014): 447–467.Google Scholar

“Peirush Rashi le-Tehillim we-ha-pulmus ha-Yehudi–Noṣri” [Rashi’s commentary on Psalms and the Jewish–Christian debate]. In Meḥqarim ba-Miqra u-be-ḥinnukh, ed. Rappel, Dov, 59–74. Jerusalem: Touro College, 1996.Google Scholar

Rashi, trans. Joel A. Linsider. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2012.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Rejection of Philosophy.” Jahrbuch des Simon-Dubnow-Instituts 8 (2009): 95–118.Google Scholar

“The School of Literal Jewish Exegesis in Northern France.” In HBOT I/2, 321–371.Google Scholar

“The Treatment of Grammar and Lexicon in Rashi’s Commentaries: Rashi’s Ties with the Islamic Lands” (Hebrew). Leshonenu 73 (2011): 425–448.Google Scholar

Grossman, Avraham, and Japhet, Sara, eds. Rashi: The Man and his Work (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center, 2008.Google Scholar

Grotans, Anna A. Reading in Medieval St. Gall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Gruber, , Rashi on Psalms. See under Rashi, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Haas, Jair. “Rashbam on the Song of Songs: A Reconsideration” (Hebrew). JSIJ 7 (2008): 127–146.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Criticism of Mahberet Menahem” (Hebrew). In Zer Rimonim: Studies in Biblical Literature and Jewish Exegesis Presented to Professor Rimon Kasher, ed. Avioz, Michael, Assis, Elie, and Shemesh, Yael, 449–463. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2013.Google Scholar

Hailperin, Herman. Rashi and the Christian Scholars. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Halbertal, Moshe. People of the Book: Canon, Meaning and Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Harf-Lancner, Laurence. “Chrétien’s Literary Background.” In A Companion to Chrétien De Troyes, ed. Lacy, Norris J. and Grimbert, Joan T., 26–42. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2005.Google Scholar

Harkins, Franklin T. Reading and the Work of Restoration: History and Scripture in the Theology of Hugh of St. Victor. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2009.Google Scholar

Harris, Jay M. How do we Know This? Midrash and the Fragmentation of Modern Judaism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Harris, Robert A. “Awareness of Biblical Redaction among Rabbinic Exegetes of Northern France” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 12 (2000): 289–310.Google Scholar

Discerning Parallelism: A Study in Northern French Medieval Jewish Biblical Exegesis. Providence, RI: Brown Judaic Studies, 2004.Google Scholar

“The Literary Hermeneutic of R. Eliezer of Beaugency.” PhD dissertation, Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1997.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Wolfhart P. “Scriptural Hermeneutics and Literary Theory in Islam.” Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabische-islamischen Wissenschaften 7 (1991/2): 253–284.Google Scholar

Heller, Marvin J. Printing the Talmud: A History of the Earliest Printed Editions of the Talmud. New York: Im Hasefer, 1992.Google Scholar

Himmelfarb, Lea. “The Link between the Jewish–Christian Polemic and the Masorah Notes in Rashi’s Bible Commentary.” JJS 59:2 (2008): 292–307.Google Scholar

“On Rashi’s Use of the Masorah Notes in his Bible Commentary” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 15 (2005): 167–184.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Hartmut. Die Würzburger Paulinenkommentare der Ottonenzeit. Hanover: Hahnsche, 2009.Google Scholar

Hollender, Elisabeth. Piyyut Commentary in Medieval Ashkenaz. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar

Holmes, Urban T., and Amelia Klenke, M.. Chrétien, Troyes, and the Grail. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Hunt, R. W. “The Introductions to the ‘Artes’ in the Twelfth Century.” In Studia Mediaevalia in Honorem Admodum Reverendi Patris Raymundi Josephi Martin, Ordinis Praedicatorum S. Theologiae Magistri LXXUM Natalem Diem Agentis. Bruges: De Tempel, 1948.Google Scholar

Irvine, Martin. The Making of Textual Culture: Grammatica and Literary Theory, 350–1100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jonathan. Bekhor Shoro Hadar Lo: R. Joseph Bekhor Shor between Continuity and Innovation (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 2017.Google Scholar

“Clarification of the Extent to which Rashbam Knew Midrash Leqaḥ Tov.” In Ta-Shma: Studies in Judaica in Memory of Israel M. Ta-Shma, ed. Reiner, Avraham, 475–499. Alon Shevut: Tevunot, 2012.Google Scholar

“The Leqah Tov Commentary on Song of Songs: Its Place in the History of Biblical Exegesis and its Relationship with the Commentary of Rashi” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 23 (2014): 225–241.Google Scholar

“Rabbi Joseph Kara as an Exegete of Biblical Narrative: Discovering the Phenomenon of Exposition.” JSQ 19 (2012): 73–89.Google Scholar

“Rashbam’s Major Principles of Interpretation as Deduced from a Manuscript Fragment Found in 1984.” REJ 170 (2011): 443–463.Google Scholar

Jaeger, C. Stephen. The Envy of Angels: Cathedral Schools and Social Ideals in Medieval Europe, 950–1200. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.Google Scholar

The Origins of Courtliness: Civilizing Trends and the Formation of Courtly Ideals, 939–1210. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.Google Scholar

“Pessimism in the Twelfth-Century ‘Renaissance.’” Speculum 78:4 (2003): 151–183.Google Scholar

Japhet, Sara. “The Anonymous Commentary on the Song of Songs in Ms Prague” (Hebrew). In To Settle the Plain Meaning of the Verse: Studies in Biblical Exegesis (Hebrew), ed. Japhet, Sara and Viezel, Eran, 206–247. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Collected Studies in Bible Exegesis (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2008.Google Scholar

“Did Rashbam Know the Vulgate Latin Translation of the Song of Songs?” Textus 24 (2009): 263–285.Google Scholar

“The Nature and Distribution of Medieval Compilatory Commentaries in the Light of Rabbi Joseph Kara’s Commentary on the Book of Job.” In Fishbane, ed., Midrashic Imagination, 98–130.Google Scholar

Rashbam on Job. See under Rashbam, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Rashbam on Song of Songs. See under Rashbam, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

“Rashbam’s Introduction to his Commentary on Lamentations” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 19 (2009): 231–243.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Commentary on the Song of Songs: The Revolution of the Peshat and its Aftermath” (Hebrew). In Grossman and Japhet, eds., Rashi, 205–226.Google Scholar

“The Tension between Rabbinic Legal Midrash and the ‘Plain Meaning’ (Peshat) of the Biblical Text – an Unresolved Problem? In the Wake of Rashbam’s Commentary on the Pentateuch.” In Sefer Moshe: The Moshe Weinfeld Jubilee Volume, ed. Cohen, Chaim, Hurvitz, Avi, and Paul, Shalom M., 403–425. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004.Google Scholar

Japhet, Sara, ed. The Bible in Light of its Interpreters: Sarah Kamin Memorial Volume. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994.Google Scholar

Japhet, and Salters, , Rashbam on Qohelet. See under Rashbam, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar

Jastrow, Marcus. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi and the Midrashic Literature. New York: Pardes, 1950.Google Scholar

Jeauneau, Édouard. Rethinking the School of Chartres, trans. Claude Paul Desmarais. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Jeudy, Colette. “L’œuvre de Remi d’Auxerre.” In L’École carolingienne d’Auxerre: De Murethach à Remi, 830–908, ed. Iogna-Prat, Dominique et al., 373–396. Paris: Beauchesne, 1991.Google Scholar

Kadari, Tamar. “‘Friends Hearken to your Voice’: Rabbinic Interpretations of the Song of Songs.” In Approaches to Literary Readings of Ancient Jewish Writings, ed. Smelik, K. A. D. and Vermeulen, Karolien, 183–209. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

“Rabbinic and Christian Models of Interaction on the Song of Songs.” In Interaction between Judaism and Christianity in History, Religion, Art and Literature, ed. Poorthuis, Marcel, Schwartz, Joshua, and Turner, Joseph, 65–82. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Kahana, Menahem. “The Halakhic Midrashim.” In The Literature of the Sages, Second Part: Midrash and Targum, Liturgy, Poetry, Mysticism, Contracts, Inscriptions, Ancient Science and the Languages of Rabbinic Literature, ed. Safrai, Shmuel, 3–106. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum, 2006.Google Scholar

Kalman, Jason. “When What you See is not What you Get: Rashbam’s Commentary on Job and the Methodological Challenges of Studying Northern French Jewish Biblical Exegesis.” Religion Compass 2:5 (2008): 844–861.Google Scholar

Kamin, Sarah. “Affinities between Jewish and Christian Exegesis in 12th Century Northern France.” In Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies: Panel Sessions, Bible Studies and Ancient Near East, ed. Goshen-Gottstein, Moshe, 141–155. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1988; repr. in Kamin, Jews and Christians, xxi–xxxv (English section).Google Scholar

Jews and Christians Interpret the Bible (Hebrew), ed. Japhet, Sara, 2nd ed. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2009.Google Scholar

Rashi’s Exegetical Categorization with Respect to the Distinction between Peshat and Derash (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 1986.Google Scholar

Kanarfogel, Ephraim. “Ashkenazic Talmudic Interpretation and the Jewish–Christian Encounter.” Medieval Encounters 22 (2016): 72–94.Google Scholar

The Intellectual History and Rabbinic Culture of Medieval Ashkenaz. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

“Tosafists as Peshat Exegetes: A Century after S. A. Poznanski’s Introduction to Biblical Exegesis in Northern France” (Hebrew). Michlol 1 (2016): 147–160.Google Scholar

Kearney, Jonathan. Rashi – Linguist Despite Himself: A Study of the Linguistic Dimension of Rabbi Solomon Yishaqi’s Commentary on Deuteronomy. London: T&T Clark, 2012.Google Scholar

Keiner, Ronald C. “The Hebrew Paraphrase of Saadiah Gaon’s Kitāb al-Amānāt wa’l-I‘tiqādāt.” AJS Review 11 (1986): 1–25.Google Scholar

Kelley, Page H., Mynatt, Daniel S., and Crawford, Timothy G.. The Masorah of Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia: Introduction and Annotated Glossary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Robert George. “Thomas Aquinas and the Literal Sense of Sacred Scripture.” PhD dissertation, Notre Dame. 1985.Google Scholar

Kessler, Stephan C. “Gregory the Great: A Figure of Tradition and Transition in Church Exegesis.” In HBOT I/2, 135–147.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey. The Early Karaite Tradition of Hebrew Grammatical Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

King, Christopher. Origen on the Song of Songs as the Spirit of Scripture: The Bridegroom’s Perfect Marriage-Song. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kislev, Itamar. “The Contribution of MS Hamburg 52 for Improving the Text of Rashbamʼs Torah Commentary” (Hebrew). Alei Sefer 26/27 (2017): 41–70.Google Scholar

“‘Exegesis in Perpetual Motion’: The Short Commentary of Ibn Ezra as a Source for Rashbam in his Commentary on the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 79 (2010): 413–438.Google Scholar

“Rashbam’s Commentary on the Story of the Creation” (Hebrew). JSIJ 10 (2012):95–107.Google Scholar

“‘Whoever has Heeded the Words of our Creator’: Rashbam’s Methodological Preface to Leviticus and the Relationship between Rashi’s and Rashbam’s Commentaries” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 73 (2004): 225–237.Google Scholar

Klepper, Deanna. The Insight of Unbelievers: Nicholas of Lyra and Christian Readings of Jewish Texts in the Later Middle Ages. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kraebel, A. B. “Grammatica and the Authenticity of the Psalms-Commentary Attributed to Bruno the Carthusian.” Mediaeval Studies 71 (2009): 63–97.Google Scholar

“John of Rheims and the Psalter Commentary Attributed to Ivo II of Chartres.” Revue Bénédictine 122 (2012): 252–293.Google Scholar

“The Place of Allegory in the Psalter-Commentary of Bruno the Carthusian.” Mediaeval Studies 73 (2011): 207–216.Google Scholar

“Poetry and Commentary in the Medieval School of Rheims: Reading Virgil, Reading David.” In Cohen and Berlin, eds., Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, 227–248.Google Scholar

“Prophecy and Poetry in the Psalms-Commentaries of St. Bruno and the Pre-Scholastics.” Sacris Erudiri 50 (2011): 413–459.Google Scholar

Kugel, James L. The Bible as it Was. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and its History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Lasker, Daniel J. “The Influence of Karaism on Maimonides” (Hebrew). Sefunot n.s. 5 (1991): 145–161.Google Scholar

“Rashi and Maimonides on Christianity. In Between Rashi and Maimonides: Themes in Medieval Jewish Thought, Literature and Exegesis, ed. Kanarfogel, Ephraim and Sokolow, Moshe, 3–21. New York: Ktav, 2010.Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, ed. Orton, David E. and Anderson, R. Dean. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Lawee, Eric. “Introducing Scripture: The “Accessus ad Auctores” in Hebrew Exegetical Literature from the Thirteenth through the Fifteenth Centuries.” In McAuliffe et al., eds., Reverence for the Word, 157–179.Google Scholar

“The Reception of Rashi’s Commentary on the Torah in Spain: The Case of Adam’s Mating with the Animals.” JQR 97 (2007): 33–66.Google Scholar

Layton, Richard. “Hearing Love’s Language: The Letter of the Text in Origen’s Commentary on the Song of Songs.” In The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity: Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser, 11–13 October 2006, ed. Turcescu, Lucian, DiTommaso, Lorenzo, and Kannengiesser, Charles, 287–315. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Leclercq, Jean. “Monastic Commentary on Biblical and Ecclesiastical Literature from Late Antiquity to the Twelfth Century,” trans. A. B. Kraebel. The Medieval Journal 2:2 (2012): 27–53.Google Scholar

“Origèn au XIIe siècle.” Irenikon 24 (1951): 425–439.Google Scholar

Leibowitz, Nehama. “Darko shel Rashi be-hava’at midrashim be-ferusho la-Torah” In Iyyunim ḥadashim be-sefer Shemot, 497–524. Jerusalem: World Zionist Organization, 1975. English trans. “Rashi’s Method in Citing Midrashim in his Torah Commentary.” In Nehama Leibowitz on Teaching Tanakh: Three Essays, ed. and trans. Moshe Sokolow, 31–70. New York: Torah Education Network, 1986.Google Scholar

Levy, Abraham. Rashi’s Commentary on Ezekiel 40–48: Edited on the Basis of Eleven Manuscripts. Philadelphia: Dropsie College for Hebrew and Cognate Learning, 1931.Google Scholar

Levy, Ian Christopher. “Bruno the Carthusian: Theology and Reform in his Commentary on the Pauline Epistles.” In Analecta Cartusiana 300, ed. Hogg, James, Girard, Alain, and Blévec, Daniel Le, 5–61. Salzburg: FB Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Universität Salzburg, 2013.Google Scholar

Leyra Curiá, Montse. In Hebreo: The Victorine Exegesis of the Bible in the Light of its Northern-French Jewish Sources. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.Google Scholar

Liss, Hanna. “The Commentary on the Song of Songs Attributed to R. Samuel ben Meïr (Rashbam).” Medieval Jewish Studies 1 (2007): 1–27.Google Scholar

Creating Fictional Worlds: Peshaṭ-Exegesis and Narrativity in Rashbam’s Commentary on the Torah. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Lockshin, Martin. “The Connection between Rabbi Samuel ben Meir’s Torah Commentary and Midrash Sekhel Tov.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh World Congress of Jewish Studies, I:135–142. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies, 1993.Google Scholar

“Does Halakhah Really Uproot Peshat?” Diné Israel 32 (2018): 211*–226*.Google Scholar

“Moses Wrote the Torah: Rashbam’s Perspective.” HUCA (2015): 109–125.Google Scholar

Rabbi Samuel Ben Meir’s Commentary on [Torah]: An Annotated Translation, 5 vols. Lewiston, NY, Lampeter (Wales), and Queenston (Ontario): Edwin Mellen Press, 1989–2004.Google Scholar

“Rashbam as Literary Exegete.” In McAuliffe et al., eds., Reverence for the Word, 83–91.Google Scholar

“Tradition or Context: Two Exegetes Struggle with Peshat.” In From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism: Intellect in Quest of Understanding. Essays in Honor of Marvin Fox, ed. Neusner, Jacob et al., II:173–186. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lowth, Robert. Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews, trans. G. Gregory, 2 vols. London: J. Johnson, 1787.Google Scholar

Lutz, Cora. “One Formula of Accessus in Remigius’ Works.” Latomus 19 (1960): 774–780.Google Scholar

Mack, Hannanel. “The Bifurcated Legacy of Rabbi Moses ha-Darshan and the Rise of Peshat Exegesis in Medieval France.” In Castaño et al., eds., Regional Identities, 73–91.Google Scholar

The Mystery of R. Moses Hadarshan (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2010.Google Scholar

Madigan, Daniel A. The Qur’ân’s Self Image: Writing and Authority in Islam’s Scripture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Malter, Henry. Saadia Gaon, his Life and Works. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1921.Google Scholar

Maman, Aharon. Comparative Semitic Philology in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

“The Linguistic School.” In HBOT I/2, 261–281.Google Scholar

“Peshat and Derash in Medieval Hebrew Lexicons.” In Israel Oriental Studies XIX, Compilation and Creation in Adab and Lugha: Studies in Memory of Naphtali Kinberg (1948–1997), ed. Arazi, Albert, Sadan, Joseph, and Wesserstein, David J., 343–357. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1999.Google Scholar

Marcus, Ivan G. “History, Story and Collective Memory: Narrativity in Early Ashkenazic Culture.” In Fishbane, ed., Midrashic Imagination, 255–279.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Choice: The Humash Commentary as Rewritten Midrash.” In Studies in Medieval Jewish Intellectual and Social History: Festschrift in Honor of Robert Chazan, ed. Engel, David, Schiffman, Lawrence H., and Wolfson, Elliot R., 29–45. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Matter, E. Ann. The Voice of my Beloved: The Song of Songs in Western Medieval Christianity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, Walfish, Barry D., and Goering, Joseph W., eds. With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Melammed, Ezra Zion. Bible Commentators (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 1978.Google Scholar

Meir, Amirah. Siddur devarim qaruy shirah: parshanuto shel Rashbam le-shirat ha-Torah [Poetry is the arrangement of words: Rashbam’s exegesis of biblical poetry]. Beth Mikra 42 (1997): 34–44.Google Scholar

Merdler, Ronela. “Dayyaqut me-Rabbenu Shemuel: Rashbam’s Grammatical Commentary on the Bible and its Exegetical Contribution” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 14 (2004): 241–255.Google Scholar

“Rabbi Samuel ben Meir (Rashbam) and Hebrew Grammar, his Grammatical View on Topics of Phonology and Morphology, his Place in the History of Hebrew Linguistics, and his Character as a Grammarian” (Hebrew). PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2004.Google Scholar

Mews, Constant. “Bruno of Reims and the Evolution of Scholastic Culture in Northern France, 1050–1100.” In Beyer et al., eds., Bruno and his Mortuary Roll, 49–81.Google Scholar

“Bruno of Reims and Roscelin of Compiègne on the Psalms.” In Latin Culture in the Eleventh Century, ed. Herren, Michael et al., 129–152. Turnhout: Brepols, 2002.Google Scholar

Minnis, Alastair. “Figuring the Letter: Making Sense of Sensus Litteralis in Late-Medieval Christian Exegesis.” In Cohen and Berlin, eds., Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, 159–182.Google Scholar

Medieval Theory of Authorship: Scholastic Literary Attitudes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Minnis, Alastair, and Scott, A. B., with the assistance of Wallace, David. Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c.1100–c.1375: The Commentary Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Mirsky, Hananel. “The Linguistic Theory of Menahem ben Saruq.” PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 2014.Google Scholar

“Shalosh sugyot me-ḥokhmat ha-lashon mi-bet midrasho shel Menaḥem ben Saruq” [Three topics in the discipline of language from the school of Menahem ben Saruq]. Mehkarim be-Lashon (Language Studies) 14–15 (2013): 99–131.Google Scholar

Molho, Michael, and Mevorah, Abraham. Histoire des israélites de Castoria. Thessaloniki: M. Molho, 1938.Google Scholar

Mondschein, Aharon. “Additional Comments on ha-Sadran and ha-Mesadder” (Hebrew). Leshonenu 67 (2005): 331–346.Google Scholar

“On the Attitude of R. Abraham Ibn Ezra to the Exegetical Use of the Hermeneutic Norm Gematri‘a” (Hebrew). In Te‘uda 8: Studies in the Works of Abraham Ibn Ezra, ed. Levin, Israel, 137–161. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

“Concerning the Inter-Relationship of the Commentaries of R. Abraham Ibn Ezra and R. Samuel ben Meir to the Pentateuch: A New Appraisal” (Hebrew). In Te‘udah 16–17: Studies in Judaica, ed. Hoffman, Yair, 15–46. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

“Only One in a Thousand of his Comments may be Called Peshat”: Toward Ibn Ezra’s View of Rashi’s Commentary to the Torah” (Hebrew). In Studies in Bible and Exegesis V: Presented to Uriel Simon, ed. Garsiel, Moshe et al., 221–248. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

“On Rashbam’s Rediscovered ‘Lost Commentary’ on Psalms” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 79 (2010): 91–141.Google Scholar

Murphy, James Jerome. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Netzer, Nissan. “Comparison with Mishnaic Hebrew: One of Rashi’s Strategies in his Biblical Commentary” (Hebrew). In Rashi Studies, ed. Steinfeld, Zvi Arie, 107–136. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Neuwirth, Angelika, Sinai, Nicolai, and Marx, Michael, eds. The Qurʼān in Context: Historical and Literary Investigations into the Qurʼānic Milieu. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Novetsky, Hillel. “A Reconstruction of Rashbam’s Lost Commentary on Bereshit 1–17” (Hebrew). PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1971.Google Scholar

Novikoff, Alex J. The Medieval Culture of Disputation Pedagogy, Practice, and Performance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Ocker, Christopher. Biblical Poetics before Humanism and Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, Bernard. The Courtly Love Tradition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Ofer, Yosef. “When Was ‘Dayaqot’ – R. Shmuel Ben Meir’s Grammatical Treatise – Written?” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 17 (2007): 233–251.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Mary J. Courtly Love Songs of Medieval France: Transmission and Style in the Trouvère Repertoire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Owens, Jonathan. The Foundations of Grammar: An Introduction to Medieval Arabic Grammatical Theory. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1988.Google Scholar

Paget, James N. B. Carleton. “Christian Exegesis in the Alexandrian Tradition.” In HBOT I/1, 478–542.Google Scholar

Penkower, Jordan. “The End of Rashi’s Commentary on Job. The Manuscripts and the Printed Editions.” JSQ 10 (2003): 18–48.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Commentary on Ezekiel: On the Occasion of its New Edition in Miqra’ot Gedolot Haketer” (Hebrew). In Studies in Bible and Exegesis VII: Presented to Menachem Cohen, ed. Vargon, Shmuel, Ofer, Yosef, Penkower, Jordan S., and Klein, Jacob, 425–474. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Corrections to his Commentary on the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). JSIJ 6 (2007): 141–188.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Corrections to his Commentary on the Prophets” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 15 (2005): 185–212.Google Scholar

“The Textual Transmission of Rashi’s Commentary on Ezekiel 27:17” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 63 (1994): 219–234.Google Scholar

Pereira-Mendoza, Joseph. Rashi as Philologist. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1940.Google Scholar

Perez, Maaravi. “Quotations from Kitab al-Istighna by R. Shmuel ha-Nagid in an Anonymous Commentary on the Book of Psalms” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 12 (2002): 241–287.Google Scholar

Polliack, Meira. “Karaite Conception of the Biblical Narrator (Mudawwin).” In Encyclopaedia of Midrash: Biblical Interpretation in Formative Judaism, ed. Neusner, J., Avery-Peck, A. J., and Green, W. S., I:350–374. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

“Major Trends in Karaite Biblical Exegesis.” In Polliack, ed., Karaite Judaism, 363–413.Google Scholar

Polliack, Meira, ed. Karaite Judaism: A Guide to its History and Literary Sources. Leiden: Brill, 2003Google Scholar

Poonawala, Ismail. “Ta’wīl.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., X:390–392. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Poznanski, Samuel A. Fragments de l’exégèse biblique de Menahem bar Helbo. Warsaw: Schuldberg, 1904.Google Scholar

“Mavo ‘al ḥakhmei ṣorfat mefarshei ha-miqra” [Introduction to the Bible commentator sages of France]. In Kommentar zu Ezechiel und den XII kleinen Propheten von Eliezer au Beaugency, ed. Poznanski, Samuel A., IX–CLXVI. Warsaw: Mekize Nirdamim, 1913.Google Scholar

Pradié, Pascal. Bruno de Cologne, Ludolphus de Saxonia, Denys le Chartreux, Le commentaire des Psaumes des montées: une échelle de vie intérieure. Paris: Beauchesne, 2006.Google Scholar

Prebor, Gila. “The Use of Midrash in Rashi’s Commentary on Ecclesiastes” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 19 (2009): 209–229.Google Scholar

Reiner, Avraham. “Bible and Politics: A Correspondence between Rabbenu Tam and the Authorities of Champagne.” In Entangled Histories: Knowledge, Authority, and Jewish Culture in the Thirteenth Century, ed. Baumgarten, Elisheva, Karras, Ruth Mazzo, and Melser, Katelyn, 59–72. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.Google Scholar

“From Rabbeinu Tam to R. Isaac of Vienna: The Hegemony of the French Talmudic School in the Twelfth-Century.” In The Jews of Europe in the Middle Ages (Tenth to Fifteenth Centuries), ed. Cluse, Christoph, 273–281. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar

“Rabbenu Tam and his Contemporaries: Relationships, Influences and Methods of Interpretation of the Talmud” (Hebrew). PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2002.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Judah. “Ha-pulmus ha-anti noṣri be-Rashi ‘al ha-Tanakh” [Anti-Christian polemic in Rashi on the Bible]. In Rosenthal, Judah, Studies and Texts in Jewish History, Literature and Religion, 101–116. Jerusalem: Rubin Mass, 1967.Google Scholar

Sáenz-Badillos, Angel. “Early Hebraists in Spain: Menahem Ben Saruq and Dunash ben Labrat.” In HBOT I/2, 96–109.Google Scholar

Scaglione, Aldo. Knights and Courts: Courtliness, Chivalry, & Courtesy from Ottonian Germany to the Italian Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Schippers, Arie. “Symmetry and Repetition as a Stylistic Ideal in Andalusian Poetry: Moses Ibn Ezra and Figures of Speech in the Arabic Tradition.” In Amsterdam Middle Eastern Studies, ed. Woidich, M., 160–173. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert, 1990.Google Scholar

Schlossberg, Eliezer. “Le-gilgulo shel perush Rasag ‘al Daniel 3:10” [The development of R. Saadia Gaon’s commentary on Daniel 10:3]. In Studies in Hebrew Literature and Yemenite Culture: Jubilee Volume Presented to Yehuda Ratzaby, ed. Dishon, Judith and Hazan, Ephraim, 81–87. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Schmelzer, Menahem H. Isaac Ben Abraham Ibn Ezra: Poems (Hebrew). New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1979.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Jean-Claude, and Novikoff, Alex J.. The Conversion of Herman the Jew: Autobiography, History, and Fiction in the Twelfth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Baruch J. “Rashi’s Commentary on Exodus 6:1–9: Reconsideration” (Hebrew). In To Settle the Plain Sense of Scripture, ed. Japhet, Sara and Viezel, Eran, 100–112. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2010.Google Scholar

Sela, Shlomo, and Freudenthal, Gad. “Abraham Ibn Ezra’s Scholarly Writings: A Chronological Listing,” Aleph 6 (2006): 13–55.Google Scholar

Shapira, Amnon. “Rashi’s Twofold Interpretations (Peshuto and Midrasho): A Dualistic Approach?” (Hebrew). In Japhet, ed., Bible in Light of its Interpreters, 287–311.Google Scholar

Sharf, Andrew. “An Unknown Messiah of 1096 and the Emperor Alexius.” JJS 7 (1956): 59–70.Google Scholar

Shereshevsky, Esra. “Inversions in Rashi’s Commentary (‘Mikrah Mesoras’).” In Gratz College Anniversary Volume: On the Occasion of the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary of the Founding of the College, 1895–1970, ed. Passow, Isidore David and Lachs, Samuel Tobias, 263–268. Philadelphia: Gratz College, 1971.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s and Christian Interpretations.” JQR 61 (1970): 76–86.Google Scholar

Shinan, Avigdor. “The Midrashic Interpretations of the Ten Dotted Passages in the Pentateuch.” In Japhet, ed., Bible in the Light of its Interpreters, 198–214.Google Scholar

Signer, Michael. “Restoring the Narrative: Jewish and Christian Exegesis in the Twelfth Century.” In McAuliffe et al., eds., Reverence for the Word, 70–82.Google Scholar

“Vision and History: Nicholas of Lyra on the Prophet Ezechiel.” In Nicholas of Lyra: The Senses of Scripture, ed. Krey, Philip D. W. and Smith, Lesley, 147–171. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar

Simon, Uriel. The Ear Discerns Words: Studies in Ibn Ezra’s Exegetical Methodology (Hebrew). Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Four Approaches to the Book of Psalms: From Saadiah Gaon to Abraham Ibn Ezra, trans. Lenn Schramm. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Singerman, Jerome E. Under Clouds of Poesy: Poetry and Truth in French and English Reworkings of the Aeneid, 1160–1513. New York: Garland Publications, 1986.Google Scholar

Smalley, Beryl. “Andrew of St. Victor, Abbot of Wigmore: A Twelfth-Century Hebraist.” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 10 (1938): 358–373.Google Scholar

“A Commentary on the Hebraica by Herbert of Bosham.” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiéval 18 (1951): 29–65.Google Scholar

“Stephen Langton and the Four Senses of Scripture.” Speculum 6 (1931): 60–76.Google Scholar

The Study of the Bible in the Middle Ages, 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 1983.Google Scholar

Smith, Lesley. The Glossa Ordinaria: The Making of a Medieval Bible Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Sokolow, Moshe. “Rashbam’s Pentateuch Commentary: New Material” (Hebrew). Alei Sefer 11 (1984): 73–74.Google Scholar

Soloveitchik, Haym. Collected Essays I. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2013.Google Scholar

Collected Essays II. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2014.Google Scholar

“Halakhah, Hermeneutics, and Martyrdom in Medieval Ashkenaz.” JQR 94:1 (2004) 77–108; 2: 278–299.Google Scholar

“Rabad of Posquières: A Programmatic Essay.” In Studies in the History of Jewish Society Presented to Professor Jacob Katz on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday, ed. Etkes, Immanuel and Salmon, Yosef, 7–40. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1980.Google Scholar

“Three Themes in Sefer Ḥasidim,” AJS Review 1 (1976): 311–357.Google Scholar

“Two Notes on the ‘Commentary on the Torah’ of R. Yehudah he-Hasid.” In Turim: Studies in Jewish History and Literature: Presented to Dr. Bernard Lander, ed. Shmidman, Michael A. and Lander, Bernard, 241–251. New York: Touro College Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Southern, R. W. “The Schools of Paris and the School of Chartres.” In Benson and Constable, eds., Renaissance and Renewal, 113–137.Google Scholar

Spiegel, Yaakov. Chapters in the History of the Jewish Book: Writing and Transmission (Hebrew). Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Steckel, Sita. “Doctor doctorum: Changing Concepts of ‘Teaching’ in the Mortuary Roll of Bruno the Carthusian (d. 1101).” In Beyer et al., eds., Bruno and his Mortuary Roll, 83–116.Google Scholar

Steiner, Richard C. A Biblical Translation in the Making: The Evolution and Impact of Saadia Gaon’s Tafsir. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

“The Byzantine Biblical Commentaries from the Genizah: Rabbanite vs. Karaite.” In Bar-Asher et al., eds., Shai le-Sara Japhet, 243–262.Google Scholar

“A Jewish Theory of Biblical Redaction from Byzantium: Its Rabbinic Roots, its Diffusion and its Encounter with the Muslim Doctrine of Falsification.” JSIJ 2 (2003): 123–167.Google Scholar

“The ‘Lemma Complement’ in Hebrew Commentaries from Byzantium and its Diffusion to Northern France and Germany.” JSQ 18 (2011): 367–379.Google Scholar

“Linguistic Aspects of the Commentary on Ezekiel and the Minor Prophets in the Hebrew Scrolls from Byzantium” (Hebrew). Leshonenu 59 (1996): 39–56.Google Scholar

“‘Muqdam u-Me’uḥar’ and ‘Muqaddam wa-Muaḥḥar’: On the History of Some Hebrew and Arabic Terms for Hysteron Proteron and Anastrophe.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 66 (2007): 33–45.Google Scholar

“The Rabbanite Biblical Commentaries from the Genizah and their Place in the History of Biblical Exegesis.” Unpublished MS.Google Scholar

Stockmen from Tekoa, Sycomores from Sheba: A Study of Amos’ Occupations. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2003.Google Scholar

Stercal, Claudio. Stephen Harding: A Biographical Sketch and Texts, trans. Martha F. Krieg. Trappist, KY: Cistercian Publications, 2008.Google Scholar

Stern, David. The Jewish Bible: A Material History. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative: Ideological Literature and the Drama of Reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Eileen C. Anselm of Canterbury and the Desire for the Word. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Taitz, Emily. The Jews of Medieval France: The Community of Champagne. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ta-Shma, Israel M. “Bible Criticism in Early Medieval Franco-Germany” (Hebrew). In Japhet, ed., Bible in Light of its Interpreters, 453–459.Google Scholar

“Hebrew-Byzantine Bible Exegesis ca. 1000, From the Cairo Genizah” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 69 (2000): 247–256.Google Scholar

“Open Bible Criticism in an Anonymous Commentary on the Book of Psalms” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 66 (1997): 417–423.Google Scholar

Studies in Medieval Rabbinic Literature (Hebrew). Vol. I: Germany. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2004; vol. III: Italy & Byzantium. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2005.Google Scholar

Talmudic Commentary in Europe and North Africa, Part I: 1000–1200 (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 1999.Google Scholar

Tchernetska, Natalie, Olszowy-Schlanger, Judith, and de Lange, Nicholas. “An Early Hebrew–Greek Biblical Glossary from the Cairo Genizah.” REJ 166 (2007): 91–128.Google Scholar

Tene, David. “Hebrew Linguistic Literature.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica, XVI:1352–1390. Jerusalem: Encyclopaedia Judaica, 1972.Google Scholar

“Hebrew Linguistic Tradition.” In Concise History of the Language Sciences, from the Sumerians to the Cognitivists, ed. Koerner, E. F. K. and Asher, R. E., 21–28. Oxford: Pergamon, 1995.Google Scholar

Touitou, Eleazar. “Concerning the Presumed Original Version of Rashi’s Commentary on the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 56 (1987): 211–242.Google Scholar

Exegesis in Perpetual Motion: Studies in the Pentateuchal Commentary of Rabbi Samuel ben Meir (Hebrew). Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

“Rashi’s Commentary on Genesis 1–6 in the Context of Judeo-Christian Controversy.” HUCA 61 (1990): 159–183.Google Scholar

Review of Sarah Kamin, Rashi’s Exegetical Categorization in Respect to the Distinction between Peshat and Derash (Hebrew). Tarbiz 56 (1987): 439–447.Google Scholar

“Shiṭato ha-parshanit shel Rashbam ‘al reqa‘ ha-meṣi’ut ha-hisṭorit shel zemano” [Rashbam’s exegetical system within the context of the historical reality of his time]. In Studies in Rabbinic Literature, Bible and Jewish History [Dedicated to Professor Ezra Zion Melammed], ed. Gilat, Y. D., Levine, C., and Rabinowitz, Z. M., 48–74. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

“Traces of Leqaḥ Ṭov in the Text of Rashi’s Commentary to the Torah” (Hebrew). ‘Alei Sefer 15 (1988/9): 37–44.Google Scholar

Touitou, Inbal. “The Exegetical Methodology of Rabbi Tobias ben Eliezer in his Commentary Leqaḥ Ṭov to the Pentateuch” (Hebrew). MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, 2005.Google Scholar

Twersky, Isadore. Introduction to the Code of Maimonides. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Urbach, Efraim Elimelech. Arugat ha-bosem. Jerusalem: Mekitse Nirdamim, 1939.Google Scholar

Vaciago, Paolo. Glossae Biblicae. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004.Google Scholar

van Liere, Frans. “Andrew of St. Victor, Jerome, and the Jews: Biblical Scholarship in the Twelfth-Century Renaissance.” In Scripture and Pluralism: Reading the Bible in the Religiously Plural Worlds of the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Heffernan, Thomas J. and Burman, Thomas E., 59–75. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

van ’t Spijker, Ineke. “The Literal and the Spiritual: Richard of Saint-Victor and the Multiple Meaning of Scripture.” In van ’t Spijker, ed., Multiple Meaning of Scripture, 225–247.Google Scholar

van ’t Spijker, Ineke, ed. The Multiple Meaning of Scripture: The Role of Exegesis in Early-Christian and Medieval Culture. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Versteegh, Kees. Arabic Grammar and Qur’anic Exegesis in Early Islam. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar

Viezel, Eran. The Commentary on Chronicles Attributed to Rashi (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Magnes, 2010.Google Scholar

“The Commentary on Ezra–Nehemiah Attributed to Rashi” (Hebrew). JSIJ 9 (2010): 123–180.Google Scholar

“An Examination of Statements in Rashi’s Commentaries concerning Targum Onkelos” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 16 (2006): 181–203.Google Scholar

“The Formation of Some Biblical Books, According to Rashi.” JTS 61 (2010): 16–42.Google Scholar

“Medieval Bible Commentators on the Question of the Composition of the Bible: Research and Methodological Aspects” (Hebrew). Tarbiz 84 (2016): 103–158.Google Scholar

“Rashbam on Moses’ Role in Writing the Torah” (Hebrew). Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 22 (2013): 167–188.Google Scholar

“The Secret of the Popularity of Rashi’s Commentary on the Torah,” Review of Rabbinic Judaism 17 (2014): 201–217.Google Scholar

“Targum Onkelos in Rashi’s Exegetical Consciousness,” Review of Rabbinic Judaism 15 (2012):1–19.Google Scholar

Walton, Michael T. “In Defense of the Church Militant: The Censorship of the Rashi Commentary in the Magna biblia rabbinica.” Sixteenth Century Journal 21 (1990): 385–400.Google Scholar

Watson, Wilfred G. E. Classical Hebrew Poetry: A Guide to its Techniques. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Wechter, Pinchas. Ibn Barun’s Arabic Works on Hebrew Grammar and Lexicography. Philadelphia: Dropsie College, 1964.Google Scholar

Weiss Halivni, David. Peshat & Derash. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Westermann, Claus. The Psalms: Structure, Content and Message. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1980.Google Scholar

Wetherbee, Winthrop. “Philosophy, Cosmology and the Twelfth-Century Renaissance.” In A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy, ed. Dronke, Peter, 21–53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

White, Hugh. Nature, Sex and Goodness in a Medieval Literary Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Whitman, Jon. “The Literal Sense of Christian Scripture: Redefinition and Revolution.” In Cohen and Berlin, eds., Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, 133–158.Google Scholar

Wild, Stefan, ed. Self-Referentiality in the Qur’an. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar

“The Self-Referentiality of the Qur’an: Sura 3:7 as an Exegetical Challenge.” In McAuliffe et al., eds., Reverence for the Word, 422–436.Google Scholar

Williams, John R. “The Cathedral School of Rheims in the Eleventh Century.” Speculum, 29:4 (1954): 661–677.Google Scholar

Wright, David. “Augustine: His Exegesis and Hermeneutics.” In HBOT I/1, 701–730.Google Scholar

Wyrick, Jed. The Ascension of Authorship: Attribution and Canon Formation in Jewish, Hellenistic, and Christian Traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Yadin, Azzan. Scripture as Logos: Rabbi Ishmael and the Origins of Midrash. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Zawanowska, Marzena. The Arabic Translation and Commentary of Yefet ben ʻEli the Karaite on the Abraham Narratives (Genesis 11:10–25:18). Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Zemler-Cizewski, Wanda. “The Literal Sense of Scripture according to Rupert of Deutz.” In van ’t Spijker, ed., Multiple Meaning of Scripture, 203–224.Google Scholar

Ziomkowski, Robert. Manegold of Lautenbach: Liber Contra Wolfelmum. Paris: Peeters, 2002.Google Scholar

Zohory, Menahem. Grammarians and their Writings in Rashi’s Commentaries (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Carmel, 1994.Google Scholar

Zucker, Moshe. “Le-pitron be‘ayat 32 middot u-mishnat Rabi Eliezer” [On the resolution of the problem of the thirty-two middot and Mishnat Rabbi Eliezer]. Proceedings of the American Academy of Jewish Research 23 (1954): 1–39.Google Scholar

Rav Saadya Gaon’s Translation of the Torah (Hebrew). New York: Feldheim, 1959.Google Scholar

Saadya on Genesis. See under Saadia, in Primary Sources.Google Scholar