Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-j65dx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T04:17:35.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John King
John King
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Get access

Summary

Attempts in the past to create genetically engineered (GE) crops have led to a great deal of negative publicity about and considerable public antipathy towards the technology; this is unfortunate. Improvements to the technology have moved well beyond the first generation of GE crops, those with resistance to herbicides. More recent advances in this field have considerable relevance to several topics covered here in Parts IV and V; further advances now in the early stages of exploration and exploitation promise to transform the world as we know it.

One major driver in the future of GE agriculture will be climate change. The number one tool that all living organisms use to respond to alterations to their environment which occur naturally over time is genetic change, which is adaptive. But the kind of genetic change dependent on simple mutations of existing endogenous genes will not bring about adaptation fast enough to meet the challenges posed by rapid climate change in the case of crop species. GE is the only technology that is both sufficiently rapid and targeted to bring about adaptation to and mitigation of the human forcing of changes to global and regional environments in crops.

For example, nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas some 300 times more harmful than CO2, is percolating into the atmosphere from soil, to which we are adding increasing amounts of nitrogen fertilizer, worldwide.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reaching for the Sun
How Plants Work
 , pp. 284 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beerling, D. (2007). The Emerald Planet: How Plants Changed Earth's History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The key influence of plants on evolution of the planet over geological time.Google Scholar
Beerling, D. J. and Berner, R. A. (2005). Feedbacks and the coevolution of plants and atmospheric CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 1302–5. Investigations into links in the evolution of terrestrial plants, CO2, and climate over the Past 500 million years.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekker, A., Holland, H. D., Wang, P.-L. et al. (2004). Dating the rise of atmospheric oxygen. Nature, 427, 117–20. When the level of oxygen began to increase in the Earth's atmosphere.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernacchi, C. J., Kimball, B. A., Quarles, D. R., Long, S. P. and Ort, D. R. (2007). Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiology, 143, 134–44. How much evapotranspiration is changed in a particular crop when the atmosphere is enriched with CO2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, R. A. (1999). Atmospheric oxygen over Phanerozoic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 96, 10955–7. Significant variations have occurred in the planet's atmospheric [O2] over geological time.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betts, R. A., Boucher, O., Collins, M. et al. (2007). Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature, 448, 1037–41. The effect of increasing atmospheric [CO2] on the hydrological cycle.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biello, D. (2010). Climate numerology. Scientific American, 302, 14. Scientists at the December, 2009 meeting on climate change try to determine what might be a “safe” level of atmospheric CO2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, A. S. (2009). Expanding the limits of life. Scientific American, 301, 62–7. How and where life might have evolved deep in the ocean far away from the influence of sunlight.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, S. (2009). Whole Earth Discipline: An Ecopragmatist Manifesto. New York: Viking. Provocative, thought-provoking, and scientifically rigorous views on the future of mankind in a rapidly changing world.Google Scholar
Britannica Guide to Climate Change: An Unbiased Guide to the Key Issue of our Age. (2008). Philadelphia: Running Press. The scientific evidence for climate change and possible solutions to it.
Caldeira, K. and Wickett, M. E. (2003). Oceanography: anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature, 425, 365. Quantifies changes to ocean pH that could result from continued increases in atmospheric CO2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, S. and Ravilious, K. (2008). Unknown Earth: our planet's seven biggest mysteries. New Scientist, 199, 28–35. Answers questions about the origin and physical and chemical composition of the planet, and from where life might have come.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W., Colman, R., Haywood, J., Manning, M. R. and Mote, P. (2007). The physical science behind climate change. Scientific American, 297, 65–73. These participants in the IPCC 2007 report summarize the arguments and discuss the uncertainties about climate change.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copley, J. (2001). The story of O. Nature, 410, 862–4. Considers the difficult question of why the early Earth appears to have lacked oxygen for so long.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowie, J. (2007). Climate Change: Biological and Human Aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. A textbook covering past, present, and possible future climate change from a biological, ecological, and human perspective.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLucia, E. H., Hamilton, J. G., Naidu, S. L. et al. (1999). Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment. Science, 284, 1177–9. Controlled experiments demonstrating increases to primary productivity with increased CO2 that are restrained by other factors in the long term.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duce, R. (2008). Texas A&M University (May 16). Atmosphere threatened by nitrogen pollutants entering ocean. ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com (accessed July 11, 2008). Increased removal from the atmosphere of CO2 because of higher ocean productivity due to nitrogen pollution is partially offset by the release of nitrous oxide gas, which also forms in the ocean.Google Scholar
Dwyer, S. A., Ghannoum, O., Nicotra, A., and Caemmerer, S. (2007). High temperature acclimation of C4 photosynthesis is linked to changes in photosynthetic biochemistry. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 53–66. Reduced photosynthesis in experiments at higher temperatures was as a result of precise changes in chloroplast photosynthetic components.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, C. B. (2001). Plant physiology of the “missing” carbon sink. Plant Physiology, 125, 25–8. Illustrates that limits to increases in growth of plants as atmospheric CO2 levels rise may develop after several years.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, D. (2007). Saved by the trees?New Scientist, 27 October, 42–6. Studies have shown that early increases in growth rate of trees in some tropical forests due to higher temperatures do not continue over the long term.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, M.J. and Safina, C. (2010) Threatening ocean life from the inside out. Scientific American, 303, 66–73. Highlights the effects of increasing CO2 emissions on ocean acidification, imperiling the growth and reproduction of plant and animal life.CrossRefPubMed
Hawkesford, M. J. and Kok, L. J. (eds) (2007). Sulfur in Plants: An Ecological Perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. Comprehensive treatment of sulfur and the biosphere.CrossRef
Hazen, R. M. (2010). Evolution of minerals. Scientific American, 302, 58–65. Follows the evolution of the formation of minerals on our planet and the influence of life on the process.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Illinois State Water Survey: Nitrogen Cycles Project (2008). Human Influences on the Nitrogen Cycle. http://www.sws.uiuc.edu (accessed July 4, 2008). A valuable source of information about the complexities of nitrogen release into the biosphere and nitrogen cycling.
,International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports. http://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed July 25, 2010). Here can be found all four of the IPCC reports to date.
Jacobson, M. C., Charlson, R. J., Rodhe, H. and Orians, G. H. (2000). Earth System Science From Biogeochemical Cycles to Global Change. San Diego: Academic Press. A textbook which is a source of information about the biogeological cycles and climate change, among many topics.Google Scholar
Kepler, F. and Röckmann, T. (2007). Methane, plants and climate change. Scientific American, 296, 52–7. Find that plants emit the greenhouse gas, methane, into the atmosphere through their stomata.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBauer, D. S. and Treseder, K. K. (2008). Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology, 89, 371–9. An analysis of the results of 126 experiments across the globe showing the strong interaction between the nitrogen and carbon cycles and how they affect one another.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAuliffe, K. (2008). Ocean reflux. Discover, July 28–37. How much CO2 is entering the oceans because of human activities and how this is affecting ocean pH and organisms.Google Scholar
Miller-Rushing, A. J. and Primack, R. B. (2008). Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau's Concord: a community perspective. Ecology, 89, 332–41. Comparison of flowering times near Concord over the last ca. 150 years.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minorsky, P. V. (2002). The hot and the classic. Plant Physiology, 129, 1421–2. Advances in average first flowering dates among some British and American plants in the last half of the twentieth century and how these changes might affect interactions with pollinators and predators.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morison, J. I. L. and Morecroft, M. D. (eds) (2006). Plant Growth and Climate Change. Oxford: Blackwell. Collection of articles on effects of changes to atmospheric CO2, temperature, and water availability on plant life.CrossRef
Morison, J. I. L. (1987). Plant growth and CO2 history. Nature, 327, 560. Morison comments on the effect of historically varying atmospheric CO2 concentrations on plant growth and stomatal density, including the work of Woodward (see below).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. A. and Edwards, D. (2001). Roots: evolutionary origins and biogeochemical significance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 381–401. Chronology of the first appearance and growth in importance over geological time of roots in biogeological cycling of, for example, soil minerals.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, J., Zhazybayeva, O., Gorgarten, J. P., Gerdes, S. Y. and Blankenship, R. E. (2002). Whole-genome analysis of photosynthetic prokaryotes. Science, 298, 1616–20. That, in the bacteria examined, photosynthesis did not evolve via a linear path of incremental change but more rapidly by the swapping among them of blocks of genetic material known as horizontal gene transfer. These results have profound implications for the evolution of complexity in organisms more generally.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricardo, A. and Szostak, J. W. (2009). Life on Earth. Scientific American, 301, 54–61. Some fresh clues about how life might have arisen de novo.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saleska, S. R., Didan, K., Huete, A. R. and da Rocha, H. R. (2007). Amazon forests green-up during 2005 drought. Science, 318, 612. Mapping the resilience of photosynthesis in tropical forests to drought using data from satellites.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, W. H. (1991). Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. San Diego: Academic Press. The origin of chemical elements on Earth and evolution of geochemical and biogeochemical cycles.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. (2006). That other greenhouse gas. American Scientist, 94, 504–5. The rise in atmospheric methane levels has ceased: implications for global warming.Google Scholar
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J. and Huntingford, C. (2007). Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature, 448, 791–4. Effect of tropospheric ozone on plant stomata affects both the ability of the plant to take up CO2 and its water balance.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smil, V. (2002). The Earth's Biosphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Valuable source of information about the contributions of V. I. Vernadsky, among many other aspects of the biosphere.Google Scholar
Smil, V. (2001). Cycles of Life: Civilization and the Biosphere. Scientific American Library. New York: Freeman. Major source of information on G. T. Carruthers, V. I. Vernadsky, biogeochemical cycles, and the biosphere.Google Scholar
Tausz, M., Grulke, N. E. and Wieser, G. (2007). Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change. Environmental Pollution, 147, 525–31. Cause and effect problems in determining how tropospheric ozone affects plant performance.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of our Microbial Planet. (2007). Report of committee. Washington: National Academies Press. Provides details of the essential nature to all life of microbes and their future manipulation to our advantage. A free copy of this book can be downloaded athttp://books.nap.edu/
Townsend, A. R. and Howarth, R. W. (2010). Fixing the global nitrogen problem. Scientific American, 302, 64–71. February. Growing global use of nitrogen fertilizer is damaging the environment and threatening human health. Can we fix this problem?CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuba, Z. and Lichtenhaler, H. K. (2007). Long-term acclimation of plants to elevated CO2 and its interaction with stresses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1113, 135–46. Comprehensive review of how plants use their stress-coping mechanisms to deal with the negative aspects of elevated CO2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernadsky, V. I. (2005). The renaissance of V. I. Vernadsky. The Geochemical News – Newsletter of the Geochemical Society, October, 2005. A detailed account of Vernadsky's life and contributions.
Visoly-Fisher, I., Daie, K., Terazono, Y.et al. (2006). Conductance of a biomolecular wire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 8686–90. How plants, growing under hot, dry, sunny conditions, protect themselves against excessive energy from the Sun.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, F. I. (1987). Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature, 327, 617–18. A combination of correlative and causative studies to demonstrate that there is a close link between atmospheric CO2 concentration and stomatal numbers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wullschleger, S. D. and Strahl, M. (2010). Climate change: a controlled experiment. Scientific American, 302, 78–83. Scientists around the world are manipulating CO2 levels and temperatures in a variety of ecosystems in an attempt to determine how such changes affect the biosphere.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Appendix
  • John King, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: Reaching for the Sun
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973895.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Appendix
  • John King, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: Reaching for the Sun
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973895.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Appendix
  • John King, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: Reaching for the Sun
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973895.024
Available formats
×