Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:59:52.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Between the Texts: Woolf's Acts of Revision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Julia Briggs
Affiliation:
De Montfort University
Get access

Summary

I want to read largely & freely once: then to niggle over details.

(Diary iii, 127)

Near the end of A Room of One's Own, in a coda as cunning and surprising as any of Beethoven's, Virginia Woolf declares, ‘The truth is, I often like women. I like their unconventionality. I like their subtlety. I like their anonymity. I like – but I must not run on in this way.’ Or so the passage appears in the special limited edition published in the United States on 21 October 1929 and in Britain on 24 October, in the British and American first editions (also published 24 October), and in all subsequent American editions. Yet in the second British impression, published less than a month later, on 9 November 1929, Woolf liked ‘their unconventionality. I like their completeness. I like their anonymity’. This revised version continued to appear in all British editions of the text until January 1992, fifty years after her death, when Virginia Woolf's work came out of copyright in Britain. In new editions published by Penguin and Oxford World's Classics, editions that reset the text from the British first edition, Woolf reverted to liking women's ‘subtlety’.

As the general editor of the Penguin reprints, I was one of those responsible for the decision to return to the text of the first British edition on the grounds that this would be a practical way of shedding the accumulated errors of later editions. This decision seemed further justified by the widespread assumption that, though Woolf revised her work extensively in the stages before and sometimes during publication, she lost interest in it thereafter, so that any post-publication changes that occurred were probably non-authorial. Since 1992, however, I have become steadily less confident of this assumption: an example such as I began with must call it in question, while the assumption has itself functioned to deter further investigation into Woolf’s post-publication revisions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×