Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ricco, Robert B. 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. p. 1.

    Koralus, Philipp and Mascarenhas, Salvador 2013. THE EROTETIC THEORY OF REASONING: BRIDGES BETWEEN FORMAL SEMANTICS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DEDUCTIVE INFERENCE*. Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 312.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: June 2012

11 - Interpretation, Representation, and Deductive Reasoning

Summary

A View with no Room

Is the psychology of deduction about the few well-known laboratory tasks in which subjects are presented with logical puzzles and asked to solve them: the selection task, syllogisms, the suppression task, conditional reasoning, …? And if our capacity of deduction is not just for performing these tasks, what is it for? What everyday functions does it serve? How are theoretical analyses of deductive performance in these laboratory tasks related to analyses of other cognitive functions?

From the position of being absolutely central in the cognitive revolution, which was founded on conceptions of reasoning, computation and the analysis of language, the psychology of deduction has gone to being the deadbeat of cognitive psychology, pursued in a ghetto, surrounded by widespread scepticism as to whether human reasoning really happens outside the academy. “Isn't what we really do decision?” we increasingly often hear. Many eminent psychology departments do not teach courses on reasoning. Imagine such a psychology department (or indeed any psychology department) not teaching any courses on perception. Even where they do teach reasoning they are more likely to be focused on analogical reasoning, thought of as a kind of reasoning at the opposite end of some dimension of certainty from deduction.

We believe that the reason for this ghettoisation can be traced to a series of assumptions which we will consider shortly. We will argue that the way out of the ghetto is to drop these assumptions, none of which bears scrutiny anyway.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Reasoning
  • Online ISBN: 9780511814273
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814273
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C.. The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.
Arbib, M. A. and Rizzolatti, G.. Neural expectations: A possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language. Communication and Cognition, 29:393–424, 1997.
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A.. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Baggio, G., Lambalgen, M., and Hagoort, P.. Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study of the semantics of temporal connectives. Journal of Memory and Language, Submitted.
Barwise, J. and Feferman, S., editors. Model-theoretic logics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
Bernstein, B.. Class, codes and control: Vol. 1, Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.
Bienenstock, E. and Malsburg, C. von. A neural network for invariant pattern recognition. Europhysics Letters, 4(1): 121–126, 1987.
Bransford, J. D., Banks, J. R., and Franks, J. J.. Sentence memory: A constructive versus an interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3:193–209, 1972.
Byrne, R. M. J.. Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31:61–83, 1989.
Byrne, R. M. J., Espino, O., and Santamaria, C.. Counterexamples and the supression of inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 40:347–373, 1999.
Cheng, P. and Holyoak, K.. Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1985.
Cheng, P., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R. E., and Oliver, L. Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18:293–328, 1986.
Chesnevar, C., Maguitman, G., and Loui, R.. Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys, 32:337–383, 2000.
Cooper, R. P.. Modelling high-level cognitive processes. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2002.
Craik, K. J. W.. The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.
Damasio, A. R.. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Putnam, 1994.
Evans, J.St.B. T.. In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10): 454–459, 2003.
S. I. Fillenbaum. How to do some things with if. In Cotton, and Klatzky, , editors, Semantic ‘factors’ in cognition. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.
Fodor, J. A.. The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. In appendix.
Gernsbacher, M. A.. Handbook of psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1994.
Gigerenzer, G. and Hug, K.. Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change. Cognition, 43: 127–171, 1992.
Greenfield, P. M.. Language, tools and the brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behavioral and brain sciences, 14:531–595, 1991.
H. P. Grice. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J., editors, Syntax and semantics Vol 3: Speech acts. London: Academic Press, 1975.
Griggs, R. A. and Cox, J. R.. The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73:407–420, 1982.
Hölldobler, S. and Kalinke, Y. Towards a massively parallel computational model of logic programming. In Proceedings ECA194 Workshop on combining symbolic and connectionist processing, 68–77. ECAI, 1994.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Byrne, R. M.. Deduction. Hove, Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., and Legrenzi, M. S.. Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63:395–, 1972.
H. Kamp. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, J., Janssen, T., and Stokhof, M., editors, Formal methods in the study of language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam, 277–322, 1981.
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U.. From Discourse to Logic, Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Part 1, volume 42 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
A. Lechler. Interpretation of conditionals in the suppression task. M.Sc. thesis, HCRC, University of Edinburgh, 2004.
Lehman, D., Lempert, R., and Nisbett, R.. The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday life events. American Psychologist, 431–442, 1988.
Manktelow, K. and Over, D.. Inference and understanding: A philosophical perspective. London: Routledge, 1990.
McCarthy, J.. Circumscription – a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artficial Intelligence, 13:27–39, 1980.
Newell, A. and Simon, H.. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972.
Newstead, S.. Interpretational errors in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28:78–91, 1989.
Newstead, S.. Gricean implicatures and syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 34:644–664, 1995.
Oaksford, M. R. and Chater, N. C.. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101: 608–631, 1994.
Reiter, R.. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13:81–132, 1980.
Roberts, M., Newstead, S., and Griggs, R. A.. Quantifier interpretation and syllogistic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 7(2): 173–204, 2001.
Ryle, G.. Dilemmas. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1954.
M. Shanahan. Reinventing shakey. In Minker, J., editor, Logic-based artificial intelligence. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.
Stanovich, K. E.. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
Steedman, M.. Plans, affordances and combinatory grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6): 725–753, 2002.
K. Stenning. Anaphora as an approach to pragmatics. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J., and Miller, G. A., editors, Linguistic theory and psychological reality. MIT Press, 1978.
K. Stenning. Representation and conceptualisation in educational communication. In Someren, M., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, E., and Jong, T., editors, Learning with multiple representations, Advances in Learning and Instruction, chapter 16, pages 321–334. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.
Stenning, K.. Seeing reason. Image and language in learning to think. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Stenning, K. and Cox, R.. Rethinking deductive tasks: Relating interpretation and reasoning through individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59:1454–1483, 2006.
K. Stenning and J. Oberlander. Spatial inclusion as an analogy for set membership: A case study of analogy at work. In Holyoak, K. and Barnden, J., editors, Analogical connections, volume 2 of Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, chapter 9, pages 446–486. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994.
Stenning, K. and Lambalgen, M.. Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
Stenning, K. and Lambalgen, M.. A little logic goes a long way: Basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Cognitive Science, 28(4): 481–530, 2004.
Stenning, K. and Lambalgen, M.. Semantic interpretation as reasoning in nonmonotonic logic: The real meaning of the suppression task. Cognitive Science, 29(6): 919–960, 2005.
K. Stenning and M. van Lambalgen. Explaining the domain generality of human cognition. In Roberts, M., editor, Integrating the Mind, chapter 8, pages 179–209, Psychology Press, Hove, Sussex, 2006.
Stenning, K. and Yule, P.. Image and language in human reasoning: A syllogistic illustration. Cognitive Psychology, 34:109–159, 1997.
Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., and Sedivy, J.. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268:632–634, 1995.
Lambalgen, M. and Hamm, F.. The proper treatment of events. Blackwell, Oxford and Boston, 2004.
C. von der Malsburg. The correlation theory of brain function. Internal Report 81–2, Dept. of Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Goettingen, Germany, 1981. Reprinted in: Domany, E., Hemmen, J. L. and Schulten, K. (eds.) Models of neural networks II, Springer Verlag, 1994.
Malsburg, C. von. Pattern recognition by labeled graph matching. Neural Networks, Berlin, 1:141–148, 1988.
C. von der Malsburg. The dynamic link architecture. In Arbib, M. A., editor, The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. 2nd edition.
Malsburg, C. von and Bienenstock, E.. A neural network for the retrieval of superimposed connection patterns. Europhysics Letters, 3(11): 1243–1249, 1987.
Malsburg, C. von and Willshaw, D.. Co-operativity and the brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 4(4): 80–83, 1981.
Malsburg, C. von and Willshaw, D. J.. How to label nerve cells so that they can interconnect in an ordered fashion. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 74:5176–5178, 1977.
Wason, P. C.. Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20:273–281, 1968.
P. C. Wason. Problem solving. In Gregory, R. L., editor, The Oxford Companion to the Mind, pages 641–644. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Wason, P. C. and Green, D. W.. Reasoning and mental representation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A:598–611, 1984.
Wason, P. C. and Johnson-Laird, P. N.. A conflict between selecting and evaluating information in an inferential task. British Journal of Psychology, 61(4): 509–515, 1970.
Willshaw, D. J. and Malsburg, C. von. How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization. Proceedings Royal Society of London, B194:431–445, 1976.
Willshaw, D. J. and Malsburg, C. von. A marker induction mechanism for the establishment of ordered neural mappings: Its application to the retinotectal problem. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, B287:203–243, 1979.