Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T20:53:45.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3.4 - The Deep Commodification of Labour

from Part III - Market Constitutionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2021

Emilios Christodoulidis
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

The ‘quartet’ of the Laval/Viking decisions, all decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union within a period of two years (2007–2009)2 heralded a ‘constitutional moment’ of far-reaching significance that has shaped the field of labour protection and Europe’s social constitution. It is a degenerative constitutional moment. Its impact has been to unsettle the difficult articulation between the national and transnational constitutional orders of labour protection. It was clear then, as it is now, that the launch of EU Labour Law with Maastricht, during what we identified in Chapter 3.3 as the second phase of European integration, was never going to be smooth. From the start, EU Labour Law understood itself as the regulation of the European labour market (the same shift in the self-understanding of labour law as labour market regulation had occurred in the United Kingdom in the 1980s).3 This placed EU Labour Law in a difficult ‘middle’ position where it faced a difficult relationship at either interface: with the ILO which now held to (a limited but) substantive set of principles, and with the national systems (organised in their majority according to principles of political constitutionalism) that established social and labour protection as a matter of national-democratic decision-making. The earlier phase of the constitutional jurisprudence of the European Court had reflected both the difficulty of boundary-maintenance, but also a deference to what the Treaty clearly identified as matters that fell under member state jurisdiction. Not always coherently, and certainly with a dose of self-restraint on the part of the ECJ, the fragile architecture had been upheld during this time. It took the constitutional moment of Laval/Viking decisively to collapse what for a decade before it had been quietly eroding, and to subsume labour protection to the logic of market optimisation. Let us look at the steps of this degeneration, both in terms of its effects on the institutional architecture of labour protection in the European Union, and also at the conceptual level, in terms of the deep commodification of labour.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Redress of Law
Globalisation, Constitutionalism and Market Capture
, pp. 395 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×