Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T20:35:23.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Preferential rules of origin in regional trade agreements

from Part One - Trade in goods and services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2016

Rohini Acharya
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asian Development Bank (2012). Asian Economic Integration Monitor July 2012, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Augier, P., Gasiorek, M. and Lai, Tong C. (2005). “The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows”, Economic Policy, 20(43): 567624.Google Scholar
Bak, H.-M. (2009). “Rules of Origin on Outward Processing under FTAs: Implications for Korea”, Seoul: Korea Review of International Studies, 12(2): 5683.Google Scholar
Brenton, P. (2010). “Preferential Rules of Origin”, in Chauffour, J.-P. and Maur, J.-C. (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development: A Handbook, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Cadot, O., Carrere, C., de Melo, J. and Tumurchudur, B. (2005). “Product-specific Rules of Origin in the EU and US Preferential Trading Agreements: An Assessment”, World Trade Review, 25(2): 199224.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.-A. (2012). “Market Access Provisions on Trade in Goods in Regional Trade Agreements”, Geneva: WTO, Staff Working Paper No. 2012–20.Google Scholar
Donner Abreu, M. (2013). “Preferential Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements”, Geneva: WTO, WTO Staff Working Paper No. 2013–05.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. and Suominen, K. (2004a). “Rules of Origin: A World Map and Trade Effects”, mimeograph, Integration, Trade and Hemispheric Issues Division, Integration and Regional Programs Department, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. and Suominen, K. (2004b). “Rules of Origin in FTAs in Europe and in the Americas: Issues and Implications for the EU–MERCOSUR Inter-Regional Association Agreement”, Buenos Aires: INTAL-ITD Working Paper 15.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A. and Suominen, K. (2005). “What are the Effects of Rules of Origin on Trade?”, June 2005, mimeograph.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A., Suominen, K., Harris, J. and Shearer, M. (2009). Bridging Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas, New York: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
European Commission, European Commission Taxation Services, “A User’s Handbook to the Rules of Preferential Origin Used in Trade between the European Community, other European Countries and the Countries Participating to the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership”, mimeograph.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012a). “Trade as a Driver of Development”, Brussels: Commission Staff Working Document, 27 January 2012.Google Scholar
European Commission (2012b). “EU Relations with the Principality of Andorra, the Principality of Monaco and the Republic of San Marino”, Brussels: COM(2012) 680 final, 20 November 2012.Google Scholar
European Commission (2015). “Trade for All – Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy”, Luxembourg: Publications Office.Google Scholar
ITAQA for the European Commission, Directorate General for Trade (2012). “Evaluation of the Economic Impact of the Trade Pillar of the EU–Chile Association Agreement – Final Report”, Paris: ITAQA, 23 March 2012.Google Scholar
Kawai, M., and Wignaraja, G. (2010). “Asian FTAs: Trends, Prospects, and Challenges”, Manila: Asian Development Bank, Economics Working Paper Series No. 226.Google Scholar
Kawai, M., and Wignaraja, G. (2011). “Main Findings and Policy Implications”, in Kawai, M. and Wignaraja, G. (eds.), Asia’s Free Trade Agreements – How is Business Responding?, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Asian Development Bank and Asian Development Bank Institute with Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Keck, A. and Lendle, A. (2012). “New Evidence on Preference Utilization”, Geneva: WTO, Staff Working Paper No. 2012–12.Google Scholar
Komuro, N. (2009). “Outward Processing Schemes under FTAs: ‘Domine, Quo Vadis?’”, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, CNAEC Research Series 09–02.Google Scholar
LAIA (2011). “Evolución del Comercio Negociado 1993–2010”, Montevideo: ALADI/SEC/Estudio 200.Google Scholar
LAIA (2013). “Evolución del Comercio Negociado 1993–2012 y Aprovechamiento de las Preferencias Arancelarias en 2012”, Montevideo: ALADI/SEC/Estudio 203.Google Scholar
National Board of Trade (2012). “The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade – A Comparison of the EU’s and the US’s Rules for the Textile and Clothing Sector”, Stockholm: Kommerskollegium 2012:1.Google Scholar
Nilsson, L. (2011). “Principles of EU Imports, Tariffs, and Tariff Regimes”, Journal of World Trade, 45(4): 821–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Productivity Commission (2010). Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements, Canberra: Research Report.Google Scholar
Ticon Development Consulting, The Origin Institute, Trade Facilitation Services (2013). “Cross-Cumulation in Free Trade Agreements: Opportunities, Potential and Challenges”, Grundlagen der Wirtschaftspolitik, 21, des Staatssekretariats für Wirtschaft SECO, Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) (2012). Assessing Regional Integration in Africa (ARIA V): Towards an African Continental Free Trade Area, Addis Ababa: ECA.Google Scholar
WTO (2002). “Rules of Origin Regime in Regional Trade Agreements”, Geneva: WTO, document number WT/REG/W/45.Google Scholar
WTO (2003). World Trade Report 2003 – Trade and Development, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2011). World Trade Report 2011 – The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence, Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×