Abe, Akio, Ken Akiyama, and Gen' Imai, eds. and annot. 1970. Genji Monogatari [The Tale of Genji], vols. I & II. Nihon Koten Bungaku Zenshuu series, 12 vols. Tokyo: Shogakukan

Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II, 331–380

Adamson, Sylvia. 1995. From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisation and (de-)subjectivisation as processes of language change. In Stein and Wright, 195–224

Ahlqvist, Anders, ed. 1982. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Aijmer, Karin. 1985. The semantic development of will. In Fisiak, 11–21

Aijmer, Karin 1986. Why is actually so popular in spoken English? In Gunnel Tottie and Ingegard Bäcklund, eds., English in Speech and Writing: a Symposium, 119–129. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell

Aijmer, Karin 1996. I think – an English modal particle. In Swan and Westvik, 1–47

Aissen, Judith. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68: 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson, and Lynn A. MacLeod, eds., The Joy of Grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Akatsuka, Noriko 1997. Negative conditionality, subjectification, and conditional reasoning. In Athenasiadou and Dirven, 323–354

Akatsuka, Noriko and Sung-Ock S. Sohn. 1994. Negative conditionality: the case of Japanese -tewa and Korean -taka. In Noriko Akatsuka, ed., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4: 203–219. Stanford University: Center for the Study of Language and Information

Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. The grammaticalization of the verb “pray.” In Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, eds., Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 67–84, Amsterdam: Benjamins

Allen, Cynthia, L. 1995. On doing as you please. In Jucker, 275–308

Allerton, D. and Cruttenden, A.. 1974. English sentence adverbials: their syntax and their intonation in British English. Lingua 34: 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, The. 2000. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 4th ed

Amino, Yoshihiko. 1991. Nihon no rekisi o yomi-naosu [Rereading the History of Japan]. Tokyo: Tsukuma Shobo

Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49: 765–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Lloyd B. 1982. Universals of aspect and parts of speech: parallels between signed and spoken languages. In Paul J. Hopper, ed., Tense–Aspect: between Semantics and Pragmatics, 91–114. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Andrews, Edna. 1995. Seeing is believing: visual categories in the Russian lexicon. In Ellen Contini-Morava and Barbara Sussman Goldberg, with Robert S. Kirsner, eds., Meaning as Explanation: Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory, 363–377. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot. 1989. Argumentativity and informativity. In Michael Meyer, ed., From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, 71–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Anttila, Raimo. 1989 [1972]. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2nd ed

Anttila, Raimo 1992. Historical explanation and historical linguistics. In Garry W. Davis and Gregory K. Iverson, eds., Explanation in Historical Linguistics, 17–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Archangeli, Diana. 1997. Optimality Theory: an introduction to linguistics in the 1990s. In Diana Archangeli and D. Terence Langendoen, eds., Optimality Theory: an Overview, 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell

Ariel, M. 1994. Pragmatic operators. In Asher and Simpson, vol. VI: 3250–3253

Arnovick, Leslie Katherine. 1989. The Wallis rules as speech act prescription: an illocutionary re-evaluation. General Linguistics 29: 150–158Google Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie Katherine 1994. The expanding discourse of promises in Present-Day English: a case study in historical pragmatics. Folia Linguistica Historica 15: 175–191Google Scholar

Asher, R. E. and J. M. Y. Simpson, eds. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 6 vols

Athanasiadou, Angeliki and René Dirven, eds. 1997. On Conditionals Again. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Atlas, Jay D. and Stephen C. Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form. In Peter Cole, 1–61

Atooda, Toshiko. 1980. Nihongo Zyoosiki Tesuto [Tests of Common Sense about Japanese (Usage)]. Tokyo: Ikeda Shoten

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Axmaker, Shelley, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster, eds. 1988. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Bach, Ulrich. 1995. Wills and will making in 16th and 17th century England: some pragmatic aspects. In Jucker, 125–144

Baker, Philip and Anand Syea, eds. 1996. Changing Meanings, Changing Functions. Westminster Creolistics Series. London: University of Westminster Press

Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10: 1–39Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Barcelona, Antonio, ed. 2000a. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: a Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Barcelona, Antonio 2000b. Introduction: the cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In Barcelona 2000a: 1–28

Baron, Naomi. 1977. Language Acquisition and Historical Change. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Bartsch, Renate. 1984. Norms, tolerance, lexical change, and context-dependent meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. In Lehmann and Malkiel, 85–94

Benveniste, Emile 1971a [1958]. Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics, 223–230. Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Publ. as De la subjectivité dans le langage, Problèmes de Linguistique Gènèrale, 258–266. Paris: Gallimard, 1966); Orig. publ. in Journal de psychologie 55: 267f. 1958).)

Benveniste, Emile 1971b [1958]. Delocutive verbs. In Problems in General Linguistics, 239–246. Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Publ. as Les verbes délocutifs, Problémes de Linguistique Gènèrale, 277–285. Paris: Gallimard, 1966 [1958]; Orig. publ. in A. G. Hatcher and K. L. Selig, eds., Studia Philologica et Litteraria in Honorem L. Spitzer, 57–63, Bern, 1958.)

Benveniste, Emile 1973. Indo-European Language and Society. Trans. by E. Palmer. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press

Bergner, Heinz. 1998. Dialogue in the Medieval drama. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 75–83

Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Biber, Douglas and Edward, Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11: 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Edward, Finegan 1989. Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjork, Robert E. and Anita Obermeier. 1997. Date, provenance, author, audiences. In Robert E. Bjork and John D. Niles, eds., A Beowulf Handbook, 13–34. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press

Blake, Norman F. 1992–93. Shakespeare and discourse. Stylistica 2/3: 81–90Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell

Blakemore, Diane 1988. So as a constraint on relevance. In Ruth Kempson, ed., Mental Representation: the Interface between Language and Reality, 183–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Blakemore, Diane 1990. Constraints on interpretation. In Kira Hall, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Michael Meacham, Sondra Reinman, and Laurel A. Sutton, eds., Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 363–370. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Blakemore, Diane 1996. Are apposition markers discourse markers?Journal of Linguistics 32: 325–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, Andreas. 1997. Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen.T übingen: Niemeyer

Blank, Andreas 1999. Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In Blank and Koch, 61–89

Blank, Andreas and Peter Koch, eds. 1999. Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Blass, Regina. 1996. Relevance Relations in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bloch, Oscar and Walter von Wartburg. 1960. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue francaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 3rd ed

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984 [1933]. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper, eds. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. Semantic overloading: a restudy of the verb remind. Language 47: 522–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1979. To catch a metaphor: you as norm. American Speech 54: 194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgmeier, Raimund, Herbert Grabes, and Andreas H. Jucker, eds. 1998. Historical Pragmatics: Anglistentag 1997 Giessen Proceedings. Giessen: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. and introduced by John B. Thompson; trans. by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Press

Bowler, P. J. 1975. The changing meaning of “evolution.”Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 95–114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyd, Julian and Zelda Boyd. 1980. “Shall” and “will.” In Leonard Michaels and Christopher Ricks, eds., The State of the Language, 43–53. Berkeley: University of California Press

Boyd, Julian and Thorne, J. P.. 1969. The semantics of modal verbs. Journal of Linguistics 5: 57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bréal, Michel. 1964 [1900]. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. Trans. by Mrs. Henry Cust. New York: Dover

Bréal, Michel 1991 [1882]. The Beginnings of Semantics: Essays, Lectures and Reviews. Ed. and trans. by George Wolf. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Brown, Cecil H. and Stanley, R. Witkowski. 1983. Polysemy, lexical change and cultural importance. Man (N. S.) 18(7): 2–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Keith. 1992. Double modals in Hawick Scots. In Peter Trudgill and J. K. Chambers, eds., Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 74–103. London: Longman

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Brugman, Claudia. 1984. The very idea: a case study in polysemy and cross-lexical generalization. Papers from the Twentieth Meeting of The Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on lexical semantics, 21–38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar

Brugman, Claudia 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland

Bryson, Bill. 1991. Mother Tongue: the English Language. London: Penguin

Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Bühler, Karl. 1990[1934]. Theory of Language: the Representational Function of Language. Trans. by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Orig. publ. as Sprachtheorie, Jena: Fischer, 1934.)

Busse, Ulrich. 1998. Prithee now, say you will, and go about it: prithee vs. pray you as discourse markers in the Shakespeare corpus. In Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann and Sabine Schilling, eds., Anglistentag 1998, Erfurt: Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: a Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, 247–264

Bybee, Joan L. 1995. The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Bybee and Fleischman, 503–517

Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman, eds. 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak, 59–83

Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Giacalone Ramat, Carruba, and Bernini, 108–122

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins. 1991. Back to the future. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II: 17–58

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cameron, Angus, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler, and Antonette diPaolo Healey. 1980. The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. University of Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project

Campbell, Lyle. 1999 [1998]. Historical Linguistics: an Introduction. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Carston, Robyn. 1995. Quantity maxims and generalized implicature. Lingua 96: 213–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casad, Eugene H., ed. 1996. Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: the Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: the Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press

Chafe, Wallace and Johanna Nichols, eds. 1986. Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex

Chao, Yuenren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger

Chou, Fa-kao. 1953. Notes on Chinese Grammar. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 24: 224–247Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra and Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, vol. III: 202–258

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Clark, Eve V. 1978. Locationals: existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In Greenberg, Ferguson, and Moravcsik, vol. IV: 85–126

Clark, Eve V. and Herbert, H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas, B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58: 332–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm

Coates, Jennifer 1995. The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In Bybee and Fleischman, 55–66

Cole, Peter. 1975. The synchronic and diachronic status of conversational implicature. In Cole and Morgan, 257–288

Cole, Peter 1981. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press

Cole, Peter and Jerry Morgan, eds. 1975. Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press

Coleman, Linda and Paul, Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: the English word lie. Language 57: 26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Linguistic politeness axes: speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander. Pragmatics Microfiche 1(7): A3. Cambridge University: Department of LinguisticsGoogle Scholar

Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1998. Situational meanings of Japanese social deixis: the mixed use of the masu and plain forms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(1): 87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Croft, William 1993. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 335–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 1995. Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71: 490–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, Tony. 1996. Language in History: Theories and Texts. London: Routledge

Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cruse, D. Alan 2000. Meaning in Language: an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Culpeper, Jonathan and Elena, Semino. 2000. Constructing witches and spells: speech acts and activity types in Early Modern England. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlgren, Kathleen. 1978. The nature of linguistic stereotypes. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, and K. W. Todrys, eds., 58–70

Dahlgren, Kathleen 1985. Social terms and social reality. In Suzanne Romaine and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, eds., Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–125

Dancygier, Barbara. 1992. Two metatextual operators: negation and conditionality in English and Polish. In Laura A. Buszard-Welcher, Lionel Wee, and William Weigel, eds., Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 61–75. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Danet, Brenda. 1997. Speech, writing and performativity: an evolutionary view of the history of constitutive ritual. In Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell, and Bengt Nordberg, eds., The Construction of Professional Discourse, 1–41. London: Longman

Danet, Brenda and Bryna Bogoch. 1994. Orality, literacy, and performativity in Anglo-Saxon wills. In John Gibbon, ed., Language and the Law, 100–135. Harlow: Longman

Dasher, Richard B. 1983. The semantic development of honorific expressions in Japanese. Papers in Linguistics 2: 217–228Google Scholar

Dasher, Richard B. 1995. Grammaticalization in the System of Japanese Predicate Honorifics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Dekeyser, Xavier. 1998. Loss of prototypical meanings in the history of English semantics or semantic redeployment. In Hogg and van Bergen, 63–71

Denison, David. 1990. Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 139–166Google Scholar

Denison, David 1992. Counterfactual may have. In Gerritsen and Stein, 229–256

Denison, David 1993. English Historical Syntax. London: Longman

Denison, David 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine, ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. IV: 1776–1997, 92–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Derrig, Sandra. 1978. Metaphor in the color lexicon. In Farkas, Jacobsen, and Todrys, 85–96

Diewald, Gabriele. 1993. Zur Grammatikalisierung der Modalverben im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 12: 218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele 1999. Die Modalverben im Deutschen: Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität. Tübingen: Niemeyer

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary Dictionary of Old English: Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Compiled by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler, and Antonette diPaolo Healey. University of Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. ()

Doi, Tadao, tr. 1955. Nihon daibunten [Translation of Arte da lingoa de Japam, by P. João Rodriguez (1604–8)]. Tokyo: Sanseido

Doi, Tadao, Takesi Morita, and Minoru Chonan, eds. 1980. Nippo Jisho [Modern Japanese translation of the Vocabulario da Lingoa de Iapam (Japanese–Portuguese dictionary, 1603)]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Dowty, David R. 1985. On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 291–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, 343–365

Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. Operateurs argumentatifs et visée argumentative. Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise 5: 7–36Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin, eds. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University

Enkvist, Nils E. and Brita Wårvik. 1987. Old English Þ a, temporal chains, and narrative structure. In Giacalone Ramat, Carruba, and Bernini, 221–237

Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas, . 1993. Pragmaticalization: the case of bá and you know. Studier i modern språkvetenskap 10: 76–93. Stockholm: Almqvist WiksellGoogle Scholar

Ernst, Thomas Byden. 1984. Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Position in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club

Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Kei Nakamura, and Jiansheng Guo. 1995. Shifting face from Asia to Europe. In Shibatani and Thompson, 43–71

Evans, Nicholas. 1994. Kayardild. In Goddard and Wierzbicka, 203–228

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Faingold, Eduardo D. 1991. Evidence of seventeenth century uses of shall and will compatible with markedness-reversal. Papiere zur Linguistik 44–45/1–2: 57–63Google Scholar

Faltz, Leonard M. 1989. A role for inference in meaning change. Studies in Language 13: 317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farkas, Donka, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys, eds. 1978. Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Polarity and the scale principle. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy Vance, eds., Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–199. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Ferrara, Kathleen. 1997. Form and function of the discourse marker anyway: implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics 35: 343–378

Fillmore, Charles J. 1978. On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In Farkas, Jacobsen, and Todrys, 148–173

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quadierni di Semantica 6: 222–255Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1997 [1971]. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul, Kay, and O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: an introduction. In Stein and Wright, 1–15

Fischer, Olga. 1994. The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus 78: 137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1985. Historical Semantics: Historical Word-formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fleischman, Suzanne 1983. From pragmatics to grammar: diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua 60: 183–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1989. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language. 13: 1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1990. Tense and Narrativity: from Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press

Fleischman, Suzanne 1991. Discourse as space/discourse as time: reflections on the metalanguage of spoken and written discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1992. Discourse and diachrony: the rise and fall of Old French SI. In Gerritsen and Stein, 433–473

Fleischman, Suzanne and Marina Yaguello. Forthcoming. Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French. In C. L. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic, eds., Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge

Fong, Vivienne. 1997. The Order of Things: what Directional Locatives Denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Foolen, Ad. 1996. Pragmatic particles. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics 1996, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1991. The de dicto domain in language. In Traugott and Heine, vol. I: 218–251

Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In Cole and Morgan, 187–210

Fraser, Bruce 1988. Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38: 19–33Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Bruce 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6: 167–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, B. and Malamud-Makowski, M.. 1996. English and Spanish contrastive discourse markers. Language Sciences 18: 863–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Fries, Udo. 1998. Dialogue in instructional texts. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 85–96

Fritz, Gerd. 1998. Historische Semantik. Stuttgart: Metzler

Fujii, Noriko. 1991. Historical Discourse Analysis: Grammatical Subject in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Gamon, David. 1994. On the development of epistemicity in the German modal verbs mögen and müssen. Folia Linguistica Historica 14: 125–176Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1983. Reclassifying semantic change. Quadierni di Semantica 4: 217–240Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk 1992. Prototypicality effects in diachronic semantics: a round-up. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 183–203

Geeraerts, Dirk 1995. Specialization and reinterpretation in idioms. In Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan van der Linden, André Schenk, and Rob Schreuder, eds., Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, 57–73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Geeraerts, Dirk 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: a Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon

Geis, Michael L. and Arnold, M. Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: on Left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gerritsen, Marinell and Dieter Stein, eds. 1992. Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 2000. On some grammaticalization patterns for auxiliaries. In Smith and Bentley, 125–154

Giacalone Ramat, Anna, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini, eds. 1987. Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1993. Process and products in making sense of tropes. In 1993 edition of Ortony 1993 [1979] 252–276

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press

Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka, eds. 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Goossens, Louis. 1982. The development of the modals and of the epistemic function in English. In Ahlqvist, 74–84

Goossens, Louis 1985. Framing the linguistic action scene in Old and Present-Day English: OE cwe an, secgan, sp(r)ecan and present-day English speak, talk, say, and tell compared. In Jacek Fisiak, ed., Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 149–170. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goossens, Louis 1987a. Modal tracks: the case of magan and motan. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, ed., Studies in Honor of René Derolez, 216–236. Genl. Seminarie voor Engelse en Oud-Germaanse Taalkunds

Goossens, Louis 1987b. Modal shifts and predication types. In Johan van der Auwera and Louis Goossens, eds., Ins and Outs of the Predication, 21–37. Dordrecht: Foris

Goossens, Louis 1992. Cunnan, conne(n), can: the development of a radial category. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 377–394

Goossens, Louis 1995a. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action. In Goossens et al., 159–174

Goossens, Louis 1995b. From three respectable horses' mouths: metonymy and conventionalization in a diachronically differentiated data base. In Goossens et al., 175–204

Goossens, Louis 1996. English Modals and Functional Models: a Confrontation. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 86. University of Antwerp

Goossens, Louis 1999. Metonymic bridges as modal shifts. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, ed., Metonymy on Language and thought, 193–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goossens, Louis 2000. Patterns of meaning extension, “parallel chaining”, subjectification, and modal shifts. In Barcelona 2000a, 149–169

Goossens, Louis, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, and Johan Vanparys, eds. 1995. By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Belknap Press of Harvard University

Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966 [1963]. Some universals of language with particular reference to word order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg, ed., Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies, 178–194. The Hague: Mouton, 2nd ed

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith Moravcsik, eds., Universals of Human Language, vol. III: 249–295. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1985. Some iconic relationships among place, time, and discourse deixis. In Haiman, 271–287

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1993. The second person is rightly so called. In Mushira Eid and Gregory Iverson, eds., Principles and Predictions: the Analysis of Natural Languages: Papers in Honor of Gerald Sanders, 9–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles A. Ferguson, Edith Moravcsik, eds. 1978. Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 4 vols

Grice, Paul. 1989 [1975]. Logic and conversation. In his Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Press. (Orig. publ. in Cole and Morgan 1975, 41–58.)

Groefsema, Marjolein. 1995. Can, may, must and should: a Relevance theoretic account. Journal of Linguistics 31: 53–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guiraud, Pierre. 1955. La sémantique. Que sais-je? 655. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris

Györi, Gábor. 1996. Historical aspects of categorization. In Casad, 175–206

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar. Language 56: 515–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John ed. 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Haiman, John and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1988. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Halle, Morris. 1964. Phonology in generative grammar. In Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz, eds., The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, 334–352. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6: 322–365Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1977. Functional Linguistics. London: Arnold

Halliday, M. A. K. 1990. Linguistic perspectives on literacy: a systemic–functional approach. In F. Christie and E. Jenkins, eds., Literacy in Social Processes. Sidney: Literacy Technologies

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994 [1985]. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 2nd ed

Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, 46–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The Function of Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hanson, Kristin. 1987. On subjectivity and the history of epistemic expressions in English. Papers from the Twenty-third Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 133–147. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar

Harada, Shin-ichi. 1976. Honorifics. In Masayoshi Shibatani, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. V: Japanese Generative Grammar, 499–561. New York: Academic Press

Harkins, Jean. 1994. Bridging Two Worlds: Aboriginal English and Crosscultural Understanding. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press

Harkins, Jean 1995. Desire in Language and Thought: a Study in Crosscultural Semantics. PhD dissertation, Australian National University

Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Harris, Martin. 1978. The Evolution of French Syntax: a Comparative Approach. New York: Longman

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World's Languages. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 3. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA

Haspelmath, Martin 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?Studies in Language 22: 315–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattori, Shiro. 1967. Descriptive linguistics in Japan. In Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. II: 530–584. The Hague: Mouton

Hayashi, Shiroo, and Fujio Minami, eds. 1973–74. Keigo Kooza [Monographs Series on Honorifics]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, 10 vols

Healey, Antonette di Paolo, et al. 1994. Dictionary of Old English, fascicle A. Microfiche, Dictionary of Old English Project, Center for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto

Heeschen, Volker. 1983. The metalinguistic vocabulary of a speech community in the Highlands of Irian Jaya (West New Guinea). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Publ. 15: Man, Culture, and Environment in the Highlands of Irian Jaya

Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heine, Bernd 1995. Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: some observations on German modals. In Bybee and Fleischman, 17–53

Heine, Bernd 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: a Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Heine, Bernd, Tom Güldemann, Christa Kilian-Katz, Donald A. Lessau, Heinz Roberg, Mathias Schladt, and Thomas Stolz. 1993. Conceptual Shift: a Lexicon of Grammaticalization Processes in African Languages. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 34/35. University of Cologne

Heine, Bernd and Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske

Held, Gudrun. 1999. Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations. Pragmatics 9: 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herring, Susan C., Pieter van Reenen, and Lise Sch⊘sler, eds. 2000. Textual Parameters in Older Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Higgins, Roger. 1990. By mishap and out of control: on the meaningful descent of raising in English. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Hinds, John. 1976. Aspects of Japanese Discourse Structure. Tokyo: Kaitakusha

Hinds, John, Senko Maynard, and Shoichi Iwasaki, eds. 1987. Perspectives on Topicalization: the Case of Japanese wa. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hisatake, Akiko. 1974. Syoomotu, kirisitan siryoo no keigo [Honorifics in the Syoomotu (collections of Late Middle Japanese lecture notes and commentaries about literary or religious works) and Christian materials]. In Hayashi and Minami 1973–74, vol. III: 223–258

Hobbes, Thomas. 1969 [1650]. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2nd ed

Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991 [1986]. Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2nd ed

Hock, Hans Henrich and Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: an Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Hoenigswald, Henry H. 1992. Semantic change and “regularity”: a legacy of the past. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 85–105

Hogg, Richard M. and Linda van Bergen, eds. 1998. Historical Linguistics 1995, vol. II: Germanic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hopper, Paul J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Talmy Givón, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and Syntax, 213–241. New York: Academic Press

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott and Heine, vol. I: 17–35

Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra, Annear Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications; Georgetown University Round Table ‘84, 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1991. Given as new: when redundant affirmation isn't. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1998. Conditionals ‘R’ us: from IF to IFF via R-based implicature. Paper presented at Stanford University, May

Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman

Hughes, Geoffrey. 1992. Social factors in the formulation of a typology of semantic change. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 107–124

Iizumi, Rokuroo. 1963. Kido-airaku-go Ziten [Dictionary of Words for Emotions]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan

Ipsen, G. 1924. Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In J. Friedrich et al., eds., Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Festschrift für Streitberg, 200–237. Heidelberg: Winter

Ishida, Takeshi. 1984. Conflict and its accommodation: omote-ura and uchi-soto relations. In Ellis Krauss, Thomas Rohlen, and Patricia Steinhoff, eds., Conflict in Japan, 16–38. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 28. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Jucker, 3–33

Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Russian Language Project

Jakobson, Roman and Morris Halle. 1971. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton

Janda, Richard D. 1995. From agreement affix to subject “clitic” – and bound root: -mos > -nos vs. (-)nos(-) and nos-otros in New Mexican and other regional Spanish dialects. In Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need, and Sheri Pargman, eds., Papers from the Thirty-first Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. II: The Parasession on Clitics, 118–139. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin

Jucker, Andreas H., ed. 1995. Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jucker, Andreas H 1997. The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 1: 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma, Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 67–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv, eds., 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Justus, Carol F. 1993. Mood correspondences in older Indo-European prayer petitions. General Linguistics 33: 129–161Google Scholar

Kahr, Joan Casper. 1975. Adposition and locationals: typology and diachronic development. Working Papers on Language Universals 19: 21–54. Department of Linguistics, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar

Kakehi, Iori. 1980. Ueda Kazutosi [Biography of K. Ueda]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 58–59Google Scholar

Kakouriotis, Athanasios and Eliza Kitis. 1997. The case of “vob/lai” and other psychological verbs. In Amalia Mozer, ed., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 131–140. Athens: Ellinika Grammata

Karashima, Mie. 1993. Ru, raru no sonkei-yoohoo no hassei to tenkai: komonzyota no yoorei kara [Derivation and development of the honorific uses of -ru and -raru: based on examples taken from Komonjo [official documents] and other ancient texts]. Kokugogaku 172: 1–14Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. and Jerry, A. Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul. 1975. Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms. Language in Society 4: 257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul 1990. Even. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111. (Repr. in Kay, 1997: 49–98.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul 1997. Words and the Grammar of Context. Stanford University: CSLI

Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard, Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: the Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. by Brigitte Nerlich. (Orig. publ. as Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache, Tübingen: Francke, 1990.)

Keller, Rudi 1995. The epistemic weil. In Stein and Wright, 16–30

Kellermann, Günter and Michael D. Morrissey, eds. 1992. Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang

Kemenade, Ans. 1999. Functional categories, morphosyntactic change, grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Kempson, Ruth. 1980. Ambiguity and word meaning. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, eds., Studies in English linguistics, 7–16. London: Longman

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1994. Modality. In Asher and Simpson, vol. V: 2515–2520

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1997. Modality and pragmatics. Folia Linguistica. Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europeae 31: 241–253Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Yasuto. 1996. Keigo Sainyuumon [Re-introduction to (Japanese) Honorifics]. Tokyo: Maruzen

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982 [1968]. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Explanation in Phonology, 13–43. Dordrecht: Foris. (Orig. publ. in Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory, 171–202. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.)

Kiparsky, Paul 1992. Analogy. In William Bright, ed., International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol. I: 56–60. New York: Oxford University Press

Kiparsky, Paul 1995. Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds., Clause Structure and Language Change, 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Kleparski, Grzegorz. 1986. Semantic Change and Componential Analysis: an Inquiry into Pejorative Developments in English. Regensburg: Pustet

Kleparski, Grzegorz 1990. Semantic Change in English: a Study of Evaluative Developments in the Domain of Humans. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Kul

Kluge, F. and E. Seebold. 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3rd ed

Kokugogaku Daijiten. [Dictionary of Japanese Linguistics]. 1980. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan

Komatsu, Hideo. 1980. Zisyo [Dictionaries]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 460–464Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly, and e, eds., On Conditionals, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

König, Ekkehard 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: a Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge

König, Ekkehard and Peter Siemund. 1999. Intensifiers as targets and sources of semantic change. In Blank and Koch, 237–257

König, Ekkehard and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1982. Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of “yet” and “still.” In Monica Macaulay, Orin Gensler, Claudia Brugman, Inese Civkulis, Amy Dahlstrom, Katherine Krile, and Rob Sturm, eds., Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 170–179. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite Discourse in Shakespeare's English. Poznan: Adam Miskiewicz University Press

Kopytko, Roman 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare's plays. In Jucker, 515–540

Kortmann, Bernd. 1992. Reanalysis completed and in progress: participles as sources of prepositions and conjunctions. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 429–453

Kortmann, Bernd 1997. Adverbial Subordination: a Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. The scope of metaphor. In Barcelona 2000a, 79–92

Kövecses, Zoltán and Günter Radden, . 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koyama, Hiroshi, ed. and annot. 1960. Kyoogen-syuu [Anthology of Kyogen Plays]. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei (NKBT) series 42. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronasser, Heinz. 1952. Handbuch der Semasiologie: Kurze Einführung in die Geschichte, Problematik und Terminologie der Bedeutungslehre. Heidelberg: Winter

Kroon, Caroline H. C. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin: a Study of Nam, Enim, Autem, Vero and At. Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 4. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben

Krug, Manfred G. 1998. Gotta – the tenth central modal in English? Social, stylistic and regional variation in the British National Corpus as evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. In Hans Lindquist, Staffen Klintborg, Magnus Levin, and Maria Estling, eds., The Major Varieties of English: Papers from MAVEN 97, 177–191. Växjö: Acta Wexioninsia

Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: a Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. 1998. Pragmatic markers in Early Modern English court trials. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 47–56

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3rd ed

Kuno, Susumo. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Kuno, Susumo and Etsuko, Kaburaki. 1977. Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 627–672Google Scholar

Kuroda. S.-Y. 1973. Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet: a case study from Japanese. In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 377–391. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1975. Metaphor and metonymy. Esquisses Linguistiques, vol. II: 88–92. Munich: Wilhelm FinkGoogle Scholar

Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is Hereby Performed: Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang

Kytö, Merja 1993 [1991]. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press

Labov, William. 1974. On the use of the present to explain the past. In Luigi Heilman, ed., Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, 825–852. Bologna: Mulino

Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, and Gloria G. Phares, eds., Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183–225. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: what Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press

Lakoff, George 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In 1993 edition of Ortony 1993 [1974], 202–251

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lakoff, Robin. 1972. Language in context. Language 48: 907–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles Li, ed., Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press

Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In Haiman, 109–150

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987/91. Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2 vols

Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1993. Universals of construal. In Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser, and Cheryl C. Zoll, eds., Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 447–463. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71: 1–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Losing control: grammaticalization, subjectification, and transparency. In Blank and Koch, 147–175

Lass, Roger. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lass, Roger 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lass, Roger 2000. Remarks on (Uni)directionality. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, eds., Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 207–227. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1970. Towards a Semantic Description of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Legge, James. 1984. The Chinese Classics II: The Works of Mencius. Oxford: Oxford Press

Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman and Thompson, 181–225

Lehmann, Christian 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA. (Orig. publ. as Thoughts on Grammaticalization: a Programmatic Sketch, vol. I. Arbeiten Des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48. Cologne: University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 1982.)

Lehmann, Winfred P. and Yakov Malkiel, eds. 1968. Directions for Historical Linguistics: a Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1974. Semantic Fields And Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Lehrer, Adrienne 1985. The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In Fisiak, 283–295

Lehrer, Adrienne and Eva Feder Kittay, eds. 1992. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Lehti-Eklund, Hanna. 1990. Från Adverb till Markör i Text. Studier i Semantisk-syntaktisk Utveckling i Äldre Svenska. Helsingfors: Humanistika Avhandlingar

Lepschy, Giulio. 1981. Enantiosemy and irony in Italian lexis. The Italianist 1: 82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: at the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 25. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. Pragmatics and social deixis: reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. In John Kingston, Eve E. Sweetser, James Collins, Huruko Kawasaki, John Manley-Baser, Dorothy W. Marschak, Catherine O'Connor, David Shaul, Marta Tobey, Henry Thompson, and Katherine Turner, eds., Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 206–223. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Levinson, Stephen C.1995. Three levels of meaning. In F. R. Palmer, ed., Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Levinson, Stephen C.2000. Presumptive Meanings: the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press, Bradford

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 1985. On semantic change in a dynamic model of language. In Fisiak, 297–323

Lewin, Bruno, ed. 1969. Beiträge zum Interpersonalen Bezug im Japanischen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz

Li, Dong-yi. 1992. Hanzi Yanbian Wubaili [The Evolution of Five Hundred Chinese Characters]. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press, 3rd ed., revised

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67: 474–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lightfoot, David 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Lightfoot, David 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Malden, manner adverb(ial): Blackwell

Lipka, Leonhard. 1990. An Outline of English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics, and Word-Formation.Tübingen: Niemeyer

Longacre, Robert E. 1976. Mystery particles and affixes. In Salikoko Mufwene, Carol A. Walker, and Sanford B. Steever, eds., Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 468–475. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Lord, Carol. 1993. Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lyons, John 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2 volsCrossRef

Lyons, John 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein, eds., Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, 101–124. New York: Wiley

Lyons, John 1994. Subjecthood and subjectivity. In Marina Yaguello, ed., Subjecthood and Subjectivity: the Status of the Subject in Linguistic Theory, 9–17. Paris: Ophrys; London: Institut Français du Royaume-Uni

Lyons, John 1995. Linguistic Semantics: an Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Mabuchi, Kazuo and Kazuko, Ariga. 1982. Konzyaku Monogatari-syuu Ziritu-go Sakuin [Index of Independent Words in the Konjaku Monogatari-shuu (1130–40 “Tales of Times Now Past”)]. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin

Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1995. The adverbs of authority. English World-Wide 16: 37–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCawley, James D. 1968. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. In Bill J. Darden, Charles-James N. Bailey, and Alice Davidson, eds., Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 71–80. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

McCawley, James D. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, vol. II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1982. Adverbs and logical form: a linguistically realistic theory. Language 58: 144–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, John. 1997. Towards a New Model of Creole Genesis. New York: Peter Lang

Manoliu, Maria M. 2000. From deixis ad oculos to discourse markers via deixis ad phantasma. In Smith and Bentley, 243–260

Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. Forthcoming. Language Evolution and Semantic Representations: from “Subjective” to “Objective” in French

Martin, Samuel. 1964. Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In Dell Hymes, ed., Language in Culture and Society, 407–415. New York: Harper and Row

Martin, Samuel 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press

Masuda, Koh, ed. 1974. Kenkyusha's New Japanese–English Dictionary. Tokyo: Kenkyusha, 4th ed

Matisoff, James A. 1973. The Grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press

Matoré, Georges. 1953. La méthode en lexicologie: Domaine français. Paris: Didier

Matsumoto, Yo. 1988. From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: history of some Japanese connectives. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, 340–351

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1985. A sort of speech act qualification in Japanese: Chotto. Journal of Asian Culture 11: 143–159Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko 1988. Reexamination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko 1997. The rise and fall of Japanese nonsubject honorifics: the case of “o-Verb-suru.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 719–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsuo, Hajime, ed. and annot. 1961. Taketori Monogatari zenshaku [Complete annotated edition of the Bamboo Cutter's Tale]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin

Matthiessen, Christian and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. The structure of discourse and “subordination”. In Haiman and Thompson, 275–329

Maynard, Senko K. 1993. Discourse Modality: Subjectivity, Emotion, and Voice in the Japanese Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Middle English Dictionary: The Middle English Dictionary. 1956–2001. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (see also http://www.hti.umich.edu/dict/med/)

Meillet, Antoine. 1958 [1905–6]. Comment les mots changent de sens. In his Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 230–280. Paris: Champion (Repr. from Année sociologique 1905–06.)Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine 1958 [1912]. L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In his Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 130–148. Paris: Champion. (Repr. from Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XII, 1912.)

Meillet, Antoine 1958 [1915–16]. Le renouvellement des conjonctions. In his Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 159–174. Paris: Champion. (Repr. from Annuaire de l’École Pratique des Hautes Etudes, 1915–16.)

Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Michaelis, Laura A. 1993. “Continuity” within three scalar models: the polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics 10: 193–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Roy Andrew. 1967. The Japanese Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change: on the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell

Milroy, James 1993. On the social origins of language change. In Charles Jones, ed., Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 215–236. London: Longman

Milroy, James and Lesley, Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Baltimore: University Park Press

Mitchell, Bruce. 1986. A Guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell, 2 vols

Mizutani, Osamu and Nobuko Mizutani. 1987. How to Be Polite in Japanese. Tokyo: Japan Times

Montgomery, Michael B. and Stephen, J. Nagle. 1993. Double modals in Scotland and the southern United States: trans-atlantic inheritance or independent development?Folia Linguistica Historica 14: 91–107Google Scholar

Morgan, Jerry L. 1993 [1979]. Observations on the pragmatics of metaphor. In Ortony, 124–134

Mori, Shu, Bunzo Torigoe, and Chiyoji Nagatomo, eds. 1972. Tikamatu Monzaemon Syuu [Collected works of Chikamatsu Monzaemon], vol. I. Nihon Koten Bungaku Zenshuu series 43. Tokyo: Shogakukan

Morino, Muneaki. 1971. Kodai no keigo II [Honorifics of Late Old Japanese]. In Tsujimura, 97–182

Mossé, Fernand. 1952. A Handbook of Middle English. Trans. by James A. Walker. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins

Mushin, Ilana. 1998. Evidentiality and epistemological stance in Macedonian, English and Japanese narrative. PhD dissertation, SUNY, Buffalo

Myhill, John. 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33: 157–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myhill, John 1996. The development of the strong obligation system in American English. American Speech 71: 339–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myhill, John 1997. Should and ought: the rise of individually oriented modality in American English. Journal of English Linguistics 1: 3–23Google Scholar

Myhill, John and Laura A. Smith. 1995. The discourse and interactive functions of obligation expressions. In Bybee and Fleischman, 239–292

Nakamura, Hajime. 1981. Bukkyoogo Daijiten [Dictionary of Buddhist terms]. Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki Kabushiki Gaisha

Nakamura, Michio, ed. and annot. 1957. Ukiyo-buro [Public Bath of the Floating World (1808)]. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei series 63. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Nakata, Iwao and Yutaka, Tsukijima. 1980. Kokugo-si [History of the Japanese language]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 399–404Google Scholar

Nelson, Andrew N. 1962. The Modern Reader's Japanese–English Character Dictionary. Tokyo: Tuttle

Nerlich, Brigitte and David D. Clarke. 1992. Outline of a model for semantic change. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 125–141

Nerlich, Brigitte and David D. Clarke 1999. Synecdoche as a cognitive and communicative strategy. In Blank and Koch, 197–213

Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: the pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Jucker, 541–601

Nevis, Joal A. 1986. Decliticization and deaffixation in Saame: abessive taga. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 34: 1–19Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J., ed. 1988. Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4 vols

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press, Bradford

Nicolle, Steve. 1997. A relevance-theoretic account of be going to. Journal of Linguistics 33: 355–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolle, Steve 1998. A relevance theory perspective on grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikiforidou, Kiki. 1996. Modern Greek as: a case study in grammaticalization and grammatical polysemy. Studies in Language 20: 599–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nippo Jisho. See Doi, Morita, and Chonan, 1980

Nihon Kokugo Daiziten: Nihon Kokugo Daijiten [Unabridged Dictionary of the Japanese Language]. 1972–76. Tokyo: Shogakukan, 20 vols

N⊘lke, Henning. 1992. Semantic constraints on argumentation: from polyphonic micro-structure to argumentative macro-structure. In Frans H. van Eemeren, ed., Argumentation Illuminated, 189–200. Amsterdam: SICSAT

Nordlinger, Rachel and Elizabeth, Closs Traugott. 1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to. English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club

Nunberg, Geoffrey 1979. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 143–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 1998. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Pragmatics, Reims, July

O'Connor, Patricia. 1994. “You could feel it through the skin”: agency and positioning in the prisoners' stabbing stories. Text 14: 45–75Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary: The Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd ed. (also Oxford English Dictionary2/e CD-ROM V 2.0, 1999); Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd. ed. ()

Ohno, (also Ono, Oono), Susumu, . 1980. Imi henka [Meaning change]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 35–37Google Scholar

Ohno, Susumu, and Toshiko Karashima, eds. 1972. Ise Monogatari Soosakuin [Comprehensive Index to the Ise Monogatari (Tales of Ise)]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin

Ohno, Susumu, Akihiro Satake, and Kingoro Maeda, eds. 1990[1974]. Iwanami Kogo Jiten [The Iwanami Dictionary of Old Japanese Words]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, revised ed

Ohori, T., ed. 1998. Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Tokyo: Kurosio

Okamoto, Shigeko. 1999. Situated politeness: manipulating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics 9(1): 51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, David R. 1994. The World on Paper: the Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: the Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen

Onodera, Noriko Okada. 1993. Pragmatic change in Japanese: conjunctions and interjections as discourse markers. PhD dissertation, Georgetown University

Onodera, Noriko Okada 1995. Diachronic analysis of Japanese discourse markers. In Jucker, 393–437

Ooishi, Hatsutaroo. 1983. Gendai Keigo Kenkyuu [Research into Honorifics of Modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shoboo

Ormelius-Sandblom, Elisabet. 1997. Die Modalpartikel ja, doch und schon. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell

Ortony, Anthony, ed. 1993 [1979]. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed

Östman, Jan-Ola. 1981. You Know: a Discourse-functional Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Pagliuca, William, ed. 1994. Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Palmer, F. R. 1990[1979]. Modality and the English Modals. New York: Longman, 2nd ed

Papi, Marcella Bertuccelli. 2000. Is a diachronic speech act theory possible?Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, Hermann. 1920 [1880]. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte.Tübingen: Niemeyer, 5th ed

Pauwels, Paul, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 1995. Body parts in linguistic action: underlying schemas and value judgments. In Goossens et al., 35–69

Pederson, Eric, Eve, Danciger, David, Wilkins, Stephen, Levinson, Sotara, Kita, and Gunter, Senft. 1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74: 557–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955 [1898]. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Ed. by Justus Bucher. New York: Dover

Pérez, Aveline. 1990. Time in motion: grammaticalisation of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 49–64Google Scholar

Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal Expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Perret, Michèle. 1982. De léspace romanesque à la matérialité du livre. Léspace énonciatif des premiers romans en prose. Poétique 50: 173–182Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 1999. On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. In H. S. Wang, F. Tsao and C. Lien, eds., Selected Papers from the 5th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 27–52. Taipei: Crane

Pinkster, Harm. 1987. The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In Martin B. Harris and Paolo Ramat, eds., The Historical Development of Auxiliaries, 193–223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Plank, Frans. 1984. The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8: 305–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pokorny, Julius. 1959/69. Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke, 2 vols

Pons Bordería, Salvador. 1998. Conexión y Conectores: Estudio de su Relación en el Registro Informal de la Lengua. Cuadernos de Filología 27. University of Valencia: Departamento de Filología Española

Powell, Mava Jo. 1992a. The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 75–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, Mava Jo. 1992b. Folk theories of meaning and principles of conventionality: encoding literal attitude via stance adverb. In Lehrer and Kittay 1992, 333–353

Prince, Ellen. 1988. Discourse analysis: a part of the study of linguistic competence. In Newmeyer, vol. II: 164–182

Prokosch, E. 1938. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman

Radden, Günter. 2000. How metonymic are metaphors? In Barcelona 2000a, 93–108

Ramat, Paolo and Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Van der Auwera with Baoill, 187–275

Reddy, Michael J. 1993 [1979]. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, 164–201

Rescher, N. 1968. Topics in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel

Rissanen, Matti. 1986. Variation and the study of English historical syntax. In David Sankoff, ed., Diversity and Diachrony, 97–109. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Rissanen, Matti, Merja Kytö, and Minna Palander-Collin, eds. 1993. Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Robert. 1992. Dictionnaire historique de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert

Roberts, Ian G. 1993. A formal account of grammaticalisation in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica 13: 219–258Google Scholar

Roberts, Sarah Julianne. 1998. The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. Language 74: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodriguez, João. See Doi 1955

Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical Linguistics: its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11: 203–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104: 192–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor 1994. Expressive sentence types – a contradiction in terms: the case of exclamation. Sprache und Pragmatik 33: 38–68. LundGoogle Scholar

Rosengren, Inger. 1992. Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. In Inger Rosengren, ed., Satz und Illokution, vol. I: 263–306. Linguistische Arbeiten 278. Tübingen: Germanistisches Institut der Universität Lund

Rossari, C. 1994. Les opérations de reformulation: Analyse du processus et des marques dans une perspective contrastive français-italien. Bern: Peter Lang

Rouchota, Villy. 1996. Discourse connectives: what do they link? In J. Harris and R. Backley, eds., 1996 University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 199–212

Roulet, E. 1987. Complétude interactive et connecteurs reformulatifs. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 8: 111–140Google Scholar

Rudolph, Elisabeth. 1988. Connective relations – connective expressions – connective structures. In János S. Petöfi, ed., Text and Discourse Constitution: Empirical Aspects, Theoretical Approaches, 97–133. Berlin: de Gruyter

Rudolph, Elisabeth 1996. Contrast: Adversative and Concessive Relations and their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida. 1995. Metaphor, schema, invariance: the case of verbs of answering. In Goossens et al., 205–243

Saeki, Umetomo and Tsunehisa Imuta, eds. 1981. Kageroo Nikki Soosakuin [Comprehensive Index and Text of the Kageroo Nikki (“Gossamer Years Diary,” mid-10th century)]. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo

Sakurai, Mitsuaki. 1966. Konzyaku Monogatari-syuu no Gohoo no Kenkyuu. [Studies of word use in the Konjaku Monogatari-shuu (“Tales of Times Now Past,” mid-12th century)]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin

Sanders, José and Wilbert, Spooren. 1996. Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: a study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankoff, Gilian. 1980. The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Sansom, George B. 1952. Japan: a Short Cultural History. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Sato, Shigeru. 1974. Otogi-Zoosi, Bukkyoo bungaku no keigo [Honorifics in Otogi-Zooshi (Late Middle Japanese collections of short stories) and Buddhist literature]. In Hayashi and Minami 1973–74, vol. III: 177–222

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1967 [1879]. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les languages indo-européennes, Paris: Vieweg. (Trans. by Winfred P. Lehmann as “On the primitive system of vowels in the Indo-European languages,” in Winfred P. Lehmann, ed., A Reader in Nineteenth Century Historical Indo-European Linguistics, 217–224. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967.)

Saussure, Ferdinand de 1996 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. by Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schiffrin, Deborah 1988. Conversation analysis. In Newmeyer, vol. IV: 251–276

Schiffrin, Deborah 1990a. The principle of intersubjectivity in communication and conversation. Semiotica 80: 121–151Google Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah 1990b. Between text and context: deixis, anaphora, and the meaning of then. Text 10: 245–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah 1992. Anaphoric then: aspectual, textual, and epistemic meaning. Linguistics 30: 753–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, Deborah 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell

Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte. 1983. Traditionen des Sprechens: Elemente einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichtsschreibung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer

Schlieben-Lange, Brigitte 1992. The history of subordinating conjunctions in some Romance languages. In Gerritsen and Stein, 341–354

Schourop, Lawrence C. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation: Like, Well, Y'Know. New York: Garland

Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity and Exclusivity. New York: Garland

Schwenter, Scott A. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1995. The semantic and pragmatic development of substitutive complex prepositions in English. In Jucker, 243–273

Schwenter, Scott A. and Elizabeth, Closs Traugott 2000. Invoking scalarity: the development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John R. 1965. What is a speech act? In Max Black, ed., Philosophy in America, 221–239. Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Searle, John R. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Seeley, Christopher. 1991. A History of Writing in Japanese. Leiden: Brill

Seidensticker, Edward G., trans. 1964. The Gossamer Years (Kageroo Nikki): a Diary by a Noblewoman of Heian Japan. Tokyo and Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle. trans. 1980. The Tale of Genji. New York: Knopf

Seiler, Hansjakob. 1983. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language.Tübingen: Narr

Shepherd, Susan C. 1981. Modals in Antiguan Creole, language acquisition, and history. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Shepherd, Susan C. 1982. From deontic to epistemic: an analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition. In Ahlqvist, 316–323

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Shibatani, Masayoshi 1991. Grammaticalization of topic into subject. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II: 93–133

Shibatani, Masayoshi and Sandra Thompson, eds. 1995. Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics in Honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Shopen, Timothy, ed. 1985. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3 vols

Silverstein, Michael. 1976a. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, eds., Meaning in Anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press

Silverstein, Michael 1976b. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Languages

Slobin, Dan I. 1977. Language change in childhood and in history. In John MacNamara, ed., Language Learning and Thought, 185–214. New York: Academic Press

Slobin, Dan I. 1994. Talking perfectly: discourse origins of the present perfect. In Pagliuca, 119–133

Smith, John Charles and Delia Bentley, eds. 2000. Historical Linguistics 1995, vol. I: General Issues and Non-Germanic Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Solomon, Julie. 1995. Local and global functions of a borrowed/native pair of discourse markers in a Yucatec Maya narrative. In Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser, and Ju Namkung, eds., Papers from the Twenty-first Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 287–298. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995 [1986]. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd ed

Steele, Susan. 1975. Is it possible?Stanford Working Papers in Language Universals 18: 35–58Google Scholar

Stein, Dieter and Susan Wright, eds. 1995. Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1998. From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk. In Jucker and Ziv, 127–165

Stern, Gustaf. 1968 [1931]. Meaning and Change of Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Orig. publ. Göteborg, Elanders boktryckeri aktiebolag, 1931.)

Stubbs, Michael. 1986. “A matter of prolonged field work”: notes toward a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 7: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word Order Changes and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Sun, Chaofen 1998. Aspectual categories that overlap: a historical and dialectal perspective of the Chinese ZHE. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Ryoko. 1998. From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particle: wake. In Toshio Ohori, ed., Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization, 67–92. Tokyo: Kurosio

Suzuki, Ryoko 1999. Grammaticization in Japanese: a study of pragmatic particle-ization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara

Svorou, Soteria. 1993. The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: a Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation. Oslo: Novus

Swan, Toril 1991. Adverbial shifts: evidence from Norwegian and English. In Dieter Kastovsky, ed., Historical English Syntax, 409–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Swan, Toril 1997. From manner to subject modification: adverbialization in English. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20: 179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swan, Toril and Olaf Jansen Westvik, eds. 1996. Modality in Germanic Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Sweetser, Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, 389–405

Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sweetser, Eve E. and Gilles Fauconnier. 1996. Cognitive links and domains: basic aspects of mental space theory. In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve E. Sweetser, eds., Spaces, World, and Grammars, 1–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 1999. Pragmatic space in historical linguistics: speech acts and speech act verbs in the history of English. Paper presented at the Workshop on Historical Pragmatics, 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Vancouver, August 1999

Tabor, Whitney. 1994a. Syntactic innovation: a connectionist model. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Tabor, Whitney 1994b. The gradual development of degree modifier sort of and kind of: a corpus proximity model. In Katharine Beals, Gina Cooke, David Kathman, Sotaro Kita, Karl-Erik McCullough, and David Testen, eds., Papers from the Twenty-ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 451–465. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society

Takagi, Ichinosuke, Tomohide Gomi, and Susumu Ohno, eds. and annot. 1957–60. Man’ yooshuu [The Ten Thousand Leaves]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei (NKBT) series: 4–7

Takemitsu, Makoto. 1998. Nitizyoogo no Yurai Ziten [Etymological Dictionary of Everyday Words in Japanese]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, vol. III: 57–149

Talmy, Leonard 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 2: 49–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tamba, Irene. 1986. Approche du “signe” et du “sens” linguistiques à travers les systèmes d’écriture japonais. In Jean-Claude Chevalier, Michel Launay, and Maurice Molho, eds., Langages: Le signifiant 82: 83–100

Taylor, John R. 1996. On running and jogging. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1997 [1989]. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon, 2nd ed

Thomas, Francis-Noél and Mark Turner. 1994. Clear and Simple as the Truth: Writing Classic Prose. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II: 313–329

Tiersma, Peter. 1986. The language of offer and acceptance: speech acts and the question of intent. California Law Review 74: 189–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tiersma, Peter 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Tobler, Adolf 1921 [1882]. Il ne faut pas que tu meures “du darfst nicht sterben”. Repr. in Vermischte Beiträge zur französischen Grammatik, vol. I: 201–205. Leipzig: Hirzel, 3rd ed

Tokieda, Motoki. 1941. Kokugogaku-si Genron [Fundamental Principles of Japanese Linguistics]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1978. On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith A. Moravcsik, eds., Universals of Human Language, vol. III, 369–400. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1980. Meaning-change in the development of grammatical markers. Language Sciences 2: 44–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings; some semantic–pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, eds., Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1985a. On conditionals. In Haiman 1985, 289–307

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1985b. On regularity in semantic change. Journal of Literary Semantics 14: 155–173Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1986. Is internal semantic–pragmatic reconstruction possible? In Caroline Duncan-Rose and Theo Vennemann, eds., On Language: Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica: a Festschrift for Robert P. Stockwell from his Friends and Colleagues, 128–144. London: Routledge

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1987. Literacy and language change: the special case of speech act verbs. In Judith Langer, ed., Language, Literacy, and Culture: Issues of Society and Schooling, 11–27. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, 406–416

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 57: 33–65Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1994. Grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Asher and Simpson, vol. III: 1481–1486

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1991. English speech act verbs: a historical perspective. In Linda R. Waugh and Stephen Rudy, eds., New Vistas in Grammar: Invariance and Variation, 387–406. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1995a. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Stein and Wright 1995, 31–54

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1995b. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995. (http://www.stanford.edu/∼traugott/traugott.html)

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1996. Subjectification and the development of epistemic meaning: the case of promise and threaten. In Swan and Westvik, 185–210

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1996/97. Semantic change: an overview. Glot International 2 (9/10): 3–6Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1999a. The role of pragmatics in semantic change. In Jef Verschueren, ed., Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. II, 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1999b. The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: a study in subjectification. In Blank and Koch 1999, 177–196

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs Forthcoming. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Richard Janda and Brian Joseph, eds., A Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard Dasher. 1987. On the historical relation between mental and speech act verbs in English and Japanese. In Giacalone Ramat, Carruba, and Bernini, 561–573

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Bernd Heine, eds. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2 vols

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics–pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott and Heine, vol. I: 189–218

Trier, Jost. 1931. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter

Tsujimura, Toshiki. 1967. Gendai no Keigo [Honorific Language of Modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Kyoobunsha

Tsujimura, Toshiki 1968. Keigo no Si-Teki Kenkyuu [Historical Studies of Japanese Honorifics]. Tokyo: Tokyodo

Tsujimura, Toshiki ed. 1971. Keigo-Si [The History of Japanese Honorifics]. Kooza Kokugosi, 5 [Monograph Series on the History of the Japanese Language 5]. Tokyo: Taishuukan Shoten

Ueda, Kazutoshi (“Bannen”), et al. 1977 [1918]. Daiziten [Chinese-Character Dictionary]. Tokyo: Kodansha

Ullmann, Stephen. 1957. The Principles of Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd ed. 1964. Semantics: an Introduction to the Science of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland

Van der Auwera, Johan. 1997. Conditional perfection. In Athanasiadou and Dirven, 169–190

Van der Auwera, Johan 1999. On the semantic and pragmatic polyfunctionality of modal verbs. In Ken Turner, ed., The Semantics–Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 49–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier

Van der Auwera, Johan Forthcoming. On the typology of negative modals. In Jack Hoeksema, ed., Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Van der Auwera, Johan with Dónall P. O Baoill, eds. 1998. Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Auwera, Johan and Vladimir, A. Plungian. 1998. Modality's semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124Google Scholar

Vanparys, Johan. 1995. A survey of metalinguistic metaphors. In Goossens et al., 1–34

Verhagen, Arie. 1995. Subjectification, syntax, and communication. In Stein and Wright, 103–128

Verhagen, Arie 1996. Sequential conceptualization and linear order. In Casad, 793–817

Verhagen, Arie 2000. “The girl that promised to become something”: an exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch. In Thomas F. Shannon and Johan P. Snapper, eds., The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1997: the Dutch Language at the Millennium, 197–208. Lanham, MD: University Press of America

Verschueren, Jef. 1995. The conceptual basis of performativity. In Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra Thompson, eds., Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics in Honor of Charles J. Fillmore, 299–321. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Verschueren, Jef 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold

Viberg, Åke. 1983. The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21: 123–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Victorri, Bernard. 1997. La polysémie: un artefact de la linguistique?Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 2: 41–62Google Scholar

Vincent, Nigel. 1982. The development of the auxiliaries HABERE and ESSE in Romance. In Nigel Vincent and Martin Harris, eds., Studies in the Romance Verb, 71–96. London: Croom Helm

Vincent, Nigel 1994. Lectures on historical syntax. Australian Linguistics Institute, La Trobe, July

Visser, F. Th. 1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, vol. III, part 1. Leiden: Brill

Voyles, Joseph B. 1973. Accounting for semantic change. Lingua 31: 95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warner, Anthony R. 1990. Reworking the history of the English auxiliaries. In Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent, and Susan Wright, eds., Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 537–558. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Warren, Beatrice. 1992. Sense-developments: a Contrastive Study of the Development of Slang Sense and Novel Standard Senses in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell

Warren, Beatrice 1998. What is metonymy? In Hogg and van Bergen, 301–310

Wartburg, Walther von. 1928–66. Französisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Basel: Zbinden

Watkins, Calvert. 1985. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

Watts, Richard J. 1995. Justifying grammars: a socio-pragmatic foray into the discourse community of Early English grammarians. In Jucker, 145–185

Wegener, Heide. 1998. Zur Grammatikalisierung von Modalpartikeln. In Irmhild Barz and Günther Öhlschläger, eds., Zwischen Grammatik und Lexicon, 37–55. Tübingen: Niemeyer

Weinreich, Uriel. 1964. Webster's Third: a critique of its semantics. International Journal of American Linguistics 30: 405–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann and Malkiel, 97–195

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985a. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma

Wierzbicka, Anna 1985b. A semantic metalanguage for a crosscultural comparison of speech acts and speech genres. Language in Society 14: 491–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna 1985c. English Speech Act Verbs: a Semantic Dictionary. Orlando: FL: Academic Press

Wierzbicka, Anna 1992. Semantics, Primes, and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wierzbicka, Anna 1994. Semantic primitives across languages: a critical review. In Goddard and Wierzbicka, 445–500

Wierzbicka, Anna 1995. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Wierzbicka, Anna 1997. Understanding Cultures through their Key Words. New York: Oxford University Press

Wilkins, David. 1996. Natural tendencies in semantic change and the search for cognates. In Mark Durie and Malcolm Ross, eds., The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, 264–304. New York: Oxford University Press

Williams, Joseph M. 1976. Synaesthetic adjectives: a possible law of semantic change. Language 52: 461–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Raymond. 1985 [1976]. Keywords: a Vocabulary of Culture and Society.New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd ed

Wilson, Deirdre and Dan, Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolf, George. 1991. Translator's introduction: the emergence of the concept of semantics. In Michel Bréal, The Beginnings of Semantics: Essays, Lectures and Reviews (ed. and trans by George Wolf), 3–17. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Yamada, Tadao, ed. 1958. Taketori Monogatari Soosakuin [Comprehensive Index of the Taketori Monogatari (“Bamboo Cutter's Tale,” early 10th century)]. Tokyo: Musashino Shoin

Yamada, Yoshio, Tadao Yamada, Hideo Yamada, and Toshio Yamada, eds. 1959. Konjaku Monogatari-shuu [1130–40 “Tales of Times Now Past”]. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei series 22–23. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Yamaguchi, Yoshinori. 1998. Kurashi no Kotoba: Gogen Jiten [Etymological Dictionary of Everyday Words]. Tokyo: Kodansha

Yang, Ping. 1989. The development and structure of V de O. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Grammar] 2: 126–136Google Scholar

Yoshizawa, Norio. 1985. Doko-ka Okasii Keigo [Honorific (Usage in Japanese) that is Somehow Odd]. Tokyo: Goma Shobo

Zipf, George Kingsley. 1965 [1949]. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Hafner

Abe, Akio, Ken Akiyama, and Gen' Imai, eds. and annot. 1970. Genji Monogatari [The Tale of Genji], vols. I & II. Nihon Koten Bungaku Zenshuu series, 12 vols. Tokyo: Shogakukan

Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II, 331–380

Adamson, Sylvia. 1995. From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisation and (de-)subjectivisation as processes of language change. In Stein and Wright, 195–224

Ahlqvist, Anders, ed. 1982. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Aijmer, Karin. 1985. The semantic development of will. In Fisiak, 11–21

Aijmer, Karin 1986. Why is actually so popular in spoken English? In Gunnel Tottie and Ingegard Bäcklund, eds., English in Speech and Writing: a Symposium, 119–129. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell

Aijmer, Karin 1996. I think – an English modal particle. In Swan and Westvik, 1–47

Aissen, Judith. 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68: 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson, and Lynn A. MacLeod, eds., The Joy of Grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Akatsuka, Noriko 1997. Negative conditionality, subjectification, and conditional reasoning. In Athenasiadou and Dirven, 323–354

Akatsuka, Noriko and Sung-Ock S. Sohn. 1994. Negative conditionality: the case of Japanese -tewa and Korean -taka. In Noriko Akatsuka, ed., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4: 203–219. Stanford University: Center for the Study of Language and Information

Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. The grammaticalization of the verb “pray.” In Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, eds., Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 67–84, Amsterdam: Benjamins

Allen, Cynthia, L. 1995. On doing as you please. In Jucker, 275–308

Allerton, D. and Cruttenden, A.. 1974. English sentence adverbials: their syntax and their intonation in British English. Lingua 34: 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, The. 2000. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 4th ed

Amino, Yoshihiko. 1991. Nihon no rekisi o yomi-naosu [Rereading the History of Japan]. Tokyo: Tsukuma Shobo

Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49: 765–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Lloyd B. 1982. Universals of aspect and parts of speech: parallels between signed and spoken languages. In Paul J. Hopper, ed., Tense–Aspect: between Semantics and Pragmatics, 91–114. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Andrews, Edna. 1995. Seeing is believing: visual categories in the Russian lexicon. In Ellen Contini-Morava and Barbara Sussman Goldberg, with Robert S. Kirsner, eds., Meaning as Explanation: Advances in Linguistic Sign Theory, 363–377. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Oswald Ducrot. 1989. Argumentativity and informativity. In Michael Meyer, ed., From Metaphysics to Rhetoric, 71–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Anttila, Raimo. 1989 [1972]. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2nd ed

Anttila, Raimo 1992. Historical explanation and historical linguistics. In Garry W. Davis and Gregory K. Iverson, eds., Explanation in Historical Linguistics, 17–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Archangeli, Diana. 1997. Optimality Theory: an introduction to linguistics in the 1990s. In Diana Archangeli and D. Terence Langendoen, eds., Optimality Theory: an Overview, 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell

Ariel, M. 1994. Pragmatic operators. In Asher and Simpson, vol. VI: 3250–3253

Arnovick, Leslie Katherine. 1989. The Wallis rules as speech act prescription: an illocutionary re-evaluation. General Linguistics 29: 150–158Google Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie Katherine 1994. The expanding discourse of promises in Present-Day English: a case study in historical pragmatics. Folia Linguistica Historica 15: 175–191Google Scholar

Asher, R. E. and J. M. Y. Simpson, eds. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 6 vols

Athanasiadou, Angeliki and René Dirven, eds. 1997. On Conditionals Again. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Atlas, Jay D. and Stephen C. Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form. In Peter Cole, 1–61

Atooda, Toshiko. 1980. Nihongo Zyoosiki Tesuto [Tests of Common Sense about Japanese (Usage)]. Tokyo: Ikeda Shoten

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Axmaker, Shelley, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster, eds. 1988. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Bach, Ulrich. 1995. Wills and will making in 16th and 17th century England: some pragmatic aspects. In Jucker, 125–144

Baker, Philip and Anand Syea, eds. 1996. Changing Meanings, Changing Functions. Westminster Creolistics Series. London: University of Westminster Press

Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10: 1–39Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Barcelona, Antonio, ed. 2000a. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: a Cognitive Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Barcelona, Antonio 2000b. Introduction: the cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In Barcelona 2000a: 1–28

Baron, Naomi. 1977. Language Acquisition and Historical Change. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Bartsch, Renate. 1984. Norms, tolerance, lexical change, and context-dependent meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. In Lehmann and Malkiel, 85–94

Benveniste, Emile 1971a [1958]. Subjectivity in language. In Problems in General Linguistics, 223–230. Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Publ. as De la subjectivité dans le langage, Problèmes de Linguistique Gènèrale, 258–266. Paris: Gallimard, 1966); Orig. publ. in Journal de psychologie 55: 267f. 1958).)

Benveniste, Emile 1971b [1958]. Delocutive verbs. In Problems in General Linguistics, 239–246. Trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Publ. as Les verbes délocutifs, Problémes de Linguistique Gènèrale, 277–285. Paris: Gallimard, 1966 [1958]; Orig. publ. in A. G. Hatcher and K. L. Selig, eds., Studia Philologica et Litteraria in Honorem L. Spitzer, 57–63, Bern, 1958.)

Benveniste, Emile 1973. Indo-European Language and Society. Trans. by E. Palmer. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press

Bergner, Heinz. 1998. Dialogue in the Medieval drama. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 75–83

Berlin, Brent and Paul Kay. 1969. Basic Color Terms: their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Biber, Douglas and Edward, Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11: 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Edward, Finegan 1989. Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjork, Robert E. and Anita Obermeier. 1997. Date, provenance, author, audiences. In Robert E. Bjork and John D. Niles, eds., A Beowulf Handbook, 13–34. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press

Blake, Norman F. 1992–93. Shakespeare and discourse. Stylistica 2/3: 81–90Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell

Blakemore, Diane 1988. So as a constraint on relevance. In Ruth Kempson, ed., Mental Representation: the Interface between Language and Reality, 183–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Blakemore, Diane 1990. Constraints on interpretation. In Kira Hall, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Michael Meacham, Sondra Reinman, and Laurel A. Sutton, eds., Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 363–370. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Blakemore, Diane 1996. Are apposition markers discourse markers?Journal of Linguistics 32: 325–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, Andreas. 1997. Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen.T übingen: Niemeyer

Blank, Andreas 1999. Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In Blank and Koch, 61–89

Blank, Andreas and Peter Koch, eds. 1999. Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Blass, Regina. 1996. Relevance Relations in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bloch, Oscar and Walter von Wartburg. 1960. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue francaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 3rd ed

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984 [1933]. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper, eds. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. Semantic overloading: a restudy of the verb remind. Language 47: 522–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight 1979. To catch a metaphor: you as norm. American Speech 54: 194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgmeier, Raimund, Herbert Grabes, and Andreas H. Jucker, eds. 1998. Historical Pragmatics: Anglistentag 1997 Giessen Proceedings. Giessen: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. and introduced by John B. Thompson; trans. by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Press

Bowler, P. J. 1975. The changing meaning of “evolution.”Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 95–114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boyd, Julian and Zelda Boyd. 1980. “Shall” and “will.” In Leonard Michaels and Christopher Ricks, eds., The State of the Language, 43–53. Berkeley: University of California Press

Boyd, Julian and Thorne, J. P.. 1969. The semantics of modal verbs. Journal of Linguistics 5: 57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bréal, Michel. 1964 [1900]. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. Trans. by Mrs. Henry Cust. New York: Dover

Bréal, Michel 1991 [1882]. The Beginnings of Semantics: Essays, Lectures and Reviews. Ed. and trans. by George Wolf. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Brown, Cecil H. and Stanley, R. Witkowski. 1983. Polysemy, lexical change and cultural importance. Man (N. S.) 18(7): 2–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Keith. 1992. Double modals in Hawick Scots. In Peter Trudgill and J. K. Chambers, eds., Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 74–103. London: Longman

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Style in Language, 253–276. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Brugman, Claudia. 1984. The very idea: a case study in polysemy and cross-lexical generalization. Papers from the Twentieth Meeting of The Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on lexical semantics, 21–38. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar

Brugman, Claudia 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland

Bryson, Bill. 1991. Mother Tongue: the English Language. London: Penguin

Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Bühler, Karl. 1990[1934]. Theory of Language: the Representational Function of Language. Trans. by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Orig. publ. as Sprachtheorie, Jena: Fischer, 1934.)

Busse, Ulrich. 1998. Prithee now, say you will, and go about it: prithee vs. pray you as discourse markers in the Shakespeare corpus. In Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann and Sabine Schilling, eds., Anglistentag 1998, Erfurt: Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag

Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: a Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, 247–264

Bybee, Joan L. 1995. The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Bybee and Fleischman, 503–517

Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman, eds. 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak, 59–83

Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Giacalone Ramat, Carruba, and Bernini, 108–122

Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins. 1991. Back to the future. In Traugott and Heine, vol. II: 17–58

Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Cameron, Angus, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler, and Antonette diPaolo Healey. 1980. The Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. University of Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project

Campbell, Lyle. 1999 [1998]. Historical Linguistics: an Introduction. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Carston, Robyn. 1995. Quantity maxims and generalized implicature. Lingua 96: 213–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casad, Eugene H., ed. 1996. Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: the Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: the Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Univerisity of Chicago Press

Chafe, Wallace and Johanna Nichols, eds. 1986. Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex

Chao, Yuenren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger

Chou, Fa-kao. 1953. Notes on Chinese Grammar. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 24: 224–247Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra and Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, vol. III: 202–258

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Clark, Eve V. 1978. Locationals: existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In Greenberg, Ferguson, and Moravcsik, vol. IV: 85–126

Clark, Eve V. and Herbert, H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas, B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58: 332–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm

Coates, Jennifer 1995. The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In Bybee and Fleischman, 55–66

Cole, Peter. 1975. The synchronic and diachronic status of conversational implicature. In Cole and Morgan, 257–288

Cole, Peter 1981. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press

Cole, Peter and Jerry Morgan, eds. 1975. Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press

Coleman, Linda and Paul, Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: the English word lie. Language 57: 26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Linguistic politeness axes: speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander. Pragmatics Microfiche 1(7): A3. Cambridge University: Department of LinguisticsGoogle Scholar

Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1998. Situational meanings of Japanese social deixis: the mixed use of the masu and plain forms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(1): 87–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Croft, William 1993. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 335–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 1995. Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71: 490–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, Tony. 1996. Language in History: Theories and Texts. London: Routledge

Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cruse, D. Alan 2000. Meaning in Language: an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Culpeper, Jonathan and Elena, Semino. 2000. Constructing witches and spells: speech acts and activity types in Early Modern England. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlgren, Kathleen. 1978. The nature of linguistic stereotypes. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, and K. W. Todrys, eds., 58–70

Dahlgren, Kathleen 1985. Social terms and social reality. In Suzanne Romaine and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, eds., Folia Linguistica Historica 6: 107–125

Dancygier, Barbara. 1992. Two metatextual operators: negation and conditionality in English and Polish. In Laura A. Buszard-Welcher, Lionel Wee, and William Weigel, eds., Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 61–75. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Danet, Brenda. 1997. Speech, writing and performativity: an evolutionary view of the history of constitutive ritual. In Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell, and Bengt Nordberg, eds., The Construction of Professional Discourse, 1–41. London: Longman

Danet, Brenda and Bryna Bogoch. 1994. Orality, literacy, and performativity in Anglo-Saxon wills. In John Gibbon, ed., Language and the Law, 100–135. Harlow: Longman

Dasher, Richard B. 1983. The semantic development of honorific expressions in Japanese. Papers in Linguistics 2: 217–228Google Scholar

Dasher, Richard B. 1995. Grammaticalization in the System of Japanese Predicate Honorifics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Dekeyser, Xavier. 1998. Loss of prototypical meanings in the history of English semantics or semantic redeployment. In Hogg and van Bergen, 63–71

Denison, David. 1990. Auxiliary + impersonal in Old English. Folia Linguistica Historica 9: 139–166Google Scholar

Denison, David 1992. Counterfactual may have. In Gerritsen and Stein, 229–256

Denison, David 1993. English Historical Syntax. London: Longman

Denison, David 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine, ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. IV: 1776–1997, 92–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Derrig, Sandra. 1978. Metaphor in the color lexicon. In Farkas, Jacobsen, and Todrys, 85–96

Diewald, Gabriele. 1993. Zur Grammatikalisierung der Modalverben im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 12: 218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele 1999. Die Modalverben im Deutschen: Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität. Tübingen: Niemeyer

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary Dictionary of Old English: Dictionary of Old English Corpus in Electronic Form. Compiled by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler, and Antonette diPaolo Healey. University of Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. ()

Doi, Tadao, tr. 1955. Nihon daibunten [Translation of Arte da lingoa de Japam, by P. João Rodriguez (1604–8)]. Tokyo: Sanseido

Doi, Tadao, Takesi Morita, and Minoru Chonan, eds. 1980. Nippo Jisho [Modern Japanese translation of the Vocabulario da Lingoa de Iapam (Japanese–Portuguese dictionary, 1603)]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Dowty, David R. 1985. On recent analyses of the semantics of control. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 291–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, 343–365

Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. Operateurs argumentatifs et visée argumentative. Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise 5: 7–36Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin, eds. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University

Enkvist, Nils E. and Brita Wårvik. 1987. Old English Þ a, temporal chains, and narrative structure. In Giacalone Ramat, Carruba, and Bernini, 221–237

Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas, . 1993. Pragmaticalization: the case of bá and you know. Studier i modern språkvetenskap 10: 76–93. Stockholm: Almqvist WiksellGoogle Scholar

Ernst, Thomas Byden. 1984. Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Position in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club

Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Kei Nakamura, and Jiansheng Guo. 1995. Shifting face from Asia to Europe. In Shibatani and Thompson, 43–71

Evans, Nicholas. 1994. Kayardild. In Goddard and Wierzbicka, 203–228

Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Faingold, Eduardo D. 1991. Evidence of seventeenth century uses of shall and will compatible with markedness-reversal. Papiere zur Linguistik 44–45/1–2: 57–63Google Scholar

Faltz, Leonard M. 1989. A role for inference in meaning change. Studies in Language 13: 317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farkas, Donka, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys, eds. 1978. Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Polarity and the scale principle. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy Vance, eds., Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 188–199. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Ferrara, Kathleen. 1997. Form and function of the discourse marker anyway: implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics 35: 343–378

Fillmore, Charles J. 1978. On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In Farkas, Jacobsen, and Todrys, 148–173

Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quadierni di Semantica 6: 222–255Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1997 [1971]. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul, Kay, and O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: an introduction. In Stein and Wright, 1–15

Fischer, Olga. 1994. The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus 78: 137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1985. Historical Semantics: Historical Word-formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fleischman, Suzanne 1983. From pragmatics to grammar: diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua 60: 183–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1989. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language. 13: 1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1990. Tense and Narrativity: from Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press

Fleischman, Suzanne 1991. Discourse as space/discourse as time: reflections on the metalanguage of spoken and written discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne 1992. Discourse and diachrony: the rise and fall of Old French SI. In Gerritsen and Stein, 433–473

Fleischman, Suzanne and Marina Yaguello. Forthcoming. Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French. In C. L. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic, eds., Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge

Fong, Vivienne. 1997. The Order of Things: what Directional Locatives Denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University

Foolen, Ad. 1996. Pragmatic particles. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics 1996, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1991. The de dicto domain in language. In Traugott and Heine, vol. I: 218–251

Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In Cole and Morgan, 187–210

Fraser, Bruce 1988. Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38: 19–33Google Scholar

Fraser, Bruce 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Bruce 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6: 167–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, B. and Malamud-Makowski, M.. 1996. English and Spanish contrastive discourse markers. Language Sciences 18: 863–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Fries, Udo. 1998. Dialogue in instructional texts. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 85–96

Fritz, Gerd. 1998. Historische Semantik. Stuttgart: Metzler

Fujii, Noriko. 1991. Historical Discourse Analysis: Grammatical Subject in Japanese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Gamon, David. 1994. On the development of epistemicity in the German modal verbs mögen and müssen. Folia Linguistica Historica 14: 125–176Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1983. Reclassifying semantic change. Quadierni di Semantica 4: 217–240Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk 1992. Prototypicality effects in diachronic semantics: a round-up. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 183–203

Geeraerts, Dirk 1995. Specialization and reinterpretation in idioms. In Martin Everaert, Erik-Jan van der Linden, André Schenk, and Rob Schreuder, eds., Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, 57–73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Geeraerts, Dirk 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: a Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon

Geis, Michael L. and Arnold, M. Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: on Left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gerritsen, Marinell and Dieter Stein, eds. 1992. Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 2000. On some grammaticalization patterns for auxiliaries. In Smith and Bentley, 125–154

Giacalone Ramat, Anna, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini, eds. 1987. Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1993. Process and products in making sense of tropes. In 1993 edition of Ortony 1993 [1979] 252–276

Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press

Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka, eds. 1994. Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and Empirical Findings. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Goossens, Louis. 1982. The development of the modals and of the epistemic function in English. In Ahlqvist, 74–84

Goossens, Louis 1985. Framing the linguistic action scene in Old and Present-Day English: OE cwe an, secgan, sp(r)ecan and present-day English speak, talk, say, and tell compared. In Jacek Fisiak, ed., Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 149–170. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goossens, Louis 1987a. Modal tracks: the case of magan and motan. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, ed., Studies in Honor of René Derolez, 216–236. Genl. Seminarie voor Engelse en Oud-Germaanse Taalkunds

Goossens, Louis 1987b. Modal shifts and predication types. In Johan van der Auwera and Louis Goossens, eds., Ins and Outs of the Predication, 21–37. Dordrecht: Foris

Goossens, Louis 1992. Cunnan, conne(n), can: the development of a radial category. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 377–394

Goossens, Louis 1995a. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action. In Goossens et al., 159–174

Goossens, Louis 1995b. From three respectable horses' mouths: metonymy and conventionalization in a diachronically differentiated data base. In Goossens et al., 175–204

Goossens, Louis 1996. English Modals and Functional Models: a Confrontation. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 86. University of Antwerp

Goossens, Louis 1999. Metonymic bridges as modal shifts. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, ed., Metonymy on Language and thought, 193–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Goossens, Louis 2000. Patterns of meaning extension, “parallel chaining”, subjectification, and modal shifts. In Barcelona 2000a, 149–169

Goossens, Louis, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, and Johan Vanparys, eds. 1995. By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Belknap Press of Harvard University

Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966 [1963]. Some universals of language with particular reference to word order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg, ed., Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies, 178–194. The Hague: Mouton, 2nd ed

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, and Edith Moravcsik, eds., Universals of Human Language, vol. III: 249–295. Stanford: Stanford University Press

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1985. Some iconic relationships among place, time, and discourse deixis. In Haiman, 271–287

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1993. The second person is rightly so called. In Mushira Eid and Gregory Iverson, eds., Principles and Predictions: the Analysis of Natural Languages: Papers in Honor of Gerald Sanders, 9–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles A. Ferguson, Edith Moravcsik, eds. 1978. Universals of Human Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 4 vols

Grice, Paul. 1989 [1975]. Logic and conversation. In his Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Press. (Orig. publ. in Cole and Morgan 1975, 41–58.)

Groefsema, Marjolein. 1995. Can, may, must and should: a Relevance theoretic account. Journal of Linguistics 31: 53–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guiraud, Pierre. 1955. La sémantique. Que sais-je? 655. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris

Györi, Gábor. 1996. Historical aspects of categorization. In Casad, 175–206

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar. Language 56: 515–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John ed. 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Haiman, John and Sandra A. Thompson, eds. 1988. Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Halle, Morris. 1964. Phonology in generative grammar. In Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz, eds., The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, 334–352. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6: 322–365Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1977. Functional Linguistics. London: Arnold

Halliday, M. A. K. 1990. Linguistic perspectives on literacy: a systemic–functional approach. In F. Christie and E. Jenkins, eds., Literacy in Social Processes. Sidney: Literacy Technologies

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994 [1985]. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 2nd ed

Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman

Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, 46–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The Function of Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hanson, Kristin. 1987. On subjectivity and the history of epistemic expressions in English. Papers from the Twenty-third Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 133–147. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic SocietyGoogle Scholar

Harada, Shin-ichi. 1976. Honorifics. In Masayoshi Shibatani, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. V: Japanese Generative Grammar, 499–561. New York: Academic Press

Harkins, Jean. 1994. Bridging Two Worlds: Aboriginal English and Crosscultural Understanding. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press

Harkins, Jean 1995. Desire in Language and Thought: a Study in Crosscultural Semantics. PhD dissertation, Australian National University

Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Harris, Martin. 1978. The Evolution of French Syntax: a Comparative Approach. New York: Longman

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World's Languages. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 3. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA

Haspelmath, Martin 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?Studies in Language 22: 315–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hattori, Shiro. 1967. Descriptive linguistics in Japan. In Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. II: 530–584. The Hague: Mouton

Hayashi, Shiroo, and Fujio Minami, eds. 1973–74. Keigo Kooza [Monographs Series on Honorifics]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, 10 vols

Healey, Antonette di Paolo, et al. 1994. Dictionary of Old English, fascicle A. Microfiche, Dictionary of Old English Project, Center for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto

Heeschen, Volker. 1983. The metalinguistic vocabulary of a speech community in the Highlands of Irian Jaya (West New Guinea). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Publ. 15: Man, Culture, and Environment in the Highlands of Irian Jaya

Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heine, Bernd 1995. Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: some observations on German modals. In Bybee and Fleischman, 17–53

Heine, Bernd 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: a Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Heine, Bernd, Tom Güldemann, Christa Kilian-Katz, Donald A. Lessau, Heinz Roberg, Mathias Schladt, and Thomas Stolz. 1993. Conceptual Shift: a Lexicon of Grammaticalization Processes in African Languages. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 34/35. University of Cologne

Heine, Bernd and Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Buske

Held, Gudrun. 1999. Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations. Pragmatics 9: 21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herring, Susan C., Pieter van Reenen, and Lise Sch⊘sler, eds. 2000. Textual Parameters in Older Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Higgins, Roger. 1990. By mishap and out of control: on the meaningful descent of raising in English. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Hinds, John. 1976. Aspects of Japanese Discourse Structure. Tokyo: Kaitakusha

Hinds, John, Senko Maynard, and Shoichi Iwasaki, eds. 1987. Perspectives on Topicalization: the Case of Japanese wa. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hisatake, Akiko. 1974. Syoomotu, kirisitan siryoo no keigo [Honorifics in the Syoomotu (collections of Late Middle Japanese lecture notes and commentaries about literary or religious works) and Christian materials]. In Hayashi and Minami 1973–74, vol. III: 223–258

Hobbes, Thomas. 1969 [1650]. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. New York: Barnes and Noble, 2nd ed

Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991 [1986]. Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2nd ed

Hock, Hans Henrich and Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: an Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Hoenigswald, Henry H. 1992. Semantic change and “regularity”: a legacy of the past. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 85–105

Hogg, Richard M. and Linda van Bergen, eds. 1998. Historical Linguistics 1995, vol. II: Germanic Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Hopper, Paul J. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Talmy Givón, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and Syntax, 213–241. New York: Academic Press

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott and Heine, vol. I: 17–35

Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra, Annear Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles

Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications; Georgetown University Round Table ‘84, 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Horn, Laurence R. 1991. Given as new: when redundant affirmation isn't. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1998. Conditionals ‘R’ us: from IF to IFF via R-based implicature. Paper presented at Stanford University, May

Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman

Hughes, Geoffrey. 1992. Social factors in the formulation of a typology of semantic change. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 107–124

Iizumi, Rokuroo. 1963. Kido-airaku-go Ziten [Dictionary of Words for Emotions]. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan

Ipsen, G. 1924. Der alte Orient und die Indogermanen. In J. Friedrich et al., eds., Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft. Festschrift für Streitberg, 200–237. Heidelberg: Winter

Ishida, Takeshi. 1984. Conflict and its accommodation: omote-ura and uchi-soto relations. In Ellis Krauss, Thomas Rohlen, and Patricia Steinhoff, eds., Conflict in Japan, 16–38. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press

Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 28. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Jucker, 3–33

Jakobson, Roman. 1957. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): Harvard University Russian Language Project

Jakobson, Roman and Morris Halle. 1971. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton

Janda, Richard D. 1995. From agreement affix to subject “clitic” – and bound root: -mos > -nos vs. (-)nos(-) and nos-otros in New Mexican and other regional Spanish dialects. In Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need, and Sheri Pargman, eds., Papers from the Thirty-first Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. II: The Parasession on Clitics, 118–139. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin

Jucker, Andreas H., ed. 1995. Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jucker, Andreas H 1997. The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 1: 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma, Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1: 67–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. and Yael Ziv, eds., 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Justus, Carol F. 1993. Mood correspondences in older Indo-European prayer petitions. General Linguistics 33: 129–161Google Scholar

Kahr, Joan Casper. 1975. Adposition and locationals: typology and diachronic development. Working Papers on Language Universals 19: 21–54. Department of Linguistics, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar

Kakehi, Iori. 1980. Ueda Kazutosi [Biography of K. Ueda]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 58–59Google Scholar

Kakouriotis, Athanasios and Eliza Kitis. 1997. The case of “vob/lai” and other psychological verbs. In Amalia Mozer, ed., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 131–140. Athens: Ellinika Grammata

Karashima, Mie. 1993. Ru, raru no sonkei-yoohoo no hassei to tenkai: komonzyota no yoorei kara [Derivation and development of the honorific uses of -ru and -raru: based on examples taken from Komonjo [official documents] and other ancient texts]. Kokugogaku 172: 1–14Google Scholar

Katz, Jerrold J. and Jerry, A. Fodor. 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul. 1975. Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms. Language in Society 4: 257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul 1990. Even. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 59–111. (Repr. in Kay, 1997: 49–98.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Paul 1997. Words and the Grammar of Context. Stanford University: CSLI

Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard, Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: the Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. by Brigitte Nerlich. (Orig. publ. as Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache, Tübingen: Francke, 1990.)

Keller, Rudi 1995. The epistemic weil. In Stein and Wright, 16–30

Kellermann, Günter and Michael D. Morrissey, eds. 1992. Diachrony within Synchrony: Language History and Cognition. Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang

Kemenade, Ans. 1999. Functional categories, morphosyntactic change, grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 997–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Kempson, Ruth. 1980. Ambiguity and word meaning. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, eds., Studies in English linguistics, 7–16. London: Longman

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1994. Modality. In Asher and Simpson, vol. V: 2515–2520

Kiefer, Ferenc. 1997. Modality and pragmatics. Folia Linguistica. Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europeae 31: 241–253Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Yasuto. 1996. Keigo Sainyuumon [Re-introduction to (Japanese) Honorifics]. Tokyo: Maruzen

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982 [1968]. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Explanation in Phonology, 13–43. Dordrecht: Foris. (Orig. publ. in Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory, 171–202. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.)

Kiparsky, Paul 1992. Analogy. In William Bright, ed., International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, vol. I: 56–60. New York: Oxford University Press

Kiparsky, Paul 1995. Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds., Clause Structure and Language Change, 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Kleparski, Grzegorz. 1986. Semantic Change and Componential Analysis: an Inquiry into Pejorative Developments in English. Regensburg: Pustet

Kleparski, Grzegorz 1990. Semantic Change in English: a Study of Evaluative Developments in the Domain of Humans. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Kul

Kluge, F. and E. Seebold. 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter, 3rd ed

Kokugogaku Daijiten. [Dictionary of Japanese Linguistics]. 1980. Tokyo: Tokyodo Shuppan

Komatsu, Hideo. 1980. Zisyo [Dictionaries]. Kokugogaku Daijiten, 460–464Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly, and e, eds., On Conditionals, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

König, Ekkehard 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: a Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge

König, Ekkehard and Peter Siemund. 1999. Intensifiers as targets and sources of semantic change. In Blank and Koch, 237–257

König, Ekkehard and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1982. Divergence and apparent convergence in the development of “yet” and “still.” In Monica Macaulay, Orin Gensler, Claudia Brugman, Inese Civkulis, Amy Dahlstrom, Katherine Krile, and Rob Sturm, eds., Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 170–179. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Kopytko, Roman. 1993. Polite Discourse in Shakespeare's English. Poznan: Adam Miskiewicz University Press

Kopytko, Roman 1995. Linguistic politeness strategies in Shakespeare's plays. In Jucker, 515–540

Kortmann, Bernd. 1992. Reanalysis completed and in progress: participles as sources of prepositions and conjunctions. In Kellermann and Morrissey, 429–453

Kortmann, Bernd 1997. Adverbial Subordination: a Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. The scope of metaphor. In Barcelona 2000a, 79–92

Kövecses, Zoltán and Günter Radden, . 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koyama, Hiroshi, ed. and annot. 1960. Kyoogen-syuu [Anthology of Kyogen Plays]. Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei (NKBT) series 42. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten

Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronasser, Heinz. 1952. Handbuch der Semasiologie: Kurze Einführung in die Geschichte, Problematik und Terminologie der Bedeutungslehre. Heidelberg: Winter

Kroon, Caroline H. C. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin: a Study of Nam, Enim, Autem, Vero and At. Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 4. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben

Krug, Manfred G. 1998. Gotta – the tenth central modal in English? Social, stylistic and regional variation in the British National Corpus as evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. In Hans Lindquist, Staffen Klintborg, Magnus Levin, and Maria Estling, eds., The Major Varieties of English: Papers from MAVEN 97, 177–191. Växjö: Acta Wexioninsia

Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: a Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. 1998. Pragmatic markers in Early Modern English court trials. In Borgmeier, Grabes, and Jucker, 47–56

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3rd ed

Kuno, Susumo. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Kuno, Susumo and Etsuko, Kaburaki. 1977. Empathy and syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 627–672Google Scholar

Kuroda. S.-Y. 1973. Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet: a case study from Japanese. In Stephen R. Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, eds., A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 377–391. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1975. Metaphor and metonymy. Esquisses Linguistiques, vol. II: 88–92. Munich: Wilhelm FinkGoogle Scholar

Kurzon, Dennis. 1986. It is Hereby Performed: Legal Speech Acts. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Frankfurt-am-Main: Peter Lang

Kytö, Merja 1993 [1991]. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press

Labov, William. 1974. On the use of the present to explain the past. In Luigi Heilman, ed., Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists, 825–852. Bologna: Mulino

Labov, William 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, and Gloria G. Phares, eds., Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183–225. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: what Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press

Lakoff, George 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In 1993 edition of Ortony 1993 [1974], 202–251

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lakoff, Robin. 1972. Language in context. Language 48: 907–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles Li, ed., Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press

Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In Haiman, 109–150

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987/91. Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2 vols

Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1993. Universals of construal. In Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser, and Cheryl C. Zoll, eds., Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 447–463. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71: 1–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Losing control: grammaticalization, subjectification, and transparency. In Blank and Koch, 147–175

Lass, Roger. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lass, Roger 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lass, Roger 2000. Remarks on (Uni)directionality. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, and Dieter Stein, eds., Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 207–227. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1970. Towards a Semantic Description of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Legge, James. 1984. The Chinese Classics II: The Works of Mencius. Oxford: Oxford Press

Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Haiman and Thompson, 181–225

Lehmann, Christian 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA. (Orig. publ. as Thoughts on Grammaticalization: a Programmatic Sketch, vol. I. Arbeiten Des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48. Cologne: University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, 1982.)

Lehmann, Winfred P. and Yakov Malkiel, eds. 1968. Directions for Historical Linguistics: a Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1974. Semantic Fields And Lexical Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland

Lehrer, Adrienne 1985. The influence of semantic fields on semantic change. In Fisiak, 283–295

Lehrer, Adrienne and Eva Feder Kittay, eds. 1992. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Lehti-Eklund, Hanna. 1990. Från Adverb till Markör i Text. Studier i Semantisk-syntaktisk Utveckling i Äldre Svenska. Helsingfors: Humanistika Avhandlingar

Lepschy, Giulio. 1981. Enantiosemy and irony in Italian lexis. The Italianist 1: 82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: at the Syntax–Lexical Semantics Interface. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 25. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. Pragmatics and social deixis: reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. In John Kingston, Eve E. Sweetser, James Collins, Huruko Kawasaki, John Manley-Baser, Dorothy W. Marschak, Catherine O'Connor, David Shaul, Marta Tobey, Henry Thompson, and Katherine Turner, eds., Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 206–223. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Levinson, Stephen C.1995. Three levels of meaning. In F. R. Palmer, ed., Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honor of Sir John Lyons, 90–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Levinson, Stephen C.2000. Presumptive Meanings: the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press, Bradford

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 1985. On semantic change in a dynamic model of language. In Fisiak, 297–323

Lewin, Bruno, ed. 1969. Beiträge zum Interpersonalen Bezug im Japanischen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz

Li, Dong-yi. 1992. Hanzi Yanbian Wubaili [The Evolution of Five Hundred Chinese Characters]. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press, 3rd ed., revised

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67: 474–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Lightfoot, David 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, manner adverb(ial): MIT Press

Lightfoot, David 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Malden, manner adverb(ial): Blackwell