Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:43:14.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Relational Egalitarianism
Living as Equals
, pp. 239 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, E. (1999). What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109(2), 287337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2008a). Expanding the Egalitarian Toolbox: Equality and Bureaucracy. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 82(1), 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2008b). How Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks? Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9(1), 239–70.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2010a). The Fundamental Disagreement between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 40, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2010b). The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2012a). Equality. In Estlund, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4057.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2012b). Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Institutions. Social Epistemology 26(2), 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. (2015). Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Justice. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/#auth [last accessed 16 May 2017].Google Scholar
Anderson, E. and Pildes, R. H. (2000). Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148(5), 1503–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56(1), 7793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, R. (1999a). What, if Anything, Renders All Humans Morally Equal? In Jamieson, D. (ed.), Singer and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 103–28.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1999b). Egalitarianism and Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 3(3), 225–47.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (2000). Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism. Ethics 111(2), 339–49.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (2006). What Is Wrongful Discrimination? San Diego Journal of Law 43(4), 775807.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (2010). Democratic Equality and Relating as Equals. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 40, 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsen, D. and Nielsen, L. (2015). Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress. Journal of Political Philosophy 23(4), 406–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. (2015). Conceptions and Dimensions of Social Equality. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6586.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (1989). Theories of Justice, Vol. I. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. (2013). The Standing to Blame: A Critique. In Coates, D. J. and Tognazzini, N. A. (eds.), Blame: Its Nature and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, 263–81.Google Scholar
Bidadanure, J. (2016). Making Sense of Age-group Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15(3), 234–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. (2014). Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2014). What Should Egalitarians Believe if they Really are Egalitarian? A Reply to Martin O’Neill. European Journal of Political Theory 13(4), 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (1987 [1790]). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Caney, S. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, I. (2011). Respect and the Basis of Equality. Ethics 121(3), 538–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, P. (2007). Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough. Ethics 117(2), 296326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2000). If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2009). Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2011). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice: And Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (2013). Finding Oneself in the Other. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordelli, C. (2015). Justice as Fairness and Relational Resources. Journal of Political Philosophy 23(1), 86110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R. (2003). Equality, Priority and Compassion. Ethics 113(4), 745–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. (2000). Morally Speaking. In Ullmann-Margalit, E. (ed.), Reasoning Practically. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 182–8.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1994) Life’s Dominion. New York: Random Hounce Inc.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fabre, C. (2007). Justice in a Changing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fabre, C. (2018). Economic Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fourie, C. (2012). What Is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal. Res Publica 18(2), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, C. (2015). To Praise and to Scorn. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87106.Google Scholar
Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.) (2015). Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourie, C. and Rid, A. (eds.) (2017). What Is Enough? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1988). The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (1999). Necessity, Volition and Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Honneth, A. (2003). Recognition or Redistribution. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, J. (2016). What We Owe to Hypocrites: Contractualism and the Speaker-Relativity of Justification. Philosophy & Public Affairs 44(4), 223–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrau, M. and Laborde, C. (2015). Relational Equality, Non-Domination and Vulnerability. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4564.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1956). Good and Evil. Analysis 17(2), 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheaus, A. (2016). Hikers in Flip-Flops: Luck-Egalitarianism, Democratic Equality and the Distribuenda of Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy, online first, 116.Google Scholar
Gosseries, A. and Meyer, L. H. (eds.) (2009). Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (1986). Well-Being. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. and Waldren, M. S. (2011). Egalitarianism Reconsidered. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8(4), 567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, D. (2008). When Is Discrimination Wrong? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, T. (2001). Must Egalitarians Choose between Fairness and Respect? Philosophy & Public Affairs 30(1), 7287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, I. (2015). Egalitarianism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holroyd, J. (2017). The Social Psychology of Discrimination. In Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Discrimination. London: Routledge, 381–93.Google Scholar
Holtug, N. (2010). Persons, Interests and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, B. (2005). Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8(4), 329–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (2004 [1751]). An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (2003). Justice, Luck and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huseby, R. (2010). Sufficiency: Restated and Defended. Journal of Political Philosophy 18(2), 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, R. and Lance, M. (2009). ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, R. (1993). Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(4), 293330.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2001). Equality, Option Luck and Responsibility. Ethics 111(3), 548–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2006). The Badness of Discrimination. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9(2), 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2008). Publicity and Egalitarian Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5(1), 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2011). Luck-Egalitarianism: Faults and Collective Choice. Economics and Philosophy 27(2), 151–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2012). Who Can I Blame? In Kühler, M. and Jelinek, N. (eds.), Autonomy and the Self. Dordrecht: Springer, 295316.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2013a). Born Free and Equal? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2013b). Offensive Preferences, Snobbish Tastes and Egalitarian Justice. Journal of Social Philosophy 44(4), 439–58. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2014). Justice and Bad Luck. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-bad-luck/ [last accessed 16 May 2017].Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2015a). Luck Egalitarianism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2015b). Luck Egalitarianism versus Relational Egalitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45(2), 220–41. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2017) (Luck and Relational) Egalitarians of the World, Unite! Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 4, 81109.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2018a). Affirmative Action and Relational Egalitarianism. In Collins, H. and Khaitan, T. (eds.), Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 173–96.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2018b). Reply to Critics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, online first.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (forthcoming). Discrimination and Disrespect. In Hurd, H. (ed.), Festschrift for Larry Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1960 [1689]). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, A. (2015). Justice, Respect and Treating People as Equals. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Wallimann-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–45.Google Scholar
McKerlie, D. (1996). Equality. Ethics 106(2), 274–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerlie, D. (2012). Justice between the Young and the Old. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, J. (2002). The Ethics of Killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miklosi, Z. (2017). Varieties of Relational Egalitarianism. Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 4, 110140.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1972 [1861]). Utilitarianism, On Liberty, and Considerations on Representative Government. London: J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1988 [1869]). The Subjection of Women. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1995). Complex Equality. In Miller, D. and Walzer, M. (eds.), Pluralism, Justice and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (1998). Equality and Justice. In Mason, A. (ed.), Ideals of Equality. Oxford: Blackwell, 2136.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2012). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2015). Foreword. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Wallimann-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, viixi.Google Scholar
Moles, A. and Parr, T. (2018). Distributions and Relations: A Hybrid Account. Political Studies, online first.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1989 [1903]). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2), 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, R. (2011). Equal Standing in the Global Community. The Monist 94(4), 593614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, R. (2015). On the Scope and Grounds of Social Equality. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Wallimann-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 186208.Google Scholar
Navin, M. (2011). Luck and Oppression. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14(5), 533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, R. (1998). The Social Basis of Equality. In Mason, A. (ed.), Ideals of Equality. Oxford: Blackwell, 3751.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
O’Neill, M. (2008). What Should Egalitarians Believe? Philosophy & Public Affairs 36(2), 119–56.Google Scholar
Otsuka, M. (2004). Equality, Ambition and Insurance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 78, 151–66.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1998). Equality and Priority. In Mason, A. (ed.), Ideals of Equality. Oxford: Blackwell, 120.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (2000). Equality or Priority? Lindley Lectures Delivered at the University of Kansas. Lawrence, Kansas: 1991. In Clayton, M. and Williams, A. (eds.), The Ideal of Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 81125.Google Scholar
Persson, I. (2001). Equality, Priority and Person-Affecting Value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4(1), 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plato, (1983 [377–370 BC]). The Republic. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2006). Relational Conception of Justice: Responsibility for Health Outcomes. In Anand, S., Peter, F. and Sen, A. (eds.), Public Health, Ethics and Equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 135–61.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. (2008). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, Revised Version. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001a). Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001b). Justice as Fairness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Risse, M. (2015). On Global Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (forthcoming). Having Too Much. In Knight, J. and Schwartzberg, M. (eds.), NOMOS LVI: Wealth. Yearbook of American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. (1973 [1754]). A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2000). The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2008). Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, T. (1999). What Is a Child? Ethics 109(4), 715–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (1982). The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2003a). What Is Egalitarianism? Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(1), 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2003b). Equality as the Virtue of Sovereigns: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin. Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(2), 199206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2005). Choice, Circumstance and the Value of Equality. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4(4), 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2006). Is the Basic Structure Basic? In Sypnowich, C. (ed.), The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 102–29.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2015). The Practice of Equality. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2144.Google Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2011). Why Relational Egalitarians Should Care about Distributions. Social Theory and Practice 37(3), 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2012a). Distributive and Relational Equality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 11(2), 123–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2012b). Luck Egalitarianism as Democratic Reciprocity: A Response to Tan. Journal of Philosophy 109(7), 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmel, C. (2015). Social Equality – Or Just Justice? In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 146–66.Google Scholar
Schuppert, F. (2015). Being Equals. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107–26.Google Scholar
Segall, S. (2013). Equality and Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, S. (2016). Incas and Aliens: The Truth in Telic Egalitarianism. Economics and Philosophy 32(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1979). Equality of What? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/documents/a-to-z/s/sen80.pdf [last accessed 16 May 2017].Google Scholar
Sher, G. (2006). In Praise of Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, L. (2012). The Prospects for Sufficientarianism. Utilitas 24(1), 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. (1990). Animal Liberation, 2nd edn. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. (2007). Ten Moral Paradoxes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. M. (2007). On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible. Journal of Ethics 11(4), 465–84.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. (2011). Reconciling Two Egalitarian Visions. In Knight, C. and Stemplowska, Z. (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–35.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48, 125.Google Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2008). A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Philosophy 105, 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K.-C. (2014). Justice, Institutions and Luck: The Site, Ground and Scope of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. (1993). Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, P. (2017). A Unified Account of the Moral Standing to Blame. Noûs, online first, 127.Google Scholar
Tomlin, P. (2015). What Is the Point of Egalitarian Social Relationships? In Kaufman, A. (ed.), Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–79.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, K. (forthcoming). No Discrimination in Disapproval: Basic Equality Does Not Explain the Wrongness of Hypocritical Condemnation.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, P. (2015). Justice, Interpersonal Morality and Luck Egalitarianism. In Kaufman, A. (ed.), Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–9.Google Scholar
Voigt, K. (2017). Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen:Luck Egalitarianism. Ethics 127(4), 939–43.Google Scholar
Voigt, K. (forthcoming). Rational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2010). Hypocrisy, Moral Address and the Equal Standing of Persons. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(4), 307–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. J. (2011). Dispassionate Opprobrium: On Blame and the Reactive Emotions. In Wallace, R. J., Kumar, R. and Freeman, S. (eds.), Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 348–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1998). Incentives, Inequality and Publicity. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27(3), 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27(2), 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. (2010). Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos Revisited. Journal of Ethics 14(3/4), 335–50.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. (2015). Social Equality and Social Inequality. In Fourie, C., Schuppert, F. and Walliman-Helmer, I. (eds.), Social Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209–25.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×