Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-28gj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:42:08.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Managing religions: liberal and authoritarian states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Bryan S. Turner
Affiliation:
City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

When sociologists refer to ‘the management of religion’ or the crisis of multiculturalism or the problems of secularism, they are essentially talking about how modern liberal states respond to the radicalisation of modern religions, that is, to the alleged ‘depersonalisation’ of religion (Casanova, 1994) or, more crudely, to ‘fundamentalism’. In this context, the particular issues surrounding Muslim minorities in non-Muslim secular states can be seen as simply one instance of the more general problem of state and religion in modern multicultural societies. There is some agreement that virtually all modern societies are multicultural. Because in practice it is difficult to separate ‘religion’ from ‘culture’, all multicultural societies are by definition multi-faith societies. Therefore any policy relating to multiculturalism is automatically a policy about religion. Despite the separation of church and state in liberal constitutions, modern governments find themselves dragged into forming religious policies, however implicit or covert, in order to manage the resulting tensions between competing religious traditions. This development is one reason for the growth of political interest in religion, not necessarily because of ‘re-sacralisation’ but simply because ‘identity politics’ means ‘religion and politics’. Much of the literature has been concentrated on religion in Western liberal societies, where Islam, as a result of large-scale migration and settlement, has been seen as a threat to democratic cultures. In addition, there is the argument that societies that have experienced very rapid waves of migration, and as a result have become diverse ethnic societies, have experienced a decline in public commitment to taxation to support welfare states (Freeman, 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Religion and Modern Society
Citizenship, Secularisation and the State
, pp. 175 - 193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×