Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Rituals, Beliefs, and Practices
- Part II Religious Demographics in the Armed Forces
- Part III Religion and Military Operations
- Part IV Constitutional Challenges
- 8 United States I
- 9 United States II
- 10 Turkey
- Conclusion
- Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
10 - Turkey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Rituals, Beliefs, and Practices
- Part II Religious Demographics in the Armed Forces
- Part III Religion and Military Operations
- Part IV Constitutional Challenges
- 8 United States I
- 9 United States II
- 10 Turkey
- Conclusion
- Contributor Biographies
- Index
- References
Summary
The Turkish Republic is a secular country with a Muslim majority. Less than 1 percent of its population consists of non-Muslims. Even though Turkey has been a multiparty democracy since the 1950s, the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) has traditionally enjoyed a very influential position in Turkish politics. The TAF has proven highly protective of Turkey’s secular identity and has intervened in Turkish politics multiple times to block Islamist influence. Despite its thoroughly secular founding principles, however, the TAF routinely employs religious rituals and symbols to increase troop morale, similar to its predecessor, the Ottoman military. Historically, the role and function of religion in the TAF has undergone significant changes, often in response to changing political environments.
This chapter sketches some of the contrasting tendencies that coexist in the TAF. We argue that Islamic symbols and practices in the contemporary military originated during the Ottoman Empire, where they played a central role. Its successor, the Turkish Republic, redefined the space allotted to Islam and chose to maintain an ambiguous relationship with religion. The Republic adopted a strict form of secularism that required the removal of Islam from the new military’s official training and institutional structure. Unlike the Ottoman military, the TAF does not retain official chaplains, and it confines the religious practices of troops to the private sphere. At the same time, the TAF routinely employs religious symbols and concepts to boost the combat morale of its soldiers. These include Islamic concepts, such as shahid (martyrdom) and ghazi (war veteran), which date back to the Ottoman Empire. Islamic symbols are also freely used when they are considered useful for enhancing social cohesion. Finally, the TAF treats its religious staff as temporary, creating their positions in an ad hoc manner for the duration of military campaigns. This further signifies the subordination of religion to the TAF’s secular principles.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Religion in the Military Worldwide , pp. 208 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
, Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
and , eds., State, Democracy, and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1988)
, Islamic Political Identity in Turkey (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)
and , “The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research,” Social Research Update 25, University of Surrey (Summer 1999)Google Scholar
and , Hierarchy: Persistence and Transformation in Social Formations (New York: Berghahn Books, 2009): 185–187
, Osmanlı Tarihi, vol. 3/1 (Ankara: TTK, 1995): 348–349
, “Osmanlı Ordusunda Moral Yükseltici bir Kurum olarak Ordu Şeyhliği,” Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1 (2008): 174–176Google Scholar
, Osmanlı Devleti Teşkilatından Kapukulu Ocakları, Acemi Ocağı ve Yeniçeri Ocağı, vol. 1 (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, 1984): 232–233
, Osmanlı Döneminde İmamlar ve Bir İmamın Günlüğü (İstanbul: Tarih ve Tabiat Vakfı Yayınları, 2001)
, “Ordu Şeyhi,” Osmanlı Tarih Deyimleri ve Terimleri Sözlüğü, vol. 2 (Istanbul: MEB Yayını, 1971): 729
,” TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, vol. 2 (Istanbul: Türk Diyanet Vakfı, 1989): 348
, “Cumhuriyet Devrinde ‘Askere Din Dersleri,’ İyi Asker İyi Müslüman, İyi Müslüman İyi Asker Olur,” Toplumsal Tarih, issue 166 (December 2007): 49Google Scholar
, “The Ottoman Conscription System in Theory and Practice,” Arming the State (London: I. B. Tauris, 1999): 88
, ed., The Middle East and North Africa in World Politics: A Documentary Record (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975)
, Osmanlı Tarihi, vol. 6 (Ankara: TTK, 1954): 160
, Maruzat (Istanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 1980): s.114
, Tezakir (Ankara: TTK, 1986)
, The War Correspondence of Leon Trotsky: The Balkan Wars 1912–13 (New York: Monad Press; Sydney: Pathfinder Press, 1980): 194
, Amele Taburları (Istanbul: IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 2007): 47–49
, With the Turks in Palestine (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1916): 23–24
, Gallipoli Mission (Sydney: ABC Books, 1990): 189
, “Şeyh Edebali ve Milli Mücadele’de Bilecik Müftüsü Mehmet Nuri Efendi,” Diyanet İlmî Dergi, vol. 30, no. 3 (July, August, September 1994): 15–24Google Scholar
, Gayrimüslim Mehmetçikler: Hatıralar – Tanıklıklar (İstanbul: Libra Kitap, 2011).
, Bir Türkleştirme Serüveni (1923–1945): Cumhuriyet Yıllarında Türkiye Yahudileri (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1999): 408–423
Devletin Yahudileri ve Öteki Yahudi (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2004): 301–307
, ed., Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, vol. 1 (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2001)
, Ordu ve Din (Istanbul: Berfin Yayınları, 2008): 154–155
, “Din-u Devlet All Over Again? The Politics of Military Secularism and Religious Militarism in Turkey Following the 1980 Coup,” International Journal of Middle East Studies vol. 34, no. 1 (February 2002): 116Google Scholar
, Ortaokullar için Din Kültürü ve Ahlak Bilgisi 3 (Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1987): 115
, İki Darbe Arasında (Istanbul: Kapı Yayınları, 2010): 84–87
, ed., Türk Dış Politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, vol. 2 (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2001)
, “Turkey: Return to Stability?” Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 35, no. 4 (October 1999): 209–234Google Scholar
, , and , İmam Hatip Liseleri: Efsaneler ve Gerçekler (Istanbul: TESEV, 2004): 89
, “Demythologyzing the National Security Concept: The Case of Turkey,” Middle East Journal, vol. 57, no. 2 (Spring 2003): 218Google Scholar
, Between Fact and Fantasy: Turkey’s Ergenekon Investigation (Washington, DC: Central Asia–Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, 2009)
, “Civil-Military Relations in Turkey: Toward a Liberal Model?” Turkish Studies, vol. 12, no. 2 (June 2011): 241–252Google Scholar
, “Ergenekon, New Pacts, and the Decline of the Turkish ‘Inner State’,” *Turkish Studies*, vol, 12, no. 2 (June 2011): 227–239Google Scholar
, “A Paradigmatic Shift for the Turkish Generals and an End to the Coup Era in Turkey,” Middle East Journal 63, no. 4 (Autumn 2009): 581–596Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 2
- Cited by