Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-gx2m9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-30T21:05:15.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Stephen Pihlaja
Affiliation:
Newman University, Birmingham
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Religious Talk Online
The Evangelical Discourse of Muslims, Christians, and Atheists
, pp. 171 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, H. Porter. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abboud, Peter F. (1988). Speech and religious affiliation in Egypt. In Jazayery, Mohammad Ali & Winter, Walter (Eds.), Language and cultures: Studies in honor of Edgar C. Polome (pp. 2127). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Dominic, & Hogg, Michael. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In Dovidio, J., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., and Esses, V. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179193). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446200919.n11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamic, Lada, & Glance, Natalie. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Al-Rawi, Ahmed. (2016). Facebook as a virtual mosque: The online protest against innocence of Muslims. Culture and Religion, 17(1), 1934. doi:10.1080/14755610.2016.1159591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allington, Daniel. (2007). “How come most people don’t see it?”: Slashing the Lord of the Rings. Social Semiotics, 17(1), 4362.10.1080/10350330601124650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allington, Daniel, & Swann, Joan. (2009). Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature, 18(3), 219230.10.1177/0963947009105850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jon W. (2003). The Internet and Islam’s new interpreters. In Eickelman, Dale F & Anderson, Jon W (Eds.), New media in the Muslim world: The emerging public sphere (pp. 4560). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet, 5. Retrieved from www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. (2010). Localising the global on the participatory web. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Handbook of language and globalization (pp. 201231). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444324068.ch9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context and Media, 4–5, 6273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo, & Tseliga, Theodora. (2010). “You have no idea what you are talking about!”: From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 6(1), 5782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arensberg, Conrad M. (1954). The community-study method. American Journal of Sociology, 60(2), 109124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, Patricia, Milosevic, Tijana, & Bello, Brian. (2015). The impact of copyright permissions culture on the US visual arts community: The consequences of fear of fair use. New Media and Society, 18(9), 20122027. doi:10.1177/1461444815575018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Mahmoud. (1995). Jesus the Son of God: A study of the terms Ibn and Walad in the Qu’ran and Tafsir tradition. In Haddad, Ybonne Yazbeck & Haddad, Wadi (Eds.), Christian-Muslim encounters (pp. 6581). Gainsville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350933996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, & McEnery, Tony. (2013). Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. (1981). The Dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Austin Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42posCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. In Bamberg, Michael & Andrews, Molly (Eds.), Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (pp. 351371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, Monisha. (2007). Blasphemy site “playing texas hold ‘em with eternity.” Retrieved from www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200702/CUL20070205a.htmlGoogle Scholar
Barker, Valerie, Dozier, David M, Weiss, Amy Schmitz, & Borden, Diane L. (2015). Harnessing peer potency: Predicting positive outcomes from social capital affinity and online engagement with participatory websites. New Media and Society, 17(10), 16031623. doi:10.1177/1461444814530291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Emma. (January 11, 2010). Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg says privacy is no longer a “social norm.” The Telegraph. Retrieved from www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/6966628/Facebooks-Mark-Zuckerberg-says-privacy-is-no-longer-a-social-norm.htmlGoogle Scholar
Baron, Naomi. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, Karine, & Barzilai, Gad. (2005). Cultured technology: The Internet and Religious Fundamentalism. The Information Society, 21(1), 2540.10.1080/01972240590895892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, David W. (1989). Evangelicalism in modern Britain: A history from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, Carmen. (2011). Muslims on the path of the Salaf al-Salih. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 11811203. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.597414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermingham, Adam, Conway, Maura, McInerney, Lisa, O’Hare, Neil, & Smeaton, Alan. (July 20–22, 2009). Combining social network analysis and sentiment analysis to explore the potential for online radicalisation. Paper presented at ASONAM 2009 – Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, July 20–22, 2009, Athens, Greece.10.1109/ASONAM.2009.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, John. (2007). YouTube launches revenue sharing partners program, but no pre-rolls. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/youtube-launches-revenue-sharing-partners-program-but-no-pre-rolls/Google Scholar
Bijlefeld, Willem A. (1995). Christian-Muslim studies, Islamic studies, and the future of Christian-Muslim encounter. In Haddad, Ybonne Yazbeck & Haddad, Wadi (Eds.), Christian-Muslim encounters (pp. 1340). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 73, 1936. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
boyd, danah. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 3958). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
boyd, danah, & Ellison, Nicole. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210230. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2007.00393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandtzæg, Petter Bae, Lüders, Marika, & Skjetne, Jan Håvard. (2010). Too many facebook “friends”? content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11–12), 10061030. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Steve. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broxton, Tom, Interian, Yannet, Vaver, Jon, & Wattenhofer, Mirjam. (2011). Catching a viral video. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 40(2), 241259. doi:10.1007/s10844-011–0191–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckman, Amy. (2002). Ethical Guidelines for Research Online. Retrieved from www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/ethicsGoogle Scholar
Bunt, Gary R. (2009). iMuslims: Rewiring the house of Islam. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Jean, & Green, Joshua. (October 15–18, 2008). Agency and controversy in the YouTube community. Paper presented at the Internet Research 9.0: Rethinking Community, Rethinking Place, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Burgess, J., and Green, J. (2009). YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Caers, Ralf, De Feyter, Tim, De Couck, Marijke, Stough, Talia, Vigna, Claudia, & Du Bois, Cind. (2013). Facebook: A literature review. New Media and Society, 15(6), 9821002. doi:10.1177/1461444813488061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lynne. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18(2), 197222.10.1177/0957926507073376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2011). Metaphor and reconciliation: The discourse dynamics of empathy in post-conflict conversations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2015). Embracing connectedness and change: A complex dynamic systems perspective for applied linguistic research. AILA Review, 28(1), 2848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, & Maslen, Rob (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi A. (2012). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, H. A. (2005). Exploring religious community online: We are one in the network. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Campbell, Heidi A., & Lövheim, Mia. (2011). Introduction. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 10831096. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.597416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheong, Pauline Hope, Huang, Shirlena, & Poon, Jessie P. H. (2011). Cultivating online and offline pathways to enlightenment. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 11601180. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.579139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimino, Richard, & Smith, Christopher. (2007). Secular humanism and atheism beyond progressive secularism. Sociology of Religion, 68(4), 407424.10.1093/socrel/68.4.407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimino, R., and Smith, C. (2011). The new atheism and the formation of the imagined secularist community. Journal of Media and Religion, 10(1), 2438. doi:10.1080/15348423.2011.549391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimino, R., and Smith, C. (2014). Atheist awakening: Secular activism and community in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca, & Helani, Fadi. (2010). Inshallah: Religious invocations in Arabic topic transition. Language in Society, 39(03), 357382.10.1017/S0047404510000199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. (2012). YouTube gives 24-karat gold “play button” to channels with 1m+ subs. Tubefilter. Retrieved from www.tubefilter.com/2012/06/29/youtube-gold-play-button-million-subscribers/Google Scholar
Cosentino, Victor J. (1994). Virtual legality. Byte, 19(3), 278.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. (1993). Theism, atheism, and big bang cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Creese, Angela. (2008). Linguistic ethnography. In Hornberger, Nancy- (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, vol. 2 (pp. 229241). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Stuart, Craig, David, & Silver, Jon. (2016). YouTube, multichannel networks and the accelerated evolution of the new screen ecology. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(4), 376391. doi:10.1177/1354856516641620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Dembski, William A. (2002). Intelligent design: The bridge between science and theology. Champaign-Urbana, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Dorst, Aletta, & Klop, Marry-Loïse. (2017). Not a Holy Father: Dutch Muslim teenagers’ metaphors for Allah. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(1), 6787.10.1075/msw.7.1.05dorCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Charlie, & Gribbon, Luke. (2013). Pathways to violent extremism in the digital era. The RUSI Journal, 158(5), 4047. doi:10.1080/03071847.2013.847714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Lee, Klein, Bethany, Lee, David, Moss, Giles, & Philip, Fiona. (2013). Framing the consumer: Copyright regulation and the public. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(1), 924. doi:10.1177/1354856512456788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Nicole B., Steinfield, Charles, & Lampe, Cliff. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 11431168. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2007.00367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Carl. (2004). Rethinking Islam in the contemporary world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Eronen, Maria. (2014). Moral argumentation as a rhetorical practice in popular online discourse: Examples from online comment sections of celebrity gossip. Discourse and Communication, 8(3), 278298. doi:10.1177/1750481313510818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, John L. (Ed.). (2003). The Oxford dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ess, Charles. (1996). Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Estes, Douglas. (2009). SimChurch: Being the church in the virtual world. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Etling, Bruce, Kelly, John, Faris, Robert, & Palfrey, John. (2014). Mapping the Arabic blogosphere: Politics, culture, and dissent. Retrieved from www.ikhwanweb.com/uploads/lib/HNFNAB99APYNXAK.pdf10.1057/9781137403155_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
Feinberg, John S. (2013). Can you believe it’s true?: Christian apologetics in a modern and postmodern era. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Google Scholar
Fernback, Jan, & Thompson, Brad. (1995). Virtual communities: Abort, retry, failure? International Communication Association. Retrieved from www.rheingold.com/texts/techpolitix/VCcivil.htmlGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, Joshua. (2016a). 7 more officers shot!! I have a solution … Retrieved from www.facebook.com/joshua.feuerstein.5/videos/804387082997309/Google Scholar
Feuerstein, J. (2016b). Personal Facebook page. Retrieved from www.facebook.com/joshua.feuerstein.5/Google Scholar
Fossheim, Hallvard, & Ingierd, Helene (Eds.). (2015). Internet research ethics. Kristiansand, Norway: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1981). The orders of discourse. In Young, Robert (Ed.), Untying the Text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freund, Katharina. (2014). “Fair use is legal use”: Copyright negotiations and strategies in the fan-vidding community. New Media and Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814555952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Christian. (2012). The Political Economy of Privacy on Facebook. Television and New Media, 13(2), 139159. doi:10.1177/1527476411415699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Noam, Shifman, Limor, and Kampf, Zohar. (2015). “It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media and Society, 1698–1714. doi:10.1177/1461444814568784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. (2015). Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances. Discourse, Context and Media, 9, 6472. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgalou, Mariza. (2016). ‘I make the rules on my Wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook. Discourse and Communication, 10(1), 4064. doi:10.1177/1750481315600304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. (2011). The Allegorical Impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilesnan, Michael. (2000). Recognizing islam: Religion and society in the modern arab world. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Marie, Herbert, David, and Greenhill, Anita (Eds.). (2013). Social Media and Religious Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110270488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Hugh. (2000). A history of Christian-Muslim relations. Chicago: New Amsterdam Books.10.5771/9781461636212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, Gerard. (2014). Facebook’s mobile career. New Media and Society, 16(7), 10681086. doi:10.1177/1461444814543996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Eric, and e Silva, Adriana de Souza. (2011). Net locality: Why location matters in a networked world. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, Peter, and Greenberg, Gabriel. (2008). Islamophobia: Making Muslims the enemy. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman and Littlefield Pub Inc.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph Edward. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph, Oakley, Todd, and Coulson, Sean. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In Gibbs, Raymond W. and Steen, Gerard (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.175.07graCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage Lambert. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 742759. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Hilary. (2015). Former Pastor Suggests Christians Should Fight Gay Rights with Guns. www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/christians-gay-rights-guns_55abeacee4b065dfe89e989a (Accessed on December 11, 2015).Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6, 215).Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and McGlashan, Mark. (2016). “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 8093. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargittai, Eszter, Gallo, Jason, and Kane, Matthew. (2008). Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134(1–2), 6786.10.1007/s11127-007-9201-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom. (2000). The social construction of terrorism. In Moghaddam, Fathali and Marsella, Anthony (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and interventions (pp. 91102). Washington, D.C.: APA Press.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, Moghaddam, Fathali M., Cairnie, Tracey Pilkerton, Rothbart, Daniel, and Sabat, Steven R. (2009). Recent Advances in Positioning Theory. Theory and Psychology, 19(1), 531. doi:10.1177/0959354308101417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom, and van Langenhove, Luk. (1998). Positioning Theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. (2010). When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 6(1), 731.10.1515/jplr.2010.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherly, Kyle A, Lu, Yanqin, and Lee, Jae Kook. (2016). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media and Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816634677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffelfinger, Chris. (2011). Radical Islam in America: Salafism’s journey from Arabia to the West. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. (2003). Computer-mediated discourse. In Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, Hiedi (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612634). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. (2004a). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Barab, Sasha, Kling, Rob, and Gray, James (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan. (2004b). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society, 6(1), 2636.10.1177/1461444804039906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, John. (1991). Jesus and Muhammad In Cohn-Sherbok, Dan (Ed.), Islam in a world of diverse faiths (pp. 114118). Basingstoke: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael. (2004). Social Identity Theory. In Eagly, A.H., Baron, R.M., and Hamilton, V. (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 111136): American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Mark. (1863). Lectures on the evidences of Christianity: Before the Lowell Institute, January, 1844. Boston: T.R. Martin.Google Scholar
Housley, William, and Fitzgerald, Richard. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Fitzgerald, Richard. (2009). Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse and Society, 20(3), 345362.10.1177/0957926509102405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Robert Glenn. (2011). Digital Jesus: The making of a new Christian fundamentalist community on the Internet. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Tim. (2007). Creating church online: A case-study approach to religious experience. Studies in World Christianity, 13(3), 243260.10.3366/swc.2007.13.3.243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Tim. (2011). Contemporary religious community and the online church. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 11181135. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.591410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, Torsten. (2003). Your cradle is green: The Islamic foundation and the call to Islam in children’s literature (Vol. 18). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Jones, Steven. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In Jones, Steven (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated Communication and Community (pp. 1035). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Justdawah.org. (n.d.). Just Dawah: Conveying the Message homepage. www.justdawah.org/ (Accessed on March 22, 2016).Google Scholar
Karagiannis, Emmanuel. (2012). European converts to Islam: Mechanisms of radicalization. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 13(1), 99113.10.1080/21567689.2012.659495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Patricia. (1999). Integration and identity in Muslim schools: Britain, United States and Montreal. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 10(2), 197217. doi:10.1080/09596419908721180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, David A. (1991). The Prophet Muhammad in Christian theological perspective. In Cohn-Sherbok, Dan (Ed.), Islam in a World of Diverse Faiths. Basingstoke: MacMIllan.Google Scholar
Kiesler, Sara, Siegel, Jane, and McGuire, Timothy W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 11231134. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.39.10.1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jin. (2012). The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture and Society, 34(1), 5367. doi:10.1177/0163443711427199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Know Your Meme. (n.d.). The amazing atheist. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/the-amazing-atheist (Accessed on March 29, 2017).Google Scholar
Kress, Gunter, and Van Leeuwen, Theo. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, Grace Chi En, and Skoric, Marko M. (2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 1625.10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Ohbyung, and Wen, Yixing. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254263. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972a). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia. (2006). What is your claim to flame? First Monday, 11(9). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1393/1311 (Accessed on March 21, 2010)Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia. (2007a). Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia. (2007b). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361380.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Patricia. (2007c). Searching for the ‘You’ in ‘YouTube’: An analysis of online response ability. Paper presented at the EPIC 2007, Keystone, CO.10.1111/j.1559-8918.2007.tb00061.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Cameron, Lynne. (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDrew, Stephen. (2012). The evolution of atheism: Scientific and humanistic approaches. History of the Human Sciences, 25(3), 7087. doi:10.1177/0952695112441301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDrew, Stephen. (2013). Discovering atheism: Heterogeneity in trajectories to atheist identity and activism. Sociology of Religion, 74(4), 431453. doi:10.1093/socrel/srt014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Karen. (2003). American Muslim politics: Discourses and practices. Ethnicities, 3(2), 147181. doi:10.1177/1468796803003002001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. (1993). Islam and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195076196.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C.S. (1952). Mere Christianity. San Franciso: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lipka, Michael. (2015). 7 facts about atheists. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/05/7-facts-about-atheists/ (Accessed on March 22, 2016)Google Scholar
Litt, Eden. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56(3), 330345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litt, Eden, and Hargittai, Eszter. (2016). The imagined audience on social network Sites. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 112. doi:10.1177/2056305116633482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Bou-Franch, Patricia. (2011). On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 25782593. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchjenbroers, J., and Aldridge-Waddon, M. (2011). Paedophiles and politeness in email communications: Community of practice needs that define face-threat. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(1), 2142.Google Scholar
Lundby, Knut. (2011). Patterns of belonging in online/offline interfaces of religion. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 12191235. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.594077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malley, Brian. (2004). How the Bible works: An anthropological study of Evangelical Biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Markham, Annette, and Buchanan, Elizabeth. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. http://aoir.org/ethics/ (Accessed on February 10, 2015).Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and boyd, danah. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114133.10.1177/1461444810365313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Aleecia, and Cranor, Lorrie. (2009). The Cost of reading privacy policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 4(3), 543568.Google Scholar
McLeod, Jack M, and Lee, Nam-Jin. (2012). Social networks, public discussion and civic engagement: A socialization perspective. In Holli A. Semetko and Margaret Scammell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political communication (pp. 197–208).10.4135/9781446201015.n17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mission Dawah. (n.d.). Dawah Missions Overview. www.missiondawah.com/training/dawah-missions-overview/ (Accessed on March 21, 2016).Google Scholar
Moor, Peter J., Heuvelman, Ard, and Verleur, Ria. (2010). Flaming on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 15361546. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, John A. (2006). Arabic, Islām, and the Allāh lexicon: How language shapes our conception of God. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, Justin Wm. (2015). Starbucks ‘removed Christmas from their cups because they hate Jesus,’ Christian says in viral Facebook video. The Washington Times. www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/11/09/starbucks-removed-christmas-from-their-cups-because-they-hate-jesus-christian-says-in-viral-facebook-video/ (Accessed on March 22, 2016)Google Scholar
Neill, Stephen Charles. (1964). A history of Christian missions. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko. (2010). Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 6(1), 3555.10.1515/jplr.2010.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitschke, Paula, Donges, Patrick, and Schade, Henriette. (2016). Political organizations’ use of websites and Facebook. New Media and Society, 18(5), 744764. doi:10.1177/1461444814546451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran. (2014). Deconstructing arguments via digital mining of online comments. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 30(4), 559588. doi:10.1093/llc/fqu034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. B., and Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing “flaming” and other problematic messages. New Media and Society, 5(1), 6994.10.1177/1461444803005001908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osteen, Joel. (2004). Your best life now: 7 steps to living at your full potential. Brentwood, TN, USA: FaithWords.Google Scholar
Owen, William Foster. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274287.10.1080/00335638409383697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, James Innell. (1973). Knowing God. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth. (2010). Re-examining narrativity: Small stories in status updates. Text and Talk, 30, 423–444).10.1515/text.2010.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse and Communication, 6(2), 181201. doi:10.1177/1750481312437441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. (2013). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203148617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pariser, Eli. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York City: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
Parshall, Phil. (2003). Muslim evangelism: Contemporary approaches to contextualization. Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA: Biblica.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131156. doi:10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07parCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan, Duguid, Alison, and Taylor, Charlotte. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) (Vol. 55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/scl.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peek, Lori. (2005). Becoming Muslim: The development of a religious identity. Sociology of Religion, 66(3), 215242.10.2307/4153097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peplow, David. (2011). “Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people”: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature, 20(4), 295315.10.1177/0963947011401964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peplow, David. (2016). Talk about books: A study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pfannenstiel, A. N. (2010). Digital literacies and academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(2), 4149.10.21913/IJEI.v6i2.702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Whitney. (2011). LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online.10.5210/fm.v16i12.3168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piamenta, Moshe. (1979). Islam in everyday Arabic speech. Leiden: E.J. Brill.10.1163/9789004661660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2011). Cops, popes, kings, and garbage collectors: Metaphor and antagonism in an atheist/Christian YouTube video thread. Language@Internet, 8(1). www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2011/Pihlaja/ (Accessed on 6 June 2013)Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2013a). ‘It’s all red ink’: The interpretation of biblical metaphor among Evangelical Christian YouTube users. Language and Literature, 22(2), 103117.10.1177/0963947013483996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2013b). Truck stops and fashion shows: A case study of the discursive construction of Evangelical Christian group identity on YouTube. In Herbert, D. and Gillespie, M. (Eds.), Social Media, Religion and Spirituality (pp. 165184). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2014a). Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2014b). ‘Christians’ and ‘bad Christians’: Categorization in atheist user talk on YouTube. Text and Talk, 34(5), 623639.Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2015). Antagonism in religious discourse on YouTube. In Cheruvallil-Contractor, Sariya and Shakkour, Suha (Eds.), Digital Methodologies in the Sociology of Religion. London: Bloomsbury. (pp. 4958)Google Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2016a). Expressing pleasure and avoiding engagement in online adult video comment sections. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 5(1), 94112.10.1075/jls.5.1.04pihCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2016b). ‘What about the wolves?’: The use of scripture in YouTube arguments. Language and Literature, 25(3), 226238.10.1177/0963947016652784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlaja, Stephen. (2017) More than 50 shades of grey: Creative content and copyright on social networking sites. Applied Linguistics Review. 8/2-3:213-228. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2016-1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planchenault, Gaëlle. (2010). Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers of identity and solidarity in a transvestites’ website. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 6(1), 83103.10.1515/jplr.2010.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poston, Larry. (1992). Islamic da’wah in the West: Muslim missionary activity and the dynamics of conversion to Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195072273.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Markus. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., and Lytra, V. (2004). UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper. Retrieved from www.ling-ethnog.org.uk. (Accessed on August 14, 2012)Google Scholar
Rational Response Squad. (2007). The Blasphemy Challenge. www.blasphemychallenge.com/ (Accessed on December 11, 2015).Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06rayCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Paul. (2015). Every little helps? YouTube, sousveillance and the ‘anti-Tesco’ riot in Stokes Croft. New Media and Society, 17(5), 755771. doi: 10.1177/1461444813512195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, John. (2011). Islam and Christianity: Theological themes in comparative perspective. London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520948334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7105.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Peter. (2012). A closer walk: A study of the interaction between metaphors related to movement and proximity and presuppositions about the reality of belief in Christian and Muslim testimonials. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 233261.10.1075/msw.2.2.05ricCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. David. (2010). “Everybody goes down”: Metaphors, Stories, and Simulations in Conversations. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 123143. doi:10.1080/10926488.2010.489383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roof, Wade Clark. (1999). Spiritual marketplace: Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruesch, Michelle Anna, and Märker, Oliver. (2012). Real Name Policy in E-Participation. Paper presented at the CeDEM 12 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, May 3–4, 2012. Danube-University Krems, Austria.Google Scholar
Rushfield, Richard, and Hoffman, Claire. (2006). Mystery fuels huge popularity of web’s Lonelygirl15. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2006/sep/08/entertainment/et-lonelygirl8 (Accessed on May 4, 2016)Google Scholar
Sabat, Steven R. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer’s. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sabat, Steven R. (2003). Malignant positioning and the predicament of people with Alzheimer’s disease. In Harré, Rom and Moghaddam, Fathali (Eds.), The Self and Others Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Westport, CT, USA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schrage, Michael. (1997). Mr. Bozo, meet Miss Courtesy Worm. Computerworld, 31(8), 37.Google Scholar
Schultze, Quentin J. (2003). Televangelism and American culture: The business of popular religion. Eugene, Oregon, USA: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. (1997). PC analysis of key words—and key key words. System, 25(2), 233245.10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip, and Tagg, Caroline. (2014). The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137029317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedghi, Ami. (2014). Facebook: 10 years of social networking, in numbers. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/feb/04/facebook-in-numbers-statistics (Accessed on March 22, 2016)Google Scholar
Shafaat, Ahmed. (1991). The Abrahamic Ummah. In Cohn-Sherbok, Dan (Ed.), Islam in a world of diverse faiths (pp. 188200). Basingstoke: MacMIllan.10.1007/978-1-349-21408-2_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor. (2012). An anatomy of a YouTube meme. New Media and Society, 14(2), 187203. doi:10.1177/1461444811412160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, Ronald J. (1975). Evangelism, salvation and social justice. International Review of Mission, 64(255), 251267.10.1111/j.1758-6631.1975.tb01182.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jane, Dubrovsky, Vitaly, Kiesler, Sara, and McGuire, Timothy W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(2), 157187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749–5978(86)90050-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Stephanie. (2008). Atheists reach out – just don’t call it proselytizing. Wall StreetJournal.Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203496589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sledgianowski, Deb, and Kulviwat, Songpol. (2009). Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 7483. doi:10.1080/08874417.2009.11645342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Christian, and Emerson, Michael. (1998). American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226229225.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Christopher, and Cimino, Richard. (2012). Atheisms unbound: The role of the new media in the formation of a secularist identity. Secularism and Nonreligion, 1(0), 1731. doi: http://doi.org/10.5334/snr.abCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jesse M. (2011). Becoming an atheist in America: Constructing identity and meaning from the rejection of theism. Sociology of Religion, 72(2), 215237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jesse M. (2013). Creating a Godless community: The collective identity work of contemporary american atheists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(1), 8099. doi:10.1111/jssr.12009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, Rebecca (2011). Terms and conditions: Not reading the small print can mean big problems. www.theguardian.com/money/2011/may/11/terms-conditions-small-print-big-problems (Accessed on September 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Solomon, Norman. (1991). Stereotyping other theologies. In Cohn-Sherbok, Dan (Ed.), Islam in a world of diverse faiths (pp. 104113). Basingstoke: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-21408-2_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelma, J. H., and Cameron, L. J. (2007). Intonation units in spoken interaction: Developing transcription skills. Text and Talk, 27(3), 361393.10.1515/TEXT.2007.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stempel, Jonathan. (2014). Google, Viacom settle landmark YouTube lawsuit. www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/18/us-google-viacom-lawsuit-idUSBREA2H11220140318 (Accessed on September 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Stewart, Anna Rose. (2011). Text and response in the relationship between online and offline religion. Information, Communication and Society, 14(8), 12041218. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.592206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stommel, Wyke. (2008). Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet, 5 , article 5.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Reich, Stephanie M., Waechter, Natalia, and Espinoza, Guadalupe. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420433. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabak, Alan. (2004). Hundreds register for new Facebook website. The Harvard Crimson. www.thecrimson.com/article/2004/2/9/hundreds-register-for-new-facebook-website/ (Accessed on May 4, 2016)Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. (2012). Discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. London: Continuum/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. (1983). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, Michael, Bundy, R.P., and Flament, Claude. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149178.10.1002/ejsp.2420010202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Tajfel, Henri (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3347). London: European Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Keith. (2006, December/January). Atheists in cyberspace. Free Inquiry, 26(6), 5152.Google Scholar
Theocharis, Yannis, and Quintelier, Ellen. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media and Society, 18(5), 817836. doi:10.1177/1461444814549006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C. (2009). Hermeneutics: An introduction: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
Thoburn, Nicholas. (2003). Deleuze, Marx and politics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203361740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thunderf00t. (2008). Game over man, game over . . . https://youtu.be/TIVRIyBGkhU?list=PL4244972AB1AAE8C9 (Accessed on March 30, 2017).Google Scholar
Trammell, Jim. (2015). Jesus? There’s an app for that! Tablet Media in the “New” Electronic Church. In Ward, Mark (Ed.), The electronic Church in the digital age: Cultural impacts of evangelical mass media. Westport, Connecticut, USA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Turner, John. (1981). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, Henri (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 1540). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turow, Joseph. (2012). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Jewitt, Carey. (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Til, Cornelius. (1955). The defense of the faith. Phillipsburg, New Jersey, USA: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company.Google Scholar
van Zoonen, Liesbet, Vis, Farida, and Mihelj, Sabina. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 249262. doi:10.1080/17405904.2010.511831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zoonen, Liesbet, Vis, Farida, and Mihelj, Sabina. (2011). YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media and Society, 13(8), 12831300. doi:10.1177/1461444811405020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vie, Stephanie. (2014). “You Are How You Play”: Privacy policies and data mining in social networking games. In deWinter, Jennifer and Moeller, Ryan M. (Eds.), Computer games and technical communication: Critical methods and applications at the intersection (pp. 171–187).Google Scholar
Vis, Farida, van Zoonen, Liesbet, and Mihelj, Sabina. (2011). Women responding to the anti-Islam film Fitna: Voices and acts of citizenship on YouTube. Feminist Review, 97(1), 110129.10.1057/fr.2010.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogelstein, Fred. (2009). The Wired Interview: Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg. Wired. com. www.wired.com/2009/06/mark-zuckerberg-speaks/ (Accessed on January 21, 2016).Google Scholar
Vonderau, Patrick. (2016). The video bubble: Multichannel networks and the transformation of YouTube. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. doi:10.1177/1354856516641882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorvoreanu, Mihaela. (2009). Perceptions of corporations on Facebook: An analysis of Facebook social norms. Journal of New Communications Research, 4(1), 6786.Google Scholar
Wagner, Rachel. (2012). You are what you install: Religious authenticity and identity in mobile apps. In Campbell, Heidi A. (Ed.), Digital religion: Understanding religious practices in new media worlds (pp. 199206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walther, Joseph. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205216.10.1023/A:1021368426115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, William Montgomery. (2013). Muslim-Christian encounters: Perceptions and misperceptions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (2002 [1905]). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism and other writings. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wesch, Michael. (2009). Youtube and you: Experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam. Explorations in Media Ecology, 8(2), 1934.10.1386/eme.8.2.99_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Anne, Lewis, Jane, and Currie, Peter. (2009). Students’ Facebook ‘friends’: public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615627. doi:10.1080/13676260902960752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Brian. (2013). What happens at an atheist church? BBC Magazine. www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21319945 (Accessed on March 22, 2016)Google Scholar
Wilken, Rowan. (2014). Places nearby: Facebook as a location-based social media platform. New Media and Society, 16(7), 10871103. doi:10.1177/1461444814543997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, David, and Thelwall, Mike. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387401. doi:10.1177/0894439310378979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. (2007). Deluded by Dawkins? A Christian response to the God delusion. Colorado Springs, CO: Kingsway Books.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Meyer, Michael. (2002). Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yates, Timothy. (1996). Christian mission in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
YouTube. (2016). Statistics. www.youtube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html (Accessed on March 21, 2016).Google Scholar
Yung-Tzu Joyce, Lin, Meng-Yen Tom, Lin, and Kuo-Chen, Li. (June 22–24, 2015). Consumer involvement model of fan page: Mining from Facebook data of a real celebrity fashion brand. Paper presented at the 2015 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM).10.1109/ICSSSM.2015.7170187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharias, Ravi. (2008). The end of reason: A response to the new atheists. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Stephen Pihlaja
  • Book: Religious Talk Online
  • Online publication: 19 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316661963.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Stephen Pihlaja
  • Book: Religious Talk Online
  • Online publication: 19 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316661963.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Stephen Pihlaja
  • Book: Religious Talk Online
  • Online publication: 19 February 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316661963.009
Available formats
×