Abbott, Edwin A.Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 1992.Google Scholar

Abraham, William J.Divine Revelation and the Limits of Historical Criticism. Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Adams, Nicholas. Habermas and Theology. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William P. “Can We Speak Literally of God?” in Steuer, A. D. and McLendon, J. W. (eds.), Is God God?Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1981, pp. 146–75.Google Scholar

Alston, William P.Divine Nature and Human Language: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Alston, William P. “How to Think about Divine Action,” in Hebblethwaite, Brian and Henderson, Edward (eds.), Divine Action: Studies Inspired by the Philosophical Theology of Austin Farrer. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1990, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1948.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition, 2nd edn. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Badcock, Gary. Light of Truth & Fire of Love: A Theology of the Holy Spirit. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.Google Scholar

Badcock, Gary “Whatever Happened to God the Father?” Crux 36, no. 3 (Sept. 2000), pp. 2–12.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, MikhailThe Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, MikhailProblems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, tr. Emerson, Caryl. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, MikhailSpeech Genres & Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, MikhailToward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Balentine, Samuel E.Prayer in the Hebrew Bible: The Drama of Divine–Human Dialogue. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar

Balthasar, Hans Urs von.Epilogue, tr. Oakes, Edward T.. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, MikhailTheo-drama: Theological Dramatic Theory, vols. I–V. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988–98.Google Scholar

Barbour, Ian G.Religion and Science: History and Contemporary Issues, rev. and expanded edn. San Francisco: Harper, 1997.Google Scholar

Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics, I/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1975.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlChurch Dogmatics I/2. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlChurch Dogmatics II/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1957.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlThe Göttingen Dogmatics: Instruction in the Christian Religion, vol. I, tr. Bromiley, Geoffrey W.. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1991.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlHumanity of God. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlPrayer, 50th Anniversary Edition. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox, 2002.Google Scholar

Barth, KarlProtestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Its Background and History. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2002.Google Scholar

Battles, Ford Lewis. “God was Accommodating Himself to Human Capacity,” Interpretation 31 (1977), pp. 19–38.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. God Crucified: Monotheism & Christology in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard “‘Only the Suffering God Can Help’: Divine Passibility in Modern Theology,” Themelios 9 (1984:3), pp. 6–12.Google Scholar

Bavinck, Herman. Reformed Dogmatics, vols. I–IV, tr. Vriend, John. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2003–08.Google Scholar

Bayer, Oswald. Gott als Autor: Zu einer Poietologischen Theologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar

Beale, G. K. “An Exegetical and Theological Consideration of the Hardening of Pharaoh's Heart in Exodus 4–14 and Romans 9,” Trinity Journal 5 (1984), pp. 129–54.Google Scholar

Benson, Bruce Ellis.Graven Ideologies: Nietzsche, Derrida & Marion on Modern Idolatry. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Billings, J. Todd.Calvin, Participation and the Gift: The Activity of Believers in Union with Christ. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boersma, Hans. Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross: Reappropriating the Atonement Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar

Boyd, Gregory A.God of the Possible: A Biblical Introduction to the Open View of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2000.Google Scholar

Brant, Jo-Ann A.Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Gospel. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar

Bray, Gerald. The Doctrine of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Brown, Jeannine K.Scripture as Communication: Introducing Biblical Hermeneutics. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007.Google Scholar

Brueggemann, Walter. A Commentary on Jeremiah: Exile and Homecoming. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Brueggemann, WalterTheology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brümmer, Vincent. The Model of Love: A Study in Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brümmer, VincentWhat Are We Doing When We Pray? rev. edn. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Brunner, Emil. The Christian Doctrine of God, vol. I of Dogmatics, tr. Wyon, Olive. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1949.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin. I and Thou. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1958.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Karl and Jaspers, Karl. Myth & Christianity: An Inquiry into the Possibility of Religion Without Myth. New York: Prometheus Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf. Faith and Understanding. London: SCM Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Bultmann, RudolfJesus Christ and Mythology. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1958.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolf “The New Testament and Mythology,” in Bartsch, Hans Werner (ed.), Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate, tr. Fuller, R. H., 2nd edn., vol. I. London: SPCK, 1964, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Burke, Sean. The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Burrell, David B.Aquinas, God, and Action. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Buxton, Graham. The Trinity, Creation and Pastoral Ministry: Imaging the Perichoretic God. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2005.Google Scholar

Caird, G. B.The Language and Imagery of the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.Google Scholar

Callen, Barry L.Discerning the Divine: God in Christian Theology. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. Commentaries on the Twelve Minor Prophets, vol. I: Hosea, tr. Owen, John. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1950.Google Scholar

Calvin, JohnInstitutes of the Christian Religion, 2 vols. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Caneday, A. B. “Veiled Glory? God's Self-Revelation in Human Likeness: A Biblical Theology of God's Anthropomorphic Self-Disclosure,” in Piper, John, Taylor, Justin, and Helseth, Paul Kjoss (eds.), Beyond the Bounds: Open Theism and the Undermining of Biblical Christianity. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2003, pp. 149–99.Google Scholar

Canlis, Julie. “Calvin, Osiander and Participation in God.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 6 (2004), pp. 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caputo, John D. and Michael, J. Scanlon. God, the Gift, and Postmodernism. Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Caputo, John D., Dooley, Mark, and Scanlon, Michael J. (eds.). Questioning God. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001.

Castelo, Daniel. “A Crisis in God-Talk? The Bible and Theopathy.” Theology 110 (2007), pp. 411–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castelo, Daniel “Moltmann's Dismissal of Divine Impassibility: Warranted?” Scottish Journal of Theology 61 (2008), pp. 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Childs, Brevard S.The Book of Exodus: A Critical, Theological Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Claassens, L.Julianna, M. “Biblical Theology as Dialogue: Continuing the Conversation on Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Theology.” Journal of Biblical Literature 122 (2003), pp. 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, W. Norris.Explorations in Metaphysics: Being – God – Person. Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Clarke, W. Norris.The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics. University of Notre Dame Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D.Adventures in the Spirit: God, World, Divine Action. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D.God and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, MI and Edinburgh: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. and Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D. “Kenotic Trinitarian Panentheism,” Dialog: A Journal of Theology 44 (2005), pp. 250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clayton, Philip D.Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. OxfordUniversity Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D. “Panentheist Internalism: Living within the Presence of the Trinitarian God,” Dialog: A Journal of Theology 40 (2002), pp. 208–15.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D.The Problem of God in Modern Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2000.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D. and Knapp, Steven. “Divine Action and the ‘Argument from Neglect’,” in Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R. (eds.), Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil. Berkeley, CA and Vatican City State: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences and Vatican Observatory, 2007, pp. 179–94.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip D. and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.). In Whom We Live and Move and Have our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God's Presence in a Scientific World. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2004.

Coakley, Sarah. “‘Persons’ in the ‘Social’ Doctrine of the Trinity: A Critique of Current Analytic Discussion,” in Davis, Kendall, and O'Collins, (eds.), The Trinity, OxfordUniversity Press, 1999, pp. 123–44.Google Scholar

Coates, Ruth. Christianity in Bakhtin: God and the Exiled Author. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Cobb, John B. and Griffin, David Ray. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Cobb, John B. and Pinnock, Clark H. (eds.). Searching for an Adequate God: A Dialogue between Process and Free Will Theists. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2000.

Cole, Graham. “The Living God: Anthropomorphic or Anthropathic?” The Reformed Theological Review 59 (2000), pp. 16–27.Google Scholar

Collins, C. John. The God of Miracles: An Exegetical Examination of God's Action in the World. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Cooper, John. Panentheism: The Other God of the Philosophers. From Plato to the Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2006.Google Scholar

Craig, William Lane.Time and Eternity: Exploring God's Relationship to Time. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creel, Richard E.Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Cunningham, David. “Participation as a Trinitarian Virtue: Challenging the Current ‘Relational’ Consensus,” Toronto Journal of Theology 14 (1998), pp. 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalferth, Ingolf U.Becoming Present: An Inquiry into the Christian Sense of the Presence of God. Leuven and Paris: Peeters, 2006.Google Scholar

Davies, Oliver. The Creativity of God: World, Eucharist, Reason. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, OliverA Theology of Compassion: Metaphysics of Difference and the Renewal of Tradition. London: SCM Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, and O'Collins, Gerald (eds.). The Trinity. OxfordUniversity Press, 1999.

DeYoung, Kevin. “Divine Impassibility and the Passion of Christ in the Book of Hebrews.” Westminster Theological Journal 68 (2006), pp. 41–50.Google Scholar

Dixon, Thomas. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doan, William and Giles, Terry. Prophets, Performance, and Power: Performance Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. New York and London: T & T Clark International, 2005.Google Scholar

Eberhard, Philippe. The Middle Voice in Gadamer's Hermeneutics: A Basic Interpretation with Some Theological Implications. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar

Elliott, Matthew A.Faithful Feelings: Rethinking Emotion in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2006.Google Scholar

Ellul, Jacques. The Humiliation of the Word. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1985.Google Scholar

Emerson, Caryl. The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Emery, Gilles. “Essentialism or Personalism in the Treatise on God in Saint Thomas Aquinas?” Thomist 64 (2000), pp. 521–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, Mary Potter.John Calvin's Perspectival Anthropology. AAR Academy Series, no. 52. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fairbairn, Donald. Grace and Christology in the Early Church. OxfordUniversity Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farley, Edward. Divine Empathy: A Theology of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Farley, Wendy. Tragic Vision and Divine Compassion: A Contemporary Theodicy. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Farmer, H. H.The World and God: A Study of Prayer, Providence and Miracle in Christian Experience. London: Nisbet & Co., 1936.Google Scholar

Farrer, Austin. Faith and Speculation. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1988.Google Scholar

Farrer, AustinGod is not Dead. New York: Morehouse-Barlow, 1966.Google Scholar

Farrow, Douglas. Ascension and Ecclesia. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999.Google Scholar

Feenstra, Roland J. and Plantinga, Cornelius, Jr. (eds.). Trinity, Incarnation, and Atonement: Philosophical and Theological Essays. University of Notre Dame Press, 1989.

Feinberg, John. No One Like Him: The Doctrine of God. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Felch, Susan M. and Contino, Paul J. (eds.). Bakhtin and Religion: A Feeling for Faith. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2001.

Feuerbach, Ludwig. The Essence of Christianity, tr. Eliot, George. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989.Google Scholar

Fiddes, Paul S.The Creative Suffering of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fiddes, Paul S.Participating in God: A Pastoral Doctrine of the Trinity. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Finney, Charles G. “Affections and Emotions of God,” The Oberlin Evangelist (October 9, 1839), Lecture XVIII.Google Scholar

Fiske, John. Understanding Popular Culture. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Allan D. (ed.). Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999.

Ford, , David, F. and Pecknold, C. C. (eds.). The Promise of Scriptural Reasoning. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.

Forstman, Jackson H.Word and Spirit: Calvin's Doctrine of Biblical Authority. Stanford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Frame, John M.The Doctrine of God. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

Frame, John M.The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar

Frankenberry, Nancy. “Classical Theism, Panentheism, and Pantheism: On the Relation between God Construction and Gender Construction,” Zygon 28 (1993), pp. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franks, Christopher A. “The Simplicity of the Living God: Aquinas, Barth, and some Philosophers,” Modern Theology 21 (2005), pp. 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freddoso, Alfred J. “The ‘Openness’ of God: A Reply to Hasker,” Christian Scholar's Review 28 (1998), pp. 124–33.Google Scholar

Frei, Hans. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Fretheim, Terence. “God and Violence in the Old Testament,” Word & World 24 (2004), pp. 18–28.Google Scholar

Fretheim, Terence E.God and World in the Old Testament: A Relational Theology of Creation. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Fretheim, Terence E.The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ganssle, Gregory E. (ed.). God & Time: Four Views. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2001.CrossRef

Gavrilyuk, Paul. The Suffering of the Impassible God: The Dialectics of Patristic Thought. OxfordUniversity Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Timothy (ed.). God the Holy Trinity: Reflections on Christian Faith and Practice. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2006.

Gilson, Etienne. The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy. London: Sheed and Ward, 1936.Google Scholar

Goetz, Ronald. “The Suffering God: The Rise of a New Orthodoxy.” Christian Century 103.13 (April 16, 1986), pp. 385–9.Google Scholar

Goldie, Peter. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert M. “The Passivity of Emotions,” The Philosophical Review 95 (1986), pp. 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorringe, T. J.God's Theatre: A Theology of Providence. London: SCM Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Green, Barbara. Mikhail Bakhtin and Biblical Scholarship: An Introduction. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2000.Google Scholar

Green, Garrett. “The Gender of God and the Theology of Metaphor,” in Kimel, Alvin F., Jr. (ed.), Speaking the Christian God: The Holy Trinity and the Challenge of Feminism. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1992, pp. 44–64.Google Scholar

Green, GarrettTheology, Hermeneutics, and Imagination: The Crisis of Interpretation at the End of Modernity. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Grenz, Stanley J.The Named God and the Question of Being: A Trinitarian Theo-Ontology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2005.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul E. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. University of Chicago Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, Paul J. Lying: An Augustinian Theology of Duplicity. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2004.Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.Jesus the Word According to John the Sectarian. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2002.Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H.The Old Is Better: New Testament Essays in Support of Traditional Interpretations. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.Google Scholar

Gunton, Colin. Act and Being: Towards a Theology of the Divine Attributes. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2002.Google Scholar

Gunton, ColinThe One, the Three, and the Many. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunton, Colin (ed.). Persons: Divine and Human. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1991.

Gutenson, Charles E.Reconsidering the Doctrine of God. New York and London: T. & T. Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, tr. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston, MA: Beacon, 1984.Google Scholar

Hallman, Joseph M.The Descent of God: Divine Suffering in History and Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Harris, Harriet A. “Should We Say that Personhood is Relational?” Scottish Journal of Theology 51 (1998), pp. 214–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Harriet A. and J. Insole (, Christophereds.). Faith and Philosophical Analysis: The Impact of Analytic Philosophy on the Philosophy of Religion. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2005.

Hart, David Bentley.The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003.Google Scholar

Hart, David Bentley. “The Lively God of Robert Jenson,” First Things, no. 156 (Oct. 2005), pp. 28–34.Google Scholar

Hart, David Bentley. “No Shadow of Turning: On Divine Impassibility,” Pro Ecclesia 11 (2002), pp. 184–206.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, Charles. The Logic of Perfection. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1962.Google Scholar

Harvey, . Feuerbach and the Interpretation of Religion. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard. The Moral Vision of the New Testament: A Contemporary Introduction to New Testament Ethics. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar

Heaney, Robert S. “Towards the Possibility of Impassibilist Pastoral Care,” Heythrop Journal 48 (2007), pp. 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hebblethwaite, Brian and Henderson, Edward (eds.). Divine Action: Studies Inspired by the Philosophical Theology of Austin Farrer. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1990.

Hector, Kevin W. “God's Triunity and Self-Determination,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7 (2005), pp. 246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helm, Paul. “B. B. Warfield on Divine Passion” Westminster Theological Journal 69 (2007), pp. 95–104.Google Scholar

Helm, PaulEternal God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Helm, PaulJohn Calvin's Ideas. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heschel, Abraham J.The Prophets. New York: Perennial Classics, HarperCollins, 2001.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary. Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “‘Something Much Too Plain to Say’: Towards a Defence of the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity,” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 43 (2001), pp. 137–54.Google Scholar

Holquist, Michael. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his World, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Hooper, Walter (ed.). C. S. Lewis: A Companion and Guide. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.

Horton, Michael S.Covenant and Eschatology: The Divine Drama. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox, 2002.Google Scholar

Horton, Michael S.Covenant and Salvation. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox, 2007.Google Scholar

Horton, Michael S.Lord and Servant: A Covenant Christology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.Google Scholar

House, P. R. “God's Character and the Wholeness of Scripture,” Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology 23 (2005), pp. 4–17.Google Scholar

Huffman, Douglas S. and Johnson, Eric L. (eds.). God Under Fire: Modern Scholarship Reinvents God. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2002.

Hunsinger, George. Disruptive Grace: Studies in the Theology of Karl Barth. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2000.Google Scholar

Hunsinger, GeorgeHow To Read Karl Barth: The Shape of His Theology. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Irwin, William H. “The Course of the Dialogue between Moses and yhwh in Exodus 33:12–17,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 59 (1997), pp. 629–36.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Alan. A Theology of Reading: The Hermeneutics of Love. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Janicaud, Dominique et al. Phenomenology and the “Theological Turn”: The French Debate. New York: Fordham University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Jenson, Robert W.Systematic Theology, vol. I: The Triune God. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Johnson, Elizabeth A.She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse. New York: Crossroad, 2002.Google Scholar

Johnson, Roger A.The Origins of Demythologizing: Philosophy and Historiography in the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1974.Google Scholar

Jones, Gareth (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Modern Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.

Jones, Serene. Calvin and the Rhetoric of Piety. Columbia Series in Reformed Theology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1995.Google Scholar

Jüngel, Eberhard. God as the Mystery of the World: On the Foundation of the Theology of the Crucified One in the Dispute between Theism and Atheism, tr. Guder, Darrell L.. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1983.Google Scholar

Jüngel, EberhardGod's Being is in Becoming. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2001.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, tr. Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan, 1933.Google Scholar

Kapic, Kelly M.Communion with God: The Divine and the Human in the Theology of John Owen. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007.Google Scholar

Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti.The Doctrine of God: A Global Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar

Kasper, Walter. The God of Jesus Christ, tr. O, Matthew J.'Connell, . New York: Crossroad, 2000.Google Scholar

Kelsey, David H.Proving Doctrine: The Uses of Scripture in Recent Theology. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1999.Google Scholar

Kerr, Fergus. After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kilby, Karen. “Perichoresis and Projection: Problems with Social Doctrines of the Trinity,” New Blackfriars 81 (2000), pp. 432–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Robert H.The Meaning of God. London: SCM Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Knight, Douglas. The Eschatological Economy: Time and the Hospitality of God. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, U.K.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2006.Google Scholar

Kovacs, Judith L. “‘Now Shall the Ruler of This World be Driven Out’: Jesus' Death as Cosmic Battle in John 12:20–36,” Journal of Biblical Literature 114 (1995), pp. 227–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaCugna, Catherine. God for Us: The Trinity and Christian Life. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1991.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Mark, Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lapsley, Jacqueline E. “Friends with God? Moses and the Possibility of Covenantal Friendship,” Interpretation 58 (2004), pp. 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lash, Nicholas. Holiness, Speech, and Silence: Reflections on the Question of God. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Lash, NicholasTheology on the Way to Emmaus. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar

Latvus, Kari. God, Anger, and Ideology: The Anger of God in Joshua and Judges. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998.Google Scholar

Lee, Hak Joon.Covenant and Communication: A Christian Moral Conversation with Jürgen Habermas. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2006.Google Scholar

Leftow, Brian. Time and Eternity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Levenson, Jon D.Creation and the Persistence of Evil: The Jewish Drama of Divine Omnipotence. Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Levering, Matthew. Scripture and Metaphysics: Aquinas and the Renewal of Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity, tr. Lingis, Alphonso. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Lewis, Alan E.Between Cross & Resurrection: A Theologian of Holy Saturday. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2001.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S.God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1970.Google Scholar

Lints, Richard, Horton, Michael S., and Talbot, Mark R. (eds.). Personal Identity in Theological Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2006.

Long, D. StephenSpeaking of God: Theology, Language, and Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2009.Google Scholar

Long, D. Stephen and Kalantzis, George, (eds.). The Sovereignty of God Debate. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2009.

MacDonald, Nathan. “Listening to Abraham – Listening to yhwh: Divine Justice and Mercy in Genesis 18:16–33,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66 (2004), pp. 25–43.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Neil B.Metaphysics and the God of Israel: Systematic Theology of the Old and New Testaments. Milton Keynes: Paternoster and Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2006.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Donald M.Borderlands of Theology and Other Essays. Philadelphia and New York: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1968.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Donald M. “Can a Divinity Professor Be Honest?” The Cambridge Review 12 (1966), pp. 94–6.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Donald M. “The Problem of the ‘System of Projection’ Appropriate to Christian Theological Statements,” in Explorations in Theology 5. London: SCM Press, 1979, pp. 70–89.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Donald M.Themes in Theology: The Three-Fold Cord. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1987.Google Scholar

Macmurray, John. The Self as Agent. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1991.Google Scholar

Macquarrie, John. An Existentialist Theology: A Comparison of Heidegger and Bultmann. London: SCM Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Marcel, Gabriel. The Mystery of Being, vol. I: Reflection and Mystery. London: The Harvill Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc.God without Being, tr. Carlson, Thomas A.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. “Saint Thomas d'Aquin et l'onto-théologie,” Revue Thomiste 102 (2003), pp. 31–66.Google Scholar

Mauser, Ulrich. “God in Human Form,” Ex Auditu 16 (2000), pp. 81–99.Google Scholar

Mavrodes, George. Revelation in Religious Belief. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

McCabe, Herbert. “Aquinas on the Trinity,” New Blackfriars 80 (1999), pp. 268–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, Dennis J.Treaty and Covenant, Analecta Biblica 21. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute Press, 1963.Google Scholar

McCool, Gerald A. (ed.). The Universe as Journey: Conversations with W. Norris Clarke, S. J. New York: Fordham University Press, 1988.

McCormack, Bruce L.(ed.). Engaging the Doctrine of God: Contemporary Protestant Perspectives. Grand Rapids, MI and Edinburgh: Baker and Rutherford House, 2008.

McCormack, Bruce L. “Karl Barth's Christology as a Resource for a Reformed Version of Kenoticism,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 8 (2006), pp. 243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “The Ontological Presuppositions of Barth's Doctrine of the Atonement,” in Hill, Charles E. and James, Frank A. III (eds.), The Glory of the Atonement. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2004, pp. 346–66.Google Scholar

McCormack, Bruce L. “What's at Stake in Current Debates Over Justification? The Crisis of Protestantism in the West,” in Husbands, Mark and Treier, Daniel (eds.), Justification: What's At Stake in the Current Debates. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004, pp. 81–117.Google Scholar

McFadyen, Alistair I.The Call to Personhood: A Christian Theory of the Individual in Social Relationships. Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McFague, Sallie. The Body of God: An Ecological Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

McIntyre, John. Theology after the Storm: Reflections on the Upheavals in Modern Theology and Culture. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.Google Scholar

McWilliams, Warren. The Passion of God: Divine Suffering in Contemporary Protestant Theology. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Migliore, Daniel L.The Power of God and the gods of Power. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Mihailovic, Alexandar. Corporeal Words: Mikhail Bakhtin's Theology of Discourse. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Milbank, John. The Word Made Strange: Theology, Language, Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Miles, Jack. God: A Biography. New York: Vintage Books, 1996.Google Scholar

Moberly, R. W. L.At the Mountain of God: Story and Theology in Exodus 23–24, JSOT Supl. 22. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Moberly, R. W. L.The Bible, Theology, and Faith. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molnar, Paul D.Divine Freedom and the Doctrine of the Immanent Trinity: Karl Barth and Contemporary Theology. London and New York: T & T Clark and Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.The Coming of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.The Crucified God: The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology, tr. Wilson, R. A. and Bowden, John. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.God in Creation: An Ecological Doctrine of Creation. London: SCM Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.Theology and the Future of the Modern World. Pittsburgh: ATS, 1995.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.The Trinity and the Kingdom of God: The Doctrine of God, tr. Kohl, Margaret. London: SCM Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Jürgen.The Way of Jesus Christ: Christology in Messianic Dimensions. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. (ed.). The Concept of God. OxfordUniversity Press, 1987.

Moltmann, Jürgen.Divine & Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Morrow, James. Towing Jehovah. New York/London: Harvest Book, 1994.Google Scholar

Morson, Gary Saul and Emerson, Caryl. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Muers, Rachel. Keeping God's Silence: Towards a Theological Ethics of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muilenburg, James. “The Biblical View of Time,” Harvard Theological Review 54 (1961), pp. 225–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, Richard A.Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics: The Rise and Development of Reformed Orthodoxy, ca. 1520 to ca. 1725, vols. I–IV. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2003.Google Scholar

,Murphy, Francesca. God is Not a Story: Realism Revisited. OxfordUniversity Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Newsom, Carol A. “Bakhtin, the Bible, and Dialogic Truth.” Journal of Religion 76 (1996), pp. 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ngien, Dennis. The Suffering of God According to Martin Luther's “Theologia Crucis.”New York: Peter Lang, 1995.Google Scholar

Nichols, Aidan. No Bloodless Myth: A Guide Through Balthasar's Dramatics. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, Reinhold. “Biblical Thought and Ontological Speculation in Tillich's Theology,” in W. Kegley, Charles and Bretall, Robert W. (eds.), The Theology of Paul Tillich, vol. I. New York: Macmillian, 1952, pp. 216–29.Google Scholar

Nimmo, Paul T.Being in Action: The Theological Shape of Barth's Ethical Vision. London and New York: T & T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar

Noll, Stephen F.Angels of Light, Powers of Darkness: Thinking Biblically about Angels, Satan & Principalities. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C.Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O, 'Brien, Peter. “Principalities and Powers: Opponents of the Church,” in Carson, D. A. (ed.), Biblical Interpretation and the Church: The Problem of Contextualization. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1985, pp. 110–50.Google Scholar

O, 'Day, Gail. “Jesus as Friend in the Gospel of John,” Interpretation 58 (2004), pp. 144–57.Google Scholar

Ogden, Schubert. Christ without Myth: A Study Based on the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1961.Google Scholar

O, 'Hanlon, G. F.The Immutability of God in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

O, 'Keefe, John J. “Impassible Suffering? Divine Passion and Fifth-Century Christology.” Theological Studies 58 no. 1 (March 1997), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar

Olson, Dennis. “Biblical Theology as Provisional Monologization: A Dialogue with Childs, Brueggemann, and Bakhtin,” Biblical Interpretation 6 (1998), pp. 162–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Roger E. and , Christopher A. Hall. The Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2002.Google Scholar

Otto, Randall E. “The Use and Abuse of Perichoresis in Recent Theology,” Scottish Journal of Theology 54 (2001), pp. 366–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its relation to the Rational, tr. Harvey, John W., 2nd edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Owen, H. P.Concepts of Deity. New York: Herder and Herder, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, H. P.Revelation and Existence: A Study in the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Owen, John. Communion with the Triune God, Kapic, Kelly M. and Taylor, Justin. (eds.) Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2007.Google Scholar

Pao, David W.Acts and the Isaianic New Exodus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2000.Google Scholar

Patrick, Dale. The Rendering of God in the Old Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Peacocke, Arthur. All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Peacocke, ArthurTheology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine, and Human (enlarged edn.). London: SCM, 1993.Google Scholar

Peters, Ted. God as Trinity: Relationality and Temporality in the Divine Life. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Peukert, Helmut. Science, Action, and Fundamental Theology: Towards a Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Pike, Nelson. God and Timelessness. New York: Schocken, 1970.Google Scholar

Pinnock, Clark H.Most Moved Mover: A Theology of God's Openness. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001.Google Scholar

Pinnock, Clark H. et al. The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. “What is intervention?” Theology and Science 6 (2008), pp. 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polkinghorne, John. Science and Theology: An Introduction. London and Minneapolis: SCM and Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, John (ed.). The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2001.

Powell, Samuel M.Participating in God: Creation and Trinity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl. The Trinity. New York: Herder & Herder, 1970.Google Scholar

Rauser, Randal. “Rahner's Rule? An Emperor without Clothes?” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7 (2005), pp. 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, Walter. Dialogues of the Word: The Bible as Literature According to Bakhtin. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Reno, R. R. “Biblical Theology and Theological Exegesis,” in Bartholomew, Craig et al. (eds.), Out of Egypt: Biblical Theology and Biblical Interpretation. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2004, pp. 385–408.Google Scholar

Richards, Jay Wesley.The Untamed God: A Philosophical Exploration of Divine Perfection, Simplicity, and Immutability. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, PaulFiguring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, PaulHistory and Truth. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, PaulOneself as Another, tr. Blamey, Kathleen. University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul “Philosophical Hermeneutics and Biblical Hermeneutics,” in Bovon, François (ed.), Exegesis. Pittsburgh Theological Monograph Series #21 (Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press, 1978), pp. 321–39.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, PaulThe Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, tr. Czerny, R., McLaughlin, K., and Costello, J.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, PaulTime and Narrative, vol. I, tr. McLaughlin, Kathleen and Pellauer, David. University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul and André,. Thinking Biblically: Exegetical and Hermeneutical Studies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Roberts, Robert C.Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarot, Marcel“What an Emotion Is: A Sketch,” The Philosophical Review (1988), pp. 183–209.Google Scholar

Robinson, John A. T.Honest To God. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Robinson, John A. T.Thou Who Art: The Concept of the Personality of God. London and New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Rogers, Eugene F.After the Spirit: A Constructive Pneumatology from Resources outside the Modern West. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2005.Google Scholar

Sarot, MarcelThomas Aquinas and Karl Barth. University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A.Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Roy, Steven C.How Much Does God Foreknow? A Comprehensive Biblical Study. Downers Grove, IL and Nottingham: IVP Academic and Apollos, 2006.Google Scholar

Russell, Edward. “Reconsidering Relational Anthropology: A Critical Assessment of John Zizioulas's Theological Anthropology,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 5 (2003), pp. 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, Meyering, Theo C., and Arbib, Michael A. (eds.). Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City State and Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory Publications and Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1999.

Sanders, Fred. The Image of the Immanent Trinity: Rahner's Rule and the Theological Interpretation of Scripture, Issues in Systematic Theology, vol. XII. New York and Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2005.Google Scholar

Sanders, Fred and Issler, Klaus (eds.). Jesus in Trinitarian Perspective. Nashville, TN: B & H Publishing, 2007.

Sanders, John. The God Who Risks: A Theology of Providence. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel. “Auschwitz, Morality and the Suffering of God,” Modern Theology 7 (1991), pp. 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarot, Marcel “God, Emotion, and Corporeality: A Thomist Perspective,” The Thomist 58 (1994), pp. 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarot, MarcelGod, Passibility and Corporeality. Kampen: Kok Pharos Publishing House, 1992.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel “Patripassianism, Theopaschitism and the Suffering of God: Some Historical and Systematic Considerations,” Religious Studies 26 (1990), pp. 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, Nicholas. Divine Action & Modern Science. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayers, Dorothy L.The Mind of the Maker. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar

Schaab, Gloria L. “A Procreative Paradigm of the Creative Suffering of the Triune God: Implications of Arthur Peacocke's Evolutionary Theology,” Theological Studies 67 (2006), pp. 542–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schindler, D. C.Hans Urs von Balthasar and the Dramatic Structure of Truth. New York: Fordham University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Schmithals, Walter. An Introduction to the Theology of Rudolf Bultmann, tr. Bowden, John. London: SCM Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Schrag, Calvin O.God as Otherwise Than Being: Toward a Semantics of the Gift. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Schrag, Calvin O.The Self After Postmodernity. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schwöbel, Christoph. God: Action and Revelation. Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1992.Google Scholar

Schwöbel, Christoph “God as Conversation: Reflections on a Theological Ontology of Communicative Relations,” in Haers, J. and Mey, P. (eds.), Theology and Conversation: Towards a Relational Theology. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2003, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar

Schwöbel, Christoph (ed.). Trinitarian Theology Today: Essays on Divine Being and Act. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1995.

Scobie, Charles. TheWays of our God: An Approach to Biblical Theology. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003.Google Scholar

Scrutton, Anastasia. “Emotion in Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas: A Way Forward for the Im/passibility Debate?” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7 (2005), pp. 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shortt, Rupert (ed.). God's Advocates: Christian Thinkers in Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2005.

Shults, F. LeRon.Reforming the Doctrine of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2005.Google Scholar

Shults, F. LeRon.Reforming Theological Anthropology: After the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003.Google Scholar

Simoni, Henry. “Divine Passibility and the Problem of Radical Particularity: Does God Feel Your Pain?” Religious Studies 33 (1997), pp. 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smedes, Taede A.Chaos, Complexity, and God: Divine Action and Scientism. Leuven – Paris – Dudley, MA: Peeters, 2004.Google Scholar

Smith, Christian. Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. OxfordUniversity Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, James K. A.Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of the Incarnation. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, James K. A. and Olthius, James H. (eds.). Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005.

Smith, J. Warren.Passion and Paradise: Human and Divine Emotion in the Thought of Gregory of Nyssa. New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 2004.Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C.The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2003.Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C.What is an Emotion? Classic and Contemporary Readings, 2nd edn. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Soskice, Janet Martin, “Athens and Jerusalem, Alexandria and Edessa: Is there a Metaphysics of Scripture?” International Journal of Systematic Theology 8 (2006), 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solomon, Robert C.Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.Google Scholar

Speidell, Todd H. “A Trinitarian Ontology of Persons in Society,” Scottish Journal of Theology 47 (1994), pp. 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiegel, James S.The Benefits of Providence: A New Look at Divine Sovereignty. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Stacey, David. Prophetic Drama in the Old Testament. London: Epworth, 1990.Google Scholar

Steiner, George. Tolstoy or Dostoevsky: An Essay in Contrast. London: Faber and Faber, 1959.Google Scholar

Stewart, James S.A Man in Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1975.Google Scholar

Stiver, Dan R.Theology after Ricoeur: New Directions in Hermeneutical Theology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2001.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F.Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Surin, Kenneth (ed.). Christ, Ethics, and Tragedy: Essays in Honor of Donald MacKinnon. Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Te Velde, Rudi. Aquinas on God: The “Divine Science” of theSumma Theologiae. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Thiselton, Anthony C.The Hermeneutics of Doctrine. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, U.K.: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2007.Google Scholar

Thiselton, Anthony C.New Horizons in Hermeneutics: The Theory and Practice of Transforming Biblical Reading. Grand Rapids, MI and Carlisle, U.K.: Zondervan and Paternoster, 1992.Google Scholar

Thomas, Owen C. (ed.). God's Activity in the World: The Contemporary Problem. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983.

Thomassen, Niels. Communicative Ethics in Theory and Practice, tr. Irons, John. London: Macmillan, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, John. Modern Trinitarian Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Thompson, Marianne Meye.The Promise of the Father: Jesus and God in the New Testament. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2000.Google Scholar

Tiessen, Terrance. Providence and Prayer: How does God Work in the World?Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tilley, Terrence W.The Evils of Theodicy. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar

Tillich, Paul. Theology and Culture. OxfordUniversity Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Torchia, Joseph. Exploring Personhood: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Human Nature. Lanham, MD and Plymouth, U.K.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar

Tracy, David. On Naming the Present: God, Hermeneutics, and Church. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis and London: SCM, 1994.Google Scholar

Trible, Phylis. God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Tupper, E. Frank.A Scandalous Providence: The Jesus Story of the Compassion of God. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Turcescu, Lucian. Gregory of Nyssa and the Concept of Divine Persons. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J.Biblical Narrative in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: A Study in Hermeneutics and Theology. Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRef

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (gen. ed.). Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker. 2005.

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. “Discourse on Matter: Hermeneutics and the ‘Miracle’ of Understanding,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7 (2005), pp. 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J.The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-linguistic Approach to Christian Theology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J.First Theology: God, Scripture, and Hermeneutics. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C. “Human Being, Individual and Social,” in Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine. Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 158–88.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J.Is There a Meaning in this Text? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (ed.). Nothing Greater, Nothing Better: Theological Essays on the Love of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2001.

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. “Once more into the Borderlands: The Way of Wisdom in Philosophy and Theology after the ‘Turn to Drama’,” in Vanhoozer, and Warner, Martin (eds.), Transcending Boundaries in Philosophy and Theology: Reason, Meaning, and Experience. Aldershott, U.K.: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 31–54.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (ed.). The Trinity in a Pluralistic Age: Theological Essays on Culture and Religion. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997.

Vanhoozer, Kevin J. “Triune Discourse: Theological Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks,” in Lauber, David and Treier, Daniel (eds.), Trinitarian Theology for the Church: Scripture, Community, Worship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2009, pp. 23–78.Google Scholar

Vanstone, W. H.Love's Endeavor, Love's Expense: The Response of Being to the Love of God. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1977.Google Scholar

Vischer, Wilhelm. “Words and the Word: The Anthropomorphisms of the Biblical Revelation,” Interpretation 3 (1949), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volf, Miroslav. After Our Likeness: The Church as the Image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Volf, Miroslav (ed.). The Future of Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1996.

Volf, Miroslav and Welker, Michael, (eds.). God's Life in Trinity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006.

Voorwinde, Stephen. Jesus' Emotions in the Fourth Gospel: Human or Divine?London and New York: T. & T. Clark International, 2005.Google Scholar

Ward, Graham (ed.). The Postmodern God: A Theological Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

Ward, Keith. Divine Action. London: Collins, 1990.Google Scholar

Ware, Bruce A. (ed.). Perspectives on the Doctrine of God: Four Views. Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman Publishers, 2008.

Warfield, B. B. “On the Emotional Life of our Lord,” in The Person and Work of Christ. Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1970, pp. 93–145.Google Scholar

Webb, Stephen H.The Divine Voice: Christian Proclamation and the Theology of Sound. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Webster, John (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef

Webster, John. Confessing God: Essays in Christian Dogmatics II. London and New York: T. & T. Clark, 2005.Google Scholar

Webster, John “God's Perfect Life,” in Volf, Miroslav and Welker, Michael (eds.), God's Life in Trinity. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2006, pp. 143–52.Google Scholar

Webster, JohnHoly Scripture: A Dogmatic Sketch. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster, JohnPresence and Perfection. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., forthcoming.

Webster, John “Resurrection and Scripture,” in Lincoln, Andrew and Paddison, Angus (eds.), Christology and Scripture: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: T & T Clark, 2007, pp. 138–55.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G.Does God Suffer?University of Notre Dame Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G. “Easter Saturday and the Suffering of God: The Theology of Alan E. Lewis,” International Journal of Systematic Theology 5 (2003), pp. 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westphal, Merold. Overcoming Onto-theology: Toward a Postmodern Christian Faith. New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North.Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, corrected edition, Griffin, David Ray and Sherburne, Donald W. (eds.). New York: The Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Wicker, Brian. The Story-Shaped World. Fiction and Metaphysics: Some Variations on a Theme. University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Wiebe, Donald. The Irony of Theology and the Nature of Religious Thought. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Wilken, Robert. The Spirit of Early Christian Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, rev. edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Williams, Stephen. “More on Open Theism,” Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology 22 (2004), pp. 32–50.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Art in Action: Toward a Christian Aesthetic. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1980.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas “Could God Not Sorrow If We Do?” in Wilkins, Christopher I. (ed.), The Papers of the Henry Luce III Fellows in Theology, vol. V. Pittsburgh: The Association of Theological Schools in the United States and Canada, 2002, pp. 139–63.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, NicholasDivine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas “God Everlasting,” in Cahn, Steven M. and Shatz, David (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982, pp. 77–98.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas “Suffering Love,” in Morris, Thomas (ed.), Philosophy and the Christian Faith. University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, pp. 196–237.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas “The Unity Behind the Canon,” in Helmer, Christine and Landmesser, Christof (eds.), One Scripture or Many? Canon from Biblical, Theological, and Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 217–32.Google Scholar

Wood, Ralph. “Christianity and Bakhtin,” Modern Theology 18 (2002), pp. 119–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yocum, John. “A Cry of Dereliction?” International Journal of Systematic Theology 7 (2005), pp. 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yong, Amos. “‘Divine Action’ in Theology-and-Science: A Review Essay,” Zygon 43 (2008), pp. 191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zizioulas, John D.Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1985.Google Scholar

Zizioulas, John D.Communion and Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church. London and New York: T & T Clark, 2006.Google Scholar