Changing the landscape management paradigm with farmers

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139344524.006

4 - Changing the landscape management paradigm with farmers

A story of community-based resource management in the ‘Heartbreak Hills’, Victoria, Australia

from Part 1 - Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013

Ruth Beilin

Edited by

Helena Bender

Show author details

Helena Bender: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This case study describes a community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) program for conservation on private agricultural land. The farmers and government agencies in this study are associated with the Victorian Landcare program, now Landcare (LC); and in particular with the formation of Farmcare groups in the Strzelecki Ranges of Victoria, an area known historically as ‘the Heartbreak Hills’. CBNRM programs create a platform for farmers and their government support agencies to converge around changing landscape management outcomes. The program began in this cleared, highly eroded, steep hill country, located approximately two hours from the city of Melbourne, in 1992 and is ongoing. This chapter reflects on LC’s role as a CBNRM program, focusing on its ability to provide an umbrella organisation for the negotiation of ideas about sustainability in this landscape. In this way the LC program is positioned between and becomes a part of the negotiation of land management changes that are driven by the interpretation of science, technology and community local knowledge. This chapter describes how local people linked their individual property scales to a regional catchment scale, utilising ideas from systems thinking. By re-imagining their landscapes as connected to the wider landscapes around them, they came to change their management objectives. Ultimately this created different conservation and agricultural norms and values and changed their understanding of what it means to be ‘sustainable’.

What is Landcare?

Landcare in Victoria began in 1986 with an alliance between the Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) and the Victorian Department of Environment and Conservation (VDEC). These two agencies had very different programs. The VFF was focused on maximising production and markets for farmers’ products; and the Department was concerned with conservation values associated with revegetation, stream management, weed control, and increasing biodiversity associated with indigenous plant and animal species. Their decision to work together was heralded as a ‘win-win’ situation for farmers and conservationists, providing an opportunity to jointly define and implement a vision for sustainable landscapes in the state. In 1990 this model was taken up at a national level with a partnership between the National Farmers Federation (NFF) and the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) to promote Landcare nationally. LC is intended to promote local identification of important landscape management issues, to seek local solutions and to involve local communities in partnership with the responsible agencies to improve natural resource management (NRM) decision-making for sustainable landscape outcomes.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Reshaping Environments
An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainability in a Complex World
, pp. 82 - 113

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139344524.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Australian Government (2011) Review of caring for our country.

Beilin, R. (1999) Looking for Landcare: The landscape and the family farm. PhD thesis. RMIT, Melbourne.

Beilin, R. (2005) Photo-elicitation and the agricultural landscape: ‘seeing’ and ‘telling’ about farming, community and place. Visual Studies 20: 1, 56–68.Google Scholar

Beilin, R. (2007) Landscape with voices: Reflecting on resilience on farms in the ‘Heartbreak Hills’, Strzelecki ranges. Local-Global International Journal: Food, Farming and Communities 4: 141–60.Google Scholar

Beilin, R., Lindborg, R. and Queiroz, C. (2011) Biodiversity and land abandonment: Connecting agriculture, place and nature in the landscape. In Agnew, J. and Roca, Z. (eds) Landscapes, identities and development. Ashgate. pp. 243–56.

Beilin, R. and Reichelt, N. (2010) Community Landcare: a key player in building social-ecological resilience networks? Discussion Paper, 2009. State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria.

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Translated by Richard Nice.

Campbell, A. (1995) Landcare, facilitation and other issues. , accessed 24 November 2011.

Campbell, A. (1996) Pixels in the big picture: farm plans, rural landscapes and livelihoods. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies Working Paper 1996/1, Australian National University, Canberra.

Carr, A. (2001) Grass roots and green tape. Federation Press, Sydney.

Collier, J. C. Jr. and Collier, M. (1986) Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Cordell, D. and White, S. (2010) Securing a sustainable phosphorus future for Australia. Farm Policy Journal 7(3): 1–18.Google Scholar

Curtis, A. and Sample, R. (2010) CBNRM in Victoria: contributing to dialogue, learning and action. A report to the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW. ISBN 978–1–86467 220–6.

de Certeau, M. (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands. (1990) The year of Landcare. Flyer. Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Melbourne.

Department of Sustainability and Environment. (2009) Securing our natural future: A white paper for land and biodiversity at a time of climate change. , accessed 12 April 2011.

Eaton, M. (1990) Responding to the call for new landscape metaphors. Landscape Journal 9(1): 22–7.Google Scholar

Eckersley, R. (1992) Environmentalism and political theory. UCL, London, pp. 35–9.

Ewing, S. (1995) It’s in your hands: An assessment of Australian Landcare movement. PhD Thesis. University of Melbourne.

Ewing, S. (2007) The truth is out there! Knowledge sharing in Victoria’s Catchment Management Framework. , accessed 5 October 2010.

Fischer, J., Brosi, B., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Goldman, R., Goldstein, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Manning, A. D., Mooney, H., Pejchar, L., Ranganathan, J. and Tallis, H. (2008). Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6(7): 380–5.Google Scholar

Harper, D. (1994) On the authority of the image: Visual methods at the crossroads. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds). Handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, California, pp. 403–12.

Lane, M., Robinson, C. and Taylor, B. (2009) Contested country. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.

Lindenmayer, D.B. (1998) The design of wildlife corridors in wood production forests. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville, Australia.

Lines, W. (1991) Taming the Great South Land. Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E. and Griffith, R. (2009) Multi-level environmental governance: lessons from Australian natural resource management. Australian Geographer 40(2): 169–86.Google Scholar

Lutz, C. and Collins, J. (1994) The photograph as an intersection of gazes: the examples of National Geographic. In Taylor, L. (ed.) Visualising theory: Selected essays from Visual Anthropology Review 1990–1994. Routledge, NY, pp. 363–84.

Morrison, T., McAlpine, C., Rhodes, J., Peterson, A. and Schmidt, P. (2010) Back to the future? Planning for environmental outcomes and the new Caring for Our Country program. Australian Geographer 41(4): 521–38.Google Scholar

Munro, N., Fischer, J., Wood, J. and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2009) Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity. Ecological Applications 19(5): 1197–210.Google Scholar

Noble, W. S. (1976) The Strzeleckis: a new future for the Heartbreak Hills. Conservation Forests and Lands, East Melbourne.

Pressey, B. (1995) Conservation reserves in NSW: Crown jewels or leftovers? Search 26(2): 47–51.Google Scholar

Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–69.Google Scholar

Robins, L. and Kanowski, P. (2011) Crying for our country: eight ways in which ‘Caring for Our Country’ has undermined Australia’s regional model for natural resource management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 18: 88–90.Google Scholar

Simpson, R., Stefanski, A., Marshal, D., Moore, A., Richardson, A. (2010) In Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture, Proceedings of the 15th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference, 15–18 November 2010, Lincoln, New Zealand.

South Gippsland Development League (1966) The land of the lyre bird: A story of early settlement in the Great South Forest of South Gippsland. The Shire of Korumburra for the South Gippsland Development League, Victoria (first edition 1920).

Wall, P. and Ziebell, D. (1993) Farmcare note no. 1: Farmcare in the Strzelecki catchment. Department of Agriculture, Victoria.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.