How Far Back Should We Go? Why Restitution Should Be Small

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511584343.004

2 - How Far Back Should We Go? Why Restitution Should Be Small

from PART I - GENERAL ISSUES

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009

Tyler Cowen

Edited by

Jon Elster

Show author details

Tyler Cowen: Affiliation:
Department of Economics, George Mason University
Jon Elster: Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

How far back should we go when deciding to restitute? Does a theft or political crime cease to be morally relevant simply because it occurred in the very distant past? Should we care about each link in a long chain of thievery and oppression, should we care only about the most recent link, or should we care only about the first link?

Should the passage of time matter at all for moral claims?

The Hopi charge that their lands were stolen from them by the Navajo. If the United States government returns lands to the Navajo, should it also return some Navajo property to the Hopi?

In the post-Communist and transition economies, should we remedy only the injustices of the Communist era? Or should we go much further back and try to rectify previous injustices as well? Should it matter that the nobles virtually enslaved the Russian peasantry? Should it matter that the Ghenghis Khan sacked Baghdad in 1258?

Everyone living today, if he or she goes back far enough, can find ancestors who were oppressed and victimized. Few land titles have been acquired justly. Subsequent corporate assets have been built on stolen land or generated by investments on originally stolen land endowments.

The choice of time horizon for restitution becomes especially important to the extent we compound past losses at positive interest.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy , pp. 17 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584343.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beinart, Peter. “Lost Tribes: Native Americans and Government Anthropologists Feud over Indian Identity.” Lingua Franca, May/June 1999, 32–41.Google Scholar

Birks, Peter. An Introduction to the Law of Restitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Block, Walter, and Yeatts, Guillermo M. “The Economics and Ethics of Land Reform: A Critique of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace's ‘Toward a Better Distribution of Land: The Challenge of Agrarian Reform.’” Unpublished manuscript, University of Central Arkansas, 1999.

Callahan, Joan C. “On Harming the Dead.” Ethics, January 1987, 97, 341–352.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cowen, Tyler. “Discounting and Restitution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Spring 1997, 26, 168–185.CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Coming to Terms with the Past: A Framework for the Study of Justice in the Transition to Democracy.” Archives of European Sociology. 1998, 39, 1, 7–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Ethical Individualism and Presentism.” The Monist, July 1993, 76, 3, 333–348.CrossRef Google Scholar

Girvan, Norman. “The Question of Compensation: A Third World Perspective.” Race, July 1974, 16, 53–82.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenfield, Jeanette. The Return of Cultural Treasures.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Kritz, N. J., editor. Transitional Justice, vols. 1–3. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Lyons, David. “The New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land.” In Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981, 355–379.Google Scholar

McDonald, Michael. “Aboriginal Rights.” In Contemporary Issues in Political Philosophy. Edited by Shea, William R. and King-Frlow, John. New York: Science History Publications, 1976, 27–48.Google Scholar

Margalit, Avishai, and Raz, Joseph “National self-determination.” The Journal of Philosophy, September 1990, 87, 9, 439–461.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marketti, James. “Estimated Present Value of Income Diverted through Slavery.” In The Wealth of Races: The Present Value of Benefits from Past Injustices. Edited by America, Richard F.. New York: Greenwood Press, 1990, 107–123.Google Scholar

Morris, Christopher W. “Existential Limits to the Rectification of Past Wrongs.” American Philosophical Quarterly, April 1984, 21, 2, 175–182.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar

Palmer, George E.The Law of Restitution. Boston: Little, Brown, & Company, 1978.Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Pogany, Istvan. Righting Wrongs in Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pross, Christian. Paying for the Past: The Struggle over Reparations for Surviving Victims of the Nazi Terror. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Regan, Donald. Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.CrossRef Google Scholar

Roemer, John E.Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sher, George. “Ancient Wrongs and Modern Rights.” In Justice between Age Groups and Generations. Edited by Laslett, Peter and Fishkin, James. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992, 48–61.Google Scholar

Simmons, A. John. “Historical Rights and Fair Shares.” Law and Philosophy, 1995, 14, 149–184.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tucker, Aviezer. “Privatization, Restitution, Property Rights and Justice.” Public Affairs Quarterly, October 1995, 9, 4, 345–361.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Superseding Historic Injustice.” Ethics, October 1992, 103, 4–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wheeler, Samuel C. III. “Reparations Reconstructed.” American Philosophical Quarterly, July 1997, 34, 3, 301–318.Google Scholar

Wilson, James. The Earth Shall Weep: A History of Native America. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.