1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
By
Edited by
Summary
After the fall of Baghdad in April 2003, the issues of the “de-Baathification” of Iraq and of compensation to the victims of the previous regime were immediately raised. Historical analogies with denazification and decommunization abounded. For observers and actors who want to learn from the past, and to avoid the mistakes of the past, the contributions to the present volume should provide useful food for thought. As the Iraqi regime was hardly the last surviving dictatorship, the lessons may remain useful in the indefinite future.
In a change of political regime, incoming leaders often want to punish or neutralize agents and leaders of the previous regime. In a transition to an authoritarian or totalitarian system, these measures are usually taken by executive fiat. The purges of the German judiciary after 1933 (Müller 1991, ch. 8) or of German schoolteachers in the Soviet occupational zone after 1945 (Welsh 1991) were not constrained by democracy or the rule of law. After transitions to democracy from an authoritarian or totalitarian regime, however, the new leaders usually want to demarcate themselves from the practices of their predecessors. Sometimes, to be sure, they will claim that their former oppressors have no grounds for complaining if they are treated by their own lawless procedures (for an example see Woller 1996, pp. 140–41). More frequently, however, the return to democracy is accompanied by the desire to see transitional justice done in an orderly manner, to prove that “We are not like them,” as Vaclav Havel said.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Adler, N. (2001), “In search of identity: The collapse of the Soviet Union and the recreation of Russia,” in , , and (eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, Oxford University Press, pp. 275–302.Google Scholar
Aguilar, P. (2001), “Justice, politics, and memory in the Spanish transition,” in , , and (eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, Oxford University Press, pp. 92–118.Google Scholar
Bancaud, A. (2003), “L'épuration des épurateurs: La magistrature,” in (ed.), Une poignée de misérables: L'épuration de la société française après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, Paris: Fayard, pp. 172–203.Google Scholar
, ed. (2003), Une poignée de misérables: L'épuration de la société française après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
(1993), Les lendemains qui déchantent: Le Parti Communiste Français à la Libération, Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. (1999), “Beyond Nuremberg: Individual responsibility for war crimes,” in and (eds.), Human Rights in Political Transitions, New York: Zenith Books, pp. 53–92.Google Scholar
(2004), Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), Accountability for Crimes of the Past and the Challenges of Criminal Prosecution: The Case of Ethiopia, Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Halmai, G., and Scheppele, K. (1997), “Living well is the best revenge: The Hungarian approach to judging the past,” in (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 155–84.Google Scholar
Karsai, L. (2000), “The People's Courts and revolutionary justice in Hungary, 1945–46,” in , , and (eds.), The Politics of Retribution in Europe, Princeton University Press, pp. 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1995), Transitional Justice, Vols. 1–3, Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
, ed. (2001), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
(1996), “Reconciliation without justice,” Southern African Review of Books, No. 46, reprinted in and (eds.), Religion and Media, Stanford University Press, 2001, pp. 376–87.Google Scholar
Mayorga, R. A. (1997), “Democracy dignified and an end to impunity: Bolivia's military dictatorship on trial,” in (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
(2001), Victors' Justice, Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Japanese Studies (reprint of 1971 edition with a new Preface).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalepa, M. (2003), “Punish all perpetrators or protect the innocent? Designing institutions of transitional justice” (unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Columbia University).
NOU (Norges Offentlige Utredninger) (1997), Inndragning av J⊘disk Eiendom i Norge under den 2. Verdenskrig, Oslo.
(1991), “Revolutions in Eastern Europe,” University of Chicago Law Review 58, 823–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. (1995), “Destalinization in the former Soviet Union,” in (ed.), Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, pp. 113–28.Google Scholar
Walicki, A. (1997), “Transitional justice and the political struggles of post-Communist Poland,” in , Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, pp. 185–238.Google Scholar
Welsh, H. (1991), “Anti-faschistisch-demokratische Umwälzung in der sowjetischen Bezatsungszone Deutschlands,” in and (eds.), Politische Säuberung in Europa, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, pp. 84–107.Google Scholar
(1996), Die Abrechnung mit dem Faschismus in Italien 1943 bis 1948, Munich: Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 3
- Cited by