Book contents
- Rewilding
- Ecological Reviews
- Rewilding
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Rewilding: a captivating, controversial, twenty-first-century concept to address ecological degradation in a changing world
- Chapter Two History of rewilding: ideas and practice*
- Chapter Three For wilderness or wildness? Decolonising rewilding
- Chapter Four Pleistocene rewilding: an enlightening thought experiment
- Chapter Five Trophic rewilding: ecological restoration of top-down trophic interactions to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems
- Chapter Six Rewilding through land abandonment
- Chapter Seven Rewilding and restoration
- Chapter Eight Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding
- Chapter Nine Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature
- Chapter Ten The psychology of rewilding
- Chapter Eleven The high art of rewilding: lessons from curating Earth art
- Chapter Twelve Rewilding a country: Britain as a study case
- Chapter Thirteen Bringing back large carnivores to rewild landscapes
- Chapter Fourteen Rewilding cities
- Chapter Fifteen The role of translocation in rewilding
- Chapter Sixteen Top-down control of ecosystems and the case for rewilding: does it all add up?
- Chapter Seventeen Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions
- Chapter Eighteen Auditing the wild: how do we assess if rewilding objectives are achieved?
- Chapter Nineteen Adaptive co-management and conflict resolution for rewilding across development contexts
- Chapter Twenty The future of rewilding: fostering nature and people in a changing world
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter Fourteen - Rewilding cities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2019
Book contents
- Rewilding
- Ecological Reviews
- Rewilding
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Rewilding: a captivating, controversial, twenty-first-century concept to address ecological degradation in a changing world
- Chapter Two History of rewilding: ideas and practice*
- Chapter Three For wilderness or wildness? Decolonising rewilding
- Chapter Four Pleistocene rewilding: an enlightening thought experiment
- Chapter Five Trophic rewilding: ecological restoration of top-down trophic interactions to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems
- Chapter Six Rewilding through land abandonment
- Chapter Seven Rewilding and restoration
- Chapter Eight Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding
- Chapter Nine Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature
- Chapter Ten The psychology of rewilding
- Chapter Eleven The high art of rewilding: lessons from curating Earth art
- Chapter Twelve Rewilding a country: Britain as a study case
- Chapter Thirteen Bringing back large carnivores to rewild landscapes
- Chapter Fourteen Rewilding cities
- Chapter Fifteen The role of translocation in rewilding
- Chapter Sixteen Top-down control of ecosystems and the case for rewilding: does it all add up?
- Chapter Seventeen Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions
- Chapter Eighteen Auditing the wild: how do we assess if rewilding objectives are achieved?
- Chapter Nineteen Adaptive co-management and conflict resolution for rewilding across development contexts
- Chapter Twenty The future of rewilding: fostering nature and people in a changing world
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rewilding , pp. 280 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Allaback, S. (2000). Mission 66 visitor centers: the history of a building type. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951d02714653.Google Scholar
Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Beckmann, J.P., Clevenger, A.P., Huijser, M., and Hilty, J.A. (2012). Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Benson, E. (2010). Wired wilderness: technologies of tracking and the making of modern wildlife. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A., Kotkin, J., and Balderas-Guzmán, C. (2017). Infinite suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Bijker, W.E. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Birge-Liberman, P. (2010). (Re)Greening the city: urban park restoration as a spatial fix. Geography Compass, 4, 1392–1407.Google Scholar
Bland, A. (2015). Will driverless cars mean less roadkill? Smithsonian. 2 November 2015. www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/will-driverless-cars-mean-less-roadkill-180957103/.Google Scholar
Boydston, E.E. (2005). Behavior, ecology, and detection surveys of mammalian carnivores in the Presidio. Henderson, NV: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Bowser, A., Wiggins, A., Shanley, L., Preece, J., and Henderson, S. (2014). Sharing data while protecting privacy in citizen science. Interactions, 21(1), 70–73.Google Scholar
Bratton, B.H. (2016). The stack: on software and sovereignty, 1st edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brower, M. (2011). Developing animals: wildlife and early American photography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/24655.Google Scholar
Bullard, R.D. (1994). Unequal protection: environmental justice and communities of color. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Cantrell, B., Martin, L.J., and Ellis, E.C. (2017). Designing autonomy: opportunities for new wildness in the Anthropocene. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, 156–166.Google Scholar
Carr, E. (2007). Mission 66: modernism and the National Park dilemma. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press in association with Library of American Landscape History.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Catlin-Groves, C.L. (2012). The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, 2012, 349630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabot, D., and Bird, D.M. (2015). Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: where do unmanned aircraft fit in? Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Virtual Issue, 1, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, F.M. (1900). Bird studies with a camera; with introductory chapters on the outfit and methods of the bird photographer. New York.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1, 7–28.Google Scholar
Cuff, D., Hansen, M., and Kang, J. (2008). Urban sensing: out of the woods. Communications of the ACM, 51, 24–33.Google Scholar
Dear, M. (1991). The postmodern urban condition, 1st edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dear, M. (2002). Los Angeles and the Chicago School: invitation to a debate. City & Community, 1, 5–32.Google Scholar
Dooling, S. (2009). Ecological gentrification: a research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33, 621–639.Google Scholar
Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 799–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D.R., Campbell, L.K., and Svendsen, E.S. (2012). The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics, 21, 26–48.Google Scholar
Foreman, D. (2004). Rewilding North America: a vision for conservation in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Foth, M., Forlano, L., Satchell, C., Gibbs, M., and Donath, J. (2011). From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedberg, A. (2006). The virtual window: from Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gabrys, J. (2014). Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 30–48.Google Scholar
Gandy, M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
Gandy, M. (2013). Marginalia: aesthetics, ecology, and urban wastelands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1301–1316.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, S., and US Environment Correspondent. (2010). BP switches on live video from oil leak. Guardian, 21 May 2010, sec. Environment. www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/may/20/deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-live-web-footage.Google Scholar
Graham, S., and Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grusin, R. (2008). Culture, technology, and the creation of America’s National Parks, 1st edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guggisberg, C.A.W. (1977). Early wildlife photographers. New York, NY: Taplinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Halpern, O., LeCavalier, J., Calvillo, N., and Pietsch, W. (2013). Test-bed urbanism. Public Culture, 25, 272–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D.J. (2013). Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hegglin, D., Bontadina, F., Gloor, S., et al. (2004). Baiting red foxes in an urban area: a camera trap study. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68(4), 1010–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huiser, M., and McGowen, P.T. (2012). Reducing wildlife–vehicle collisions. In Beckmann, J.P., Clevenger, A.P., Huijser, M., and Hilty, J.A. (Eds.), Safe passages: highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Jachowski, D.S., Slotow, R., and Millspaugh, J.J. (2014). Good virtual fences make good neighbors: opportunities for conservation. Animal Conservation, 17(3), 187–196.Google Scholar
Kan-Rice, P. (2017). New mobile app to track close encounters with coyotes. ANR Blogs (blog). 13 February 2017. http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=23229.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A., and Yocom, K. (2011). The civics of urban nature: enacting hybrid landscapes. Environment and Planning – Part A, 43(6), 1305.Google Scholar
Kays, R.W., and Slauson, K.M. (2008). Remote cameras. In Long, R.A., McKay, P., Zielinski, W.J., and Ray, J.C. (Eds.), Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores (pp. 110–140). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2004). Mission 66. In Colomina, B., Brennan, A., and Kim, J. (Eds.), Cold War hothouses: inventing postwar culture, from cockpit to playboy. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, A.G. (2007). Counterculture green: the whole Earth catalog and American environmentalism. CultureAmerica. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kucera, T.E., and Barrett, R.H. (2011). A history of camera trapping. In O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., and Karanth, K.U. (Eds.), Camera traps in animal ecology (pp. 9–26). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Kupper, P. (2016). Nature’s laboratories: exploring the intersection between science and National Parks. In Howkins, A., Orsi, J., and Fiege, M. (Eds.), National Parks beyond the nation: global perspectives on ‘America’s best idea’ (Vol. 1). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lachmund, J., and Jasanoff, S. (2004). Knowing the urban wasteland: ecological expertise as local process. In Jasanoff, S. and Long-Martello, M. (Eds.), Earthly politics: local and global environmental governance (pp. 241–261). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., Hermant, E., and Shannon, S. (1998). Paris Ville Invisible. La Découverte Paris. www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/A-PARIS%20TOTAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Locke, S.L., Cline, M.D., Wetzel, D.L., Pittman, M.T., Brewer, C.E., and Harveson, L.A. (2005). A web-based digital camera for monitoring remote wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33(2), 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manovich, L. (1999). Database as symbolic form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 5(2), 80–99.Google Scholar
Masco, J. (2010). Bad weather: on planetary crisis. Social Studies of Science, 40, 7–40.Google Scholar
Mathey, J., and Rink, D. (2010). Urban wastelands – a chance for biodiversity in cities? Ecological aspects, social perceptions and acceptance of wilderness by residents. In Müller, N., Werner, R., and Kelcey, J.G. (Eds.), Urban biodiversity and design (pp. 406–424). Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
McCormick, E. (2017). Big Brother on wheels? Fired security robot divides local homeless people. Guardian, 17 December 2017, sec. US news. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/dec/16/san-francisco-homeless-robot.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2013). Reinventing Eden: the fate of nature in western culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W.J.T. (2002). Landscape and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nechwatal, S. (2016). Using gamification to connect classrooms to communities. Interaction, 44(3), 38.Google Scholar
Nesbit, W. (1926). How to hunt with the camera: a complete guide to all forms of outdoor photography, 1st edition. Boston, MA: E.P. Dutton & Co.Google Scholar
Ng, S.J., Dole, J.W., Sauvajot, R.M., Riley, S.P.D., and Valone, T.J. (2004). Use of highway undercrossings by wildlife in southern California. Biological Conservation, 115(3), 499–507.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.D., O’Connell, A.F., and Karanth, K.U. (2011). Camera traps in animal ecology and conservation: what’s next? In O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., and Karanth, K.U. (Eds.), Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses (pp. 253–263). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., and Karanth, K.U. (Eds.) (2010). Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: cartographic reason, mapping, and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(3), 327–356.Google Scholar
Rothman, H. (2004). The new urban park: Golden Gate National Recreation Area and civic environmentalism. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Svendsen, E.S. (2010). Civic environmental stewardship as a form of governance in New York City. http://originwww.nrs.fs.fed.us/nyc/local-resources/downloads/Svendsen_dissertation.pdf.Google Scholar
Whiston Spirn, A. (1995). Constructing nature: the legacy of Frederick Law Olmstead. In Cronon, W. (Ed.), Uncommon ground: toward reinventing nature (pp. 91–113). London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wolch, J.R. (1990). The shadow state: transformations in the voluntary sector. New York, NY: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
Wolch, J.R., and Emel, J. (1998). Animal geographies: place, politics, and identity in the nature–culture borderlands. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Wolch, J.R., Byrne, J., and Newell, J.P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.Google Scholar
Yasuda, M., and Kawakami, K. (2002). New method of monitoring remote wildlife via the internet. Ecological Research, 17, 119–124.Google Scholar
Zhou, N. (2017). Volvo admits its self-driving cars are confused by kangaroos. Guardian, 1 July 2017, sec. Technology. www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/01/volvo-admits-its-self-driving-cars-are-confused-by-kangaroos.Google Scholar
Zielinski, S. (1999). Audiovisions: cinema and television as tntr’actes in history. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by