Book contents
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Rights in Action
- Part I Rights in Historical Perspective
- Part II Institutional Mechanisms for Rights Claiming
- Part III Mobilizing Rights for the Marginalized
- Part IV Shaping Rights for New Citizens and Noncitizens
- Conclusion Findings and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Introduction - Rights in Action
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2021
Book contents
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Rights Claiming in South Korea
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Rights in Action
- Part I Rights in Historical Perspective
- Part II Institutional Mechanisms for Rights Claiming
- Part III Mobilizing Rights for the Marginalized
- Part IV Shaping Rights for New Citizens and Noncitizens
- Conclusion Findings and Future Directions
- Index
- References
Summary
The chapter opens with a discussion of what we mean by “rights” in the context of Korea. At its core, this book is about people who seek ways to express their grievances about perceived injustices. While “rights talk” has a rich pedigree in Western scholarship and “human rights” has gained international currency, we use the term “rights” loosely to encompass varied conceptions and subsets (e.g., constitutional rights; human rights; civil, political, social, economic, and cultural rights; citizens’ rights; women’s rights, minority rights), and to give contributors space to define rights in the context of their disciplines and the groups they study. Next, we situate this volume within existing literature on Korea related to democratization, social movements, the judicialization of politics, constitutionalism, and human rights. This volume asks: How have groups used rights language to frame and legitimate their demands in South Korea; in what ways have rights-claiming processes and tactics differed over time and across issues; and what remains fundamentally challenging for groups asserting their rights?
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rights Claiming in South Korea , pp. 1 - 18Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Alford, William P., ed. 2007. Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. 2014. “Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea.” Law & Society Review 48 (3): 563–93.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. 2019. “Hiding in Plain Sight: Pseudonymity and Participation in Legal Mobilization.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (2): 310–41.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L., and Moon, Yong-il. 2020. “Cause Lawyering and Movement Tactics: Disability Rights Movements in South Korea and Japan.” Law & Policy 42 (1): 5–30.Google Scholar
Chang, Paul. 2015. Protest Dialectics: State Repression and South Korea’s Democracy Movement, 1970–1979. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Hyo-Je. 2010. “Two Concepts of Human Rights in Contemporary Korea.” Development and Society 39 (2): 301–27.Google Scholar
Cho, Kuk. 2002. “The Crime of Adultery in Korea: Inadequate Means for Maintaining Morality and Protecting Women.” Journal of Korean Law 2: 81–100.Google Scholar
Cho, Kuk. 2007. “Transitional Justice in Korea: Legally Coping with Past Wrongs after Democratization.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 16: 579–612.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2018. The Politics of Love in Myanmar: LGBT Mobilization and Human Rights as a Way of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamant, Neil Jeffrey, Lubman, Stanley B., and O’Brien, Kevin J.. 2005. Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Eric A. 2000. The Ritual of Rights in Japan: Law, Society, and Health Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Abel. 1981. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, and Claiming.” Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–54.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goedde, Patricia. 2009. “From Dissidents to Institution-Builders: The Transformation of Public Interest Lawyers in South Korea.” East Asia Law Review 4: 63–90.Google Scholar
Goedde, Patricia 2010. “Legal Mobilization for Human Rights Protection in North Korea: Furthering Discourse or Discord?” Human Rights Quarterly 32 (3): 530–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedde, Patricia 2011. “Lawyers for a Democratic Society (Minbyeon): The Evolution of Its Legal Mobilization Process since 1988.” In South Korean Social Movements: From Democracy to Civil Society, edited by Shin, Gi-Wook and Chang, Paul Y., 224–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guichard, Justine. 2016. Regime Transition and the Judicial Politics of Enmity: Democratic Inclusion and Exclusion in South Korean Constitutional Justice. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. 2015. Making We the People: Democratic Constitutional Founding in Postwar Japan and South Korea. Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, Pyong-choon. 1986. Korean Jurisprudence, Politics, and Culture. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ishay, Micheline R. 2008. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Hun Joon. 2012. “Local, National, and International Determinants of Truth Commissions: The South Korean Experience.” Human Rights Quarterly 34 (3): 726–50.Google Scholar
Kim, Jisoo M. 2015. The Emotions of Justice: Gender, Status, and Legal Performance in Chosŏn Korea. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol, and Park, Jonghyun. 2012. “Causes and Conditions of Sustainable Judicialization of Politics in Korea.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Asia, edited by Dressel, Björn, 37–55. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak. 2012. Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Marie Seong-Hak 2016. “Can There Be Good Colonial Law? Korean Law and Jurisprudence under Japanese Rule Revisited.” In The Spirit of Korean Law: Korean Legal History in Context, edited by Marie, Seong-Hak Kim, 129–54. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min Joo. 2019. “South Korea Court Strikes Down Six-Decade-Old Abortion Ban.” Washington Post, April 11, 2019. www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-korea-court-strikes-down-six-decade-old-abortion-ban/2019/04/11/0200f028-5c43-11e9-842d-7d3ed7eb3957_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1bb58c88a2a6.Google Scholar
Kim, Sunhyuk. 2009. “Civic Engagement and Democracy in South Korea.” Korea Observer 40 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, Sunjoo, and Kim, Jungwon (compiled and translated). 2014. Wrongful Deaths: Selected Inquest Records from Nineteenth-Century Korea. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngmin, and Pettid, Michael J., eds. 2011. Women and Confucianism in Chosŏn Korea: New Perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C.. 2011. “Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers.” Law & Society Review 45 (4): 831–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, and Hale, Daniel Crocker. 2014. “Cause Lawyering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 301–20.Google Scholar
Mayali, Laurent, and Yoo, John S., eds. 2014. Current Issues in Korean Law. Berkeley: Robbins Collection. www.law.berkeley.edu/files/koreanlaw.pdf.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minbyeon 2018. Hangukeui gongik ingwon sosong (2) [Korea’s public interest/human rights litigation, Vol. 2]. Seoul: Beopmunsa.Google Scholar
Park, Won-soon. 2003. Yeoksaga ideureul mujoero harira [History shall acquit them]. Seoul: Durae.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A., eds. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Social Change. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, William. 1981. Legal Norms in a Confucian State. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Shaw, William, ed. 1991. Human Rights in Korea: Historical and Policy Perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook, and Chang, Paul, eds. 2011. South Korean Social Movements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shin, Hyun Bang. 2018. “Urban Movements and the Genealogy of Urban Rights Discourses: The Case of Urban Protesters against Redevelopment and Displacement in Seoul, South Korea.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2): 356–69.Google Scholar
Sidel, Mark. 2010. Law and Society in Vietnam: The Transition from Socialism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stammers, Neil. 1999. “Social Movements and the Social Construction of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 21 (4): 980–1008.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Patricia G., ed. 2014. Going to Court to Change Japan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. 2013. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2012. “Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion ‘From Below’.” International Organization 66 (2): 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2018. “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (3): 380–412.Google Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K., and Gallagher, Mary E., eds. 2011. Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Hyunah, ed. 2013. Law and Society in Korea. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Yang, Kun. 1989. “Law and Society Studies in Korea: Beyond the Hahm Theses.” Law & Society Review 23 (5): 891–901.Google Scholar
Yang, Kun. 2002. “Hangugui beobmunhwawa beobui jibae” [Korean legal culture and rule of law]. Beob cheolhak yeongu 5(1): 184–202.Google Scholar
Yeo, Andrew, and Chubb, Danielle, eds. 2018. North Korean Human Rights: Activists and Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, Dae-kyu. 2010. Law and Democracy in South Korea: Democratic Development since 1987. Seoul: Kyungnam University Press.Google Scholar