Thematic overview

Eimear Spain

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139030625.004

1 - Thematic overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2011

Eimear Spain

Show author details

Eimear Spain: Affiliation:
University of Limerick

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The aim of this book is to explore the availability of a criminal defence to one who acts in contravention of the letter of the law as a result of threats or circumstances, situations traditionally encompassed by the defences of duress and necessity. The defence of duress by threats, or duress per minas, is available to one who commits an act which ostensibly breaks the law of the land as a result of threats of a serious nature, while necessity and duress of circumstances operate to exculpate one who prima facie contravenes the law due to dire circumstances. The analysis contained herein aims to provide an original perspective on the approach taken in the criminal law to such defendants by embarking upon a fresh consideration in light of both ancient philosophy and more recent breakthroughs in modern psychology.

The defences under review in this book have engaged minds in many of the most stimulating debates in criminal law theory, from abstract philosophical considerations to more practical concerns relating to the formulation of individual criminal defences. Foremost among these is an exploration of the role of emotions in criminal behaviour. Through advances in modern psychology and neuroscience our understanding of the origin, effect and constitution of emotions is becoming clearer and it is imperative to reassess the criminal law in light of this enhanced awareness. This book aims to ascertain how the emotions experienced by an individual acting in response to threats or difficult circumstances affect his or her responsibility, both moral and criminal.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Role of Emotions in Criminal Law Defences
Duress, Necessity and Lesser Evils
, pp. 1 - 65

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030625.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bayles, M. D.‘Reconceptualising Necessity and Duress’Corrado, M L.Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law: A Collection of EssaysNew YorkGarland 1994 429

Wertheimer, A.CoercionPrinceton University Press 1987

Yeo, S.Compulsion in the Criminal LawSydneyThe Law Book Company Ltd 1990 26

Law Commission of England and WalesCriminal Law Report on Defences of General ApplicationLondonHMSO 1977

Alldridge, P.‘Duress, Duress of Circumstances and Necessity’ 1989 139 NLJ911Google Scholar

Dressler, J.Understanding Criminal LawNew YorkLexis Publishing 2001

Gorr, M.‘Duress and Culpability’ 2000 19 Criminal Justice3Google Scholar

Irish Law Reform CommissionConsultation Paper on Duress and Necessity39DublinLRC 2006

Irish Law Reform CommissionReport on Defences in Criminal Law95DublinLRC 2009

Nozick, R.Philosophical ExplanationsCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1981 520

Pillsbury, S. H.‘Moralizing the Passions of Criminal Punishment’ 1989 74 Cornell L. Rev655.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C.Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the LawPrinceton University Press 2004

Reilly, A.‘The Heart of the Matter: Emotion in Criminal Defences’ 1997 29 Ottawa L. Rev117Google Scholar

Kahan, D.Nussbaum, M. C.‘Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law’ 1996 96 Colum. L. Rev269Google Scholar

Hughes, J.‘Consequentialism and the Slippery Slope: A Response to Clark’ 2000 17 Journal of Philosophy213Google Scholar

Brock, D. W.‘Discrimination against the Elderly within a Consequentialist Approach to Health Care Resource Allocation’Weisstub, D. N.Thomassy, D. C.Gauthier, S.Tomossy, G. F.Aging: Culture, Health and Social ChangeDordrechtKluwer Academic Publishers 2001 65

Katz, L.Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal LawUniversity of Chicago Press 1987 35

Horder, J.‘Self-Defence, Necessity and Duress: Understanding the Relationship’ 1998 11 Can. J. L. and Jurisprudence143Google Scholar

Carr, C. L.‘Duress and Criminal Responsibility’ 1991 10 Law & Phil161Google Scholar

Brady, P.‘Just Deserts: Can a Retributivist Theory of Punishment be Justified?’ 2004 12 ISLRwww.islr.ie/Reviews/2004/review04Contents.phpGoogle Scholar

A Hart, H. L.Punishment and Responsibility, Essays in the Philosophy of LawOxfordClarendon Press 1968 215

Hall, J.Principles of Criminal LawIndianapolis, INBobbs-Merrill Co 1947

Kutz, L.‘Responsibility’Coleman, J.Shapiro, S.Himma, K. E.The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of LawOxford University Press 2002 571

Kadish, S.‘Excusing Crime’ 1987 75 Calif. L. Rev257Google Scholar

Horder, J.Excusing CrimeOxford University Press 2004 2

Stephen, J.A History of the Criminal Law of EnglandBuffalo, NYWilliam S. Hein 1993 95

Le Bel, J.suggested that ‘[d]etermining when to absolve a person for otherwise criminal behaviour is a value-laden exercise’ v. 2001 3 703Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q.Moral Judgment: Does the Abuse Excuse threaten our Legal System?New YorkHarper Collins 1997

Nourse, V.‘The New Normativity: The Abuse Excuse and the Resurgence of Judgment in the Criminal Law’ 1998 50 Stan. L. Rev1435Google Scholar

Dershowitz, A.The Abuse Excuse: And Other Cop-Outs, Sob Stories, and Evasions of ResponsibilityBoston, MALittle Brown and Company 1994 19

Nourse, V.‘Passion's Progress: Modern Law Reform and the Provocation Defence’ 1997 106 Yale Law Journal1331Google Scholar

Kahan, D.‘Two Liberal Fallacies in the Hate Crimes Debate’ 2001 20 Law and Philosophy175Google Scholar

Duff, R. A.Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal LawOxfordHart Publishing 2007

Aristotle, 384–322 BCThe Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean EthicsHarmondsworthPenguin 1976 111

Klimchuk, D.‘Moral Innocence, Normative Involuntariness, and Fundamental Justice’ 1998 18 CR96Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B.Cannibalism and the Common LawHarmondsworthPenguin 1986 232

Ashworth, A.Principles of Criminal LawOxford University Press 2003 225

Victorian Law Reform CommissionDefences to Homicide, Final ReportMelbourneThe Commission 2004 xxx

Fletcher, G. P.Rethinking Criminal LawBoston, MALittle, Brown and Company 1978

Mousourakis, G.‘Emotion, Choice and the Rationale of the Provocation Defence’ 1999 30 Cambrian L. Rev24Google Scholar

Horder, J.Provocation and ResponsibilityOxfordClarendon Press 1992 113

Duff, R. A.‘The Virtues and Vices of Virtue Jurisprudence’Chappell, T. D. J.Values and VirtuesOxford University Press 2006

Victorian Law Reform CommissionerDuress, Necessity and CoercionMelbourneThe Commissioner 1980

Rogers, J. W.Theories of Exculpatory Defences in the Criminal LawPh.D. ThesisUniversity College London 1999 44

Stuart, D.‘Supporting General Principles for Criminal Responsibility in the Model Penal Code with Suggestions for Reconsideration: A Canadian Perspective’ 2000 4 Buff. Crim. L. Rev13

Jinnett-Sack, S.‘Autonomy in the Company of Others’Ghrubb, A.Choices and Decisions in Health CareChichesterWiley 1993 106

Smith, J. C.Justification and Excuse in the Criminal LawLondonStevens and Sons 1989 95

Bacon, F.Elements of the Common Laws of EnglandLondonAssignes of I. More 1630

Horowitz, D. L.‘Justification and Excuse in the Program of the Criminal Law’ 1986 49 L. Contemp. Prob109Google Scholar

Milhizer, E. R.‘Justification and Excuse: What They Were, What They Are, and What They Ought to Be’ 2004 78 St. John's L. Rev725Google Scholar

Pollock, F.Maitland, F. W.The History of English Law before the Time of Edward ICambridge University Press 1895

Ormerod, D.Smith & Hogan Criminal LawOxford University Press 2005 248

Ghanayim, K.‘Excused Necessity in Western Legal Philosophy’ 2006 XIX Can. J. L and Juris31Google Scholar

Irish Law Reform CommissionConsultation Paper on Homicide: The Plea of Provocation27DublinLRC 2003

Fletcher, G. P.‘Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse’ 1978 26 UCLA L. Rev1355Google Scholar

Finkelstein, C.‘Excuses and Dispositions in Criminal Law’ 2002 6 Buff. Crim. L. Rev317Google Scholar

Murphy, J. G.Retribution, Justice and TherapyDordrechtReidel Publishing Company 1979 132

Tadros, V.Criminal ResponsibilityOxford University Press 2005 9

Hume, D.A Treatise of Human NatureOxford University Press 1978

Robinson, P.‘Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds vs. Reasons’Smith, A. T. H.Simester, A.Harm and CulpabilityOxfordClarendon Press 1996 45

Schopp, R. F.Justification Defenses and Just ConvictionsCambridge University Press 1998 4

Kadish, S. H.Schulhofer, S. J.Criminal Law and Its ProcessesBoston, MALittle, Brown and Company 1995 136

Reilly, A.Mikus, R.‘R v Hibbert: The Theoretical Foundations of Duress’ 1996 30 U.B.C. L. Rev181Google Scholar

Moore, M. S.‘Causation and the Excuses’ 1985 73 Calif. L. Rev1091Google Scholar

LaFave, W.Scott, A.Criminal LawSt. Paul, MNWest Publishing Company 1986

Berger, B. L.‘A Choice Among Values: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives on the Defence of Necessity’ 2002 39 Alberta L. Rev848Google Scholar

Clarkson, C. M. VKeating, H. M.Cunningham, S. R.Criminal Law: Text and MaterialsLondonSweet & Maxwell 2007 74

Dennis, I.‘Reverse Onuses and the Presumption of Innocence: In Search of Principle’ 2005 Crim. L. Rev 901 912Google Scholar

Funk, M.‘Justifying Justifications’ 1999 19 OJLS630Google Scholar

McAuley, F.Mc Cutcheon, P.Criminal LiabilityDublinRound Hall/Sweet & Maxwell 2000 115

McSherry, B.‘Voluntariness, Intention, and the Defence of Mental Disorder: Toward a Rational Approach’ 2003 21 Behav. Sci. Law581Google Scholar

Laverick, F.Killing in Self-DefenceOxford University Press 2006 15

Simpson, A. W. B.Cannibalism and the Common LawHarmondsworthPenguin 1986 242

Williams, G.Criminal Law: The General PartLondonStevens & Sons 1961

Williams, G.‘Offences and Defences’ 1982 2 LS233Google Scholar

Glazebrook, P. R.‘The Necessity Plea in English Law’ 1972 30 Camb. L. J87Google Scholar

Newman, C.Middleton, B.‘Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspectives on the Defence of “Reasonable Excuse”’ 2010 74 JCL472Google Scholar

Gardner, S.‘Case Comment: Criminal Defences by Judicial Discretion’ 1995 LQR 177 179Google Scholar

Lanham, D.‘Larsonneur Revisited’ 1976 Crim. L. R 276Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.