Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    ROGERS, JASON 2010. In Defense of a Version of Satisficing Consequentialism. Utilitas, Vol. 22, Issue. 02, p. 198.

    Mukerji, Nikil 2016. The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered. Vol. 51, Issue. , p. 87.

    Mukerji, Nikil 2016. The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered. Vol. 51, Issue. , p. 57.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: December 2009

4 - Satisficing and Substantive Values

Summary

Satisficing theories, whether of rationality or morality, do not require agents to maximize the good. They demand only that agents bring about outcomes that are, in one or both of two senses, “good enough.” In the first sense, an outcome is good enough if it is above some absolute threshold of goodness; this yields a view that I will call absolute-level satisficing. In the second sense, an outcome is good enough if it is reasonably close to the best outcome the agent could bring about; this leads to what I will call comparative satisficing. These two views coincide in their implications for a specific sort of case, in which the situation is now fairly far below the absolute-level threshold and an agent can at best bring it to a point somewhat above that threshold. Here both absolute-level and comparative satisficing say that one need not bring about the best available outcome, though of course one may; one is required only to improve the situation to the absolute threshold. But in other cases the views diverge. If the situation is now far below the absolute threshold and, no matter what, will remain below it, absolute-level satisficing requires agents to do everything they can to improve the situation; here its implications coincide with those of maximizing. But comparative satisficing is less demanding, requiring agents only to make some reasonable percentage of the largest improvement they can.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Satisficing and Maximizing
  • Online ISBN: 9780511617058
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617058
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×