Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T09:45:08.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Distributed Transfer Learning via Cooperative Matrix Factorization

from Part Three - Alternative Learning Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2012

Evan Xiang
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Nathan Liu
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Qiang Yang
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Ron Bekkerman
Affiliation:
LinkedIn Corporation, Mountain View, California
Mikhail Bilenko
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington
John Langford
Affiliation:
Yahoo! Research, New York
Get access

Summary

Machine learning and data-mining technologies have already achieved significant success in many knowledge engineering areas including web search, computational advertising, recommender systems, etc. A major challenge in machine learning is the data sparsity problem. For example, in the domain of online recommender systems, we attempt to recommend information items (e.g., movies, TV, books, news, images, web pages, etc.) that are likely to be of interest to the user. However, the item space is usually very large and the amount of user preference values is small. When the user data are too sparse, it is difficult to obtain a reliable and useful model for recommendation. Whereas large online sites like Amazon and Google can easily access huge volumes of user data, the enormous number of smaller online business sites, which collectively constitute the long tail of the web, are much more likely to have very sparse user data and have difficulty in generating accurate recommendations. One potential solution to the data sparsity problem is to transfer knowledge from other information sources (e.g., Mehta and Hofmann, 2007; Li, Yang, and Xue, 2009). Such techniques for knowledge transfer are called transfer learning (see, e.g., Pan and Yang, 2010). An additional issue is that, in reality, many small websites often attract similar users and/or provide similar items, if not the identical ones, which implies that data about such users/items could potentially be distributed across different systems. For example, Delicious and Digg are both popular online social bookmarking tools.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×