Climate change policy: impacts, assessments, and responses

Andrew Dessler; Edward A. Parson

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819506.006

4 - Climate change policy: impacts, assessments, and responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Andrew Dessler and

Edward A. Parson

Show author details

Andrew Dessler: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Edward A. Parson: Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Understanding the science of climate change provides only part of what is needed to decide what to do about the issue. Deciding how to proceed also requires information about the likely impacts of climate change on human society, the options available to respond to climate change, and the tradeoffs these options present in terms of effectiveness, benefits, costs, and risks. This chapter summarizes present knowledge and uncertainties on these matters.

The responses available to deal with climate change fall into two broad categories, called adaptation and mitigation, plus a third type of potential response, only recently receiving serious attention, called geoengineering. Adaptation measures target the impacts of climate change: they seek to adjust human society to the changing climate, to reduce the resultant harms. Examples include building sea walls or dikes to limit risks from higher sea levels or river flooding, or planting drought-resistant crops to deal with drier summers in agricultural regions. Mitigation measures target the causes of climate change: they seek to slow or stop climate change by reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases that are responsible.

In early climate debates, many advocates treated mitigation versus adaptation as an either-or choice, perhaps because they imagined attention and support for the response they favored would be weakened by acknowledging the need for the other. Fortunately, debate has moved past this false dichotomy, and it is now widely understood that both adaptation and mitigation are needed.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change
A Guide to the Debate
, pp. 112 - 159

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819506.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Clarke, Leon, Edmonds, J., Jacoby, H., Pitcher, H., Reilly, J., and Richels, R. (2007). Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations. Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1a. Washington, DC: US Climate Change Science Program.Google Scholar

A recent analysis of the economic, technological, and policy implications of stabilizing climate change at four alternative levels, based on joint controls of multiple greenhouse gases, using three integrated-assessment models.

,IPCC (2000). Emission Scenarios. Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

,IPCC (2007b). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E. (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

This is the most recent full assessment of the IPCC's Working Group II, which reviews knowledge of potential impacts of climate change, ability to adapt, and vulnerability of environmental and social systems to climate change.

,IPCC (2007c). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Metz, B., Davidson, O., Bosch, P., Dave, R., and Meyer, L. (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

This is the most recent full assessment of the IPCC's Working Group III, which reviews knowledge of technical and economic opportunities to reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases and policy instruments to promote such reductions.

,IPCC (2007d). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K, and Reisinger, A. (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

The IPCC “synthesis report” combines results from an assessment's three working groups to present an integrated analysis of the implications of alternative emissions trajectories and reduction goals.

Moss, Richardet al (2009). Representative Concentration Pathways: A New Approach to Scenario Development for the IPCC. Nature, in press. Available at: www.pnl.gov/gtsp/publications/2008/papers/20080903_nature_rcp_new_ scenarios.pdf

The 2000 special report on emissions scenarios provided the results and background for the IPCC baseline emissions scenarios used as inputs to climate-model projections through the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. The Moss et al. paper outlines the new process for generating climate scenarios, starting with coordination on alternative pathways for radiative forcing, to be used in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.

Nordhaus, William (2008). A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

The most recent analysis of climate mitigation and adaptation responses, using the DICE integrated-assessment model. Includes a discussion of the Stern Review and the role of discounting assumptions in generating its large climate-damage estimates, as well as a discussion of the policy choice between emission taxes and cap-and-trade systems.

Stern, Nicholas H. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

A comprehensive economic assessment of climate change, led by the former chief economic advisor of the UK government. Controversy over this assessment's high climate impact estimates, mainly due to a low discount rate, generated substantially increased attention to the problem of identifying socially optimal climate strategies.

Tester, Jefferson W., Drake, E.M., Driscoll, M.J., Golay, M.W., and Paters, W.A. (2005). Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

A comprehensive text on alternative energy resources and technologies, and the key uncertainties and analytic methods involved in assessing alternative energy futures.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.