Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:28:51.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Foundations of Landscape Stewardship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Claudia Bieling
Affiliation:
Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart
Tobias Plieninger
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Birkeland, P. W. (1999). Soils and Geomorphology. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., Siccama, T. G., Pierce, R. S. & Eaton, J. S. (1974). The export of nutrients and recovery of stable conditions following deforestation at Hubbard Brook. Ecological Monographs, 44, 255277.Google Scholar
Brady, N. C. & Weil, R. R. (2001). The Nature and Properties of Soils. 13th edn. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Regime Shifts in Lake Ecosystems: Pattern and Variation. Lodendorf/Luhe: International Ecology Institute.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. & Biggs, R. (2009). Freshwaters: Managing across scales in space and time. In Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World, Chapin, F. S. III, Kofinas, G. P., & Folke, C. (eds.). New York, NY: Springer, pp. 197220.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Ludwig, D. & Brock, W. A. (1999). Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change. Ecological Applications, 9, 751771.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. New York, NY: Crest.Google Scholar
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2004). The Ecosystem Approach (CBD Guidelines). Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III & Knapp, C. N. (2015). Sense of place: A process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 53, 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Kofinas, G. P. & Folke, C. (eds.). (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E., Collins, S. L., Baron, J. S., Inouye, D. W. & Turner, M. G. (2015a). Earth stewardship: An initiative by the Ecological Society of America to foster engagement to sustain Planet Earth. In Earth Stewardship: Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice, Rozzi, R., Chapin, F. S. III, Callicott, J. B., Pickett, S. T. A., Power, M. E. & Armesto, J. J. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 173194.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Power, M. E., Pickett, S. T. A., Freitag, A., Reynolds, J. A., Jackson, R. B., Lodge, D. M., Duke, C., Collins, S. L., Power, A. G. & Bartuska, A. (2011). Earth stewardship: Science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere, 2, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III & Shaver, G. R. (1985). Individualistic growth response of tundra plant species to environmental manipulations in the field. Ecology, 66, 564576.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Sommerkorn, M., Robards, M. D. & Hiller-Pegram, K. (2015b). Ecosystem stewardship: A resilience framework for arctic conservation. Global Environmental Change, 34, 207217.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S. III, Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Lavorel, S., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M. C. & Diaz, S. (2000). Consequences of changing biotic diversity. Nature, 405, 234242.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253260.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. & Vitousek, P. M. (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass-fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 6387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
De Groot, R., Ramakrishnan, P. S., van de Berg, A., Kulenthran, T., Muller, S., Pitt, D., Wascher, D. & Wijesuriya, G. (2005). Cultural and amenity services. In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (eds.). Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 455476.Google Scholar
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B. & Norberg, J. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 488494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K. & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. J., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. (2008). Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 211219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanley, N., Breeze, T. D., Ellis, C. & Goulson, D. (2015). Measuring the economic value of pollination services: Principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. Ecosystem Services, 14, 124132.Google Scholar
Hirota, M., Holmgren, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. (2011). Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science, 334, 232235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holling, C. S. & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imhoff, M. L., Bounoua, L., Ricketts, T., Loucks, C., Harriss, R. & Lawrence, W. T. (2004). Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature, 429, 870873.Google Scholar
Ives, A. R., Gross, K. & Klug, J. L. (1999). Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science, 286, 542544.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, L. & Keller, C. (2007). Eco-Spirit: Religions and Philosophy for the Earth. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, A.-M., Vaissière, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C. K. & Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Series B: Biological Sciences), 274, 303313.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. & Swift, M. J. (1997). Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science, 227, 504509.Google Scholar
McNaughton, S. J. (1977). Diversity and stability of ecological communities: A comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. American Naturalist, 111, 515525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current Status and Trends. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Myers, R. A. & Worm, B. (2003). Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature, 423, 283.Google Scholar
Power, M. E. & Chapin, F. S. III (2009). Planetary stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 399.Google Scholar
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E. & Wiseman, W. J. (2002). Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, A.K.A. ‘The dead zone’. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 235263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Gordon, L., Folke, C., Falkenmark, M. & Engvall, M. (1999). Linkages among water vapor flows, food production and terrestrial ecosystem services. Conservation Ecology, 3, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, M. & van Nes, E. H. (2004). Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 62306235.Google Scholar
Selby, M. J. (1993). Hillslope Materials and Processes. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35, 601617.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G. M., Persson, L. M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B. & Sorlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 1259855.Google Scholar
Suding, K. N., Lavorel, S., Chapin, F. S. III, Cornelissen, J. H. C., Díaz, S., Garnier, E., Goldberg, D., Hooper, D. U., Jackson, S. T. & Navas, M.-L. (2008). Scaling environmental change through the community level: A trait-based response- and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology, 14, 11251140.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (1995). Incompletely theorized agreement. Harvard Law Review, 108, 17331772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syvitski, J. P. M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J. & Green, P. A. (2005). Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science, 308, 376380.Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research, Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J. F. (eds.). New York, NY: Plenum Press. pp. 85125.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization) (2013). The Contribution of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies with Science. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Vannote, R. I., Minshall, G. W., Cummings, K. W., Sedell, J. R. & Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 120137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H. & Tilman, G. D. (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences. Ecological Applications, 7, 737750.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H. & Matson, P. A. (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience, 36, 368373.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., Naylor, R. L., Crews, T., David, M. B., Drinkwater, L. E., Holland, E., Johnes, P. J., Katzenberger, J., Martinelli, L. A., Matson, P. A., Nzigueheba, G., Ojima, D., Palm, C. A., Robertson, G. P., Sanchez, P. A., Townsend, A. R. & Zhang, F. S. (2009). Agriculture: Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science, 324, 15191520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, B., Kinzig, A. & Langridge, J. (1999). Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2, 95113.Google Scholar

Further Reading

References

Bawole, J. N. (2013). Public hearing or ‘hearing public’? An evaluation of the participation of local stakeholders in Environmental Impact Assessment of Ghana's Jubilee oil fields. Environmental Management, 52, 385397.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. F. & Peat, D. (1987). Science, Order and Creativity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Bone, J. (2009). Beyond biophobia: A response to Jackson and Rees. Sociology, 41, 917930.Google Scholar
Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright Forum, 17, 7079.Google Scholar
Brunetta, G. & Voghera, A. (2008). Evaluating landscape for shared values: tools, principles and methods. Landscape Research, 33, 7187.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M. & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commons, M. & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, E., Cassar, L. F., Christie, M. & Fazey, I. (2011a). Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 761782.Google Scholar
Conrad, E., F. Cassar, L., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izaovičová, Z., Barankova, Z., Christie, M. & Fazey, I. (2011b). Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 13, 2347.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2000). The European Landscape Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cumming, G. S. & Collier, J. (2005). Change and identity in complex systems. Ecology and Society, 10, 29. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art29/).Google Scholar
Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., Binford, M., Holt, R. D., Stickler, C. & van Holt, T. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 8, 975987.Google Scholar
De Montis, A. (2014). Impacts of the European Landscape Convention on national planning systems: A comparative investigation of six case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 124, 5365.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. (1973). The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hagerty, B. M., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K. & Bouwsema, M. (1993). An emerging theory of human relatedness. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 291296.Google Scholar
Halliday, A. & Glaser, M. (2011). A management perspective on social ecological systems: A generic system model and its application to a case study from Peru. Human Ecology Review, 18, 118.Google Scholar
Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 409421.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 123.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. & Brown, T. (1989). Environmental preference: A comparison of four domains of predictors. Environment and Behaviour, 21, 509530.Google Scholar
Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Opdam, P. (2014). Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: Introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landscape Ecology, 29, 13471360.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. & Selman, P. (2006). Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57, 199212.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. S. & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503515.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E. & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikusiński, G., Blicharska, M., Antonson, H., Henningsson, M., Göransson, G., Angelstam, P., & Seiler, A. (2013). Integrating ecological, social and cultural dimensions in the implementation of the Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 38, 384393.Google Scholar
Miller, B. W., Caplow, S. C. & Leslie, P. W. (2012). Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems. Conservation Biology, 26, 218227.Google Scholar
Molotch, H., Freudenburg, W. & Paulsen, K. E. (2000). History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. American Sociological Review, 65, 791823.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (2012). Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 221229.Google Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal, 14, 161170.Google Scholar
Naveh, Z. (1995). Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 4354.Google Scholar
Newton, P. B. (2009). A practical procedure for assessing resilience of social-ecological systems using the Systems Dynamics Approach. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7, 6771.Google Scholar
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 821.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325, 419.Google Scholar
Papayannis, T. & Mallarach, J. M. (2009). The Sacred Dimension of Protected Areas: Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the Delos Initiative – Ouranoupolis 2007. Gland: IUCN & Athens: Med-INA.Google Scholar
Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 455463.Google Scholar
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10, 147169.Google Scholar
Pyle, R. M. (1978). The extinction of experience. Horticulture, 56, 6467.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Romolini, M., Brinkley, W. & Wolf, K. L. (2012). What is urban environmental stewardship? Constructing a practitioner-derived framework (Research note PNW-RN-56). Portland: USDA.Google Scholar
Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 110.Google Scholar
Schultz, B. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development, Schmuck, P. & Schultz, P. W. (eds.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, pp. 6178.Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J. & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. (2011). Beyond the conventional: Meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 27542762.Google Scholar
Scott, A., Shorten, J., Owen, R. & Owen, I. (2011). What kind of countryside do the public want: Community visions from Wales UK? GeoJournal, 76, 417436.Google Scholar
Silvas, D. V. (2013). Measuring an Emotional Connection to Nature among Children. PhD thesis, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
Simaika, J. P. & Samways, M. J. (2010). Biophilia as a universal ethic for conserving biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 24, 903906.Google Scholar
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34, 561581.Google Scholar
Sternlieb, F., Bixler, R. P., Huber-Stearns, H. & Huayhuaca, C. (2013). A question of fit: Reflections on boundaries, organizations and social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 117125.Google Scholar
Van den Born, R. J. G., Lenders, R. H. J., de Groot, W. T. & Huijsman, E. (2001). The new biophilia: An exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environmental Conservation, 28, 6575.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. M. & Gobster, P. H. l. (2007). Interpreting landscape change: Measured biophysical change and surrounding social context. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 6780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willemen, L., Verburg, P. H., Hein, L. & van Mensvoort, M. E. F. (2008). Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 88, 3443.Google Scholar
Willemen, L., Hein, L. & Verburg, P. H. (2010). Evaluating the impact of regional development policies on future landscape services. Ecological Economics, 69, 22442254.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. & Vaske, J. R. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830840.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Goodale, E. & Chen, J. (2014). How contact with nature affects children's biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biological Conservation, 177, 109116.Google Scholar

Further Reading

References

Arnall, A., Thomas, D. S. G, Twyman, C. & Liverman, D. (2013). NGOs, elite capture and community-driven development: Perspectives in rural Mozambique. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 51, 305330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank. (2011). Guidelines for Knowledge Partnerships. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Environmental Policy and Governance, 16, 290306.Google Scholar
Bitzer, V. & Glasbergen, P. (2015). Business-NGO partnerships in global value chains: Part of the solution or part of the problem of sustainable change? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 3540.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, D. W. & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31, 214.Google Scholar
Brouwer, H., Woodhill, J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K. & van Vuft, S. (2015). The MSP Guide: How to Design and Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.Google Scholar
Buck, L. E., Kozar, R., Recha, J., Desalegn, A., Planicka, P. & Hart, A. K. (2014). A Landscape Perspective on Monitoring and Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management Trainers’ Manual. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Buck, L. E. & Scherr, S. J. (2009). Building innovation systems for managing complex landscapes. In The Sciences and Art of Adaptive Management: Innovating for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources Management, Moore, K. M. (ed.). Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, pp. 164186.Google Scholar
Calmon, M., Brancalion, P. H. S., Paese, A., Aronson, J., Castro, P., da Silva, S. C. & Rodrigues, R. R. (2011). Emerging threats and opportunities for large-scale ecological restoration in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Restoration Ecology, 19, 154158.Google Scholar
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M. & McNie, E. (2011). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 46154622.Google Scholar
Denier, L., Scherr, S., Shames, S., Chatterton, P., Hovani, L. & Stam, N. (2015). The Little Sustainable Landscapes Book. Oxford: Global Canopy Programme.Google Scholar
EcoAgriculture Partners & Cornell University (2008). Landscape Measures Resource Center (LMRC). (http://landscapemeasures.info).Google Scholar
Estrada-Carmona, N., Hart, A. K., De Clerck, F. A. J., Harvey, C. A. & Milder, J. C. (2014). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: An assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 111.Google Scholar
Franks, J. R. & Emery, S. B. (2013). Incentivising collaborative conservation: Lessons from existing environmental stewardship scheme options. Land Use Policy, 30, 847862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Martín, M., Bieling, C., Hart, A. & Plieninger, T. (2016). Integrated landscape initiatives in Europe: Multi-sectoral collaboration in multi-functional landscapes. Land Use Policy, 58, 4353.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E., Leeuwis, C., Andersson, J. A., Andriesse, W., Brouwer, A., Frost, P., Hebinck, P., Heitkönig, I., van Ittersum, M. K., Koning, N., Ruben, R., Slingerland, M., Udo, H., Veldkamp, T., van der Vijver, C., van Wijk, M. T. & Windmeijer, P. (2008). Competing claims on natural resources: What role for science? Ecology and Society, 13, 34. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art34/).Google Scholar
Glasbergen, P. (2011). Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 113.Google Scholar
Gray, B. & Stites, J. P. (2013). Sustainability through Partnerships: Capitalizing on Collaboration. (http://nbs.net/knowledge).Google Scholar
Grivas, C., & Puccio, G. (2012). The Innovative Team: Unleashing Creative Potential for Breakthrough Results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hart, A. K., Buck, L. E., Marsh, R. R., Milder, J. C. & Scherr, S. J. (2010). Ecoagriculture and the Collaborative Management of Rural Landscapes. (http://ecoagriculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ecoagriculture-and-the-collaborative-management-of-rural-landscapes-2010.pdf).Google Scholar
Hart, A. K., Mc Michael, P., Milder, J. C. & Scherr, S. J. (2015). Multi-functional landscapes from the grassroots? The role of rural producer movements. Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 305322.Google Scholar
Heiner, K., Shames, S. & Spiegel, E. (2016). Integrated Landscape Investment in Kenya: The State of the Policy Environment and Financing Innovations. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Naivasha, Imarisha (2012). Lake Naivasha Sustainable Development Action Plan (SDAP): First Action Plan (2012–2017) & Priority Actions for Imarisha Naivasha Restoration Programme and Sustainable Development in the Lake Naivasha Basin. (https://www.imarisha.le.ac.uk/sites/default/files/document-upload-folder/SDAP_2012–17_30_09_12.pdf).Google Scholar
Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M. & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34, 6778.Google Scholar
Kissinger, G. (2014a). Financing Strategies for Integrated Landscape Investment: Case Study of Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Kissinger, G. (2014b). Financing Strategies for Integrated Landscape Investment: Case study of Imarisha Naivasha, Kenya. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Kozar, R., Buck, L. E., Barrow, E. G., Sunderland, T. C. H., Catacutan, D. E., Planicka, C., Hart, A. K. & Willemen, L. (2014). Toward Viable Landscape Governance Systems: What Works? Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, J., Carrera, F., de Camino, R. & Villalobos, R. (2014). RIABM's Approach to Cross-Landscape Knowledge-Sharing: Ingredients for Success. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
LPFN (Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative) (2015a). Learning Network: Where Landscape Leaders Share Experiences, Find Tools and Resources, and Tackle Challenges Together. (http://peoplefoodandnature.org/learning-network).Google Scholar
LPFN (Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative) (2015b). Tools: Practicing a Landscape Approach is Complex. Good Tools Help you Sort out the Complexity. (http://peoplefoodandnature.org/learning-network/find-tools).Google Scholar
Malunga, C. & Banda, C. (2013). Understanding Organizational Sustainability through African Proverbs: Insights for Leaders and Facilitators. Bourton on Dunsmore: Practical Action Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. (2008). The realities of regional stewardship: From urban issues to natural landscapes. Public Land and Resources Law Review, 29, 123.Google Scholar
Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J. & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 6880.Google Scholar
Milder, J. A. & Hart, A. H. (2013). Reviewing Integrated Landscapes in Africa: Lessons for Drylands. (http://peoplefoodandnature.org/blog/reviewing-integrated-landscapes-in-africa-lessons-for-drylands).Google Scholar
Pattberg, P. & Widerberg, W. (2014). Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Building Blocks for Success. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
Pinto, S., Melo, F., Tabarelli, M., Padovsi, A., Mesquita, C., Scaramuzza, C., Castro, P., Carrrascosa, H., Calmon, M., Rodrigues, R., Cesar, R. & Brancalion, P. (2014). Governing and delivering a biome-wide restoration initiative: the case of Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil. Forests, 5(9), 22122229.Google Scholar
Prager, K. (2012). Collective efforts to manage cultural landscapes for resilience. In Resilience and the Cultural Landscape, Plieninger, T. and Bieling, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205223.Google Scholar
Poulton, C. & Macartney, J. (2012). Can public-private partnerships leverage private investment in agricultural value chains in Africa? A preliminary review. World Development, 40, 96109.Google Scholar
Primdahl, J. & Kristensen, L. S. (2011). The farmer as a landscape manager: Management roles and change patterns in a Danish region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 111, 107116.Google Scholar
Sanginga, P. C., Chitsike, S., Njuki, J., Kaaria, S. & Kanzikwera, R. (2007). Enhanced learning from multi-stakeholder partnerships: Lessons from the enabling rural innovation in Africa programme. Natural Resources Forum, 31, 273285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherr, S. J., Buck, L. E., Willemen, L. & Milder, J. C. (2014). Ecoagriculture: Integrated landscape management for people, food and nature. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 3, 117.Google Scholar
Scherr, S. J. & Heiner, K. (2016). Towards an Approach to Integrated Landscape Modeling for the SDGs. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Scherr, S. J., Mankad, K., Jaffee, S. & Negra, C. (2015). Steps Toward Green: Policy Responses to the Environmental Footprint of Commodity Agriculture in East and Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners/The World Bank.Google Scholar
Shackleton, C. M., Cundill, G. & Knight, A. T. (2009). Beyond just research: Experiences from southern Africa in developing social learning partnerships for resource conservation initiatives. Biotropica, 41, 563570.Google Scholar
Shames, S., Clarvis, M. H. & Kissinger, G. (2014). Financing Strategies for Integrated Landscape Investment: Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners.Google Scholar
Sobrevila, C. (2008). The Role of Indigenous Peoples in Biodiversity Conservation: The Natural but often Forgotten Partners. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Thaxton, M., Forster, T., Hazlewood, P., Mercado, L., Neely, C., Scherr, S., Wertz, L., Wood, S. & Zandri, E. (2015). Landscape Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Achieving the SDGs through Integrated Landscape Management. Washington, DC: EcoAgriculture Partners on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative.Google Scholar
Tui, S. H., Adekunle, A., Lundy, M., Tucker, J., Birachi, E., Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Ballantyne, P., Duncan, A., Cadilhon, J. & Mundy, P. (2013). What Are Innovation Platforms? Innovation Platform Brief No. 1. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).Google Scholar
Wageningen, UR (2015). Institutional Analysis Tool, Knowledge Co-Creation Portal. (http://www.mspguide.org/tool/institutional-analysis).Google Scholar
Zanzanaini, C., Tran, B. T., Singh, C., Hart, A. K., Milder, J. C. & De Clerck, F. A. J. (in review). Integrated landscape management for agriculture, livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: An assessment of experience from South and Southeast Asia.Google Scholar

Further Reading

References

Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloch, D. (1982). Animal life on the Faeroe Islands. In The Physical Environment of the Faroe Islands, Rutherford, G. K (ed.). The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers, pp. 5368.Google Scholar
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J. & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343, 14361437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brammer, J. R., Brunet, N. D., Burton, A. C., Cuerrier, A., Danielsen, F., Dewan, K., Herrmann, T. M., Jackson, M., Kennett, R., Larocque, G., Mulrennan, M., Pratihast, A. K., Saint-Arnaud, M., Scott, C. & Humphries, M. M. (2016). The role of digital data entry in participatory environmental monitoring. Conservation Biology, 30, 12771287.Google Scholar
CAFF (2013). Status and trends in Arctic biodiversity. In Arctic Biodiversity Assessment, Meltofte, H (ed.). Akureyi, Iceland: Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, pp. 4469.Google Scholar
Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A. M. Z., López, B. C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J. K., Masinde, S., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Newman, G., Rosemartin, A. & Turak, E. (2016). Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004).Google Scholar
Constantino, P. A. L., Buening, J. K., Silvius, K., Danielsen, F., Poulsen, M. K., Arroyo, P., Cruz, A. T., Ribeiro, K. T., Hvalkof, S., Durigan, C., Tofoli, C., Kinouchi, M. R., Leão, A., Estupinan, G., Tawada, R. & Fonseca, C. B. (2016). Monitoramento participativo da biodiversidade e dos recursos naturais (in Portuguese). Biodiversidade Brasileira, 16, l833.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F., Topp-Jørgensen, E., Levermann, N., Løvstrøm, P., Schiøtz, M., Enghoff, M. & Jakobsen, P. (2014). Counting what counts: Using local knowledge to improve Arctic resource management. Polar Geography, 37, 6991.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F. (2016). Expanding the Scientific Basis for How the World can Monitor and Manage Natural Resources. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen/NORDECO.Google Scholar
Eira, I. M. G., Jaedicke, C., Magga, O. H., Maynard, N. G., Vikhamar-Schuler, D. & Mathiesen, S. (2013). Traditional Sámi snow terminology and physical snow classification – two ways of knowing. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85, 117130.Google Scholar
Feodoroff, P. & Mustonen, T. (2013). Näätämö and Ponoi River Collaborative Management Plan. Kontiolahti: Snowchange Cooperative.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, G., Mallory, M. & Merkel, F. (2005). Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies of migratory birds. Ecology and Society, 10, 20. (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/).Google Scholar
Greenland Government (1999). Landstingslov nr. 12 af 29. oktober 1999 om fangst og jagt, §2 stk. 3. (http://dk.nanoq.gl).Google Scholar
Johnson, N., Behe, C., Danielsen, F., Krümmel, E.-M., Nickels, S. & Pulsifer, P. L. (2016). Community-Based Monitoring and Indigenous Knowledge in a Changing Arctic: A Review for the Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks. Ottawa: Inuit Circumpolar Council.Google Scholar
Kennett, R., Danielsen, F. & Silvius, K. M. (2015). Conservation management: Citizen science is not enough on its own. Nature, 521, 161.Google Scholar
Lund, J. F. (2014). Towards a more balanced view on the potentials of locally-based monitoring. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 237239.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2013). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2012 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2012. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2014). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2013 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2013. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2015a). Hunting of Hare in the Faroe Islands in 2014 and Other Information of Faroese Hare (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2014 og annað tilfar um føroysku haruna. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2015b). Facebook was the key to collecting data for the Faroese hare hunt (in Danish). Facebook var nøglen til indsamling af data for den færøske harejagt. Jagt & Jægere, 6 /7, 69.Google Scholar
Magnussen, E. (2016). Hunting of hare in the Faroe Islands in 2015 (in Faroese). Haruveiðan í Føroyum 2015. Tórshavn: University of the Faroe Islands.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T. (2013). Oral histories as a baseline of landscape restoration – Co-management and watershed knowledge in Jukajoki River. Fennia, 191, 7691.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T. (2014). Power discourses of fish death: Case of Linnunsuo peat production. Ambio, 43, 234243.Google Scholar
Mustonen, T. (2015). Communal visual histories to detect environmental change in northern areas: Examples of emerging North American and Eurasian practices. Ambio, 44, 766777.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. (2009). Living in a world of movement: Human resilience to environmental instability in Greenland. In Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions, Crate, S. A. & Nuttall, M. (eds.). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 292326.Google Scholar
Nordic Council of Ministers (2015). Local Knowledge and Resource Management. On the Use of Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Document and Manage Natural Resources in the Arctic. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (2012). Connecting cultural landscapes to resilience. In Resilience and the Cultural Landscape – Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments, Plieninger, T. & Bieling, C. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 326.Google Scholar
Post, E., Forchammer, M. C., Bret-Harte, M. S., Callaghan, T. V, Christensen, T. R., Elberling, B., Fox, A. D., Gilg, O., Hik, D. S., Høye, T. T., Ims, R. A., Jeppesen, E., Klein, D. R., Madson, J., Mc Cuire, A. D., Rysgaard, S., Schindler, D. E., Stirling, I., Tamstorf, M. P., Tyler, N. J. C., van der Wal, R., Welker, J., Wookey, P. A., Schmidt, N. M. & Aastrup, P. (2009). Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science, 325, 13551358.Google Scholar
Riedlinger, D. & Berkes, F. (2001). Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record, 37, 315328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejersen, F. (2003). Greenlands Nature Management (in Danish). Grønlands Naturforvaltning. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T. & Folke, C. (2016). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond – lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinions in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 1725.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×