Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: August 2016

53 - Longitudinal Cohort Research: Sowing, Nurturing, Waiting, Harvesting

from Section B - Social/Personality Development
Summary

Introduction

Our scientific contribution has been to study human development using the longitudinal birth-cohort method. This method starts with a list of all babies born in a defined place (typically a city or a country), within a defined period (typically a year). This list is referred to as a “cohort.” The babies are enrolled in the study (sometimes before they are born) and then followed and assessed repeatedly throughout their lives, as they grow up and grow old. Researchers and participants collaborate on the project together for many decades, which makes this method quite different from the sorts of research projects that other psychologists typically do. The research participants generously give of themselves over and over all their lives, vouchsafing the scientists the details of their most intimate, delicate, and even dangerous behaviors and experiences, as well as their body tissues.

The scientists, in turn, accept the ethical obligations to ask important questions, publish findings rapidly, preserve the data carefully for use in future years, and guard the participants’ confidentiality at all costs. We say “scientists” in the plural, because a longitudinal cohort study is far too ambitious an enterprise to be undertaken by one psychologist in his or her own lab. In fact, we are writing this chapter together because if we had worked alone, neither of us would appear in this book of high-achieving psychologists.

We think of a longitudinal cohort study as a scientific instrument, not unlike a large Hadron particle collider or a kilometers-wide radio-telescope antenna. Like one of these instruments, a cohort study is expensive, but pays for itself because it is a resource for many scientists who make multiple discoveries. Such scientific instruments are science-magnets; they attract collaboration among large numbers of scientists and staff from many different fields and nations. Like other large scientific instruments, a cohort study demands sustained dedication to fundraising. Instruments also require loving care and maintenance; in the case of a cohort study, this means dedication to keeping as many of the original cohort members as possible participating for decades. Our scientific careers have been devoted to two such studies. In both, well over 90 percent of the original cohort members still participate.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Scientists Making a Difference
  • Online ISBN: 9781316422250
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316422250
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Arseneault, L., Cannon, M., Poulton, R., Murray, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). Cannabis use in adolescence and risk for adult psychosis: Longitudinal prospective study. British Medical Journal, 325(7374), 1212–1213.
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., … & Poulton, R. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297(5582), 851–854.
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., … & Poulton, R. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301(5631), 386–389.
Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 355–375.