Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of statutes
- Table of cases
- 1 An introduction to English sentencing
- 2 Sentencing and the constitution
- 3 Sentencing aims, principles and policies
- 4 Elements of proportionality
- 5 Aggravation and mitigation
- 6 Persistence, prevention and prediction
- 7 Equality before the law
- 8 Multiple offenders
- 9 Custodial sentencing
- 10 Non-custodial sentencing
- 11 Procedural issues and ancillary orders
- 12 Special sentencing powers
- 13 Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of statutes
- Table of cases
- 1 An introduction to English sentencing
- 2 Sentencing and the constitution
- 3 Sentencing aims, principles and policies
- 4 Elements of proportionality
- 5 Aggravation and mitigation
- 6 Persistence, prevention and prediction
- 7 Equality before the law
- 8 Multiple offenders
- 9 Custodial sentencing
- 10 Non-custodial sentencing
- 11 Procedural issues and ancillary orders
- 12 Special sentencing powers
- 13 Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sentencing and Criminal Justice , pp. 390 - 408Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1970), Non-custodial and Semi-custodial Penalties, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1974), The Young Adult Offender, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1977), The Length of Prison Sentences, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1978), Sentences of Imprisonment: A Review of Maximum Penalties, London: HMSO
(2002b), ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Restorative Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, A. (2003b), ‘Sentencing and Sensitivity’, in and (eds.), The Criminological Foundations of Penal Policy: Essays in Honour of Roger Hood, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004a), ‘Social Control and Anti-social Behaviour: The Subversion of Human Rights?’ Law Quarterly Review, 120: 263Google Scholar
(2004b), ‘Criminal Justice Reform: Principles, Human Rights and Public Protection’, Criminal Law Review, 516Google Scholar
, and (1984), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders and the Sentencing Process’, Criminal Law Review, 195Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. and Player, E. (1998), ‘Sentencing, Equal Treatment and the Impact of Sanctions’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1997), ‘Recognising Elephants: The Problem of the Custody Threshold’, Criminal Law Review, 187Google Scholar
(2001), Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. (2004), ‘Is Asset Really an Asset?’ in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1980), ‘Why the Prison Population has Grown Larger and Younger’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 19: 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978), ‘Sentencing Problems Raised by Guilty Pleas’, Modern Law Review, 41: 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘A Significant Move towards Restorative Justice, or a Recipe for Unintended Consequences?’ Criminal Law Review, 211Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Youth Justice? Half a Century of Responses to Youth Offending’, Criminal Law Review, 167Google Scholar
, and (2001), Young Offenders: Law, Policy and Practice, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
and (1998), ‘Some Ethical Issues in Defending and Prosecuting Criminal Cases’, Criminal Law Review, 16Google Scholar
et al. (1986), Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, Washington: National Institute of JusticeGoogle Scholar
(1973), ‘The Efficacy of the Fine: The Case for Agnosticism’, Criminal Law Review, 543Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1974), ‘On the Decriminalisation of the Juvenile Court’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘The Suspended Sentence in England’, British Journal of Criminology, 21: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), ‘Limiting Prison Use: Experience in England and Wales’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26: 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1995), ‘The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1998), ‘Five Puzzles in von Hirsch's Theory of Punishment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (2004), ‘Empirical Research Relevant to Sentencing Frameworks’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
and (1982), ‘The Dangerousness Debate after the Floud Report’, British Journal of Criminology, 22: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), ‘Youth Justice in Great Britain’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31: 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E., Rex, S. and Robinson, G. (2004), ‘How Did We Get Here?’ in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2004), ‘Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. and Wilson, A. (2004), ‘Attitudes to Crime in Two High-Crime Communities’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
and (1981), Taking Offenders out of Circulation, Home Office Research Study 64, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996), ‘Point Prevalence of Mental Disorder in Unconvicted Male Prisoners’, British Medical Journal, 313: 1524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (eds.), (2000), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Burnett, R. (1994), Recidivism and Imprisonment, Home Office Research Bulletin 36: 19
and (2004), ‘So Prison Works, Does it?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Talking Tough, Acting Coy: What happened to the Anti-social Behaviour Order?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41: 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders: Finding a Focus for Diversion’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34: 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), A Review of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, Home Office Research Study 236, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987), Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach, Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services
(1997), ‘Pre-Sentence Reports: The Effects of Legislation and National Standards’, British Journal of Criminology, 37: 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavadino, M. (1999), ‘Diverting Mentally Disordered Offenders from Custody’, in and (eds.), Managing People Nobody Owns, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996), Fine Impositions and Enforcement Following the Criminal Justice Act 1993, Home Office Research Findings 36, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), Attitudes to Date Rape and Relationship Rape, Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of SurreyGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R. K. (1987), ‘The Practical Problems of the Sentencer’, in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal StudiesGoogle Scholar
Corbett, C. (1987), ‘Magistrates’ and Court Clerks' Sentencing Behaviour: An Experimental Study', in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal StudiesGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Crime, Courts and Confidence: Report of an Independent Inquiry into Alternatives to Prison, London: Esmee Fairbairn FoundationGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (1976), Alternative Measures to Imprisonment, Recommendation R (76) 10, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1984), Convention on Compensation for the Victims of Violent Crime, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1992), European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures, Recommendation No. R (92) 16, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1993), Consistency in Sentencing, Recommendation R (92) 17, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment) (1992), Report on the European Committee on the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Visit to the United Kingdom, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
CPT (2001), European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Punishment, Report of Inspection of English Prisons, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 2002, Cm 6054, London: The Stationery Office
Crown Prosecution Service (2003), Annual Report 2002–2003, London: Crown Prosecution Service
Daly, K. (2002), ‘Mind the Gap: Restorative Justice in Theory and Practice’, in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1997a), ‘An Essay on the Importance and Neglect of the Magistracy’, Criminal Law Review, 627Google Scholar
(1997b), ‘For the New Lord Chancellor – Some Causes for Concern about Magistrates’, Criminal Law Review, 861Google Scholar
(2000), ‘The Mischief of Plea Bargaining and Sentence Rewards’, Criminal Law Review, 894Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘“Filling in the Gaps” – A Study of Judicial Culture’, Criminal Law Review, 243Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1981), ‘Exploring Sources of Sentencing Disparity’, in (ed.), The Trial Process, New York: PlenumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004), Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004, Statistical Bulletin 10/04, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2003), ‘Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30: 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowds, L., and Hedderman, C. (1997), ‘The Sentencing of Men and Women’, in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘An Ambiguous Participant: The Victim and the Criminal Justice System’, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. (1993), ‘Perspectives on Race and Gender’, in and (eds.), Criminal Justice under Stress, London: BlackstoneGoogle Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1998), ‘Situational Crime Prevention: Effectiveness of Local Initiatives’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Community Penalties for Fine Default and Persistent Petty Offending, Home Office Research Findings 98, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2005), Human Rights and Criminal Justice, 2nd edn, forthcoming, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. (1997), ‘Human Development and Criminal Careers’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. (2002), ‘Developmental Criminology and Risk-Focused Prevention’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1992), ‘Changes in Crime and Punishment in England and America in the 1980s’, Justice Quarterly, 9: 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983), ‘Sex. Sentencing and Reconvictions’, British Journal of Criminology, 23: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003), Minority Ethnic Young People in the Youth Justice System, London: Youth Justice BoardGoogle Scholar
(1990), Trends in Crime and their Interpretation, Home Office Research Study 119, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1993), Ethnic Minorities and the Criminal Justice System, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 21, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Psychology of Judicial Sentencing, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1998), Sentencing Practice: An Examination of Decisions in Magistrates' Courts and the Crown Court in the mid-1990s, Home Office Research Study 180, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1999), Sentencing: State and Federal Law in Victoria, 2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D. (1987), ‘Regulating Pre-trial Decisions’, in (ed.), Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. (1998), ‘Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. and Shute, S. (2000), ‘The Wrongness of Rape’, in (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Fourth Series, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gelsthorpe, L. and Loucks, N. (1997), ‘Magistrates’ Explanations of Sentencing Decisions', in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2002), ‘Women's Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Justice, 2: 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Quality and Effectiveness in Probation Officers’ Reports', British Journal of Criminology, 35: 188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidewell, Lord Justice (1992), ‘The Judicial Studies Board’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘The Charter of Rights: A Brake not an Accelerator’, European Human Rights Law Review, 473Google Scholar
Graham, D. (1998), ‘What Works in Preventing Criminality’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. (1998), ‘The Unit Fine: Monetary Sanctions Apportioned to Income’, in and (eds.), Principled Sentencing, Oxford: Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Guldenmund, B., Harding, C. and Sherlock, J. (1995), ‘Sentencing and EU Law’, in et al., Criminal Justice in Europe: a Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Sentencing and Early Release of Fixed-Term Prisoners’, Criminal Law Review, 653Google Scholar
, and (1991), ‘Treatment Needs of Prisoners with Psychiatric Diagnoses’, British Medical Journal, 303: 338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Rational-Choice Gun Use in Armed Robbery’, Criminal Law Forum, 1: 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999), A Question of Evidence? Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s, Home Office Research Study 196, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1990), The Effect of Defendants' Demeanour on Sentencing in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Bulletin 29, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), Does the Criminal Justice System Treat Men and Women Differently? Home Office Research Findings 10, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1992), Magistrates' Courts or Crown Courts? Mode of Trial Decisions and Sentencing, Home Office Research Study 125, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Hedderman, C. and Sugg, D. (1997), ‘The Influence of Cognitive Approaches’, in (ed.), Changing Offenders' Attitudes and Behaviour: What Works? Home Office Research Study 171, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Heidensohn, F. (2002), ‘Gender and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1991), Sentencing Principles and Magistrates' Sentencing Behaviour, Aldershot: AveburyGoogle Scholar
HMCI Prisons (1997), Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons for 1996–97, London: HMSO
HMCI Prisons (2003), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2002–03, London: The Stationery Office
HMCI Prisons (2004), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (1965), The Adult Offender, London: HMSO
Home Office (1977), Prisons and the Prisoners, London: HMSO
Home Office (1986), Criminal Justice: Plans for Legislation, London: HMSO
Home Office (1990), Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public, London: HMSO
Home Office (1996), Protecting the Public: The Government's Strategy on Crime, Cm 3190, London: HMSO
Home Office (1997), No More Excuses: a New Approach to Tackling Youth Crime in England and Wales, Cm 3089, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (1999), Digest 4: Information on the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales, London: Home Office
Home Office (2001), Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2002), Justice for All, Cm 5563, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2003), Respect and Responsibility: Taking a Stand against Anti-social Behaviour, Cm 5778, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2004), Reducing Crime, Changing Lives, London: Home Office
Home Office Special Data Collection Exercise (1994), Monitoring of the Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 1993, Statistical Bulletin 20/94, London: Home Office
Hood, R. (1972), Sentencing the Motoring Offender, London: Heinemann
(1987), ‘Some Reflections on the Role of Criminology in Public Policy’, Criminal Law Review, 527Google Scholar
(2002), The Death Penalty: A World Wide Perspective, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Protecting the Public: Automatic Life Sentences, Parole and High Risk Offenders’, Criminal Law Review, 788Google Scholar
, , and (2002), ‘Sex Offenders Emerging from Long-Term Imprisonment’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Courts: Perceptions of Fairness, Oxford: Centre for CriminologyGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (1998), ‘Community Crime Prevention’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Sex, Violence and Sentencing in Domestic Provocation Cases’, Criminal Law Review, 546Google Scholar
, and (2003), The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population, London: Prison Reform TrustGoogle Scholar
and (1998), Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 179, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
House of Commons Expenditure Committee (1978), The Reduction of Pressure on the Prison System, London: HMSO
House of Commons (2004), Draft Sentencing Guidelines 1 and 2, Home Affairs Committee, Fifth Report of Session 2003–04, HC 1207, London: The Stationery Office
House of Lords (2003), Criminal Justice Bill, Select Committee on the Constitution, London: The Stationery Office
et al. (1998), Evaluation of the One-Stop Shop and Victim Statement Pilots, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, C. and Young, R. (2003), ‘New, Improved, Police-Led Restorative Justice?’ in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘Beyond Proportionate Punishment: Difficult Cases’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 22: 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, B. (1998), ‘Doing Justice to Difference’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hutton, N. (1999), ‘Sentencing in Scotland’, in and (eds.), Criminal Justice in Scotland, Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
Jareborg, N. (1995), ‘The Swedish Sentencing Reform’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Jareborg, N. (1998), ‘Why Bulk Discounts in Multiple Sentencing?’ in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1992), ‘Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Justice System’, Criminal Law Review, 83Google Scholar
Joint Inspection Report (2002), Streets Ahead – A Joint Inspection of the Street Crime Initiative, London: Home Office
Joint Inspection Report (2004), Joint Inspection Report into Persistent and Prolific Offenders, London: Home Office
Jones, P. (2002), ‘The Halliday Report and Persistent Offenders’, in and (eds.), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. (1998), ‘Effective Policing Strategies for Reducing Crime’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Judicial Studies Board (1988), Triennial Report 1984–87, London: HMSO
Judicial Studies Board (2004), Annual Report of the Judicial Studies Board 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
Kleinig, J. (1998), ‘The Hardness of Hard Treatment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Restorative and Community Justice in the United States’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 26: 355Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Diversion of Mentally Disordered Offenders: Victim and Offender Perspectives’, Criminal Law Review, 805Google Scholar
and (1983), ‘Selecting Delinquents for Cautioning’, British Journal of Criminology, 23: 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppala, T. (2001), ‘Sentencing and Punishment in Finland’, in and (eds.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Law Commission (1994), Binding Over, Law Com No. 222, London: HMSO
and (2004), ‘Slopping out in Scotland: The Limits of Degradation and Respect’, European Human Rights Law Review, 645Google Scholar
(1974), ‘Training, Personality and Attitudes as Determinants of Magistrates’ Sentencing', British Journal of Criminology, 14: 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (2002), ‘The Organization of Serious Crimes’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. (2004), ‘Trends in Crime, Victimisation and Punishment’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), Explaining Reconviction Rates, Home Office Research Study 135, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Lord Chancellor's Department (2002), ‘Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor: Clear Message on Sentencing’, press notice 194/02, 14 June
(1997), The Framework of Judicial Sentencing, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Sentencing the Multiple Offender: Judicial Practice and Legal Principle, Canberra: Australian Institute of CriminologyGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. and Garland, D. (1998), ‘Sovereign States and Vengeful Victims’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (2000), ‘The Operation of Section 48 of the Mental Health Act 1983’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magistrates' Association (2004), Magistrates' Courts' Sentencing Guidelines, London: The Magistrates' Association
(2004), ‘The Crime Reduction Programme in England and Wales: Reflections on the Vision and the Reality’, Criminal Justice, 4: 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, G. (2004), ‘Diversionary and Non-supervisory Approaches to Dealing with Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Offenders on Probation, Home Office Research Study 167, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1979), ‘New Findings, New Views: A Note of Caution Regarding Sentencing Reform’, Hofstra Law Review, 7: 242Google Scholar
et al. (1974), ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public Interest, 22Google Scholar
(2001), Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives, Washington: American Psychological AssociationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2004), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Merrington, S. (2004), ‘Assessments Tools in Probation’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Public Perceptions of Homicide and Criminal Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 38: 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, J. (2004), ‘The Future of Violence Risk Management’, in (ed.), The Future of Imprisonment, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (1988), ‘The Moral Worth of Retribution’, in (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The Use of Financial Penalties and the Amounts Imposed: The Need for a New Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 13Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Methods for Enforcing Financial Penalties: The Need for a Multi-dimensional Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 728Google Scholar
Morgan, R. (2002), ‘Imprisonment’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Thinking about the Demand for Probation Services’, Probation Journal, 50: 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000), ‘Something Old, Something Borrowed, Something Blue but Something New?’ Criminal Law Review, 18Google Scholar
Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (2000), ‘Restorative Conferencing’, in and (eds.), Restorative and Community Justice, Cincinnati: Anderson PublishingGoogle Scholar
, and (1993), ‘Giving Victims a Voice: The New Zealand Experience’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32: 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Electronic Monitoring in Practice, Home Office Research Study 177, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Making the Tag Fit, Home Office Research Findings 105, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1988), Sentencing Practice in the Crown Court, Home Office Research Study 103, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Moxon, D. (1998), ‘The Role of Sentencing Policy’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1990), Unit Fines: Experiments in Four Courts, Research and Planning Unit Paper 59, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1996), Imprisonment for Fine Default, Home Office Research Findings 35, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Munro, C. (1992), ‘Judicial Independence and Judicial Functions’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
and (2002), Rape and Sexual Assault of Women, Home Office Research Study 237, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the 21st Century’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23: 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13: 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Standards (2000), National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community, London: Home Office
Nellis, D. (2004), ‘Electronic Monitoring and the Community Supervision of Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Newburn, T. (2002), ‘Young People, Crime and Youth Justice’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, et al. (2002), The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System, Home Office Research Study 242, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
NOMS (2004), ‘Reducing Reoffending: National Action Plan’, at www.noms.homeoffice.gov.uk
and (1994), ‘Changes in the Use of Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Law Review, 316Google Scholar
Oxford Pilot Study (1984), Sentencing in the Crown Court: Report of an Exploratory Study, by , , , and , Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for CriminologyGoogle Scholar
(2003), Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process, 3rd edn, London: ButterworthsGoogle Scholar
(1988), The Seriousness of Offences: Findings from the 1988 British Crime Survey, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Cross-National Imprisonment Rates: Limitations of Method and Possible Conclusions’, British Journal of Criminology, 34: 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, K. (1998), ‘Changing the Context of Crime Prevention’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
et al. (1974), ‘The Development of a Scale of Offence Seriousness’, International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 182Google Scholar
Peay, J. (1997), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Peay, J. (2002), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders, Mental Health and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1979), Previous Convictions, Sentence and Reconviction, Home Office Research Study 53, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Prison Reform Trust (2000), Justice for Women: The Need for Reform, London: Prison Reform Trust
Prison Service (2004), Report of the Prison Service 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
and (1979), ‘Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Standards’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1980), ‘Incapacitating the Habitual Criminal: The English Experience’, Michigan Law Review, 1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England, London: StevensGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), ‘Financial Penalties: Who Pays, Who Doesn't, and Why Not?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), ‘An Analysis of a Guideline Case as Applied to Rape’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33: 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynor, P. (2004), ‘Rehabilitative and Reintegrative Approaches’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Rethinking Crime and Punishment (2004), Rethinking Crime and Punishment: The Report, London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation
Rex, S. (2001), ‘Beyond Cognitive-Behaviouralism? Reflections on the effectiveness Literature’, in , and (eds.), Community Penalties: Change and Challenges, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003), Accrediting Offender Programmes, Home Office Research Study 273, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1999), Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: Report of the Expert Committee, London: Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘Drinking Drivers: The Limits to Deterrence’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24: 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), Drink Driving: The Effects of Enforcement, Home Office Research Study 121, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
and (1988), Triable-Either-Way Cases: Crown Court or Magistrates' Court, Home Office Research Study 98, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2004), ‘Offending Behaviour Programmes: Emerging Evidence and Implications for Practice’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Paying for the Past: The Role of Criminal Record’, Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, 22Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Evaluating the Pluses and Minuses of Custody’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (1993), Report, London: HMSO
Rumgay, J. (2004), ‘Dealing with Substance-Misusing Offenders in the Community’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Sanders, A. (2002), ‘Victim Participation in an Exclusionary Criminal Justice System’, in and (eds.), New Visions of Crime Victims, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1980), ‘Is Mens Rea a Component of Perceived Offense Seriousness?’ Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71: 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, S. (1989), ‘Monetary Penalties and Imprisonment’, in and (eds.), Paying for Crime, Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
et al. (1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising, Washington: US CongressGoogle Scholar
, and (1998), Psychiatric Morbidity among Prisoners in England and Wales, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit (2002), Crime and Social Exclusion, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
South African Law Commission (2000), Report on a New Sentencing Framework, Pretoria: South African Law Commission
(2004), A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, 10th edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. (1993), The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor's Office, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Streatfeild, Mr Justice (1960), Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the Business of the Criminal Courts, London: HMSO
(1998), The Restricted Hospital Order, Home Office Research Study 186, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Factors Contributing to the Rising Imprisonment Figures in Germany’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), Sentencing Practice in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Study 56, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Conceptions and Representations of the Sentencing Decision Process’, Journal of Law and Society, 24: 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Blackstone's Guide to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. A. (1974), ‘The Control of Discretion in the Administration of Criminal Justice’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Sentencing Legislation – The Case for Consolidation’, Criminal Law Review, 406Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (1994), ‘Proportionality, Parsimony and Interchangeability of Punishments’, in et al., Penal Theory and Practice, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
(1995), Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1990), The United Nations and Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, New York: United Nations
and (2004), ‘Disproportionate Sentences as Human Rights Violations’, Modern Law Review, 67: 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennard, J. and Hedderman, C. (1998), ‘Effective Interventions with Offenders’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. and Jareborg, N. (1988), ‘Provocation and Culpability’, in (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991), ‘Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living Standard Analysis’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), ‘Unscientific, Unwise, Unprofitable or Unjust?’ British Journal of Criminology, 22: 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), World Prison Population List (4th edn), Home Office Research Findings 188, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘The Grant of an Absolute Discharge’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 5: 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasik, M. (1987), ‘Guidance, Guidelines and Criminal Record’, in and (eds.), Sentencing Reform, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Wasik, M. (2000), ‘Sentencing in Homicide’, in and (eds.), Rethinking English Homicide Law, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1988), ‘Non-custodial Penalties and the Principles of Desert’, Criminal Law Review, 555Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘Civil Disqualifications attending Conviction’, Cambridge Law Journal, 599Google Scholar
(1992), Sentencing for Multiple Offences in Western Australia, Perth: University of Western Australia Crime Research CentreGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Enforcing Financial Penalties, Home Office Research Study 165, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Mad or Bad? Child-Killers, Gender and the Courts’, British Journal of Criminology, 37: 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Evaluating Evidence for the Effectiveness of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Programme’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44: 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1963), Deterrents and Incentives to Crime among Youths Aged 15–21 Years, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1988), ‘Dangerous Offenders and the Morality of Protective Sentencing’, Criminal Law Review, 424Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord Justice (1991), Prison Disturbances, April 1990: Report of an Inquiry, London: HMSO
Youth Justice Board (2004), Annual Review 2003/04, London: Youth Justice Board
and (1993), Crown Court Study, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 19, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?’ Modern Law Review, 57: 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedner, L. (1998), ‘Sentencing Young Offenders’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Dangers of Dystopias in Criminal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22: 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The Concept of Security: An Agenda for Comparative Analysis’, Legal Studies, 23: 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977), ‘The Search for Sentencing Equity’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 881Google Scholar
and (1995), Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1970), Non-custodial and Semi-custodial Penalties, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1974), The Young Adult Offender, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1977), The Length of Prison Sentences, London: HMSO
Advisory Council on the Penal System (1978), Sentences of Imprisonment: A Review of Maximum Penalties, London: HMSO
(2002b), ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Restorative Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, A. (2003b), ‘Sentencing and Sensitivity’, in and (eds.), The Criminological Foundations of Penal Policy: Essays in Honour of Roger Hood, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004a), ‘Social Control and Anti-social Behaviour: The Subversion of Human Rights?’ Law Quarterly Review, 120: 263Google Scholar
(2004b), ‘Criminal Justice Reform: Principles, Human Rights and Public Protection’, Criminal Law Review, 516Google Scholar
, and (1984), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders and the Sentencing Process’, Criminal Law Review, 195Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. and Player, E. (1998), ‘Sentencing, Equal Treatment and the Impact of Sanctions’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1997), ‘Recognising Elephants: The Problem of the Custody Threshold’, Criminal Law Review, 187Google Scholar
(2001), Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Baker, K. (2004), ‘Is Asset Really an Asset?’ in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1980), ‘Why the Prison Population has Grown Larger and Younger’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 19: 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1978), ‘Sentencing Problems Raised by Guilty Pleas’, Modern Law Review, 41: 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000), ‘A Significant Move towards Restorative Justice, or a Recipe for Unintended Consequences?’ Criminal Law Review, 211Google Scholar
(2004), ‘Youth Justice? Half a Century of Responses to Youth Offending’, Criminal Law Review, 167Google Scholar
, and (2001), Young Offenders: Law, Policy and Practice, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
and (1998), ‘Some Ethical Issues in Defending and Prosecuting Criminal Cases’, Criminal Law Review, 16Google Scholar
et al. (1986), Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, Washington: National Institute of JusticeGoogle Scholar
(1973), ‘The Efficacy of the Fine: The Case for Agnosticism’, Criminal Law Review, 543Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1974), ‘On the Decriminalisation of the Juvenile Court’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
(1981), ‘The Suspended Sentence in England’, British Journal of Criminology, 21: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987), ‘Limiting Prison Use: Experience in England and Wales’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26: 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1995), ‘The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (1998), ‘Five Puzzles in von Hirsch's Theory of Punishment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. (2004), ‘Empirical Research Relevant to Sentencing Frameworks’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
and (1982), ‘The Dangerousness Debate after the Floud Report’, British Journal of Criminology, 22: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), ‘Youth Justice in Great Britain’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 31: 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E., Rex, S. and Robinson, G. (2004), ‘How Did We Get Here?’ in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2004), ‘Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottoms, A. E. and Wilson, A. (2004), ‘Attitudes to Crime in Two High-Crime Communities’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
and (1981), Taking Offenders out of Circulation, Home Office Research Study 64, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996), ‘Point Prevalence of Mental Disorder in Unconvicted Male Prisoners’, British Medical Journal, 313: 1524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (eds.), (2000), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Burnett, R. (1994), Recidivism and Imprisonment, Home Office Research Bulletin 36: 19
and (2004), ‘So Prison Works, Does it?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Talking Tough, Acting Coy: What happened to the Anti-social Behaviour Order?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41: 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders: Finding a Focus for Diversion’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34: 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), A Review of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, Home Office Research Study 236, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987), Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach, Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services
(1997), ‘Pre-Sentence Reports: The Effects of Legislation and National Standards’, British Journal of Criminology, 37: 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavadino, M. (1999), ‘Diverting Mentally Disordered Offenders from Custody’, in and (eds.), Managing People Nobody Owns, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996), Fine Impositions and Enforcement Following the Criminal Justice Act 1993, Home Office Research Findings 36, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (2002), Attitudes to Date Rape and Relationship Rape, Guildford: Department of Sociology, University of SurreyGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R. K. (1987), ‘The Practical Problems of the Sentencer’, in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal StudiesGoogle Scholar
Corbett, C. (1987), ‘Magistrates’ and Court Clerks' Sentencing Behaviour: An Experimental Study', in and (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing, Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal StudiesGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Crime, Courts and Confidence: Report of an Independent Inquiry into Alternatives to Prison, London: Esmee Fairbairn FoundationGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe (1976), Alternative Measures to Imprisonment, Recommendation R (76) 10, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1984), Convention on Compensation for the Victims of Violent Crime, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1992), European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures, Recommendation No. R (92) 16, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Council of Europe (1993), Consistency in Sentencing, Recommendation R (92) 17, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment) (1992), Report on the European Committee on the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, Visit to the United Kingdom, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
CPT (2001), European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Punishment, Report of Inspection of English Prisons, Strasbourg: Council of Europe
Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 2002, Cm 6054, London: The Stationery Office
Crown Prosecution Service (2003), Annual Report 2002–2003, London: Crown Prosecution Service
Daly, K. (2002), ‘Mind the Gap: Restorative Justice in Theory and Practice’, in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1997a), ‘An Essay on the Importance and Neglect of the Magistracy’, Criminal Law Review, 627Google Scholar
(1997b), ‘For the New Lord Chancellor – Some Causes for Concern about Magistrates’, Criminal Law Review, 861Google Scholar
(2000), ‘The Mischief of Plea Bargaining and Sentence Rewards’, Criminal Law Review, 894Google Scholar
and (2003), ‘“Filling in the Gaps” – A Study of Judicial Culture’, Criminal Law Review, 243Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1981), ‘Exploring Sources of Sentencing Disparity’, in (ed.), The Trial Process, New York: PlenumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004), Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004, Statistical Bulletin 10/04, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2003), ‘Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 30: 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowds, L., and Hedderman, C. (1997), ‘The Sentencing of Men and Women’, in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘An Ambiguous Participant: The Victim and the Criminal Justice System’, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S. (1993), ‘Perspectives on Race and Gender’, in and (eds.), Criminal Justice under Stress, London: BlackstoneGoogle Scholar
Ekblom, P. (1998), ‘Situational Crime Prevention: Effectiveness of Local Initiatives’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Community Penalties for Fine Default and Persistent Petty Offending, Home Office Research Findings 98, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2005), Human Rights and Criminal Justice, 2nd edn, forthcoming, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. (1997), ‘Human Development and Criminal Careers’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. (2002), ‘Developmental Criminology and Risk-Focused Prevention’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1992), ‘Changes in Crime and Punishment in England and America in the 1980s’, Justice Quarterly, 9: 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983), ‘Sex. Sentencing and Reconvictions’, British Journal of Criminology, 23: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003), Minority Ethnic Young People in the Youth Justice System, London: Youth Justice BoardGoogle Scholar
(1990), Trends in Crime and their Interpretation, Home Office Research Study 119, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1993), Ethnic Minorities and the Criminal Justice System, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 21, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Psychology of Judicial Sentencing, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1998), Sentencing Practice: An Examination of Decisions in Magistrates' Courts and the Crown Court in the mid-1990s, Home Office Research Study 180, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1999), Sentencing: State and Federal Law in Victoria, 2nd edn, Melbourne: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D. (1987), ‘Regulating Pre-trial Decisions’, in (ed.), Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. (1998), ‘Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. and Shute, S. (2000), ‘The Wrongness of Rape’, in (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Fourth Series, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gelsthorpe, L. and Loucks, N. (1997), ‘Magistrates’ Explanations of Sentencing Decisions', in and (eds.), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (2002), ‘Women's Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Justice, 2: 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), ‘Quality and Effectiveness in Probation Officers’ Reports', British Journal of Criminology, 35: 188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidewell, Lord Justice (1992), ‘The Judicial Studies Board’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘The Charter of Rights: A Brake not an Accelerator’, European Human Rights Law Review, 473Google Scholar
Graham, D. (1998), ‘What Works in Preventing Criminality’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. (1998), ‘The Unit Fine: Monetary Sanctions Apportioned to Income’, in and (eds.), Principled Sentencing, Oxford: Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Guldenmund, B., Harding, C. and Sherlock, J. (1995), ‘Sentencing and EU Law’, in et al., Criminal Justice in Europe: a Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2004), ‘Sentencing and Early Release of Fixed-Term Prisoners’, Criminal Law Review, 653Google Scholar
, and (1991), ‘Treatment Needs of Prisoners with Psychiatric Diagnoses’, British Medical Journal, 303: 338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001), Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework for England and Wales, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1990), ‘Rational-Choice Gun Use in Armed Robbery’, Criminal Law Forum, 1: 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999), A Question of Evidence? Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s, Home Office Research Study 196, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1990), The Effect of Defendants' Demeanour on Sentencing in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Bulletin 29, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Understanding the Sentencing of Women, Home Office Research Study 170, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), Does the Criminal Justice System Treat Men and Women Differently? Home Office Research Findings 10, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1992), Magistrates' Courts or Crown Courts? Mode of Trial Decisions and Sentencing, Home Office Research Study 125, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Hedderman, C. and Sugg, D. (1997), ‘The Influence of Cognitive Approaches’, in (ed.), Changing Offenders' Attitudes and Behaviour: What Works? Home Office Research Study 171, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Heidensohn, F. (2002), ‘Gender and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1991), Sentencing Principles and Magistrates' Sentencing Behaviour, Aldershot: AveburyGoogle Scholar
HMCI Prisons (1997), Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons for 1996–97, London: HMSO
HMCI Prisons (2003), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2002–03, London: The Stationery Office
HMCI Prisons (2004), Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons, Report 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (1965), The Adult Offender, London: HMSO
Home Office (1977), Prisons and the Prisoners, London: HMSO
Home Office (1986), Criminal Justice: Plans for Legislation, London: HMSO
Home Office (1990), Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public, London: HMSO
Home Office (1996), Protecting the Public: The Government's Strategy on Crime, Cm 3190, London: HMSO
Home Office (1997), No More Excuses: a New Approach to Tackling Youth Crime in England and Wales, Cm 3089, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (1999), Digest 4: Information on the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales, London: Home Office
Home Office (2001), Criminal Justice: The Way Ahead, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2002), Justice for All, Cm 5563, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2003), Respect and Responsibility: Taking a Stand against Anti-social Behaviour, Cm 5778, London: The Stationery Office
Home Office (2004), Reducing Crime, Changing Lives, London: Home Office
Home Office Special Data Collection Exercise (1994), Monitoring of the Criminal Justice Acts 1991 and 1993, Statistical Bulletin 20/94, London: Home Office
Hood, R. (1972), Sentencing the Motoring Offender, London: Heinemann
(1987), ‘Some Reflections on the Role of Criminology in Public Policy’, Criminal Law Review, 527Google Scholar
(2002), The Death Penalty: A World Wide Perspective, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1996), ‘Protecting the Public: Automatic Life Sentences, Parole and High Risk Offenders’, Criminal Law Review, 788Google Scholar
, , and (2002), ‘Sex Offenders Emerging from Long-Term Imprisonment’, British Journal of Criminology, 42: 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Courts: Perceptions of Fairness, Oxford: Centre for CriminologyGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. (1998), ‘Community Crime Prevention’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1989), ‘Sex, Violence and Sentencing in Domestic Provocation Cases’, Criminal Law Review, 546Google Scholar
, and (2003), The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population, London: Prison Reform TrustGoogle Scholar
and (1998), Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study 179, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
House of Commons Expenditure Committee (1978), The Reduction of Pressure on the Prison System, London: HMSO
House of Commons (2004), Draft Sentencing Guidelines 1 and 2, Home Affairs Committee, Fifth Report of Session 2003–04, HC 1207, London: The Stationery Office
House of Lords (2003), Criminal Justice Bill, Select Committee on the Constitution, London: The Stationery Office
et al. (1998), Evaluation of the One-Stop Shop and Victim Statement Pilots, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, C. and Young, R. (2003), ‘New, Improved, Police-Led Restorative Justice?’ in , et al. (eds.), Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1995), ‘Beyond Proportionate Punishment: Difficult Cases’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 22: 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, B. (1998), ‘Doing Justice to Difference’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hutton, N. (1999), ‘Sentencing in Scotland’, in and (eds.), Criminal Justice in Scotland, Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
Jareborg, N. (1995), ‘The Swedish Sentencing Reform’, in and (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Jareborg, N. (1998), ‘Why Bulk Discounts in Multiple Sentencing?’ in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1992), ‘Ethnic Minorities in the Criminal Justice System’, Criminal Law Review, 83Google Scholar
Joint Inspection Report (2002), Streets Ahead – A Joint Inspection of the Street Crime Initiative, London: Home Office
Joint Inspection Report (2004), Joint Inspection Report into Persistent and Prolific Offenders, London: Home Office
Jones, P. (2002), ‘The Halliday Report and Persistent Offenders’, in and (eds.), Reform and Punishment: The Future of Sentencing, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. (1998), ‘Effective Policing Strategies for Reducing Crime’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Judicial Studies Board (1988), Triennial Report 1984–87, London: HMSO
Judicial Studies Board (2004), Annual Report of the Judicial Studies Board 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
Kleinig, J. (1998), ‘The Hardness of Hard Treatment’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2001), ‘Restorative and Community Justice in the United States’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 26: 355Google Scholar
(1999), ‘Diversion of Mentally Disordered Offenders: Victim and Offender Perspectives’, Criminal Law Review, 805Google Scholar
and (1983), ‘Selecting Delinquents for Cautioning’, British Journal of Criminology, 23: 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppala, T. (2001), ‘Sentencing and Punishment in Finland’, in and (eds.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Law Commission (1994), Binding Over, Law Com No. 222, London: HMSO
and (2004), ‘Slopping out in Scotland: The Limits of Degradation and Respect’, European Human Rights Law Review, 645Google Scholar
(1974), ‘Training, Personality and Attitudes as Determinants of Magistrates’ Sentencing', British Journal of Criminology, 14: 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (2002), ‘The Organization of Serious Crimes’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. (2004), ‘Trends in Crime, Victimisation and Punishment’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), Explaining Reconviction Rates, Home Office Research Study 135, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Lord Chancellor's Department (2002), ‘Home Secretary and Lord Chancellor: Clear Message on Sentencing’, press notice 194/02, 14 June
(1997), The Framework of Judicial Sentencing, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Sentencing the Multiple Offender: Judicial Practice and Legal Principle, Canberra: Australian Institute of CriminologyGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. and Garland, D. (1998), ‘Sovereign States and Vengeful Victims’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (2000), ‘The Operation of Section 48 of the Mental Health Act 1983’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magistrates' Association (2004), Magistrates' Courts' Sentencing Guidelines, London: The Magistrates' Association
(2004), ‘The Crime Reduction Programme in England and Wales: Reflections on the Vision and the Reality’, Criminal Justice, 4: 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, G. (2004), ‘Diversionary and Non-supervisory Approaches to Dealing with Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Offenders on Probation, Home Office Research Study 167, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1979), ‘New Findings, New Views: A Note of Caution Regarding Sentencing Reform’, Hofstra Law Review, 7: 242Google Scholar
et al. (1974), ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public Interest, 22Google Scholar
(2001), Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives, Washington: American Psychological AssociationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2004), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Merrington, S. (2004), ‘Assessments Tools in Probation’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Public Perceptions of Homicide and Criminal Justice’, British Journal of Criminology, 38: 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, J. (2004), ‘The Future of Violence Risk Management’, in (ed.), The Future of Imprisonment, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (1988), ‘The Moral Worth of Retribution’, in (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The Use of Financial Penalties and the Amounts Imposed: The Need for a New Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 13Google Scholar
(2004), ‘The Methods for Enforcing Financial Penalties: The Need for a Multi-dimensional Approach’, Criminal Law Review, 728Google Scholar
Morgan, R. (2002), ‘Imprisonment’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Thinking about the Demand for Probation Services’, Probation Journal, 50: 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000), ‘Something Old, Something Borrowed, Something Blue but Something New?’ Criminal Law Review, 18Google Scholar
Morris, A. and Maxwell, G. (2000), ‘Restorative Conferencing’, in and (eds.), Restorative and Community Justice, Cincinnati: Anderson PublishingGoogle Scholar
, and (1993), ‘Giving Victims a Voice: The New Zealand Experience’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32: 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Electronic Monitoring in Practice, Home Office Research Study 177, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1999), Making the Tag Fit, Home Office Research Findings 105, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1988), Sentencing Practice in the Crown Court, Home Office Research Study 103, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Moxon, D. (1998), ‘The Role of Sentencing Policy’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
, and (1990), Unit Fines: Experiments in Four Courts, Research and Planning Unit Paper 59, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
and (1996), Imprisonment for Fine Default, Home Office Research Findings 35, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Munro, C. (1992), ‘Judicial Independence and Judicial Functions’, in and (eds.), Sentencing, Judicial Discretion and Judicial Training, London: Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
and (2002), Rape and Sexual Assault of Women, Home Office Research Study 237, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1998), ‘Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the 21st Century’, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23: 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993), ‘Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13: 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Standards (2000), National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community, London: Home Office
Nellis, D. (2004), ‘Electronic Monitoring and the Community Supervision of Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Newburn, T. (2002), ‘Young People, Crime and Youth Justice’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, et al. (2002), The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System, Home Office Research Study 242, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
NOMS (2004), ‘Reducing Reoffending: National Action Plan’, at www.noms.homeoffice.gov.uk
and (1994), ‘Changes in the Use of Imprisonment in England and Wales’, Criminal Law Review, 316Google Scholar
Oxford Pilot Study (1984), Sentencing in the Crown Court: Report of an Exploratory Study, by , , , and , Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for CriminologyGoogle Scholar
(2003), Text and Materials on the Criminal Justice Process, 3rd edn, London: ButterworthsGoogle Scholar
(1988), The Seriousness of Offences: Findings from the 1988 British Crime Survey, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Cross-National Imprisonment Rates: Limitations of Method and Possible Conclusions’, British Journal of Criminology, 34: 116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, K. (1998), ‘Changing the Context of Crime Prevention’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending: An Assessment of Research Evidence on Ways of Dealing with Offending Behaviour, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
et al. (1974), ‘The Development of a Scale of Offence Seriousness’, International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 182Google Scholar
Peay, J. (1997), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Peay, J. (2002), ‘Mentally Disordered Offenders, Mental Health and Crime’, in , and (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1979), Previous Convictions, Sentence and Reconviction, Home Office Research Study 53, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Prison Reform Trust (2000), Justice for Women: The Need for Reform, London: Prison Reform Trust
Prison Service (2004), Report of the Prison Service 2003–04, London: The Stationery Office
and (1979), ‘Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Standards’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1980), ‘Incapacitating the Habitual Criminal: The English Experience’, Michigan Law Review, 1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986), The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England, London: StevensGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), ‘Financial Penalties: Who Pays, Who Doesn't, and Why Not?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43: 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1994), ‘An Analysis of a Guideline Case as Applied to Rape’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33: 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynor, P. (2004), ‘Rehabilitative and Reintegrative Approaches’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Rethinking Crime and Punishment (2004), Rethinking Crime and Punishment: The Report, London: Esmee Fairbairn Foundation
Rex, S. (2001), ‘Beyond Cognitive-Behaviouralism? Reflections on the effectiveness Literature’, in , and (eds.), Community Penalties: Change and Challenges, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003), Accrediting Offender Programmes, Home Office Research Study 273, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1999), Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: Report of the Expert Committee, London: Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘Drinking Drivers: The Limits to Deterrence’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24: 241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991), Drink Driving: The Effects of Enforcement, Home Office Research Study 121, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
and (1988), Triable-Either-Way Cases: Crown Court or Magistrates' Court, Home Office Research Study 98, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2004), ‘Offending Behaviour Programmes: Emerging Evidence and Implications for Practice’, in and (eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Paying for the Past: The Role of Criminal Record’, Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, 22Google Scholar
(2003), ‘Evaluating the Pluses and Minuses of Custody’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (1993), Report, London: HMSO
Rumgay, J. (2004), ‘Dealing with Substance-Misusing Offenders in the Community’, in , and (eds.), Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
Sanders, A. (2002), ‘Victim Participation in an Exclusionary Criminal Justice System’, in and (eds.), New Visions of Crime Victims, Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
(1980), ‘Is Mens Rea a Component of Perceived Offense Seriousness?’ Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71: 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, S. (1989), ‘Monetary Penalties and Imprisonment’, in and (eds.), Paying for Crime, Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
et al. (1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising, Washington: US CongressGoogle Scholar
, and (1998), Psychiatric Morbidity among Prisoners in England and Wales, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit (2002), Crime and Social Exclusion, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
South African Law Commission (2000), Report on a New Sentencing Framework, Pretoria: South African Law Commission
(2004), A Practical Approach to Criminal Procedure, 10th edn, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. (1993), The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor's Office, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Streatfeild, Mr Justice (1960), Report of the Interdepartmental Committee on the Business of the Criminal Courts, London: HMSO
(1998), The Restricted Hospital Order, Home Office Research Study 186, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘Factors Contributing to the Rising Imprisonment Figures in Germany’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 42: 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), Sentencing Practice in Magistrates' Courts, Home Office Research Study 56, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Conceptions and Representations of the Sentencing Decision Process’, Journal of Law and Society, 24: 395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2004), Blackstone's Guide to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. A. (1974), ‘The Control of Discretion in the Administration of Criminal Justice’, in (ed.), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy, London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Sentencing Legislation – The Case for Consolidation’, Criminal Law Review, 406Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (1994), ‘Proportionality, Parsimony and Interchangeability of Punishments’, in et al., Penal Theory and Practice, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
(1995), Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1990), The United Nations and Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, New York: United Nations
and (2004), ‘Disproportionate Sentences as Human Rights Violations’, Modern Law Review, 67: 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennard, J. and Hedderman, C. (1998), ‘Effective Interventions with Offenders’, in (ed.), Reducing Offending, Home Office Research Study 187, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. and Jareborg, N. (1988), ‘Provocation and Culpability’, in (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991), ‘Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living Standard Analysis’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11: 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), ‘Unscientific, Unwise, Unprofitable or Unjust?’ British Journal of Criminology, 22: 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), World Prison Population List (4th edn), Home Office Research Findings 188, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1985), ‘The Grant of an Absolute Discharge’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 5: 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasik, M. (1987), ‘Guidance, Guidelines and Criminal Record’, in and (eds.), Sentencing Reform, Manchester: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Wasik, M. (2000), ‘Sentencing in Homicide’, in and (eds.), Rethinking English Homicide Law, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1988), ‘Non-custodial Penalties and the Principles of Desert’, Criminal Law Review, 555Google Scholar
and (1997), ‘Civil Disqualifications attending Conviction’, Cambridge Law Journal, 599Google Scholar
(1992), Sentencing for Multiple Offences in Western Australia, Perth: University of Western Australia Crime Research CentreGoogle Scholar
and (1997), Enforcing Financial Penalties, Home Office Research Study 165, London: Home OfficeGoogle Scholar
(1997), ‘Mad or Bad? Child-Killers, Gender and the Courts’, British Journal of Criminology, 37: 419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005), ‘Evaluating Evidence for the Effectiveness of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Programme’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44: 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1963), Deterrents and Incentives to Crime among Youths Aged 15–21 Years, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1988), ‘Dangerous Offenders and the Morality of Protective Sentencing’, Criminal Law Review, 424Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord Justice (1991), Prison Disturbances, April 1990: Report of an Inquiry, London: HMSO
Youth Justice Board (2004), Annual Review 2003/04, London: Youth Justice Board
and (1993), Crown Court Study, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study 19, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
(1994), ‘Reparation and Retribution: Are They Reconcilable?’ Modern Law Review, 57: 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedner, L. (1998), ‘Sentencing Young Offenders’, in and (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2002), ‘Dangers of Dystopias in Criminal Theory’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22: 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003), ‘The Concept of Security: An Agenda for Comparative Analysis’, Legal Studies, 23: 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1977), ‘The Search for Sentencing Equity’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 881Google Scholar
and (1995), Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, and (2001), Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar