Aberbach, Joel D., and Rockman, Bert A.. 1977. “The Overlapping Worlds of American Federal Executives and Congressmen.” British Journal of Political Science, 7(1): 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Rebecca, and Agnes Carey, Mary. 2003. “Compromise Will Come Hard in Medicare-Overhaul Conference.” CQ Weekly, June 28Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” The American Economic Review 62: 777–95Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 1997. “Balance of Power: Republican Party Leadership and the Committee System in the 104th House.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 10–13, Chicago

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 1998. “Measuring Conditional Party Government.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 23–25, Chicago

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000. “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon and Fleisher, Richard. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 31–72Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, pp. 269–92Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., Mark M. Berger, and David W. Rohde. 2002. “The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877–1994.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 17–35Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., Calvin C. Jillson, and Rick Wilson. 2002. “Why Congress? What the Failure of the Confederation Congress and the Survival of the Federal Congress Tell Us about the New Institutionalism.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 315–42Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H., David W. Rohde, and Michael W. Tofias. 2003. “One D Is Not Enough: Conditional Party Government 1887–2002.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference December 5–6, San Diego

Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, DeAlva Stanwood. 1970 [1916]. History and Procedure of the House of Representatives. New York: Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael, and Saving, Jason L.. 1997. “Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 809–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Party System, A Report. New York: Rinehart

Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil's Câmara dos Deputados, 1989 to 1999.” World Politics 55: 550–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, William, Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Sinclair, Valeria N.. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3, August): 357–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and James Snyder. 2000. “Money and Office: The Sources of the Incumbency Advantage in Congressional Campaign Finance.” In Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. Brady, David, Cogan, John, and Fiorina, Morris. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press: 65–86Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Gerber, Alan, and Snyder, James. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96: 767–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shigeo Hirano, and James Snyder. 2003. “What Did the Direct Primary Do to Congress?” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James, and Stewart, Charles. 2001. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 533–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the Bureaucracy: A Theory of Influence, New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Babington, Charles. 2004. “Hastert Launches a Partisan Policy.” Downloaded 11/27/04 from: www.washingtonpost.com

Bach, Stanley. 1990. “From Special Orders to Special Rules: Pictures of House Procedures in Transition.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, San Francisco

Bach, Stanley. 1991. “Resolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees and Amendments Between the Houses.” Congressional Research Service. Report no. 91–538

Bader, Anne. 2002. “Conference Committees and Party Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Paper completed in fulfillment of the requirements for the UCSD Department of Political Science Faculty Mentor Program

Baker, John D. 1973. “The Character of the Congressional Revolution of 1910.” Journal of American History 60: 679–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balla, Steven J., Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science 46(July): 515–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures,” American Political Science Review 83(4): 1181–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckmann, Matthew N. 2004. “Presidential Lobbying: How White House Officials Prosecute the President's Legislative Agenda.” Paper presented November 16 at the University of California, San Diego

Berglof, Eric, and Howard Rosenthal. 2004. “Congress and the History of Bankruptcy Law in the United States: From the Federalists to the Whigs.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Berkson, J. 1953. “A Statistically Precise and Relatively Simple Method of Estimating the Bioassay with Quantal Response, Based on the Logistic Function.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 48: 565–99Google Scholar

Bernhard, William, and Brian Sala. 2003. “The Dynamics of Senate Voting.” Paper presented at the History of Congress Conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Beth, Richard. 1998. “The Discharge Rule in the House: Recent Use in Historical Context.” Congressional Research Service. Report no. 97–856

Beth, Richard. 1999. “Discharge Rule in the House: Recent Use in Historical Context.” CRS Report for Congress. November. Congressional Research Service. The Library of Congress

Beth, Richard. 2001. “The Discharge Rule in the House: Recent Use in Historical Context.” Congressional Research Service. Report no. 97–856

Beth, Richard. 2003. “The Discharge Rule in the House: Recent Use in Historical Context.” Congressional Research Service. Report no. 97–856

Binder, Sarah A. 1996. “The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990.” American Political Science Review 90(March): 8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996.” American Political Science Review, 93(September): 519–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A., Lawrence, Eric D., and Maltzman, Forrest. 1999. “Uncovering the Hidden Effect of Party.” Journal of Politics 61(August): 815–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committee and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bolling, Richard. 1965. House Out of Order. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.Google Scholar

Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Boston Globe. 2004. “The Globe's Major Findings.” October 3

Brady, David W., and Justin Burchett. 2001. “The Benefits of Party Voting: Representation, Roll Calls, and Valued Committee Seats in the U.S. House.” Unpublished typescript, Stanford University

Brady, David W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002a. “Party, Process, and Political Change: New Perspectives on the History of Congress.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–14Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002b. “Afterword: History as a Laboratory.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 471–2Google Scholar

Brady, David, Kara Buckley, and Douglas Rivers. 2004. “Elections and Insurance Incentives: Parties at the Turn of the Century.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Brady, David W., Brandice Canes-Wrone, and John F. Cogan. 2000. “Differences in Legislative Voting Behavior Between Winning and Losing House Incumbents.” In Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. Brady, David, Cogan, John, and Fiorina, Morris. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1979. “The Decline of Party in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1968.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnick, David. 1979. “The Federal Educational Policy System: Enacting and Revising Title I.” Western Political Quarterly 32: 189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broder, David S. 1972. The Party's Over: The Failure of Politics in America. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

Brown, William Holmes. 1996. House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Browning, Clyde I. 1973. The Geography of Federal Outlays. Studies in Geography No. 4. Chapel Hill: University of North CarolinaGoogle Scholar

Browning, Robert. 1986. Politics and Social Welfare Policy in the United States. Knoxville: University of Tennessee PressGoogle Scholar

Bryce, James. 1888. The American Commonwealth. New York: Macmillan and CompanyGoogle Scholar

Bryce, James. 1921. Modern Democracies, vol. 1. New York: The Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James. 1968. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Chicago: Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burger, Timothy. 1995. “After a Defeat, House Leaders Must Regroup.” Roll Call, July 17Google Scholar

Calvert, Randall. 1995. “The Rational Choice Theory of Social Institutions: Cooperation, Coordination, and Communication.” In Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions, eds. Banks, J. and Hanushek, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 216–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvert, Randall, and Justin Fox. 2000. “Effective Parties in a Model of Repeated Legislative Bargaining.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 31–September 3, Washington, DC

Calvert, Randall L., Mark J. Moran, and Barry R. Weingast. 1987. “Congressional Influence over Policy Making: The Case of the FTC.” In Congress: Structure and Policy, eds. McCubbins, Mathew D. and Sullivan, Terry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 493–522Google Scholar

Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Charles M., Cover, Albert D., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84: 525–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Andrea, Gary Cox, and Mathew McCubbins. 2002. “Agenda Power in the US Senate. 1877–1986.” In Party, Process and Political Change in Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 146–65Google Scholar

Cannon, Clarence. 1936. Cannon's Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Carey, Mary Agnes. 2003a. “GOP Wins Battle, Not War.” CQ Weekly, November 29Google Scholar

Carey, Mary Agnes. 2003b. “Medicare Deal Goes to Wire in Late-Night House Vote.” CQ Weekly, November 22Google Scholar

Carroll, Royce, Gary W. Cox, and Mónica Pachón. 2004. “How Parties Create Electoral Democracy.” Paper presented at the 2004 meetings of the American Political Science Association, September 1–4, Chicago

Carson, Jamie, and Jason Roberts. 2003. “Using History as a Laboratory to Study Congressional Elections and Institutional Development.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Carson, Jamie, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen. 2002. “Legislative Politics in a Bicameral System: Strategic Conferee Appointments in the U.S. Congress.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, November 7–9, Providence, RI

Castle, David, and Patrick Fett. 2000. “Member Goals and Party Switching in the U.S. Congress.” In Congress on Display, Congress at Work, ed. Bianco, William T.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 231–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheney, Richard B., and Cheney, Lynne V.. 1983. Kings of the Hill: Power and Personality in the House of Representatives. New York: ContinuumGoogle Scholar

Clapp, Charles. 1964. The Congressman: His Work as He Sees It. Garden City, NY: DoubledayGoogle Scholar

Clark, Joseph S. 1964. Congress: The Sapless Branch. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar

Cleveland, W. S. 1979. “Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Linda R., and Noll, Roger G.. 1991. “How to Vote, Whether to Vote: Strategies for Voting and Abstaining on Congressional Roll Calls.” Political Behavior 13: 97–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collie, Melissa P. 1988. “Universalism and the Parties in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1921–80.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 865–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congressional Quarterly. 1984. Farm Policy: The Politics of Soil, Surpluses, and Subsidies. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly

Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1964. Volume 20

Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1973. Volume 29

Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1998. Volume 54

Congressional Quarterly Weekly. 1993. “Decisive Vote Brings Down Trade Walls with Mexico.” November 20, pp. 3174–9

Congressional Quarterly Weekly. 2003. “2003 Legislative Summary: Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage.” December 13

Congressional Record, 46th Congress, 2d sess., April 22, 1880

Congressional Record, 51st Congress, 1st sess., June 5, 1890

Connelly, William, and John Pitney. 1999. “The House Republicans: Lessons for Political Science.” In New Majority or Old Minority? The Impact of Republicans on Congress, eds. Rae, Nicol C. and Campbell, Colton C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 173–94Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph. 1970. The Origins of the Standing Committees and the Development of the Modern House. Houston: Rice UniversityGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75: 411–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, and Garry Young. 2002. “Party and Preference in Congressional Decision Making: Roll Call Voting in the House of Representatives, 1889–1999.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 64–106Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, David W. Brady, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1977. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, eds. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph. Beverly Hills: Sage Press, pp. 135–67Google Scholar

Covington, Cary R., and Bargen, Andrew A.. 2004. “Comparing Floor-Dominated and Party-Dominated Explanations of Policy Change in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1069–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1999. “Agenda Setting in the U.S. House: A Majority-Party Monopoly?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Atlanta

Cox, Gary W. 2001. “Agenda Setting in the U.S. House: A Majority-Party Monopoly?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Kernell, Samuel. 1991. The Politics of Divided Government. Boulder: Westview PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Magar, Eric. 1999. “How Much Is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth?” American Political Science Review 93: 299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. “Fiscal Policy and Divided Government.” In The Politics of Divided Government, eds. Cox, Gary W. and Kernell, Samuel. Boulder: Westview PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1994. “Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 215–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 4: 1376–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments and Policy, eds. McCubbins, Mathew D. and Haggard, Stephan. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. “Agenda Power in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1877 to 1986.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2004. “Theories of Legislative Organization.” American Political Science Association – Comparative Politics Newsletter (Winter)Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2002. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 477–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., Chris Den Hartog, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2004. “The Motion to Recommit in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Unpublished typescript. University of California, San Diego

Cox, Gary W., Masuyama, Mikitaka, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crook, Sara Brandes, and Hibbing, John R.. 1985. “Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the U.S. House of Representatives.” British Journal of Political Science 15: 207–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damgaard, Erik. 1995. “How Parties Control Committee Members.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. ed. Döring, Herbert. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, pp. 308–325Google Scholar

Damgaard, Erik, and Svensson, Palle. 1989. “Who Governs? Parties and Policies in Denmark.” European Journal of Political Research 17: 731–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dart, Bob. 2003. “Pryor Clears Judicial Panel; GOP Wins First Round in Bitter Battle.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 24Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1978. “Breaking Up Those Cozy Triangles: An Impossible Dream.” In Legislative Reform and Public Policy, eds. S. Welch and J. Petters

Den Hartog, Christopher F. 2004. Limited Party Government and the Majority Party Revolution in the Nineteenth-Century House. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego

Den Hartog, Christopher F., and Craig Goodman. 2003. “Committee Composition in the Absence of a Strong Speaker.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Den Hartog, Christopher F., and Nathan W. Monroe. 2004. “The Value of Majority Status: The Effect of Jeffords's Switch on Asset Prices of Republican and Democratic Firms.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 15–18, Chicago

Denzau, Arthur T., and Mackay, Robert J.. 1983. “Gate-Keeping and Monopoly Power of Committees: An Analysis of Sincere and Sophisticated Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 740–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denzau, Arthur, Riker, William, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1985. “Farquharson and Fenno: Sophisticated Voting and Home Style.” American Political Science Review 79: 1117–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deschler, Lewis. 1976. Lewis' Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Dierenfield, Bruce J. 1987. Keeper of the Rules: Congressman Howard W Smith of Virginia. Charlottesville: University Press of VirginiaGoogle Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92: 611–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Myerson, Roger. 1999. “Bicameralism and Its Consequences for the Internal Organization of Legislatures.” American Economic Review 89: 1182–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1996. “Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules.” Journal of Politics 58: 25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John. 1997. “Sense and Sensibility: The Role of Rules.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 945–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dlouhy, Jennifer A. 2002a. “House Passes Abortion Bill Despite Democrats' Protests Over Health, Constitution.” CQ Weekly, July 27Google Scholar

Dlouhy, Jennifer A. 2002b. “Ban on ‘Partial Birth’ Abortions Nears Vote on House Floor.” CQ Weekly, July 20Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1997. Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed. Washington DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Döring, Herbert, ed. 1995. Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar

Döring, Herbert 2001. “Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 145–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Paul H., and Hackman, Joseph. 1938. “The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 I.” Political Science Quarterly 53: 491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Paul H., and Hackman, Joseph. 1939. “The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 II.” Political Science Quarterly 54: 29–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar

Duggan, John, and Banks, Jeff. 2000. “A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice.” American Political Science Review 94: 73–88Google Scholar

Edwards, George C. III. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Engstrom, Erik, and Sam Kernell. 2003. “The Effects of Presidential Elections on Party Control of the Senate Under Indirect and Direct Elections.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference December 5–6, San Diego

Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Walter J. Oleszek. 2002. “Message Politics and Senate Procedure.” In The Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology, and the Myth of Cool Judgment, eds. Campbell, Colton C. and Rae, Nicol C.. New York: Roman and Littlefield, pp. 107–27Google Scholar

Evans, Diana. 1994. “Policy and Pork: The Use of Pork Barrel Projects to Build Policy Coalitions in the House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 894–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fagan, Amy. 2002b. “House Panel OK's Abortion Curb; Revised Partial-Birth Ban Goes to Floor.” The Washington Times, July 18Google Scholar

Fagan, Amy. 2002a. “House Bill Targets Type of Abortion; Partial-Birth Measure Goes to Senate.” The Washington Times, July 25Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1966. The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and CompanyGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Finocchiaro, Charles, and David Rohde. 2002. “War for the Floor: Agenda control and the relationship between conditional party government and cartel theory.” Unpublished typescript, Michigan State University

Finocchiaro, Charles, and David Rohde. 2003. “Puzzles of the Partisan Era of the U.S. House.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: D.C. HeathGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977a. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977b. “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.” American Political Science Review 71: 177–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. Divided Government. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government, 2nd ed. Needham, MA: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar

Forgette, Richard. 1997. “Reed's Rules and the Partisan Theory of Legislative Organization.” Polity 29: 375–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Douglas M., and Clapp, Charles. 1970. “The House Rules Committee and the Programs of the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 14: 667–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Harrison W. Jr., and Webb Hammond, Susan. 1977. Congressional Staffs: The Invisible Force in American Lawmaking. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar

Friedman, James. 1971. “A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frohlich, Normal, and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1978. Modern Political Economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Frohlich, Normal, and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Frohlich, Normal, Oppenheimer, Joe A., and Young, O.. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Froman, Lewis. 1967. The Congressional Process: Strategies, Rules and Procedures. New Haven, CT: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Froman, Lewis A. Jr., and Ripley, Randall B.. 1965. “Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats.” American Political Science Review 59: 52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galloway, George B. 1968. History of the United States House of Representatives. New York: CrowellGoogle Scholar

Galloway, George B., and Wise, Sidney. 1976. History of the House of Representatives, 2nd ed. New York: Thomas Y. CrowellGoogle Scholar

Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 2002. “Policy Leadership and the Development of the Modern Senate.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 287–311Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94: 653–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 459–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 531–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gladieux, L. E., and Wolanin, T. R.. 1976. Congress and the Colleges: The National Politics of Higher Education. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar

Goldreich, Samuel. 2003. “Old Becomes New Again As Senate Passes Energy Bill”CQ Weekly, August 2Google Scholar

Goss, Carol F. 1972. “Military Committee Membership and Defense-Related Benefits in the House of Representatives.” Western Political Quarterly 25: 215–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grenzke, Janet M. 1989. “Candidate Attributes and PAC Contributions.” Western Political Quarterly 42: 245–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grose, Christian, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2003. “The Electoral Consequences of Party Switching by Incumbent Members of Congress, Incumbent Legislators Who Switched Parties, 1947–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, Tim, and David C. King. 2001. “Committee Theories Reconsidered.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 191–216Google Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 100–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy, and Snyder, James M.. 1996. “Buying Supermajorities.” American Political Science Review 90: 303–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groseclose, Timothy, and Snyder, James M.. 2003. “Interpreting the Coefficient of Party Influence: Comment on Krehbiel.” Political Analysis 11: 104–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gryski, Gerard S., Zuk, Gary, and Barrow, Deborah J.. 1996. The Federal Judiciary and Institutional Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Hager, Gregory L., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 2000. “Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Hall, Richard, and Wayman, Frank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84: 797–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 1961 [1787]. The Federalist, ed. Rossiter, Clinton. New York: New American LibraryGoogle Scholar

Hasbrouck, Paul DeWitt. 1927. Party Government in the House of Representatives. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Haseman, J. K., and Kupper, L. L.. 1979. “Analysis of Dichotomous Response Data from Certain Toxicological Experiments.” Biometrics 35(1, March): 281–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hastert, Dennis. 2004. Speaker: Lessons from Forty Years in Coaching and Politics. Washington, DC: RegneryGoogle Scholar

Helland, Eric. 1999. “The Waiver Pork Barrel: Committee Membership and the Approval Time of Medicaid Waivers.” Contemporary Economic Policy 17: 401–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, William. 1997. “Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 485–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, Robert. 1997. Between the Margins: Party Politics and Committee Power in Conference Committees of the U.S. House of Representatives. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Hinds, Asher C. 1907. Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92: 775–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, William, Adler, Scott, Cameron, Charles, and Riemann, Charles. 2000. “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(2): 285–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies,” The American Political Science Review 90: 269–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulse, Carl. 2002. “An Abortion Bill Passes, but to an Uncertain Fate.” The New York Times, July 24Google Scholar

Hulse, Carl. 2003. “The Supreme Court: Judicial Vacancies; G. O. P. Pushes Easier Rule On Filibusters.” The New York Times, June 25Google Scholar

Humes, Brian D., Elaine K. Swift, Richard M. Valelly, Kenneth Finegold, and Evelyn C. Fink. 2002. “Representation of the Antebellum South in the House of Representatives: Measuring the Impact of the Three-Fifths Clause.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 452–66Google Scholar

Hummel, Jeff, and Barry Weingast. 2004. “The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850: Symbolic Gesture or Rational Guarantee?” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Hunter, Marjorie. 1965. “Appalachia Bill, Voted by House, Goes to Johnson.” The New York Times, March 3Google Scholar

Jackson, Matthew, and Moselle, Boaz. 2002. “Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game.” Journal of Economic Theory 103(1): 49–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, John. 1995. A Rage for Justice. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1996. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111: 203–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2003. “Explaining the Ideological Polarization of the Congressional Parties in the Postwar Era.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Jenkins, Jeff. 2003. “Partisanship and Contested Election Cases in the House of Representatives, 1789–2002.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Charles H. Stewart III. 2002. “Order from Chaos: The Transformation of the Committee System in the House, 1816–22.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 195–236Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30: 617–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, David R., and McDermott, Monika L.. 2004. “The Responsible Party Government Model in House and Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalt, Joseph P., and Zupan, Mark A.. 1990. “The Apparent Ideological Behavior of Legislators: Testing for Principal–Agent Slack in Political Institutions.” Journal of Law and Economics 33: 103–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 1986. “The Early Nationalization of Political News in America.” American Political Development 1: 255–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 1997. “The Theory and Practice of Going Public.” In Do the Media Govern? eds. Iyengar, Shanto and Reeves, Richard. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, pp. 323–33Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. 2001. “Rural Free Delivery As A Critical Test of Alternative Models of American Political Development: A Comment.” Studies in American Political Development 15: 103–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kernell, Samuel, and McDonald, Michael P.. 1999. “Congress and America's Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 792–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1998. “Restrictions on Floor Amendments in the House of Representatives.” Paper presented at the Comparative Legislative Research Conference, April 16–18, 1998. The University of Iowa, Iowa City

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11:129–61Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1985. “Congressional Appropriations and the Electoral Connection.” Journal of Politics 47: 59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1988. “Presidential Influence on Congressional Appropriations Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 713–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, Roderick, and Kevin Roust. 2003. “Legislative End Game: An Historical Analysis of the Motion To Recommit.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

King, Anthony. 1983. Both Ends of the Avenue: The Presidency, the Executive Branch, and Congress in the 1980s. Washington, DC: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar

King, David. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard. 2003. “Congressional Vote Options.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998Google Scholar

Kingdon, John. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar

Koger, Greg. 2003. “Why a 2/3 Cloture Rule? Institutional Choice in the U.S. Senate, 1913–1919.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Koszczuk, Jackie, and Allen, Jonathan. 2003. “Late-Night Medicare Vote Drama Triggers Some Unexpected Alliances.” CQ Weekly, November 29Google Scholar

Kramer, Gerald H. 1977. “Dynamic Model of Political Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory 16: 310–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1985. “Obstruction and Representativeness in Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 643–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 906–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Committee Power, Leadership, and the Median Voter: Evidence from the Smoking Ban.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 237–59Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1997. “Restrictive Rules Reconsidered.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 919–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1999. “The Party Effect from A to Z and Beyond.” Journal of Politics 61: 832–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 212–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. “The Coefficient of Party Influence.” Political Analysis 11: 96–104Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 2004. “Partisan RollRates in a Nonpartisan Legislature.” Research Paper No. 1870R

Krehbiel, Keith, and Meirowitz, Adam. 2002. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27: 191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krutz, Glen S. 2001. Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Columbus: Ohio State University PressGoogle Scholar

Kupper, L. L., and Haseman, J. K.. 1978. “The Use of a Correlated Binomial Model for the Analysis of Certain Toxicological Experiments.” Biometrics 34(1, March): 69–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Labaton, Stephen. 1993. “Clinton Expected to Change Makeup of Federal Courts.” New York Times, March 8, pp. A1, A9Google Scholar

Ladha, Krishna. 1991. “A Spatial Model of Legislative Voting with Perceptual Error.” Public Choice 68: 151–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Lancaster, John. 2001. “Senate Republicans Try to Regroup: GOP Caucus Unites Behind Lott as Leader in the Wake of Jeffords's Defection,” The Washington Post, May 26, p. A.18Google Scholar

Lapham, Louis J. 1954. Party Leadership and the House Committee on Rules. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University

Lapinski, John. 2004. “Measuring and Evaluating Legislative Performance, 1877–1946.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1991. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, Eric D., Forrest Maltzman, and Steven S. Smith. 1999. “Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 15–17, Chicago

Lawrence, Eric D., Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. In press. “Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly

Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2001. “The Politics of Speaker Cannon's Committee Assignments.” American Journal of Political Science 45(July): 551–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarus, Jeff, and Nathan W. Monroe. 2003. “The Speaker's Discretion: Conference Committee Appointments from the 97th–106th Congresses.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28–31, Philadelphia

Letter to Henry Hyde. 1999. Downloaded 11/14/2004 from: http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/lettertohydeguns.htm

Levitt, Steven D., and Poterba, James M.. 1999. “Congressional Distributive Politics and State Economic Performance.” Public Choice 99:185–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitt, Steven D., and Snyder, James M.. 1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 958–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Londregan, John. 2000. “Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points.” Political Analysis 8: 35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longley, Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter. 1989. Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Lowi, Theodore J. 1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and Gisela Sin. 2003. “The Constitutional Theory of Congressional Power: How the Senate and President Affect the Balance of Power in the House.” Working paper. Available at www.personal.Umich.edu/∼lupia

Lupia, Arthur, and Strøm, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” The American Political Science Review 89(3): 648–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKaye, William R. 1963. A New Coalition Takes Control: The House Rules Committee Fight Of 1961. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

MacKuen, Michael Bruce, Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83: 1125–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magar, Eric. 2001. Bully Pulpits: Posturing, Bargaining and Polarization in the Legislative Process of the Americas. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego

Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. 1994. “Principals, Goals, Dimensionality, and Congressional Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(4): 457–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manley, John F. 1970. The Politics of Finance: The House Committee on Ways and Means. Boston: Little, BrownGoogle Scholar

Markey, Edward J. 2004. Testimony on House Floor June 16, 2004. Retrieved on November 19, 2004, from: www.vote-smart.org

Marshall, Bryan W. 2002. “Explaining the Role of Restrictive Rules in the Postreform House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27: 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mathews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yays and Nays: Normal Decision-making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Matsunaga, Spark M., and Chen, Ping. 1976. Rulemakers of the House. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2000. America's Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison Through Newt Gingrich. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Income Redistribution and the Realignment of American Politics. Washington, DC: The AEI PressGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” American Political Science Review 95: 673–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2002. “Congress and the Territorial Expansion of the United States.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 392–451Google Scholar

McConachie, Lauros G. 1974 [1898]. Congressional Committees. New York: B. FranklinGoogle Scholar

McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D. 1985. “The Legislative Design of Regulatory Structure.” American Journal of Political Science 29(4, November): 721–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D. 1991. “Government on Lay-Away: Federal Spending and Deficits Under Divided Party Control.” In The Politics of Divided Government, eds. Cox, Gary W. and Kernell, Samuel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 113–53Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models, with Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 472–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNollgast, . 1994. “Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation.” Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems 57: 3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNollgast, . 1995. “Political Control of the Judiciary: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law.” The University of Southern California Law Review 68: 1631–83Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Nathan W. 2004. “The Policy Impact of Unified Government: Evidence from the 2000 Presidential Election.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Chicago

Munger, Michael C., and Mitchell, William. 1991. “Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey,” American Journal of Political Science 35: 512–46Google Scholar

Murphy, James T. 1974. “Political Parties and the Porkbarrel: Party Conflict and Cooperation in House Public Works Committee Decision-Making.” American Political Science Review 68: 169–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nather, David. 2003. “Contrite Chairman Does Not Quell Calls for More GOP Comity.” CQ Weekly, July 26, 2003Google Scholar

Nelson, Garrison, and Bensen, Clark H.. 1993. Committees in the U.S. Congress, 1947–1992. Washington, DC: Congressional QuarterlyGoogle Scholar

Nokken, Timothy P. 2000. “Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll Call Behavior, 1947–1997.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 417–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nokken, Timothy P. 2004. “Roll Call Behavior in the Absence of Electoral Constraints: Shirking in Lame Duck Sessions of the House of Representatives, 1879–1933.” Unpublished paper

Nokken, Timothy, and Craig Goodman. 2003. “Roll Call Behavior and Career Advancement: Analyzing Committee Assignments from Reconstruction to the New Deal.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Nokken, Timothy P., and Brian R. Sala. 2002. “Institutional Evolution and the Rise of the Tuesday–Thursday Club in the House of Representatives.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 270–86Google Scholar

Odegard, Peter H., and Allen Helms, E.. 1938. American Politics: A Study in Political Dynamics. New York: Harper and BrothersGoogle Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 1984. Congressional Procedure and the Policy Process, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 1996. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 1998. “A Pre-Twentieth Century Look at the House Committee on Rules.” Report for the Committee on Rules, available from: http://www.house.gov/rules/ pre20th_rules.htm. Accessed 3/18/05

Oleszek, Walter J. 2001. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 2004. Congressional Procedure and the Policy Process, 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1977. “The Rules Committee: New Arm of Leadership in a Decentralized House.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 96–116Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1981. “The Changing Relationship Between House Leadership and the Committee on Rules.” In Understanding Congressional Leadership, ed. Mackaman, Frank. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, pp. 207–25Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1983. History of the Committee on Rules. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1994. “The House Traffic Cop: The Rules Committee.” In Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System, ed. Silbey, Joel. New York: Scribners, pp. 1049–66Google Scholar

Ota, Alan K., Higa, Liriel, and Hughes, Siobhan. 2003. “Fracas in Ways and Means Overshadows Approval of Pension Overhaul Measure.” CQ WeeklyGoogle Scholar

Palmquist, Bradley. 1999. “Analysis of Proportion Data.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Society, July 15–19, College Station, Texas

Parker, Flenn, and Parker, Suzanne L.. 1985. Factions in House Committees. Knoxville: University of Tennessee PressGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Kelly, David B. Magleby, and James A. Thurber. 2002. “Campaign Consultants and Responsible Party Government.” In Responsible Partisanship? The Evolution of American Political Parties Since 1950, eds. Green, John C. and Herrnson, Paul S.. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, pp. 101–20Google Scholar

Peterson, Mark A. 1994. “Health Care and the Hill: Why Is This Year Different from All Others?” PS: Political Science and Politics 27: 202–7Google Scholar

Peterson, Mark A. 2001. “The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting.” Political Analysis 9: 211–26Google Scholar

Peterson, Mark A. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political–Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-NOMINATE after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political–Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pressman, Jeffrey L. 1966. House vs. Senate: Conflict in the Appropriations Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1993. Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ranney, Austin. 1951. “Toward A More Responsible Two-Party System: A Commentary.” American Political Science Review 45: 488–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, Thomas Brackett. 1887. “Rules of the House of Representatives.” The Century Magazine, MarchGoogle Scholar

Renka, Russell D., and Daniel E. Ponder. 2001. “Musical Chairs: The Changing Seniority System in Congress.” Prepared for delivery at the 97th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, San Francisco

Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74(2, June): 432–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripley, Randall B. 1964. “The Party Whip Organizations in the United States House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 58(3, September): 561–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripley, Randall B., and Franklin, Grace A.. 1980. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Rev. ed. Homewood, IL: Dorsey PressGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Jason. 2003. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Conditional Party Government and the Motion to Recommit in the House, 1909–2000.” Working paper

Roberts, Jason, and Steven S. Smith. 2003. “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Institutions in the House and Senate.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Roberts, Steven V. 1983b. “Democrats Reward Loyalty in Giving Assignments,” New York Times, January 6, p. A25Google Scholar

Roberts, Steven V. 1983a. “The Democrats Get Even.” New York Times, January 9, p. E1Google Scholar

Robinson, James A. 1959. “The Role of the Rules Committee in Arranging the Program of the U.S. House of Representatives.” Western Political Quarterly 12: 653–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, James A. 1963. The House Rules Committee. Indianapolis: Bobbs-MerrillGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” American Political Science Review 67: 889–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roll Call. 1998. “Solomon Leaves Rules to Drier: Committee Sees Subtle Changes.” April 30

Romer, Thomas, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33: 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, David E. 1995. “House Approves a Line-Item Veto for the President.” The New York Times, February 7Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Howard. 1990. “The Setter Model.” In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, eds. Enelow, James M. and Hinich, Melvin J.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rybicki, Elizabeth. 2003. “Unresolved Differences: Bicameral Negotiations in Congress, 1877–2002.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Sala, Brian R. 2002. “Party Loyalty and Committee Leadership in the House, 1921–40.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 166–92Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert. 1969. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric. 2000. “Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models.” American Political Science Review 94: 269–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric, and Rich, Andrew. 1997. “Controlling the Floor: Politics as Procedural Coalitions in the House.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1340–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric, and Greg Wawro. 2004. “Cloture Reform Reconsidered.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Schiller, Wendy. 2003. “Climbing and Clawing Their Way to the U.S. Senate: Political Ambition and Career Building 1880–1913.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Schwartz, Thomas. 1977. “Collective Choice, Separation of Issues and Vote Trading.” The American Political Science Review 71: 999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seelye, Katharine Q. 1995. “House Approves Easing of Rules on U.S. Searches.” The New York Times, February 9Google Scholar

Shelley, Mack C. 1983. The Permanent Majority: the Conservative Coalition in the United States Congress, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama PressGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Changing Textbook Congress.” In Can the Government Govern? ed. Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul. Washington, DC: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. “Structure Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice.” Public Choice 37: 509–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1984a. “Legislative Politics and Budget Outcomes.” In Federal Budget Policy in the 1980s, eds. Mills, Gregory B. and Palmer, John L., Washington, DC: Urban Institute, pp. 343–68Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984b. “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Control.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 49–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984c. “When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?” Journal of Politics 46: 206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81: 85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1994. “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(2, May): 149–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1995. “Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions.” In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, eds. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2002a. “Do Parties Matter?” In Party, Process, and Political Change: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 36–63Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2002b. “The Dream Fulfilled? Party Development in Congress, 1950–2000.” In Responsible Partisanship? The Evolution of American Political Parties Since 1950, eds. Green, John C. and Herrnson, Paul S.. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, pp. 121–40Google Scholar

Sloss, Judith. 1973. “Stable Outcomes in Majority Voting Games.” Public Choice 15: 19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 2002. “Positive Theories of Congressional Parties.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Deering, Christopher J.. 1990. Committees in Congress, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ PressGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Gerald Gamm. 2001. “The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 245–69Google Scholar

Smith, Vernon L. 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics.” American Economic Review 93: 465–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. ‘Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll Call Voting.’American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “Estimating Party Influence on Congressional Roll Call Voting: Regression Coefficients vs. Classification Success.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 689–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M., and Michael M. Ting. 2001. “Party Labels, Roll-Call Votes and Elections.” Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Association, April 19–22, Chicago

Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 90–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Gilbery Y. 1951. The Congressional Conference Committee: Seventieth to Eightieth Congresses. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Charles H. III. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1865–1921. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Charles H., III. 1991. “Lessons From the Post–Civil War Era.” In The Politics of Divided Government, eds. Cox, Gary and Kernell, Samuel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 203–38Google Scholar

Stewart, Charles H., III. 2004. “Architect or Tactician? Henry Clay and the Institutional Development of the U.S. House of Representatives.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. 2005. “Arctic Refuge Oil Drilling Is Near Fact, Backers Say.” New York Times. New York, N.Y. April 30, 2005. p. A10

Strahan, Randall. 2002. “Leadership and Institutional Change in the Nineteenth-Century House.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 237–69Google Scholar

Stratmann, Thomas. 2000. “Congressional Voting Over Legislative Careers: Shifting Positions and Changing Constraints.” American Political Science Review 94: 665–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Studenski, Paul, and Krooss, Herman E.. 1963. Financial History of the United States: Fiscal, Monetary, Banking, and Tariff, Including Financial Administration and State and Local Finance. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, John L., and O'Connor, Robert E.. 1972. “Electoral Choice and Popular Control of Public Policy: The Case of the 1966 House Elections.” The American Political Science Review 66: 1256–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Sundquist, James. L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103: 613–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Theriault, Sean. 2002. “Lawmaking in the U.S. Congress: Where and How Legislation Dies.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Southern Political Science Association, November 7–9, Savannah, GA

Theriault, Sean M., and Barry R. Weingast. 2002. “Agenda Manipulation, Strategic Voting, and Legislative Details in the Compromise of 1850.” In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, eds. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Joel A. 1986. “Bringing Home the Bacon: The Politics of Pork Barrel in the North Carolina Legislature.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11(1): 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorson, Greg, and Tasina Nitzschke. N. D. “Testing the Three Theories of Legislative Organization: An Examination of Rule Assignments during the Postreform Period.” Available at www.morris.umn.edu/∼gthorson

Tirole, Jean. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT, Press: Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Tolchin, Martin. 1981. “The Troubles of Tip O'Neill.” New York Times, August 16Google Scholar

Tolchin, Martin. 2001. The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Atomic Dog PublishingGoogle Scholar

Trochim, William. 2001. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic Dog Publishing. Cincinnati, OH

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Rules. 2004. Downloaded 11/14/2004 from: http://usinfo.org/house/rule/beg.htm

Van Houweling, Rob. 2003. “An Evolving End Game: The Partisan Use of Conference Committees in the Post-Reform Congress.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Vogler, David J. 1970. “Patterns of One House Dominance in Congressional Conference Committees.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 14: 303–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogler, David J. 1971. The Third House: Conference Committees in the United States Congress. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar

Volden, Craig, and Brandice Canes-Wrone. 2004. “Who Parties? Responsiveness to Party Pressures in Congress.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, April 9–10, Stanford, CA

Wattenberg, Martin P. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Wawro, Gregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 245–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11: 1–32Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and Moran, Mark. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control: Regulatory Policy Making by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 765–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry, Shepsle, Kenneth, and Johnson, Christopher. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 642–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, John Kenneth. 1992. “Responsible Party Government in America.” Perspectives on Political Science 21: 80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, D. A. 1975. “The Analysis of Binary Responses from Toxicological Experiments Involving Reproduction and Teratogenicity.” Biometrics 31(4, December), pp. 949–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, Rick K. 1986. “What Was It Worth to Be on a Committee in the US House, 1889–1913?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11: 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1956 [1885]. Congressional Government. New York: Meridian BooksGoogle Scholar

Wolf, Jim. 2004. “Veteran Texas Democrat Switches to Republicans.”Washington, DC: ReutersGoogle Scholar

Wolfensberger, Donald. 2003. “The Motion to Recommit in the House: The Creation, Evisceration, and Restoration of a Minority Right.” Paper presented at the History of Congress conference, December 5–6, San Diego

Young, Roland Arnold. 1956. Congressional Politics in the Second World War. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Zuk, Gary, Gryski, Gerard S., and Barrow, Deborah J.. 1993. “Partisan Transformation of the Federal Judiciary, 1896–1992.” American Politics Quarterly 21: 439–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar