Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:39:43.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Severe cases: management of the refractory borderline patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

Bert van Luyn
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychologist and Clinical Head of Transmural Services for Longterm Psychiatric Disorders, Symfora Groep The Netherlands
Bert van Luyn
Affiliation:
Symfora Group, The Netherlands
Salman Akhtar
Affiliation:
Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia
W. John Livesley
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe but not hopeless condition. Gradual improvement over time can be expected (Paris, 2003), and active psychotherapeutic treatment may be effective (Bateman and Fonagy, 2004; Giesen-Bloo et al., 2006; Linehan, 1993; Perry et al., 1999). However, not all patients respond well: some do not improve at all while others become very self-destructive, drop out of therapy, or worsen. This chapter will focus on treatment strategies and the management of severe, refractory patients.

The refractory borderline patient

Every treatment setting has its own difficult, “refractory” borderline patients: they do not respond well to any treatment, have had multiple therapists, multiple suicide attempts, severely harm themselves, and make frequent use of emergency services. Most are unemployed, and have no stable support system or are still dependent on exhausted parents. Some are left without any treatment at all. Several factors contribute to this unfortunate outcome.

First, BPD in itself is a severe, to some extent chronic, disorder (Paris, 2003). Though recent longitudinal studies on personality disorders show that borderline patients improve on a psychopathological level, their functional impairment improves much less (Skodol et al., 2005). Moreover, since personality psychopathology usually begins in early adulthood or adolescence, the risks of severe, accumulating derailments in psychosocial functioning are substantial: “The possibility of chronic, residual impairment from which a person never completely recovers is real” (Skodol et al., 2005). Psychopathological improvement is less for what seem core dimensions of BPD: affective instability and anger.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (2001). Guidelines for the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry Suppl 157: 1–52.
American Psychiatric Association (2001). Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Bateman, A. and Fonagy, P. (2004). Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Mentalization-Based Treatment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Betan, E., Heim, A. K., Zittel, Conklin C. and Westen, D. (2005). Countertransference phenomena and personality pathology in clinical practice: an empirical investigation. Am J Psychiatry 162(5): 890–898.Google Scholar
Drum, P. and Lavigne, G. (1987). Extended state hospital treatment of severely impaired borderline patients. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 38(5): 515–519.Google Scholar
Giesen-Bloo, J., Dyck, R., Spinhoven, P.et al. (2006). Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63(6): 649–658.Google Scholar
Gunderson, J. G. (2001). Borderline Personality Disorder: A Clinical Guide. Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Publishing.
Gunderson, J. G., Daversa, M. T., Grilo, C. M.et al. (2006). Predictors of 2-year outcome for patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 163 (5): 822–826.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, R. D. (1999). The difficult patient, the role of “scientific psychiatry” in understanding patients with chronic schizophrenia or severe personality disorder. Br J Psychiatry 174: 187–190.Google Scholar
Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
Links, P. S. (1998). Developing effective services for patients with personality disorders. Can J Psychiatry 43: 251–259.Google Scholar
Links, P. S., Heslegrave, R. J., Mitton, J. E.et al. (1995). Borderline personality disorder and substance abuse: consequences of comorbidity. Can J Psychiatry 40: 9–14.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J. (2003). Practical Management of Personality Disorder. New York: The Guilford Press.
Luyn, J. B. van (2003). De extra moeilijke borderlinepatiënt, het prototype van een moeilijk mens. In Hoogduin, C. A. L. and Hoogduin, W. A. (eds.) Omgaan met Moeilijke Mensen. Nijmegen: Cure and Care Publishers.
McGlashan, T. (1986). The Chestnut Lodge follow-up study. III: Long-term outcome of borderline personalities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlashan, T. H., Grilo, C. M., Sanislow, C. A.et al. (2005). Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-IV criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: toward a hybrid model of axis II disorders. Am J Psychiatry 162 (5): 833–835.Google Scholar
Meekeren, E. (2000). De regievoering in de behandeling van borderlinepatiënten; context en eenheid van behandeling. Dth 20 (3): 216–228.Google Scholar
Monroe, S. M. and Simons, A. D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research. Psychol Bull 110: 406–425.Google Scholar
Paris, J. (2003). Personality Disorders over Time, Precursors, Course and Outcome. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Perry, J. C., Banon, E. and Janni, F. (1999). Effectiveness of psychotherapy for personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 156: 1312–1321.Google Scholar
Pfohl, B. and Blum, N. (1991). Obsessive compulsive personality disorder: a review for DSM-IV. J Pers Disord 5: 363–375.Google Scholar
Shea, M. T., Pilkonis, P. A., Beckham, E.et al. (1990). Personality disorders and treatment outcome in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Am J Psychiatry 147: 711–718.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E., Pagano, M. E., Bender, D. S.et al. (2005). Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder over two years. Psychol Med 35 (3): 443–451.Google Scholar
Stein, L. I. and Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37: 392–397.Google Scholar
Stone, M. H. (1990). The Fate of Borderline Patients: Successful Outcome and Psychiatric Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Stone, M. H. (1993). Long-term outcome in personality disorders. Br J Psychiatry 162: 299–313.Google Scholar
Stone, M. H. (2001). Natural history and long-term outcome. In Livesley, W. J. (ed.) Handbook of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.
Waldinger, R. J. and Gunderson, J. G. (1984). Completed psychotherapies with borderline patients. Am J Psychotherapy 38: 190–202.Google Scholar
Yeomans, F. E., Selzen, M. A. and Clarkin, J. F. (1992). Treating the Borderline Patient: A Contract-Based Approach. New York: Basic Books.
Young, J. E. (1999). Cognitieve Therapie voor Persoonlijkheidsstoornissen. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
Zanarini, M. C. (1993). A two-site year follow up of borderline patients and axis I controls. Paper presented at the International Congress on the Disorders of Personality, Cambridge, MA., September 1993.
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Hennen, J.et al. (2003). The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology: 6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 160: 274–283.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×