Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU).SBU reports’ influence of the healthcare system. Stockholm, 2012 (in Swedish). https://bit.ly/3NBrBow.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries British Medical Journal. 1971;2:430–1.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124:161–9.Google Scholar

Eisenbrey, AB. Retinal hemorrhage in the battered child. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 1979; 5:40–4.Google Scholar

Squier, W, Mack, J, Green, A, Azis, T. The pathophysiology of brain swelling associated with subdural hemorrhage: The role of the trigeminovascular system. Child’s Nervous System. 2012;28:2005–15.Google ScholarPubMed

Duhaime, AC, Christian, CW, Rorke, LC, Zimmerman, RA. Nonaccidental head injury in infants: The ‘shaken-baby syndrome’. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338:1822–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Prange, MT, Coats, B, Duhaime, AC, Margulies, SS. Anthropomorphic simulations of falls, shakes, and inflicted impacts in infants. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2003;99:143–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duhaime, AC, Alario, A, Lewander, WJ et al. Head injuries in very young children: Mechanism, injury type and ophthalmological findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics. 1992;90:179–85.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Juth, N, Eriksson, A. From child protection to paradigm protection: The genesis, development and defence of a scientific paradigm. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2019;44:378–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. The unspoken shaken baby lie detector algorithm: An analysis of diagnostic procedures in cases of allegedly abusive head trauma without external signs of trauma. Journal of Research in Philosophy and History. 2020;3(2). www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/jrph/article/view/3224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudhary, AK, Servaes, S, Slovis, TL et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(8):1048–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Strouse, PJ. Child abuse: We have problems. Pediatric Radiology. 2016;46:587–90.Google Scholar

Ludvigsson, J, Steinwall Larsen, S, Van Agthoven, G et al. The presence of shaken baby syndrome is scientifically robust. Swedish Medical Journal. 2015;112:DE6U.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Hackshaw, AK, Vowles, GH, Nickols, CD, Whitwell, HL. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage. Brain. 2001;124:1290–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Geddes, JF, Vowles, GH, Hackshaw, A et al. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. II. Microscopic brain injury in infants. Brain. 2001;124:1299–1306.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Whitwell, HL. Inflicted head injury in infants. Forensic Science International. 2004;146:83–8.Google Scholar

Zahl, SM, Wester, K, Gabaeff, S. Examining perinatal subdural haematoma as an aetiology of extra-axial hygroma and chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109(4):659–66.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Problems of infant retino-dural hemorrhage with minimal external injury. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12:201–8.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA et al. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12:209–312.Google Scholar

Donohoe, M. Evidence-based medicine and shaken baby syndrome: Part I. Literature review, 1966–1998. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2003;24(3):239–42.Google Scholar

Riggs, JE, Hobbs, GR. Infant homicide and accidental death in the United States, 1940–2005: Ethics and epidemiological classification. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011;37:445–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Acres, M, Morris, JA. The pathogenesis of retinal and subdural haemorrhage in non-accidental head injury in infancy: Assessment using Bradford Hill criteria. Medical Hypotheses. 2014;82:1–5.8.Google Scholar

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU). Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. A systematic review. SBU assessment. Report 255E/2016 (in Swedish and English). https://bit.ly/3DGrvaC.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’: A systematic review. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1021–7.Google Scholar

Elinder, G, Eriksson, A, Hallberg, B et al. Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(S472):3–23.Google Scholar

Elinder, G, Eriksson, A, Hallberg, B et al. Gaisho sei no yusaburi: Gaishosei no yusaburi ga utagawareru jian no igakuteki chosa ni okeru san. Choko no yakuwari [Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. A systematic review]. (Translation by Kana Sasakura). Ryukoku Hogaku. 2018;50(3):670–95.Google Scholar

SBU Handbook (including appendix 10 regarding statistical concepts and chapter 10, page 130, regarding the assessment of grading studies). www.sbu.se/upload/ebm/metodbok/SBUsHandbok.pdf.Google Scholar

Whiting, P, Rutjes, AW, Reitsma, JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2003;3:25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shea, BJ, Grimshaw, JM, Wells, GA et al. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007;7:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gordon Guyatt, G, Oxman, AD, Elie, A et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction. GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64:383–94.Google Scholar

Rutjes, AWS, Reitsma, JB, Coomarasamy, A, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods. Health Technology Assessment. 2007;11(50).Google Scholar

Adamsbaum, C, Grabar, S, Mejean, N, Rey-Salmon, C. Abusive head trauma: Judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126:546–55.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, de Foort-Dhellemmens, S, Desurmont, M, Delestret, I. Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: Comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Child’s Nervous System. 2010;26:637–45.Google Scholar

Gardner, HB. A witnessed short fall mimicking presumed shaken baby syndrome. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2007;43:433–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Denton, S, Mileusnic, D. Delayed sudden death in an infant following an accidental fall: A case report with review of the literature. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2003;24(4):371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, M, Chalmers, I. Reflections on the history of systematic reviews. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2018;23(4):121–2.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Eriksson, G, Högberg, G, Wahlberg, Å. Parents’ experiences of seeking health care and encountering allegations of shaken baby syndrome: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228911.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, G. A rational controversy over compounding forces. In Scientific controversies: Philosophical and historical perspectives. Machamer, P, Pera, M, Baltas, A, eds. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Johansson, I, Lynøe, N. Medicine & philosophy: A twenty-first century introduction. Ontos, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowley, LE, Maguire, S, Farewell, DM et al. Acceptability of the predicting abuse head trauma (PredAHT) clinical prediction tool: A qualitative study with child protection professionals. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2018;81:192–205.Google Scholar

Breger, ML. Making waves or keeping the calm: Analyzing the institutional culture of family courts through the lens of social psychology groupthink theory. Law and Psychology Review. 2010;34:55–90.Google Scholar

Offiah, AC, Servaes, S, Adamsbaum, CS et al. Initial response of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology and Society for Pediatric Radiology to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services’ document on the triad of shaken baby syndrome. Pediatric Radiology. 2017;47:369–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debelle, GD, Maguire, S, Watts, P, et al. Abusive head trauma and the triad. A critique on behalf of RCPCH of ‘Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking’. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2018;103(6):606–10.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. No similarities between the Wakefield report on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the Swedish report on traumatic shaking. Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109(7):1326–9.Google Scholar

Saunders, D, Raissaki, M, Servaes, S et al. Throwing the baby out with the bath water: Response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking. Pediatric Radiology. 2017;47(11):1386–9.Google Scholar

Bilo, RAC. The Swedish Agency for Health Technology. Report about traumatic shaking: Much ado about nothing? Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2018;14(4):541–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laurent-Vannier, A, Adamsbaum, C, Raul, JS, et al. Flawed Swedish study on traumatic shaking is already being used by defence lawyers and its findings must be ignored. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(12):2048–50.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. Is focusing on the triad really irrelevant and of no practical use? Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(10):1675–6.Google Scholar

Laurent-Vannier, A, Nathanson, M, Quiriau, F et al. A public hearing on ‘Shaken baby syndrome: Guidelines on establishing a robust diagnosis and the procedures to be adopted by healthcare and social services staff’. Guidelines issued by the Hearing Commission. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;54:600–25.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. Why programs for managing colicky crying fail to prevent abusive head trauma and suggestions for improvement. JAMA Pediatrics. 2021, 26 April. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0455.Google Scholar

Keenan, HT, Leventhal, JM. A case-control study to evaluate Utah’s shaken baby prevention program. Academic Pediatrics. 2010;10:389–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wester, K, Wikström, J, Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. Unsubstantiated belief in the diagnostic accuracy of the triad of abusive head trauma may lead to incorrect diagnoses of alleged abuse cases. Acta Paediatrica. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15892.Google Scholar

Wester, K. Two infant boys misdiagnosed as ‘shaken baby’ and their twin sisters: A cautionary tale. Pediatric Neurology. 2019;97:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.02.024.Google Scholar

Levin, AV. The SBU report: A different view. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1037–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hellgren, K, Hellström, A, Hård, AL et al. The new Swedish report on shaken baby syndrome is misleading. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1040.Google Scholar

Hylton, C, Goldberg, MF. Circumpapillary retinal ridge in the shaken-baby syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351:170.Google Scholar

Narang, SK, Estrada, C, Greenberg, S, Lindberg, D. Acceptance of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma as medical diagnoses. Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;177:273–8.Google Scholar

Mulvihill, AO, Jones, P, Tandon, A, Fleck, BW, Minns, RA. An inter-observer and intra-observer study of a classification of RetCam images of retinal haemorrhages in children. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;95:99–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Minns, RA, Jones, PA, Tandon, A et al. Raised intracranial pressure and retinal haemorrhages in childhood encephalopathies. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2017;59:597–604.Google Scholar

Squier, W. Retinal haemorrhage: A red flag for raised intracranial pressure. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2017;59:565.Google Scholar

Medele, RJ, Stummer, W, Mueller, AJ, et al. Terson’s syndrome in subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe brain injury accompanied by acutely raised intracranial pressure. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1998;88(5):851–4.Google Scholar

Frayser, R, Houston, C, Bryan, AC, et al. Retinal hemorrhage at high altitude. New England Journal of Medicine. 1970;282(21):1183–4.Google Scholar

Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K et al. Medical findings and symptoms in infants exposed to witnessed or admitted abusive shaking: A nationwide registry study. PLoS One. 2020 15(10):e0240182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K, et al. Retinal haemorrhage in infants investigated for suspected maltreatment is strongly correlated with intracranial pathology. Acta Paediatrica. 2022;111(4):800–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16139.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. A diagnostic test can prove anything if you use incorrect assumptions and circular reasoning. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(12):2051–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Is accepting circular reasoning in shaken baby studies bad science or misconduct? Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(9):1445–6.Google Scholar

Squier, W, Mack, J, Lantz, PE et al. Circular reasoning. Minnesota Medicine. 2010;93(3):8.Google Scholar

Leestma, J. Case analysis of brain-injured admittedly shaken infants. 54 cases, 1969–2001. American Journal of Forensic and Medical Pathology. 2005;26:199–212.Google Scholar

Ludvigsson, J. Extensive shaken baby syndrome review provides a clear signal that more research is needed. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1028–30.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. Hidden clinical values and overestimation of shaken baby cases. Clinical Ethics. 2019;14(3):151–4.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Brooks, CB, Juth, N, Eriksson, A. Do child abuse pediatricians search for a ‘Pediatric Vulcan planet’? Comparison of controversies about the Vulcan-must-exist-theory and the infant-must-have-been-shaken-theory. Journal of Research in Philosophy and History. 2020;3(2):162–93.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. Can a prolonged unexplained event change a reliable resuscitator into an unreliable perpetrator? Submitted.Google Scholar

Adamsbaum, C, Grabar, S, Mejean, N, Rey-Salmon, C. Abusive head trauma: Judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126:546–55.Google Scholar

Brook, C. Wrongful Convictions Report. Is there evidentiary basis for shaken baby syndrome? The conviction of Joby Rowe. 2019. https://wrongfulconvictionsreport.org/2019/09/10/is-there-evidentiary-basis-for-shaken-baby-syndrome-the-conviction-of-joby-rowe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cenziper, D. Shaken science: Prosecutors build murder cases on disputed shaken baby syndrome diagnosis. Washington Post. 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/shaken-baby-syndrome.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Squier, W. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12(2):209–312.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, De Foort-Dhellemmens, S, Desurmont, M, Delestret, I. Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: Comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Child’s Nervous System. 2010;26:637–45.Google Scholar

Drizin, SA, Leo, RA. The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review. 2004;82:891–1007.Google Scholar

Leo, RA, Ofshe, RJ. The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1998;88:429–96.Google Scholar

Garrett, BL. Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Innocence Project. https://innocenceproject.org.Google Scholar

Woody, WD, Forrest, KD. Understanding police interrogation: Confessions and consequences. New York University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Kassin, SM, Drizin, SA, Grisso, T et al. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior. 2010;34:3–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leo, RA. Police interrogation and American justice. Harvard University Press, 2009 (for reviews).Google Scholar

Papetti, R. The forensic unreliability of the shaken baby syndrome. Academic Forensic Pathology International, 2018.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: Shaken baby syndrome and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Reid, John E. and Associates, Inc. http://reid.com.Google Scholar

Kozinski, W. The Reid interrogation technique and false confessions: A time for change. Seattle Journal for Social Justice. 2018;16:301–45 (for reviews).Google Scholar

Villalobos, JG, Davis, D. Interrogation and the minority suspect: Pathways to true and false confession. In Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 1). Miller, M, Bornstein, B, eds. Springer, 2016.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2012;18(4):673–704.Google Scholar

Inbau, FE, Reid, JE, Buckley, JP, Jayne, BC. Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett, 2013.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA, Livingston, TN, Rerick, PO. Interrogation and the sexual assault suspect: On the synergy between pretext caller and police interrogator. In Criminal investigations of sexual offenses: Investigative techniques and operational challenges. Deslauriers-Varin, N, Bennell, C, eds. Springer, 2021, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Livingston, T, Rerick, PO, Villalobos, JG, Davis, D. Deception induced confession: Strategies of police interrogators and their lay collaborators. In Palgrave handbook of deceptive communication. Docan-Morgan, T, ed. Springer, 2019, pp. 747–67.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Villalobos, JG. Language and the law: Illustrations from cases of disputed sexual consent. In Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. Holtgraves, T, ed. Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 438–58.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. To walk in their shoes: The problem of missing, misrepresented and misunderstood context in judging criminal confessions. New England Law Review. 2012;46(4):737–67.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. Acute suggestibility in police interrogation: Self-regulation failure as a primary mechanism of vulnerability. In Suggestibility in legal contexts: Psychological research and forensic implications. Ridley, A, Gabbert, F, La Rooy, DJ, eds. Wiley, 2012, pp. 171–97.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. Interrogation through pragmatic implication. In The Oxford handbook on language and law. Solan, L, Tiersma, P, eds. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 354–66.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. Stereotype threat and the special vulnerabilities of sexual abuse/assault suspects to false confession. In Vilified: Wrongful allegations of person abuse. Burnett, R, ed. Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar

Najdowski, CJ. Stereotype threat in criminal interrogations: Why innocent black suspects are at risk for confessing falsely. Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 2011;17(4):562–91.Google Scholar

National Research Council of the National Academies. The polygraph and lie detection. National Academies Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Steele, CM. Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. W. W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar

Steele, CM, Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69(5):797–811.Google Scholar

Harris, GT, Hilton, NZ, Rice, ME, Eke, AW. Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007;28(2):85–95.Google Scholar

Jayne, BC, Buckley, JP. Investigator anthology: A compilation of articles and essays about the Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. John E. Reid & Associates, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA, Follette, WC. Selling confession: Setting the stage with the ‘sympathetic detective with a time-limited offer. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2010;26(4):441–57.Google Scholar

Cronkright, M. What if a parent confesses to shaking a baby? Part two. 2020. www.Michiganparentdefense.com/blog/2020/January/what-if-a-parent-confesses-to-shaking-a-baby-par2.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, GH. Mental vulnerabilities and false confession. In Investigative interviewing: The essentials. St.-Ives, M, ed. Carswell, 2014, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar

Gudjonsson, GH. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Wiley, 2003.Google Scholar

Martin, A. Jerry Hobbs’ confession. New York Times Magazine. 25 November 2011.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Squier, W. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12:209–312.Google Scholar

Choudhary, AK, Servaes, S, Slovis, TL et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(8):1048–65.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019:1211–67.Google Scholar

Hymel, KP et al. for the Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2013;14:210–20.Google Scholar

Narang, SA. A Daubert analysis of abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2011;11:505–633.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, de Foort-Dhellemmes, S, Desurmont, M, Delestret, I. Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: Comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases. Child’s Nervous System. 2010;26: 637–45.Google ScholarPubMed

Maguire, SA, Kemp, AM, Lumb, RC, Farewell, DM. Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: A pooled analysis. Pediatrics.2011;128:e550–e564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piteau, SJ, Ward, MGK, Barrowman, MJ, Plint, AC. Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: A systematic review. Pediatrics. 2012;130:1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services. Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. A systematic review. 2016. https://bit.ly/3DGrvaC.Google Scholar

Matschke, J, Voss, J, Obi, N et al. Nonaccidental head injury is the most common cause of subdural bleeding in infants < year of age. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1587–94.Google Scholar

Starling, SP, Patel, S, Burke, BL et al. Analysis of perpetrator admissions to inflicted traumatic brain injury in children. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2004;158:454–8.Google Scholar

Biron, D, Shelton, D. Perpetrator accounts in infant abusive head trauma brought about by a shaking event. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2005;29:1347–58.Google Scholar

Starling, SP, Holden, JR, Jenny, C. Abusive head trauma: The relationship of perpetrators to their victims. Pediatrics. 1995;95:259–62.Google Scholar

Dias, MS. The case for shaking. In Child abuse and neglect: Diagnosis, treatment, and evidence. Jenny, C, ed. Elsevier Saunders, 2010, pp. 362–70.Google Scholar

Minns, RA. Shaken baby syndrome: Theoretical and evidential controversies. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2005;35:5–15.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, Noulé, N, Karnoub, MA. The legal challenges to the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome or how to counter 12 common fake news. Child’s Nervous System. 2022;38(1):133–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05357-8.Google Scholar

Edwards, GA, Maguire, SA, Gaither, JR, Leventhal, JM. What do confessions reveal about abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Child Abuse Review. 2020;29:253–68.Google Scholar

Adamsbaum, C, Grabar, S, Mejean, N, Rey-Salmon, C. Abusive head trauma: Judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics. 2010;126:546–55.Google Scholar

Leestma, JE. Case analysis of brain-injured admittedly shaken infants: 54 cases, 1969–2001. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2005;26:1–14.Google Scholar

Leestma, JE ‘Shaken baby syndrome’: Do confessions by alleged perpetrators validate the concept? Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. 2006;11:14–16.Google Scholar

Bell, E, Shouldice, M, Levin, A. Abusive head trauma: A perpetrator confesses. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2011;35:74–7.Google Scholar

Garrett, BL. The substance of false confessions. Stanford Law Review. 2010;62:1051–1119.Google Scholar

Innocence Project. The causes of wrongful conviction. https://innocenceproject.org/causes-wrongful-conviction.Google Scholar

National Registry of Exonerations. www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx.Google Scholar

Leo, RA. Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1996;86:266–303.Google Scholar

Kassin, SM, Kiechel, KL. The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science. 1996;7(3):125–8.Google Scholar

Ofshe, RJ, Leo, RA. The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society. 1997;16:189–251.Google Scholar

Ofshe, RJ, Leo, RA. The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review. 1997;74:979–1122.Google Scholar

Davis, D, Leo, RA. The problem of interrogation-induced false confession: Sources of failure in prevention and detection. In Handbook of forensic sociology and psychology. Morewitz, SJ, Goldstein, ML, eds. Springer Science + Business Media, 2014, pp. 47–75.Google Scholar

Drizin, SA, Leo, RA. The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review. 2004;82:891–1004.Google Scholar

Kassin, SM. The social psychology of false confessions. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2015;9:25–51.Google Scholar

Kassin, SM, Drizin, SA, Grisso, T et al. Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior. 2010;34(1):3–38.Google Scholar

Inbau, FE, Reid, JE, Buckley, JP, Jayne, BC. Criminal interrogation and confessions. 5th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2013.Google Scholar

Leo, RA, Drizin, SA. The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. In Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations. Lassiter, GD, Meissner, CA, eds. American Psychological Association, 2010, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar

People v Thomas, 8 N.E.3d 308 (N.Y. 2014).Google Scholar

Cabut, S. Shaken babies: Doubts about the reliability of self-incriminations. Le Monde. 15 November 2021. https://bit.ly/3UvJZ4m.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Eriksson, G, Högberg, G, Wahlberg, A. Parents’ experiences of seeking health care and encountering allegations of shaken baby syndrome: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228911.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, Karnoub, MA, Noulé, N et al. Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences. Child’s Nervous System. 2021;38(1):147–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05381-8.Google Scholar

Rossant, C. Personal communication. 2021.Google Scholar

Kassin, S. On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist. 2005;60:215–28.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: Shaken baby syndrome and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Aleman v Village of Hanover Park, 662 F. 3d 897 (7th Cir. 2011).Google Scholar

National Registry of Exonerations, Clarence Jones III. https://bit.ly/3UjlWWu.Google Scholar

State v Paul, Superior Court for Alaska, First Jud. Dist. at Juneau, Case No. 1JU-11-00823CR. Interviews of David Paul, 2010.Google Scholar

Medline Plus. CPR-Infant. https://bit.ly/3UoD11P.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124:161–9.Google Scholar

Imwinkelried, EJ. Shaken baby syndrome: A genuine battle of the scientific (and non-scientific) expert. Criminal Law Bulletin. 2010;46:1–44.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, N, Margulies, S. Biomechanics of toddler head during low-height falls: An anthropomorphic dummy analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics. 2010;6:57–68.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M. Response to Lynøe: Questions about isolated trauma shaking and confessions. Child’s Nervous System. 2017;33(9):1423–4.Google Scholar

Thiblin, J, Andersson, K, Wester, J et al. Medical findings and symptoms in infants exposed to witnessed or admitted abusive shaking: A nationwide registry study. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240182.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D, Sibony, O, Sunstein, CR. Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little Brown Spark, 2021.Google Scholar

Bressan, P, Dal Martello, MF. ‘Talis pater, talis filius’: Perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness. Psychological Science. 2002;13:213–18.Google Scholar

Asch, SE. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1946;41:258–90.Google Scholar

Balcetis, E, Dunning, D. See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;91:612–25.Google Scholar

Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC). (2020, 1 April). OSAC preferred terms. www.nist.gov/document/osac-preferred-terms-april-2020.Google Scholar

Klayman, J, Ha, Y-W. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;94:211–28.Google Scholar

Nisbett, RE, Wilson, TD. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review. 1977;84(3):231–59.Google Scholar

Kunda, Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;108:480–98.Google Scholar

Kassin, SM, Dror, IE, Kukucka, J. The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2013;2:42–52.Google Scholar

Berner, ES, Graber, ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. American Journal of Medicine. 2008;121(5):S2–S23.Google Scholar

Graber, ML, Wachter, RM, Cassel, CK. Bringing diagnosis into the quality and safety equations. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1211–12.Google Scholar

Groopman, J. How doctors think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2007.Google Scholar

Kukucka, J, Dror, IE (2023). Human factors in forensic science: Psychological causes of bias and error. In The Oxford handbook of psychology and law. DeMatteo, D, Scherr, KC, eds. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dror, IE, Charlton, D. Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification. 2006;56:600–16.Google Scholar

Growns, B, Kukucka, J. The prevalence effect in fingerprint identification: Match and non-match base rates impact misses and false alarms. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35:751–60.Google Scholar

Almazrouei, MA, Morgan, RM, Dror, IE. Stress and support in the workplace: The perspective of forensic examiners. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law. 2021;100059.Google Scholar

Murrie, DC, Boccaccini, MT, Guarnera, LA, Rufino, KA. Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them? Psychological Science. 2013;24:1889–97.Google Scholar

Archer, MS, Wallman, JF. Context effects in forensic entomology and use of sequential unmasking in casework. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;61:1270–7.Google Scholar

Found, B, Ganas, J. The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework. Science and Justice. 2013;53:154–8.Google Scholar

Mattijssen, EJAT, Kerkhoff, W, Berger, CEH, Dror, IE, Stoel, RD. Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination. Science and Justice. 2016;56:113–22.Google Scholar

Kukucka, J, Kassin, SM, Zapf, PA, Dror, IE. Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017;6:452–9.Google Scholar

Oliver, WR, Fang, X. Forensic pathologist consensus in the interpretation of photographs of patterned injuries of the skin. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;61:972–8.Google Scholar

Anderst, J, Nielsen-Parker, M, Moffatt, M, Frazier, T, Kennedy, C. Using simulation to identify sources of medical diagnostic error in child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2016;52:62–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wester, K, Stridbeck, U, Syse, A, Wikström, J. Re‐evaluation of medical findings in alleged shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma in Norwegian courts fails to support abuse diagnoses. Acta Paediatrica. 2022;111(4):779–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15956.Google Scholar

Hymel, KP, Willson, DF, Boos, SC et al. Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2013;14(2):210–20.Google Scholar

Narang, S. A Daubert analysis of abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome. Houston Journal of Health, Law, and Policy. 2011;11:505–633.Google Scholar

Schiff, GD. Minimizing diagnostic error: The importance of follow-up and feedback. American Journal of Medicine. 2008;121(5):S38–S42.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019;5:1211–68.Google Scholar

Bornstein, BH, Emler, AC. Rationality in medical decision-making: A review of the literature on doctors’ decision‐making biases. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2001;7(2):97–107.Google Scholar

Saposnik, G, Redelmeier, D, Ruff, CC, Tobler, PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision-Making. 2016;16(1):1–14.Google Scholar

Croskerry, P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine. 2016;78(8):775–80.Google Scholar

Doherty, TS, Carroll, AE. Believing in overcoming cognitive biases. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics. 2020;22(9):773–8.Google Scholar

Wolfe, JM, Brunelli, DN, Rubinstein, J, Horowitz, TS. Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: Trained observers miss rare targets, too. Journal of Vision. 2013;13:1–9.Google Scholar

Papesh, MH, Goldinger, SD. Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 2014;76:1335–49.Google Scholar

Horowitz, TS. Prevalence in visual search: From the clinic to the lab and back again. Japanese Psychological Research. 2017;59(2):65–108.Google Scholar

Evans, KK, Tambouret, RH, Evered, A, Wilbur, DC, Wolfe, JM. Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists’ error rates in screening for cervical cancer. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2011;135(12):1557–60.Google Scholar

Reed, WM, Ryan, JT, McEntee, MF, Evanoff, MG, Brennan, PC. The effect of abnormality-prevalence expectation on expert observer performance and visual search. Radiology. 2011;258(3):938–43.Google Scholar

Nakashima, R, Watanabe, C, Maeda, E et al. The effect of expert knowledge on medical search: Medical experts have specialized abilities for detecting serious lesions. Psychological Research. 2015;79(5):729–38.Google Scholar

Lazarus, RS, Deese, J, Osler, SF. The effects of psychological stress upon performance. Psychological Bulletin. 1952;49(4):293–317.Google Scholar

Motowidlo, SJ, Packard, JS, Manning, MR. Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71(4):618–29.Google Scholar

Dovidio, JF, Penner, LA, Albrecht, TL et al. Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Social Science and Medicine. 2008;67(3):478–86.Google Scholar

Burgess, DJ. Are providers more likely to contribute to healthcare disparities under high levels of cognitive load? How features of the healthcare setting may lead to biases in medical decision-making. Medical Decision-Making. 2010;30(2):246–57.Google Scholar

Johnson, TJ, Hickey, RW, Switzer, GE et al. The impact of cognitive stressors in the emergency department on physician implicit racial bias. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016;23(3):297–305.Google Scholar

Gitlin, JN, Cook, LL, Linton, OW, Garrett-Mayer, E. Comparison of ‘B’ readers’ interpretations of chest radiographs for asbestos related changes. Academic Radiology. 2004;11:843–56.Google Scholar

Kempe, CH, Silverman, FN, Steele, BF, Droegemueller, W, Silver, HK. The battered-child syndrome. JAMA. 1962;181(1):17–24.Google Scholar

Leake, HC, III, Holbrook, RF. Medical testimony. In Child abuse and neglect: A medical reference. Ellerstein, NS, ed. Wiley, 1981, pp. 327–43.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Christian, CW. Abusive head trauma: Evidence, obfuscation, and informed management. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2019;24(5):481–8.Google Scholar

Brown, SD. Ethical challenges in child abuse: What is the harm of a misdiagnosis? Pediatric Radiology. 2021;51(6):1070–5.Google Scholar

Risinger, DM, Saks, MJ, Thompson, WC, Rosenthal, R. The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review. 2002;90:1–56.Google Scholar

Stevenage, SV, Bennett, A. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results. Forensic Science International. 2017;276:93–106.Google Scholar

Dror, IE, Peron, AE, Hind, S-L, Charlton, D. When emotions get the better of us: The effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2005;19:799–809.Google Scholar

Kirschner, RH, Stein, RJ. The mistaken diagnosis of child abuse: A form of medical abuse? American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1985;139(9):873–5.Google Scholar

Hampton, RL, Newberger, EH. Child abuse incidence and reporting by hospitals: Significance of severity, class, and race. American Journal of Public Health. 1985;75(1):56–60.Google Scholar

Lane, WG, Rubin, DM, Monteith, R, Christian, CW. Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse. JAMA. 2002;288(13):1603–9.Google Scholar

Flaherty, EG, Sege, RD, Griffith, J et al. From suspicion of physical child abuse to reporting: Primary care clinician decision-making. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):611–19.Google Scholar

Hymel, KP, Laskey, AL, Crowell, KR et al. Racial and ethnic disparities and bias in the evaluation and reporting of abusive head trauma. Journal of Pediatrics. 2018;198:137–43.Google Scholar

Jenny, C, Hymel, KP, Ritzen, A, Reinert, SE, Hay, TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA. 1999;281(7):621–6.Google Scholar

Laskey, AL, Stump, TE, Perkins, SM et al. Influence of race and socioeconomic status on the diagnosis of child abuse: A randomized study. Journal of Pediatrics. 2012;160(6):1003–8.Google Scholar

Loos, MLH, Allema, WM, Bakx, R et al. Paediatric femur fractures: The value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases. Are we biased? European Journal of Pediatrics. 2021;180(1):81–90.Google Scholar

Najdowski, CJ, Bernstein, KM, Wahrer, KS. Do racial stereotypes contribute to medical misdiagnosis of child abuse? Investigating tunnel vision in the emergency room. Wrongful Convictions Law Review. 2020;1(2):153–80.Google Scholar

Fawver, B, Thomas, JL, Drew, T et al. Seeing isn’t necessarily believing: Misleading contextual information influences perceptual-cognitive bias in radiologists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2020;26:579–92.Google Scholar

Oliver, WR. Effect of history and context on forensic pathologist interpretation of photographs of patterned injury of the skin. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2017;62:1500–5.Google Scholar

Oliver, WR. Comment on Kukucka et al. ‘Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners’. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018;7:161.Google Scholar

Oliver, WR. Comment on Dror et al. ‘When expert decision-making goes wrong’. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018;7:314–15.Google Scholar

Medscape. (2016, 23 January). Medscape lifestyle report 2016: Bias and burnout. www.medscape.com/slideshow/lifestyle-2016-overview-6007335.Google Scholar

Medscape. (2017, 11 January). Lifestyle report 2017: Race and ethnicity, bias and burnout. www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/lifestyle/2017/overview.Google Scholar

Dror, IE, Melinek, J, Arden, JL et al. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021;66:1751–7.Google Scholar

Duflou, J. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14836.Google Scholar

Graber, ML. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14857.Google Scholar

Obenson, K. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14855.Google Scholar

Gill, JR, Pinneri, K, Denton, JS, Aiken, SS. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.’ Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14838.Google Scholar

Speth, P, Avedschmidt, S, Baeza, JJ et al. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14835.Google Scholar

Dror, IE. The paradox of human expertise: Why experts get it wrong. In The paradoxical brain. Kapur, N., ed. Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 177–88.Google Scholar

Van den Eeden, CAJ, de Poot, CJ, Van Koppen, PJ. The forensic confirmation bias: A comparison between experts and novices. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2019;64:120–6.Google Scholar

Pronin, E, Lin, DY, Ross, L. The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:369–81.Google Scholar

Peterson, BL, Arnall, M, Avedschmidt, S et al. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14843.Google Scholar

Kukucka, J. People who live in ivory towers shouldn’t throw stones: A refutation of Curley et al. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2020;2:110–13.Google Scholar

Oliver, WR. Commentary on Dror et al. ‘Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions’. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14841.Google Scholar

Wilson, TD, Brekke, N. Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin. 1994;116:117–42.Google Scholar

Sherman, M, Ricco, J, Nelson, S, Nezhad, S, Prasad, S. Implicit bias training in a residency program: Aiming for enduring effects. Family Medicine. 2019;51(8):677–81.Google Scholar

Zeidan, AJ, Khatri, UG, Aysola, J et al. Implicit bias education and emergency medicine training: Step one? Awareness. AEM Education and Training. 2019;3(1):81–5.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, C, Martin, A, Berner, D, Hurst, S. Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: A systematic review. BMC Psychology. 2019;7(1):1–12.Google Scholar

Forscher, PS, Lai, CK, Axt, JR et al. A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2019;117(3):522–59.Google Scholar

Simon, D. Minimizing error and bias in death investigations. Seton Hall Law Review. 2018;49:255–305.Google Scholar

McRobert, AP, Causer, J, Vassiliadis, J et al. Contextual information influences diagnosis accuracy and decision-making in simulated emergency medicine emergencies. BMJ Quality and Safety. 2013;22(6):478–84.Google Scholar

Dror, IE, Kukucka, J. Linear sequential unmasking–expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision-making as well as minimizing bias. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2021;3:100161.Google Scholar

Quigley-McBride, A, Dror, IE, Roy, T, Garrett, BL, Kukucka, J. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using linear sequential unmasking-expanded (LSU-E) in casework. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2022;4:100216.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Strang, DA. Ending manner of death testimony and other opinion evidence of crime. Duquesne Law Review. 2022;60:302–39.Google Scholar

Coats, B, Margulies, SS. Material properties of human infant skull and suture at high rates. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1222–32.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, NG, Margulies, SS. Biomechanics of the toddler head during low-height falls: An anthropomorphic dummy analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2010;6(1):57–68.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, NG, Wood, J, Margulies, SS, Christian, CW. Influence of age and fall type on head injuries in infants and toddlers. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2012;30(3):201–6.Google Scholar

Kriewall, TJ, McPherson, GK, Tsai, AC. Bending properties and ash content of fetal cranial bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 1981;14:73–9.Google Scholar

Kriewall, TJ. Structural, mechanical, and material properties of fetal cranial bone. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1982;143:707–14.Google Scholar

Leestma, JE, Thibault, KL. Physical injury to the nervous system. In Forensic neuropathology. 3rd ed. Leetsma, JE, ed. CRC Press, 2014, pp. 417–594.Google Scholar

Loyd, AM. Studies of the human head from neonate to adult: An inertial, geometrical and structural analysis with comparisons to the ATD head. Dissertation. Duke University, 2011.Google Scholar

Loyd, AM, Nightingale, RW, Luck, JF et al. The compressive stiffness of human pediatric heads. Journal of Biomechanics. 2015;48:3766–75.Google Scholar

Loyd, AM, Nightingale, RW, Luck, JF, Cutcliffe, HC, Myers, BS. The response of the pediatric head to impacts onto a rigid surface. Journal of Biomechanics. 2019;93:167–76.Google Scholar

Margulies, SS, Thibault, KL. Infant skull and suture properties: Measurements and implications for mechanisms of pediatric brain injury. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2000;122:364–71.Google Scholar

McPherson, GK, Kriewall, TJ. The elastic modulus of fetal cranial bone: A first step towards an understanding of the biomechanics of fetal head molding. Journal of Biomechanics. 1980.Google Scholar

McPherson, GK, Kriewall, TJ. Fetal head molding: An investigation utilizing a finite element model of the fetal parietal bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 1980;13:17–26.Google Scholar

Ommaya, AK, Goldsmith, W, Thibault, L. Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002;16:220–42.Google Scholar

Prange, MT, Margulies, SS. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2002;124(2):244–52.Google Scholar

San Cheong, V, Karunaratne, A, Amis, AA, Bull, AMJ. Strain rate dependency of fractures of immature bone. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017;66:68–76.Google Scholar

Thibault, KL, Margulies, SS. Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998;31:1119–26.Google Scholar

Thibault, LE, Gennarelli, TA, Margulies, SS, Marcus, J, Eppinger, R. The strain dependent pathophysiological consequences of inertial loading on central nervous system tissue. In International conference on the biomechanics of impacts. Bron. 1990.Google Scholar

Van Ee, C, Raymond, D, Thibault, K, Hardy, W, Plunkett, J. Child ATD reconstruction of a fatal pediatric fall. IMECE2009-12994. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2009.Google Scholar

Van Ee, C, Morowski-Browne, B, Raymond, D et al. Evaluation and refinement of the CRABI-6 anthropomorphic test device injury criteria for skull fracture. IMECE2009-12973. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2009.Google Scholar

Weber, W. [Experimental studies of skull fractures in infants] (in German). Zeitschrift fur Rechtsmedizin. 1984;92:87–94.Google Scholar

Weber, W. [Biomechanical fragility of the infant skull] (in German). Zeitschrift fur Rechtsmedizin. 1985;94:93–101.Google Scholar

Weber, W. [Predilection sites of infantile skull fractures following blunt force] (in German). Zeitschrift fur Rechtsmedizin. 1987;98:81–93.Google Scholar

Yoganandan, N, Kumaresan, S, Pintar, FA, Gennarelli, TA. Pediatric biomechanics. Accidental injury: Biomechanics and prevention. Nahum, AM, Melvin, JW, eds. Springer, 2002, pp. 550–87.Google Scholar

Melvin, JW. Injury assessment reference values for the CRABI 6-month infant dummy in a rear-facing infant restraint with airbag deployment. SAE Transactions. 1995.Google Scholar

Klinich, K, Hulbert, GM, Schneider, LW. Estimating infant head injury criteria and impact response using crash reconstruction and finite element modeling. Stapp Car Crash Journal. 2002;46:165–94.Google Scholar

Ommaya, AK. Biomechanics of head injuries: Experimental aspects. Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1984.Google Scholar

Gennarelli, TA, Thibault, LE. Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. Journal of Trauma. 1982;22:680–6.Google Scholar

Depreitere, B, Van Lierde, C, Vander Sloten, J et al. Mechanics of acute subdural hematomas resulting from bridging vein rupture. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2006;104:950–6.Google Scholar

Löwenhielm, P. Tolerance level for bridging vein disruption calculated with a mathematical model. Journal of Bioengineering. 1978;2:501–7.Google Scholar

Holbourn, AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet. 1943;242:438–41.Google Scholar

Ommaya, AK, Hirsch, AE, Yarnell, P, Harris, EH. Scaling of experimental data on cerebral concussion in sub-human primates to concussion threshold for man. appsdticmil. 1967. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD0666837.Google Scholar

Meaney, DF, Thibault, KL, Gennarelli, TA, Thibault, LE. Experimental investigation of the relationship between head kinematics and intracranial tissue deformation. Advances in Bioengineering. 1993;24:8–11.Google Scholar

Aoki, N, Masuzawa, H. Infantile acute subdural hematoma: Clinical analysis of 26 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1984;61:273–80.Google Scholar

Donohoe, M. Evidence-based medicine and shaken baby syndrome. Part I: Literature review, 1966–1998. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2003;24(3):239–42.Google Scholar

Elinder, G, Eriksson, A, Hallberg, B, Lynøe, N. Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(Suppl 472):3–23.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124(2):161–9.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: Manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics. 1974;54(4):396–403.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. British Medical Journal. 1971;2(5759):430–1.Google Scholar

Cory, CZ, Jones, MD. Can shaking alone cause fatal brain injury? A biomechanical assessment of the Duhaime shaken baby syndrome model. Medicine, Science and the Law. 2003;43(4):317–33.Google Scholar

Duhaime, A-C, Gennarelli, T, Thibault, LE et al. The shaken baby syndrome: A clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987;66(3):409–15.Google Scholar

Jenny, CA. Biomechanical response of the infant head to shaking: An experimental investigation. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2017;34(8):1579–88.Google Scholar

Prange, MT, Coats, B, Duhaime, AC, Margulies, SS. Anthropomorphic simulations of falls, shakes, and inflicted impacts in infants. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2003;99(1):143–50.Google Scholar

Roth, S, Raul, JS, Ludes, B, Willinger, R. Finite element analysis of impact and shaking inflicted to a child. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2007;121(3):223–8.Google Scholar

Nadarasa, J, Deck, C, Meyer, F et al. Development of a finite-element eye model to investigate retinal hemorrhages in shaken baby syndrome. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2007;17(2):517–30.Google Scholar

Rangarajan, N, Kamalakkannan, SB, Hasija, V et al. Finite element model of ocular injury in abusive head trauma. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2009;13(4):364–9.Google Scholar

Aoki, N, Masuzawa, H. Infantile acute subdural hematoma. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1984 ;61(2):273–80.Google Scholar

Atkinson, N, Van Rijn, R, Starling, S. Childhood falls with occipital impacts. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2018;34(12):837–41.Google Scholar

Ikeda, A, Sato, O, Tsugane, R et al. Infantile acute subdural hematoma. Child’s Nervous System. 1987;3(1):19–22.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Christian, C, Armonda, R, Hunter, J, Hertle, R. Disappearing subdural hematomas in children. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 1996;25(3):116–22.Google Scholar

Christian, CW, Taylor, AA, Hertle, RW, Duhaime, AC. Retinal hemorrhages caused by accidental household trauma. Journal of Pediatrics. 1999;135(1):125–7.Google Scholar

Plunkett, J. Fatal pediatric head injuries caused by short-distance falls. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2001;22(1):1–12.Google Scholar

Denton, S, Mileusnic, D. Delayed sudden death in an infant following an accidental fall: A case report with review of the literature. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2003;24(4):371–6.Google Scholar

Lantz, PE, Sinal, SH, Stanton, CA, Weaver, RG Jr. Perimacular retinal folds from childhood head trauma. British Medical Journal. 2004;328(7442):754–6.Google Scholar

Gardner, HB. A witnessed short fall mimicking presumed shaken baby syndrome (inflicted childhood neurotrauma). Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2007;43(5):433–5.Google Scholar

Lueder, GT, Turner, JW, Paschall, R. Perimacular retinal folds simulating nonaccidental injury in an infant. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2006;124(12):1782–3.Google Scholar

Lantz, PE, Couture, DE. Fatal acute intracranial injury, subdural hematoma, and retinal hemorrhages caused by stairway fall. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2011;56(6):1648–53.Google Scholar

Ramdas, S, O’Colmain, U, George, NDL, Kirkpatrick, M. Retinal haemorrhage in an infant following an accidental fall: A case report. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2014;173(10):1395–7.Google Scholar

Scheller, J, Huisman, TAGM. Moderate bilateral retinal hemorrhages in an infant following a short fall. Clinical Pediatrics. 2015;54(10):999–1002.Google Scholar

Steinbok, P, Singhal, A, Poskitt, K, Cochrane, DD. Early hypodensity on computed tomographic scan of the brain in an accidental pediatric head injury. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4):689–95.Google Scholar

Shuman, MJ, Hutchins, KD. Severe retinal hemorrhages with retinoschisis in infants are not pathognomonic for abusive head trauma. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2017;62(3):807–11.Google Scholar

Aoki, N. Infantile acute subdural hematoma with retinal hemorrhage caused by minor occipital impact witnessed by an ICU nurse: A case report. Journal of Pediatric Neurology and Neuroscience. 2020;4(1):47–50.Google Scholar

Mulligan, CS, Adams, S, Tzioumi, D, Brown, J. Injury from falls in infants under one year. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2017;53(8):754–60.Google Scholar

Behera, C, Rautji, R, Dogra, TD. Fatal accidental fall from height in infants and children: A study from South Delhi. Medicine, Science and the Law. 2010 ;50(1):22–4.Google Scholar

Burrows, P, Trefan, L, Houston, R et al. Head injury from falls in children younger than 6 years of age. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2015;100(11):1032–7.Google Scholar

Hughes, J, Maguire, S, Jones, M, Theobald, P, Kemp, A. Biomechanical characteristics of head injuries from falls in children younger than 48 months. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2016;101(4):310–15.Google Scholar

Hajiaghamemar, M, Lan, IS, Christian, CW, Coats, B, Margulies, SS. Infant skull fracture risk for low height falls. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2019;133(3):847–62.Google Scholar

Chaudhary, S, Figueroa, J, Shaikh, S et al. Pediatric falls ages 0–4: Understanding demographics, mechanisms, and injury severities. Injury Epidemiology. 2018;5(1):77–87.Google Scholar

Hall, JR, Reyes, HM, Horvat, M, Meller, J, Stein, R. The mortality of childhood falls. Journal of Trauma. 1989;29(9):1273–5.Google Scholar

Joffe, M, Diamond, P, Helfer, R et al. Letters to the editor. Journal of Trauma. 1990;30(11):1421–3.Google Scholar

Leventhal, JM, Edwards, GA. Flawed theories to explain child physical abuse: What are the medical-legal consequences? JAMA. 2017;318(14):1317–18.Google Scholar

Chadwick, DL, Chin, S, Salerno, C, Landsverk, J, Kitchen, L. Deaths from falls in children: How far is fatal? Journal of Trauma. 1991;31(10):1353–5.Google Scholar

Schneps, L, Rossant, C. Chutes de faible hauteur et syndrome du bébé secoué, erreurs numériques et logiques. In Hématomes sous-duraux et collections péri-cérébrales du petit nourrisson. Échenne, B., Couture, A., Sébire, G., eds. Sauramps, 2020, pp. 299–328.Google Scholar

Williams, RA. Injuries in infants and small children resulting from witnessed and corroborated free falls. Journal of Trauma. 1991;31:1350–2.Google Scholar

Sweeney, TB. X-rated playgrounds? [Commentary]. Pediatrics. 1979;64:961.Google Scholar

Institut de Veille Sanitaire. Les chutes accidentelles de grande hauteur d’enfants en Ile-de-France, Nord-Pas-de-Calais et Provence-Alpes-Côtes d’Azur. Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 2006.Google Scholar

Reid, SR, Roesler, JS, Gaichas, AM, Tsai, AK. The epidemiology of pediatric traumatic brain injury in Minnesota. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 2001;155(7):784–9.Google Scholar

Kravitz, H, Driessen, G, Gomberg, R, Korach, A. Accidental falls from elevated surfaces in infants from birth to one year of age. Pediatrics. 1969;44(5 suppl):869–76.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, N, Wood, J, Margulies, S, Christian, C. Influence of age and fall type on head injuries in infants and toddlers. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience. 2012;30(3):201–6.Google Scholar

Chadwick, DL, Bertocci, G, Castillo, E et al. Annual risk of death resulting from short falls among young children: Less than 1 in 1 million. Pediatrics. 2008;121:1213–24.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization, 2006.Google Scholar

Daniel, JH, Newberger, EH, Reed, RB, et al. Child abuse screening: Implications of the limited predictive power of abuse discriminants from a controlled family study of pediatric social illness. Child Abuse and Neglect. 1978;2:247–59.Google Scholar

Maguire, SA, Kemp, AM, Lumb, RC, et al. Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: A pooled analysis. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):e550–64.Google Scholar

Elinder, G, Eriksson, A, Hallberg, B et al. Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107(Suppl 472):3–23.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Lampa, E, Högberg, G et al. Infant abuse diagnosis associated with abuse head trauma criteria: Incidence increase due to overdiagnosis? European Journal of Public Health. 2018;28(4):641–6.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Andersson, J, Squier, W et al. Epidemiology of subdural haemorrhage during infancy: A population-based register study. PloS One. 2018:1–17.Google Scholar

Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K et al. Medical findings and symptoms in infants exposed to witnessed or admitted abusive shaking: A nationwide registry study. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240182.Google Scholar

Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K, et al. Retinal haemorrhage in infants investigated for suspected maltreatment is strongly correlated with intracranial pathology. Acta Paediatrica. 2021;111(4):800–8.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Andersson, J, Högberg, G, et al. Metabolic bone disease risk strongly contributing to long bone and rib fractures during early infancy: A population register study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208033.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Fellman, V, Thiblin, I, et al. Difficult birth is the main contributor to birth-related fracture and accidents to other neonatal fractures. Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109(10):2040–8.Google Scholar

Von Heideken, J, Thiblin, I, Högberg, U. The epidemiology of infant shaft fractures of femur or humerus by incidence, birth, accidents, and other causes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020;21(1):840.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Thiblin, I. Rib fractures in infancy, case-series and register case-control study from Sweden. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021;34(3):363–72.Google Scholar

Hobbs, C, Childs, AM, Wynne, J, et al. Subdural haematoma and effusion in infancy: An epidemiological study. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2005;90(9):952–5.Google Scholar

Edwards, GA, Maguire, SA, Gaither, JR, et al. What do confessions reveal about abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Child Abuse Review. 2020;29(3):253–68.Google Scholar

Feldman, KW, Melville, JD, Johnson, KL et al. Abusive head trauma follows witnessed infant shaking. Child Abuse Review. 2022:e2739.Google Scholar

Mitchell, PD, Brown, R, Wang, T et al. Multicentre study of physical abuse and limb fractures in young children in the East Anglia region, UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;104(10):956–61.Google Scholar

Talbot, C, Davis, N, Majid, I et al. Fractures of the femoral shaft in children: National epidemiology and treatment trends in England following activation of major trauma networks. Bone and Joint Journal. 2018;100-B(1):109–18.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Winbo, J, Fellman, V. Population-based register study of children born in Sweden from 1997 to 2014 showed an increase in rickets during infancy. Acta Paediatrica. 2019;108(11):2034–40.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Andersson, J, Högberg, G, et al. Why is there a multi-fold difference in diagnosis of abuse among infants with long bone fracture in East Anglia compared with Sweden? Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;104(11):1122.Google Scholar

Mitchell, P, Brown, R, Wang, T, et al. Challenges in comparing physical abuse, fractures and metabolic bone disease in young children in the UK and Sweden. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;104(11):1122–3.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Sennerstam, R, Högberg, G et al. Medical diagnoses among infants at entry in out-of-home care: A Swedish population-register study. Health Science Report. 2019;2(8):e133.Google Scholar

Paine, CW, Fakeye, O, Christian, CW, et al. Prevalence of abuse among young children with rib fractures: A systematic review. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2019;35(2):96–103.Google Scholar

Güvencel, A. With what certainty can it be claimed that rib fractures or classical metaphyseal lesions in infants are attributed to physical abuse? A systematic literature review [MSc]. University of Dundee, 2019.Google Scholar

Sunderland, R. Head injury: Abuse or accident. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1997;76:393–7.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Eriksson, G, Högberg, G, et al. Parents’ experiences of seeking health care and encountering allegations of shaken baby syndrome: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228911.Google Scholar

Groopman, J. How doctors think. Mifflin, 2007.Google Scholar

Blatt, J. Stolen innocence: The Sally Clark story. Ebury, 2004.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124(2):161–9.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: Manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Paediatrics. 1974;54(4):396–403.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. British Medical Journal. 1971;2(5759):430–1.Google Scholar

Hinds, TS, Giardino, AP. Clinical perspective. In Child physical abuse: Current evidence, clinical practice, and policy directions. Springer Briefs in Public Health. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61103-7_2.Google Scholar

Uscinski, R. Shaken baby syndrome: An odyssey. Neurologia Medico-chirurgica (Tokyo). 2006;46(2):57–61.Google Scholar

Stewart, M, Hasan, S, Collins, C et al. Can baseline computerised tomography scans be used to identify patients at high risk of vision loss due to Terson syndrome? American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019;211:217–28.Google Scholar

Ami, O, Maran, J, Gabor, P et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of fetal head molding and brain shape changes during the second stage of labor. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0215721.Google Scholar

Watts, P, Maguire, S, Kwok, T et al. Newborn retinal hemorrhages: A systematic review. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2013;17(1):70–8.Google Scholar

Hughes, LA, May, K, Talbot, JF, Parsons, MA. Incidence, distribution, and duration of birth-related retinal hemorrhages: A prospective study. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2006;10(2):102–6.Google Scholar

Findley, K, Risinger, M, Barnes, M et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019:1211–67.Google Scholar

Dykes, L. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: What has been learned? Child Abuse and Neglect. 1986;10:211–21.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Gennarelli, T, Thibault, L et al. The shaken baby syndrome: A clinical pathological and biomechanical study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987;66(3):409–15.Google Scholar

Purkiss, D. The children of Medea: Euripides, Louise Woodward, and Deborah Eappen. Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature. 1999;11(1):53–64.Google Scholar

Bower, H. Woodward appeal rests on medical evidence. Lancet. 1998;351(9105):812.Google Scholar

Thompson, AC, Shapiro, J, Bartlett, S, Lee, C. The child cases: Guilty until proved innocent. 2011. https://text.npr.org/s.php?sid=137454415.Google Scholar

Haberman, C. Shaken baby, syndrome: A diagnosis that divides the medical world. New York Times. 2015. https://nyti.ms/3WCSPPJ.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, W, Plunkett, J. A biomechanical analysis of the causes of traumatic brain injury in infants and children. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2004;2(25):89–90.Google Scholar

Wolfson, DR, McNally, DS, Clifford, MJ, Vloeberghs, M. Rigid-body modelling of shaken baby syndrome. Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2005;219(1):63–70.Google Scholar

Lloyd, J, Willey, E, Galaznik, J, Lee, W. Biomechanical evaluation of head kinematics during infant shaking versus paediatric activities of daily living. Journal of Forensic Biomechanics. 2011;2(9):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4303/jfb/F110601.Google Scholar

Jones, M, Martin, P, Williams, J, Kemp, A, Theobald, P. Development of a computational biomechanical infant model for the investigation of infant head injury by shaking. Medicine and the Law. 2015;55(4):291–9.Google Scholar

Vester, M, Bilo, R, Loeve, A, Rijn, R, Van Zandwijk, JP. Modelling of inflicted head injury by shaking trauma in children: What can we learn? Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2019;15(3):408–22.Google Scholar

Bonnier, C, Mesples, B, Carpentier, S, Henin, D, Gressens, P. Delayed white matter injury in a murine model of shaken baby syndrome. Brain Pathology. 2022;12(3):320–8.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. A witnessed short fall mimicking presumed shaken baby syndrome (inflicted childhood neurotrauma). Paediatric Neurosurgery. 2007;43(5):433–5.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’: A systematic review. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106(7):1021–7.Google Scholar

Cormack, L. Father charged after allegedly shaking baby, causing brain damage. Sydney Morning Herald. 14 November 2018. https://bit.ly/3sZZg1N.Google Scholar

Horan-Block, J, Newman, ET. Accidents happen: Exposing fallacies in child protection abuse cases and reuniting families through aggressive litigation. CUNY Law Review. 2019;22(2):382–425.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: ‘Shaken baby syndrome’ and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Maguire, S, Kemp, A, Lumb, R, et al. Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: A pooled analysis. Paediatrics. 2011;128(3):e550–e564.Google Scholar

Cowley, L, Maguire, S, Farewell, D, Kemp, A. Letter to the editor. Law, Probability and Risk. 2018;17(3):275–7.Google Scholar

Papetti, R. The forensic unreliability of the shaken baby syndrome. Academic Forensic Pathology International. 2018.Google Scholar

Cuellar, M. Causal reasoning and data analysis: problems with the abusive head trauma diagnosis. Law, Probability and Risk. 2017;16(4):223–39.Google Scholar

Keenan, HT, Runyan, DK, Marshall, SW, Nocera, MA, Merten, DF. A population-based comparison of clinical and outcome characteristics of young children with serious inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury. Paediatrics. 2004;114(3):633–9.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Easier to see the speck in your critical peers’ eyes than the log in your own? Response to Debelle et al. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2018;103(7):714.Google Scholar

Pearl, J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.Google Scholar

Trefan, L, Houston, R, Pearson, G et al. Epidemiology of children with head injury: A national overview. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2016;101(6):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308424.Google Scholar

Henderson, JG. Subdural haematoma and ‘battered baby’. British Medical Journal. 1968;3(5619):678.Google Scholar

Piatt, JH. A pitfall in the diagnosis of child abuse: External hydrocephalus, subdural hematoma, and retinal haemorrhages. Neurosurgical Focus. 1999;7(4):1–8.Google Scholar

Fenton, N, Neil, M. Calculating the likelihood ratio for multiple pieces of evidence, 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05328.Google Scholar