Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Zimmermann, Heiner 2006. Macbeth and Hercules. Renaissance Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 356.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: March 2007

Macbeth’s Knowledge

Summary

The first duty of the historian who would understand and explain [sixteenth-century writers] will be to return them to their milieu, where they are immersed in the mental climate of their time.

(Marc Bloch)

In an attempt to forge some kind of workable historical method of criticism in light of challenges from structuralism, semiotics, phenomenology, deconstruction, reader-response theory, New Historicism, and various psychological approaches to literature, Robert D. Hume some time ago set out as his first principle that ‘Historicism at bottom implies the illumination of text by context’, arguing that

No sensible interpreter should wish to ignore either text or context: the problem is that one cannot attend fully to both at the same time. One can do a bit of each; one can go back and forth – but one cannot fully carry out both textual and contextual enterprises simultaneously.

(p. 70)

Thus extracted, the proposition seems almost commonplace, for much of the critical work since Hume wrote has excavated, dissected, and analysed contextual materials in Shakespeare’s time to understand more reliably the cultural moment in which he wrote: the culture that formed his thinking and the culture of those who constituted his audiences. Such examinations, furthermore, have complicated the issue of combination (and occasionally also of simultaneity) by understanding the further issue of representation: that the ‘objectivity’ of past events and the records of past cultural beliefs when scrutinized provide no securely objective record at all, but rather the subjectivity of past documents and the necessary partiality of their observations, statements, and arguments.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Shakespeare Survey
  • Online ISBN: 9781139052764
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521841208
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×