Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T06:20:38.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Two Related Stories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Myra Marx Ferree
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
William Anthony Gamson
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
Jürgen Gerhards
Affiliation:
Universität Leipzig
Dieter Rucht
Affiliation:
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Get access

Summary

Es [das sich im Mutterleib entwickelnde Leben] genieβt grundsätzlich für die gesamte Dauer der Schwangerschaft Vorrang vor dem Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Schwangeren. It [the life developing in the mother's body] fundamentally takes priority over the pregnant woman's right to self-determination throughout the entire period of pregnancy.

(German Constitutional Court 1975, BVerG 1, 44)

The right to privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action or in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of the rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.

(Roe v. Wade 1973, 410 U.S. 177)

At the beginning of a new century, Germany and the United States have arrived at uneasy policy compromises on the vexed issue of abortion. The compromises are in some regards surprisingly similar: In Germany, a woman with an unwanted pregnancy can decide to have an abortion in the first trimester, although she is required to have counseling designed to encourage her to have the child. Access to abortion is relatively simple after a short waiting period. In the United States, the choice of abortion also rests with the woman in the first trimester. The 50 individual states may impose various restrictions as long as these do not place an undue burden on the woman's decision to end an unwanted pregnancy.

In other respects, the situations are sharply different. The similarity of practical outcomes is surprising because the public discussion of abortion and the constellation of actors attempting to shape it provide dramatic contrasts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shaping Abortion Discourse
Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States
, pp. 3 - 23
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×