Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:23:00.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Physical Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Holger Babinsky
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
John K. Harvey
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Get access

Summary

Shock Wave–Boundary-Layer Interactions: Why They Are Important

The repercussions of a shock wave–boundary layer interaction (SBLI) occurring within a flow are numerous and frequently can be a critical factor in determining the performance of a vehicle or a propulsion system. SBLIs occur on external or internal surfaces, and their structure is inevitably complex. On the one hand, the boundary layer is subjected to an intense adverse pressure gradient that is imposed by the shock. On the other hand, the shock must propagate through a multilayered viscous and inviscid flow structure. If the flow is not laminar, the production of turbulence is enhanced, which amplifies the viscous dissipation and leads to a substantial rise in the drag of wings or – if it occurs in an engine – a drop in efficiency due to degrading the performance of the blades and increasing the internal flow losses. The adverse pressure gradient distorts the boundary-layer velocity profile, causing it to become less full (i.e., the shape parameter increases). This produces an increase in the displacement effect that influences the neighbouring inviscid flow. The interaction, experienced through a viscous-inviscid coupling, can greatly affect the flow past a transonic airfoil or inside an air-intake. These consequences are exacerbated when the shock is strong enough to separate the boundary layer, which can lead to dramatic changes in the entire flowfield structure with the formation of intense vortices or complex shock patterns that replace a relatively simple, predominantly inviscid, unseparated flow structure. In addition, shock-induced separation may trigger large-scale unsteadiness, leading to buffeting on wings, buzz for air-intakes, or unsteady side loads in nozzles. All of these conditions are likely to limit a vehicle's performance and, if they are strong enough, can cause structural damage.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shapiro, A. HThe Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid FlowNew YorkThe Ronald Press Company 1953Google Scholar
Edney, BAnomalous heat transfer and pressure distributions on blunt bodies at hypersonic speeds in the presence of an impinging shockAeronautical Research Institute of Sweden 115 1968Google Scholar
Oswatitsch, K 1945
Coles, D. EThe law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layerJ. Fluid Mech 2 1956 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousteix, JCouche limite laminaireToulouseC??padu??s-Editions 1988Google Scholar
Cousteix, JTurbulence et couche limiteToulouseC??padu??s-Editions 1989Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. JOn boundary layer upstream influence. Part II: Supersonic flows without separationProc. Roy. Soc. A 217 1953 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, KWilliams, P. GSelf-induced separationProc. Roy. Soc., A 312 1969 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, L. FThe reflection of a shock wave at a rigid will in the presence of a boundary layerJ. Fluid Mech 30 1967 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Settles, G. S 1975
Green, J. EInteraction between shock waves and turbulent boundary layersProgress in Aerospace Science 11 1970 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, J. SHankey, W. LLaw, C. HNumerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactionAIAA J 14 1976 1451Google Scholar
Chapman, D. RKuhen, D. MLarson, H. KInvestigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transitionNACA TN 3869 1957Google Scholar
Délery, JMarvin, J. GShock Wave/Boundary Layer InteractionsAGARDograph 280 1986Google Scholar
Zhukoski, E. ETurbulent boundary-layer separation in front of a forward-facing stepAIAA J 5 1967 1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmucker, R. H 1973
Hakkinen, R. JGreber, ITrilling, LAbarbanel, S. S 1959
Gadd, G. EHolder, D. WRegan, J. DAn experimental investigation of the interaction between shock waves and boundary layersProc. Roy. Soc. A 226 1954 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfstrom, G. MTurbulent hypersonic flow at a wedge compression cornerJ. Fluid Mech 53 1972 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. EKubota, TLees, LExperimental investigation of supersonic laminar two-dimensional boundary layer separation in a compression corner with and without coolingAIAA Paper67 6 1967 7Google Scholar
Spaid, F. WFrishett, J. CIncipient separation of a supersonic, turbulent boundary layer, including effects of heat transferAIAA J 10 1972 915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Délery, J 1992
Délery, JCoët, M.-C 1990
Holden, M 1977
Hayes, W. DProbstein, R. FHypersonic flow theoryNew YorkAcademic Press 1966Google Scholar
Coët, M.-CDélery, JChanetz, B 1992
Grasso, FLeone, G 1992
Mallinson, S. GGai, S. LMudford, N. RHigh enthalpy, hypersonic compression corner flowAIAA J 34 1996 1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, R 1977
Délery, JLegendre, RobertWerlé, HenriToward the elucidation of three-dimensional separationAnn. Rev Fluid Mech 33 2001 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberis, DMolton, P 1995
Dupont, PHaddad, CDebiève, J.-FSpace and time organization in a shock-induced boundary layerJ. Fluid Mech 559 2006 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlano, F 2001
Regenscheit, BVersuche zur Widerstandsverringerung eines Flügels bei hoher Machscher – Zahl durch Absaugung der hinter dem Gebiet unstetiger Verdichtung abgelösten GrenzschichtZWB, Forschungsbericht 1424 1941Google Scholar
Fage, ASargent, R. FARC R&M 1913 1943
Délery, JShock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction and its controlProgress in Aerospace Sciences 22 1985 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanewsky, EDélery, JFulker, JGeissler, WEUROSHOCK: Drag Reduction by Passive Shock ControlNotes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics 56 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Délery, J.Handbook of Compressible AerodynamicsISTE ??? WILEY & Sons 2010Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×