Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Sign Language and Linguistic Universals
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 197
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Malaia, Evie 2018. Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages. Vol. 247, Issue. , p. 15.

    MAYBERRY, RACHEL I. and KLUENDER, ROBERT 2018. Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 21, Issue. 5, p. 938.

    Blanco-Elorrieta, Esti Kastner, Itamar Emmorey, Karen and Pylkkänen, Liina 2018. Shared neural correlates for building phrases in signed and spoken language. Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, Issue. 1,

    Brentari, Diane Falk, Joshua Giannakidou, Anastasia Herrmann, Annika Volk, Elisabeth and Steinbach, Markus 2018. Production and Comprehension of Prosodic Markers in Sign Language Imperatives. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Shield, Aaron and Meier, Richard P. 2018. Learning an Embodied Visual Language: Four Imitation Strategies Available to Sign Learners. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Johnson, Lisa Fitzhugh, Megan C. Yi, Yuji Mickelsen, Soren Baxter, Leslie C. Howard, Pamela and Rogalsky, Corianne 2018. Functional Neuroanatomy of Second Language Sentence Comprehension: An fMRI Study of Late Learners of American Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Schlenker, Philippe and Lamberton, Jonathan 2018. Iconic plurality. Linguistics and Philosophy,

    Brentari, Diane Hill, Joseph and Amador, Brianne 2018. Variation in phrasal rhythm in sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    Peressotti, Francesca Scaltritti, Michele Miozzo, Michele and Berent, Iris 2018. Can sign language make you better at hand processing?. PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. e0194771.

    Boudreault, Patrick Wolfson, Alicia Berman, Barbara Venne, Vickie L. Sinsheimer, Janet S. and Palmer, Christina 2018. Bilingual Cancer Genetic Education Modules for the Deaf Community: Development and Evaluation of the Online Video Material. Journal of Genetic Counseling, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 457.

    Sandler, Wendy 2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Mayol, Laia and Barberà, Gemma 2018. Anaphoric Strategies Across Language Modalities: A Comparison Between Catalan and Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 431.

    Krebs, Julia Wilbur, Ronnie B. Alday, Phillip M. and Roehm, Dietmar 2018. The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Language and Speech, p. 002383091880139.

    Frederiksen, Anne Therese and Mayberry, Rachel I. 2018. Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions. Second Language Research, p. 026765831775022.

    Dachkovsky, Svetlana Stamp, Rose and Sandler, Wendy 2018. Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Meade, Gabriela Lee, Brittany Midgley, Katherine J. Holcomb, Phillip J. and Emmorey, Karen 2018. Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 33, Issue. 9, p. 1092.

    Roush, Daniel R. 2018. Event Structure Metaphors through the Body. Vol. 4, Issue. ,

    Perniss, Pamela Lu, Jenny C. Morgan, Gary and Vigliocco, Gabriella 2018. Mapping language to the world: the role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. e12551.

    Gökgöz, Kadir 2018. Syllables in TİD. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, p. 29.

    Aristodemo, Valentina and Geraci, Carlo 2018. Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 685.

    ×

Book description

Sign languages are of great interest to linguists, because while they are the product of the same brain, their physical transmission differs greatly from that of spoken languages. In this 2006 study, Wendy Sandler and Diane Lillo-Martin compare sign languages with spoken languages, in order to seek the universal properties they share. Drawing on general linguistic theory, they describe and analyze sign language structure, showing linguistic universals in the phonology, morphology, and syntax of sign language, while also revealing non-universal aspects of its structure that must be attributed to its physical transmission system. No prior background in sign language linguistics is assumed, and numerous pictures are provided to make descriptions of signs and facial expressions accessible to readers. Engaging and informative, Sign Language and Linguistic Universals will be invaluable to linguists, psychologists, and all those interested in sign languages, linguistic theory and the universal properties of human languages.

Reviews

'This book quite nicely fills a void long present in the sign linguistics literature. Most sign linguistics volumes have focused on one particular issue or theme … within just one sign language … the book is very reasonably priced, and you get quite a lot for your money … I recommend this book to linguists interested in learning more about sign languages. Given the overall theme, the book would be of particular interest to those studying language typology. I would also recommend this book to students who have some background in theoretical linguistics (particularly phonology and syntax), and to anyone who is interested in the nature of modality and human language.'

Source: Journal of Linguistics

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


References
References
Aarons, Debra. 1994. Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol. 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 103–142.
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1994. Subjects and agreement in American Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 13–28. Durham: International Sign Language Association.
Aarons, Debra, Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, and Neidle, Carol.1995. Lexical tense markers in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 225–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ablorh-Odjidja, J. R. 1968. Ga for Beginners. Accra: Waterville Publishing.
Abney, S. P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ahlgren, Inger. 1990. Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. Fischer, Susan and Siple, Patricia, 167–174. University of Chicago Press.
Ahn, Sung-Ho. 1990. A structured-tiers model for ASL phonology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 11–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53: 285–311.
Anderson, D. E., and Reilly, Judy. 1998. PAH! The acquisition of adverbials in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–28.
Anderson, John, and Ewen, Colin. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ann, Jean. 1992. Physiological constraints in Taiwan Sign Language handshape change. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 143–157.
Ann, Jean.1993. A linguistic investigation of the relationship between physiology and handshape. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
Ann, Jean. 1996. On the relation between ease of articulation and frequency of occurrence of handshapes in two sign languages. Lingua 98: 19–42.
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., and Wilcox, S. E. 1995. Gesture and the Nature of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Series 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy. 2003. Classifier complexes and morphology in two sign languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. Emmorey, K.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Sandler, Wendy.2004. Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, eds. Booij, Geert and Marle, Jaap. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer, 19–39.
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, eds. K. K. Grohmann and C. Struijke, 1–34.
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81.2: 301–334.
Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. N. 1987. Morphological levels in English and Kannada: or Atarizing Reagan. In Phonomorphology, ed. Gussman, E.. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Luelskiego.
Ausín, Adolfo. 1999. Chinese-type questions in English. In Proceedings of The Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Shahin, Kimary, Blake, Susan, and Kim, Eun-Sook, 30–43. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Bach, Emmon. 1971. Questions. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 153–166.
Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, Lee, Robert G., MacLaughlin, Dawn, and Neidle, Carol. 2000. The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 31:1–27.
Bahan, Benjamin, and Petitto, Laura. 1980. Aspects of rules for character establishment and reference in ASL storytelling. Unpublished ms.; Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA.
Baker, C. L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219.
Baker, Charlotte. 1977. Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. Friedman, Lynn A., 215–236. New York: Academic Press.
Baker, Charlotte, and Cokely, Dennis. 1980. American Sign Language: A Teacher's Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. Silver Spring, MD: TJ Publishers.
Baker, Charlotte, and Padden, Carol A. 1978. Focusing on the non-manual components of ASL. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. Siple, Patricia, 27–57. New York: Academic Press.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A micro-analysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Baltin, Mark, and Collins, Chris. 2001. The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10:1–39.
Barlow, Michael, and Ferguson, Charles A. eds. 1988. Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Literature.
Battison, Robbin. 1974. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5: 1–19.
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring: Linstok Press.
Beckman, Mary, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1986. Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–310.
Bellugi, Ursula, and Fischer, Susan. 1972. A comparison of signed and spoken language. Cognition 1: 173–200.
Bellugi, Ursula, and Newkirk, Don. 1981. Formal devices for creating new signs in ASL. Sign Language Studies 10: 1–35.
Benedicto, Elena, and Brentari, Diane. 2004. Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.4: 743–810.
Berenz, Norine, and Ferreira-Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Pronouns in BCSL and ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Edmondson, William H. and Karlsson, Fred. Hamburg: Signum.
Bergman, Brita. 1983. Verbs and adjectives: morphological processes in Swedish Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. Kyle, J. and Woll, B., 3–9. London: Croom Helm.
Bergvall, Victoria. 1987. The position and properties of in situ and right-moved questions in Kikuyu. In Current Approaches to African Linguistics, ed. Odden, David, 37–54. Dordrecht: Foris.
Blevins, Juliette. 1993. The nature of constraints on the non-dominant hand in ASL. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, Geoffrey R., 43–62. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Blevins, Juliette.1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory ed. Goldsmith, John, 206–244. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Blondel, Marion, and Miller, Christopher. 2000. Rhythmic structures in French Sign Language (LSF) nursery rhymes. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 59–78.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. The syntax of verbal inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1986. Intonation and its Parts. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its Uses. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Borer, Hagit. 1983. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bos, Heleen. 1990. Person and location marking in SLN: some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Sign Language Research and Application: Proceedings of the International Congress on Sign Language Research and Application, March 23–25, 1990, Hamburg, eds. Prillwitz, S. and Vollhaber, T., 231–246. Hamburg: Signum.
Bos, Heleen.1994. An auxiliary in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 37–53. University of Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Bos, Heleen.1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. Bos, Heleen and Schermer, Trude, 121–147. Hamburg: Signum.
Bošković, Željko. 1997. Pseudoclefts. Studia Linguistica 51: 235–277.
Bošković, Željko.1998. LF movement and the Minimalist Program. In NELS 28, eds. Tamanji, Pius N. and Kusumoto, Kiyomi, 43–57. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bošković, Željko.2000. Sometimes in [Spec, CP], sometimes in situ. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Martin, Roger, Michaels, David, and Uriagareka, Juan, 53–87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple Wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–383.
Boster, Carole T. 1996. On the quantifier-NP split in American Sign Language and the structure of quantified noun phrases. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. Edmondson, William H. and Wilbur, Ronnie B., 159–208. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bouchard, Denis. 1996. Sign language and language universals: the status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 91: 101–160.
Bouchard, Denis, and Dubuisson, Colette. 1995. Grammar, order and position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 87: 99–139.
Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1981. Distinctive features of the handshapes of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Boyes-Braem, Penny. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language & Speech 42: 177–208.
Boyes-Braem, Penny, and Sutton-Spence, Rachel, eds. 2001. The Hands are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf 39. Hamburg: Signum.
Braze, F. David. 2004. Aspectual inflection, verb raising, and object fronting in American Sign Language. Lingua 114.1: 29–58.
Brennan, Mary. 1981. Grammatical processes in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on British Sign Language, eds. Woll, Bencie, Kyle, Jim, and Deuchar, Margaret, 120–135. London: Croom Helm.
Brennan, Mary.1983. Marking time in British Sign Language. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language, eds. Kyle, Jim and Woll, Bencie, 10–31. London: Croom Helm.
Brennan, Mary. 1990. Word Formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Brennan, Mary, and Turner, Graham H. eds. 1994. Word-Order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991). Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Brentari, Diane. 1990. Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
Brentari, Diane. 1993. Establishing a sonority hierarchy in American Sign Language: the use of simultaneous structure in phonology. Phonology 10: 281–308.
Brentari, Diane.1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In A Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. Goldsmith, John, 615–639. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brentari, Diane, and Goldsmith, John A. 1993. Secondary licensing and the non-dominant hand in ASL phonology. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, Geoffrey R., 19–41. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Brentari, Diane, Hulst, Harry van der, Kooij, Els van der, and Sandler, Wendy. 1996. [one] over [all]; [all] over [one]: a dependency phonology analysis of handshape in sign languages. Ms.
Brentari, Diane, and Padden, Carol A. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: a lexicon with multiple origins. In Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Word Formation, ed. Brentari, Diane, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brentari, Diane, and Poizner, Howard. 1994. A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 69–99.
Brentari, Diane, Poizner, Howard, and Kegl, Judy. 1995. Aphasic and Parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption. Brain and Language 48: 69–105.
Bresnan, Joan. 1970. On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types. Foundations of Language 6: 197–260.
Bricker, Victoria. 1978. Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, ed. England, Nora C., 3–24: Columbia University of Missouri.
Browman, Catherine, and Goldstein, Louis. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6: 201–251.
Bryzgunova, E. 1975. The declarative-interrogative opposition in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 19: 155–161.
Campbell, Lyle, and Janda, Richard. 2001. Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23.2–3: 93–112.
Campbell, Ruth, Woll, Bencie, Benson, P., and Wallace, S. 1999. Categorical perception of face actions: their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A: 67–96.
Cardinaletti, A. 1994. On the internal structure of pronominal DPs. The Linguistic Review 11: 195–219.
Chang, L. 1997. Wh-in-situ phenomena in French. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia.
Channon, Rachel. 2002a. Beads on a string? Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Language, eds. Meier, R., Cormier, K. and Quinto-Pozos, D., 65–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Channon, Rachel.2002b. Signs are single segments: phonological representations and temporal sequencing in ASL and other sign languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2001. Word order variability and acquisition in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Johan, Rooryck. 2000. Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax 3: 1–19.
Chinchor, Nancy. 1978. The syllable in American Sign Language: sequential and simultaneous phonology. Ms.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, eds. Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P., 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, ed. Freidin, Robert. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20, eds. Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J., 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Chomsky, Noam, and Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. Jacobs, J. et al., 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cinque, G. 1994. On the evidence for partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, eds. Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J. -Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R., 85–110. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Eve L., and Grosjean, F. 1982. Sign recognition processes in American Sign Language: the effect of context. Language and Speech 25: 325–340.
Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 2: 141–177.
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–252.
Clements, George N.1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 1: Between the grammar and Physics of Speech, eds. Kingston, J. and Beckman, M., 288–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Coerts, Jane. 1992. Non-manual grammatical markers: an analysis of interrogatives, negations, and topicalizations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Coerts, Jane.1994. Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands and the functions of orientations. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 69–88. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Coerts, Jane, and Mills, Anne. 1992. Early sign combinations of deaf children in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at The Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Cogill-Koez, Dorothea. 2002a. Signed language classifier predicates: linguistic structures or schematic visual representation?Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 153–207.
Cogill-Koez, Dorothea. 2002b. A model of signed language “classifier predicates” as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 209–236.
Collins-Ahlgren, M. 1989. New Zealand Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Victoria University.
Corina, David. 1990a. Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representations. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, C., 27–49. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press.
Corina, David.1990b. Reassessing the role of sonority in syllable structure: evidence from visual-gestural language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 33–44. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Corina, David.1993. To branch or not to branch: underspecification in ASL handshape contours. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, G., 63–95. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Corina, David. 1996. ASL syllables and prosodic constraints. Lingua 98: 73–102.
Corina, David, Bellugi, Ursula, and Reilly, Judy. 1999. Neuropsychological studies of linguistic and affective facial expressions in deaf signers. Language and Speech 42: 307–331.
Corina, David, and Hildebrandt, Ursula C. 2002. Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in American Sign Language. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 88–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corina, David, and Sagey, Elizabeth. 1989. Are phonological hierarchies universal? Evidence from American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL.
Corina, David, and Sandler, Wendy. 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10: 165–208.
Cormier, Kearsy, Wechsler, Stephen, and Meier, Richard. 1998. Locus agreement in American Sign Language. In Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation, eds. Webelhuth, Gert, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, and Kathol, Andreas, 215–229. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1979. American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1982. On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA.
Coulter, Geoffrey.1990. Emphatic stress in ASL. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. Fischer, Susan D. and Siple, Patricia, 109–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crasborn, Onno. 2001. Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Crasborn, Onno, and Kooij, Els van der. 1997. Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, eds. Coerts, J. and Hoop, H., 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Currie, Anne-Marie, Meier, Richard, and Walters, Keith. 2002. A crosslinguistic examination of the lexicons of four signed languages. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 224–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Neutral and counterfactual conditionals in Israeli Sign Language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Davies, D. 1985. The tongue is quicker than the eye. In SLR '83: Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Stokoe, William, and Volterra, Virginia, 185–193. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
Davis, Barbara, and MacNeilage, Peter. 1995. The articulatory basis of babbling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38: 1199–1211.
Deguchi, Masanori, and Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 2002. Prosody and wh-questions. In Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. Masako Hirotani, 73–92.
DeMateo, Asa. 1977. Visual imagery and visual analogues in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. Friedman, Lynn, 109–136. New York: Academic Press.
Deuchar, Margaret. 1983. Is BSL an SVO language? In Language in Sign, eds. Kyle, Jim and Woll, Bencie, 69–76. London: Croom Helm.
Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, eds. Peranteau, Paul M., Levi, Judith N., and Phares, Gloria C., 440–447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Dively, V. 2001. Signs without hands: nonhanded signs in ASL. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. Dively, V., Metzger, M., Taub, S., and Baer, A., 62–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Dobrin, L. 1997. The morphosyntactic reality of phonological form. Yearbook of Morphology: 59–81.
Dresher, Elan, and Hulst, Harry. 1998. Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology: complexity and visibility. Phonology 15: 317–352.
Durand, Jacques. 1986. Dependency and Non-Linear Phonology. London: Croom Helm.
Edge, VickiLee, and Hermann, Leora. 1977. Verbs and the determination of subject. In On the Other Hand, ed. Friedman, Lynn, 137–179. New York: Academic Press.
Ekman, Paul, and Friesen, Wallace V. 1975. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ekman, Paul, and Friesen, Wallace V. 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Investigator's Guide. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Emmorey, Karen. 1995. Processing the dynamic visual-spatial morphology of signed languages. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, ed. Feldman, L. B., 29–54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, Karen.1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Language and Space, eds. Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nade, L., and Garrett, M., 171–209. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Emmorey, Karen.1999. Do signers gesture? In Gesture, Speech, and Sign, eds. Messing, L. S. and Campbell, Ruth, 133–159. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, Karen. ed. 2003. Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, Karen, and Corina, David. 1990. Lexical recognition in sign language: effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills 71: 1227–1252.
Emmorey, Karen, and Falgier, B. 1999. Processing continuous and simultaneous reference in ASL. Ms. Los Angeles, CA.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1990. Pragmatics of non-manual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Edmondson, William H. and Karlsson, Fred, 121–128. Hamburg: Signum.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1994. Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Word-order Issues in Sign Language: Working Papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991), eds. Brennan, Mary and Turner, Graham H., 73–87. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth.1995. Point of view expressed through shifters. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1999. Focus structure theory and intonation. Language & Speech 42: 209–227.
Fauconnier, Giles. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischer, Susan. 1974. Sign language and linguistic universals. Paper presented at Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de grammaire Transformationnelle, Tübingen.
Fischer, Susan.1975. Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In Word Order and Word Order Change, ed. Li, Charles, 1–25. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Fischer, Susan.1978. Sign language and creoles. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. Siple, Patricia, 309–331. New York: Academic Press.
Fischer, Susan.1990. The head parameter in ASL. In SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Edmondson, W. H. and Karlsson, F., 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.
Fischer, Susan. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98: 103–120.
Fischer, Susan, Delhorne, Lorraine A., and Reed, Charlotte M. 1999. Effects of rate of presentation on the reception of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 42: 568–582.
Fischer, Susan, and Gough, Bonnie. 1978. Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 7: 17–48.
Fischer, Susan, and Janis, Wynne. 1990. Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. Prillwitz, Siegmund and Vollhaber, Tomas, 279–294. Hamburg: Signum.
Fleischmann, Suzan. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foley, W., and Van Valin, R. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, ed. Shopen, T., 282–364. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Lynn. 1975. Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 51: 940–961.
Friedman, Lynn.1976. The manifestation of subject, object, and topic in American Sign Language. In Subject and Topic, ed. Li, Charles. New York: Academic Press.
Friedman, Lynn.1977. Formational properties of American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand, ed. Friedman, L., 13–56. New York: Academic Press.
Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719.
Frishberg, Nancy.1985. Dominance relations and discourse structures. In SLR '83: Sign Language Research, eds. Stokoe, W. and Volterra, V., 79–90. Rome: Linstok Press and CNR.
Fromkin, Victoria. 1973. Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. The Hague: Mouton.
Gallaudet Research Institute. 2001. Regional and National Summary Report of data from the 1999–2000 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
Gee, James Paul, and Goodhart, Wendy. 1985. Nativization, linguistic theory, and deaf language acquisition. Sign Language Studies 49: 291–342.
Georgopoulos, Carol. 1991. Canonical government and the specifier parameter: an ECP account of weak crossover. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 1–46.
Gijn, Ingeborg Van, Kita, Sotaro, and Hulst, Harry van der. In press. How phonetic is the Symmetry Condition in sign language? In Phonetics and Phonology – Selected Papers of the Fourth HIL Phonology Conference, eds. Heuven, Vincent J., Hulst, Harry G., and Weijer, Jeroen M.. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, ed. Li, C. N., 149–188. New York: Academic Press.
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland. 1998. On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VI Proceedings, eds. Cambier-Langeveld, Tina, Lipták, Anikó, and Redford, Michael, 59–74. Leiden: SOLE.
Glück, Susanne, and Pfau, Roland.1999. A distributed morphology account of verbal inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VII Proceedings, eds. Cambier-Langeveld, Tina, Lipták, Anikó, Redford, Michael and Torre, Erik Jan, 65–80. Leiden: SOLE.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2003. The Resilience of Language: What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us about How All Children Learn Language. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology: a New Synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1957. Essays in Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greftegreff, Irene. 1993. Anatomy and features in sign language handshapes. Ms. University of Trondheim.
Grewendorf, Günther. 2001. Multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 87–122.
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. Senft, Gunter, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grosjean, F. 1981. Sign and word recognition: a first comparison. Sign Language Studies 32: 195–219.
Gruber, J. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. North Holland, New York.
Gussenhoven, Carlos, ed. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1999. Discreteness and gradience in intonational contrasts. Language & Speech 42: 283–306.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Haegeman, Liliane, and Zanuttini, Rafaella. 1991. Negative heads and the neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.
Haiman, J. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56: 515–540.
Haiman, J.ed. 1985. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hale, Ken. 1980. Remarks on Japanese phrase structure: comments on the papers on Japanese syntax. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Theoretical Issues in Japanese Linguistics, eds. Otsu, Yukio and Farmer, Ann, 185–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1.
Hall, T. Alan, and Kleinhenz, U. eds. 1999. Studies on the Phonological Word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halle, Morris. 1992. Phonological features. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 3, ed. Bright, W., 207–212. New York: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel J., 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.
Halle, Morris, and Stevens, Kenneth. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. In Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, 198–212. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hamano, Shoko Saito. 1986. The sound-symbolic system of Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Florida.
Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, eds. Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harder, R., and Schermer, T. 1986. A first phonological analysis of handshapes in SLN. In Signs of Life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research, ed. Tervoort, B. T. M., 47–51: Institute of General Linguistics.
Hayes, Bruce. 1993. Against movement. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, G., 213–226. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hayes, Bruce. 1999. Phonetically driven phonology: the role of optimality theory and inductive grounding. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, eds. Darnell, Michael, Moravscik, Edith, Noonan, Michael, Newmeyer, Frederick, and Wheatley, Kathleen, 243–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayes, Bruce, and Lahiri, Aditi. 1991. Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 47–96.
Heggie, L. 1988. The syntax of copular structures. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Heycock, C. 1991. Layers of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Syntactic Configurations in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Holmberg, A. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Hopper, P. J., and Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horvath, Julia. 1980. Movement in “Logical Form”: evidence from Hungarian. Ms. UCLA.
Huang, C. T. James. 1982. Move wh in a language without wh movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416.
Huang, C. T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.
Hulst, Harry. 1989. Atoms of segmental structure: components, gestures and dependency. Phonology 6: 253–284.
Hulst, Harry. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10: 209–242.
Hulst, Harry. 1995. The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 1–17.
Hulst, Harry. 1996. On the other hand. Lingua 98: 121–143.
Hulst, Harry, and Sandler, Wendy. 1994. Phonological theories meet sign language: two theories of the two hands. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 43–73.
Hyman, L., and Comrie, B. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X′ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo, and Safir, Kenneth eds. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Jakobson, Roman. 1968 [1941]. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton. (Original publication: Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze.)
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar, and Halle, Morris. 1951. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL Verb Phrase. PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.
Janis, Wynne. 1995. A Crosslinguistic Perspective on ASL Verb Agreement. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Janzen, Terry. 1998. Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.
Janzen, Terry. 1999. The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23: 271–306.
Janzen, Terry, and Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. Meier, Richard P., Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 199–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, Trevor, and Schembri, Adam. 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 115–185.
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model Theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kegl, Judy. 1976. Relational grammar and American Sign Language. Ms.
Kegl, Judy. 1986. Clitics in American Sign Language. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, ed. Borer, Hagit. New York: Academic Press.
Kegl, Judy. 1990. Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Kegl, Judy. 2003 [1976]. Pronominalization in American Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 6.2: 245–265. (Originally distributed as ms.).
Kegl, Judy, Neidle, Carol, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Hoza, Jack, and Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. The case for grammar, order and position in ASL: a reply to Bouchard and Dubuisson. Sign Language Studies 90: 1–23.
Kegl, Judy, Senghas, Ann, and Coppola, Marie. 1999. Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development, ed. DeGraff, Michel, 197–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kegl, Judy, and Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1976. When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology, and phonology vs. stylistic variation in ASL. Paper presented at the 12th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1985. The phonology and syntax of wh-expressions in Tangale. Studies in Linguistic Science 15: 79–91.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Kingston, John. 1999. Extrapolating from spoken to signed prosody. Language & Speech 7: 251–282.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. Yang, I. S., 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Kiparsky, Paul.2002. Paradigm effects and opacity. Ms. Stanford University.
Kisch, Shifra. 2000. Deaf Discourse: social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community in the Negev. MA thesis. Tel Aviv University.
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, eds. Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J., 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Klima, Edward S., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kooij, Els van der. 1998. The position of unselected fingers. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998, ed. Bezooijen, R. and Kager, R., 149–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kooij, Els van der.2002. Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: the role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The Syntax of Verbs: From Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koopman, Hilda, and Sportiche, Dominique. 1989. Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 555–588.
Koopman, Hilda, and Sportiche, Dominique. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211–258.
Koster, J., and Reuland, Eric J. eds. 1991. Long Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 2003. Twice as Meaningful: Reduplication in Pidgins, Creoles, and other Contact Languages. London: Battlebridge.
Krakow, Rena, and Hanson, Vicki. 1985. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: memory for signs, fingerspelling and print. Memory and Cognition 13: 265–272.
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1983. What can Japanese say about government and binding? In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Barlow, Michael, Flickinger, Daniel P. and Wescoat, Michael T., 153–164. Stanford: Stanford Linguistics Association.
Kuroda, S. -Y. 1988. Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, ed. Poser, W. J., 103–143. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Kyle, J. G., and Woll, B. 1985. Sign Language: The Study of Deaf People and Their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laka Mugarza, Miren Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Lane, Harlan, and Philip, F. eds. 1984. The Deaf Experience: Classics in Language and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. Pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern Studies in English, eds. Reibel, D. A. and Schane, S. C., 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Langdon, M. 1970. A Grammar of The Mesa Grande Dialect. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Verbal morphology: syntactic structures meets the Minimalist Program. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, eds. Campos, H. and Kempchinsky, P., 251–275. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Lasnik, Howard, and Juan, Uriagereka. 1988. A Course in GB Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lee, Robert G., Neidle, Carol, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin, and Kegl, Judy. 1997. Role shift in ASL: A syntactic look at direct speech. In Syntactic Structure and Discourse Function: An Examination of Two Constructions in American Sign Language, eds. Neidle, C., MacLaughlin, D. and Lee, R. G., 24–45. Boston, MA: American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project, Boston University.
Legate, Julie Anne. 2003. Arguments and adjuncts in Warlpiri. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut, February 2003.
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles A., 55–66. Stanford: CSLI.
Lentz, Ella Mae. 1986. Teaching role shifting. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. Padden, Carol. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
Levy, Doron. 2001. Weak drop in Israeli Sign Language. Ms. Tel Aviv.
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, ed. Li, Charles, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Liberman, Alvin. 1996. Speech: A Special Code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Liddell, Scott K. 1978. Non-manual signs and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language through Sign Language Research, ed. Siple, P., 59–90. New York: Academic Press.
Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Liddell, Scott K. 1984a. Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270.
Liddell, Scott K. 1984b. think and believe: sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60: 372–392.
Liddell, Scott K. 1986. Head thrust in ASL conditional marking. Sign Language Studies 15.52: 243–262.
Liddell, Scott K. 1990a. Four functions of a locus: reexamining the structure of Space in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Liddell, Scott K. 1990b. Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. Fischer, Susan and Siple, Patricia, 37–65. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Liddell, Scott K. 1994. Tokens and surrogates. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 105–119. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Liddell, Scott K. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liddell, Scott K. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Lane, Harlan, 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Sources of meaning in ASL classifier predicates. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. Emmorey, Karen. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liddell, Scott K., and Johnson, Robert E. 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 445–513.
Liddell, Scott K., and Johnson, Robert E. 1989 [1985]. American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 197–277. (Originally distributed as ms.).
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1985. Null pronouns and verb agreement in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of NELS 15, eds. Berman, S., Choe, J. -W., and McDonough, J., 302–318. Amherst: GLSA.
Lillo-Martin, Diane 1986a. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 415–444.
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1986b. Parameter setting: evidence from use, acquisition, and breakdown in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1990. Parameters for questions: evidence from WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, C., 211–222. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1992. Sentences as islands: on the boundedness of A′-movement in American Sign Language. In Island Constraints, eds. Goodluck, Helen and Rochemont, M., 259–274. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1997. The modular effects of sign language acquisition. In Relations of Language and Thought: The View from Sign Language and Deaf Children, eds. Marschark, Marc, Siple, Patricia, Lillo-Martin, Diane, Campbell, Ruth, and Everhart, Victoria, 62–109. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1999a. Modality effects and modularity in language acquisition: the acquisition of American Sign Language. In Handbook of Language Acquisition, eds. Ritchie, William C. and Bhatia, Tej K., 531–567. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane.1999b. Syntactic aspects of intonation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2002. Where are all the modality effects? In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 241–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Fischer, Susan. 1992. Overt and covert wh-questions in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Salamanca, Spain.
Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Klima, Edward S. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. Fischer, Susan D. and Siple, Patricia, 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lobeck, Anne. 1986. VP Ellipsis in infinitives: INFL as a proper governor. NELS 17: 425–442.
Lobeck, Anne.1990. Functional heads as proper governors. Paper presented at NELS 20.
Loew, Ruth. 1984. Roles and reference in American Sign Language: a developmental perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Lucas, Ceil. 1995. Sociolinguistic variation in ASL: the case of DEAF. In Sign Language Research 1994, eds. Bos, H. and Schermer, T., 189–210. Hamburg: Signum.
Lucas, Ceil, and Valli, Clayton. 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for ASL Users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
MacNeilage, Peter. 1998. Evolution of the mechanism of language output: comparative neurobiology of vocal and manual communication. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, eds. Hurford, James R., Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, and Knight, Chris, 222–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mandel, Mark. 1977. Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. Friedman, Lynn A.. New York: Academic Press.
Mandel, Mark.1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California.
Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 435–482.
Mathur, Gaurav. 2000. Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Mathur, Gaurav, and Rathmann, Christian. 2001. Why not GIVE-US: an articulatory constraint in signed languages. In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, eds. Dively, V., Metzger, M., Taub, S., and Baer, A., 1–25. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Matsuoka, Kazumi. 1997. Verb raising in American Sign Language. Lingua 103: 127–149.
Matsuoka, Kazumi.2000. The lexical verb sandwich in American Sign Language and the hybrid feature. Ms.
Matthews, P. H. (Peter Hugoe). 1974. Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McBurney, Susan. 2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 329–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
McCarthy, John. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.
McCarthy, John. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43: 84–108.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Brandeis University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1993. Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan.1994. The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 24, ed. M. González, 333–379.
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan. 1995. Prosodic morphology. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. Goldsmith, John, 318–366. Oxford: Blackwell.
McCloskey, James, and Hale, Ken. 1984. The syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 487–533.
McDonald, B. 1982. Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. PhD dissertation, University of Buffalo.
McIntire, Marina. 1977. The acquisition of ASL hand configurations. Sign Language Studies 16: 247–260.
McKee, David, and Kennedy, Graeme. 2000. Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology in Honor of Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Lane, Harlan, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McLemore, Cynthia. 1991. The pragmatic interpretation of English intonation: sorority speech. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gesture Reveals about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McWhorter, John. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.
Mehler, Jacques, Jusczyk, R., Lamberz, G., Halsted, G., Bertoncini, J., and Amiel-Tison, C. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29.2: 143–178.
Meier, Richard P. 1981. Icons and morphemes: models of the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 20: 92–99.
Meier, Richard P.1982. Icons, analogues, and morphemes: the acquisition of verb agreement in ASL. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Meier, Richard P. 1987. Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: iconically or morphologically determined?Journal of Memory and Language 26: 362–376.
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. Fischer, Susan D. and Siple, Patricia, 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meier, Richard P. 1993. A psychologinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, G., 169–188. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Meier, Richard P. 2002a. The acquisition of verb agreement: pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Current Developments in the Study of Signed Language Acquisition, eds. Morgan, Gary and Woll, Bencie, 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meier, Richard P. 2002b. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Modality and Structure in Signed Language and Spoken Language, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meier, Richard P., and Willerman, Raquel. 1995. Prelinguistic gesture in deaf and hearing infants. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 391–410. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Meir, Irit. 1998a. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Meir, Irit. 1998b. Syntactic-semantic interaction of Israeli Sign Language verbs: the case of backwards verbs. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 3–37.
Meir, Irit. 1999. Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli Sign Language. Yearbook of Morphology 1999: 299–319.
Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.2: 413–450.
Meir, Irit. 2003. Grammaticalization and modality: the emergence of a case marked pronoun in Israeli Sign Language. Journal of Linguistics 39.1: 109–140.
Meir, Irit, and Sandler, Wendy. 2004. Language in Space: A Window on Israeli Sign Language (Hebrew). Haifa: University of Haifa Press.
Miller, Christopher. 1991. Une théorie prosodique de la phonologie des langues des signes. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique Théoretique et Appliquée 10: 21–55.
Miller, Christopher. 1994. Simultaneous constructions in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 131–147. Durham: ISLA.
Miller, Christopher.1996. Phonologie de la langue des signes Québequois: structure simultanée et axe temporal. PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–895.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986a. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Noun Classes and Categorization (Typological Studies in Language 7), ed. Craig, Colette, 379–397. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986b. On the nature of noun incorporation. Language 62: 32–38.
Moravcsik, Edith. 1988. Agreement and markedness. In Agreement in Natural Language, eds. Barlow, M. and Ferguson, Charles A., 89–106. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Murasugi, Keiko. 1991. Noun Phrases in Japanese and English: A Study in Syntax, Learnability, and Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Nadeau, Marie, and Desouvrey, Louis. 1994. Word order in sentences with directional verbs in Quebec Sign Language. In Perspectives on sign language structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 149–158. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Nagahara, Hiroyki. 1988. Towards an explicit phonological representation for American Sign Language. MA thesis, University of California.
Neidle, Carol. 2002. Language across modalities: ASL focus and question constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 71–98.
Neidle, Carol, Bahan, Benjamin, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Lee, Robert G., and Kegl, Judy. 1998a. Realizations of syntactic agreement in American Sign Language: similarities between the clause and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 52: 191–226.
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, Bahan, Ben, Aarons, Debra, and MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. Rightward WH-movement in American Sign Language. In Rightward Movement, eds. Beerman, D., LeBlanc, D., and vanRiemsdijk, H., 247–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Benjamin, and Lee, Robert G. 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neidle, Carol, MacLaughlin, Dawn, Lee, Robert G., Bahan, Benjamin, and Kegl, Judy. 1998b. The right(ward) analysis of wh-movement in ASL. Language 74: 819–831.
Nespor, Marina, and Irene, Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Nespor, Marina, and Sandler, Wendy. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42: 143–176.
Nettle, Daniel. 1995. Segmental inventory size, word length, and communicative efficiency. Linguistics 33: 359–367.
Newkirk, Don. 1978. The form of multiples and exhaustives in ASL. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1979. The form of continuative aspect inflection on ASL verbs. Ms.
Newkirk, Don.1981. Rhythmic features of inflections in American Sign Language. Ms.
Newkirk, Don. 1998 [1981]. On the temporal segmentation of movement in American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 173–212. (Originally distributed as ms.).
Newkirk, Don, Klima, Ed, Pedersen, Carlene Canady, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1980. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue and Hand, ed. Fromkin, V.. New York: Academic Press.
Newport, Elissa L. 1981. Constraints on structure: evidence from American Sign Language and language learning. In Aspects of the Development of Competence. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, ed. Collins, W. A.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Newport, Elissa L., and Meier, Richard P. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In The Cross-Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. Slobin, Dan I., 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Newport, Elissa L., and Supalla, Ted. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Lane, Harlan, 103–114. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nunes, Jairo. 1999. Linearization of chains and phonetic realization of chain links. In Working Minimalism, eds. Epstein, Samuel David and Hornstein, Norbert, 217–249. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo and Quadros, Ronice. 2004. Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. Presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR VIII), Barcelona.
Odden, David. 1980. Associative tone in Shona. Journal of Linguistic Research 1.2: 37–51.
Ohala, John. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41: 1–16.
Urbina, Ortiz J. 1989. Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.
Osugi, Yutaka. 1997. In search of the phonological representation of ASL. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Ouhalla, J. 1990. Sentential negation, Relativized Minimality, and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.
Padden, Carol A. 1986. Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, ed. Padden, Carol. Spring, Silver, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
Padden, Carol A. 1988 [1983]. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland. (Originally distributed as: PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.)
Padden, Carol A. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Padden, Carol A. 1998. The ASL lexicon. Sign Language & Linguistics 1: 39–64.
Padden, Carol A., and Humphries, Tom. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Padden, Carol A., and Humphries, Tom. 2005. Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Padden, Carol A., and Perlmutter, David. 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 335–375.
Parisot, Anne-Marie. 2000. Do plain verbs agree in Quebec Sign Language? Ms. Amsterdam.
Perlmutter, David. ed 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Perlmutter, David.1991. Feature geometry in a language with two active articulators. Ms. Santa Cruz.
Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 407–442. Reprinted as: Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, G.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (1993).
Perlmutter, David. 1996. Compounds and lexemes in American Sign Language. Ms.
Perlmutter, David, and Carol, Rosen eds. 1984. Studies in Relational Grammar II. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in situ: movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (in)Definiteness, eds. Reuland, Eric and Meulen, Alice, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Petronio, Karen. 1991. A focus position in ASL. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Bures, Tony, 211–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Petronio, Karen.1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.
Petronio, Karen, and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1997. Wh-Movement and the position of Spec CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73: 18–57.
Pfau, Roland. 2002. Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. Meier, Richard, Cormier, Kearsy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 263–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfau, Roland, and Quer, Josep. 2003. V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Paper presented at the XXIX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Urbino, February 2003.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in communication, eds. Cohen, P., Morgan, J., and Pollack, M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pizzuto, Elena, and Corazza, Serena. 1996. Noun morphology in Italian Sign Language. Lingua 98: 169–196.
Pizzuto, Elena, Giuranna, Enza, and Gambino, Giuseppe. 1990. Manual and non-manual morphology in Italian Sign Language: grammatical constraints and discourse processes. In Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 83–102. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Poizner, Howard, Klima, Edward S., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1987. What the Hands Reveal about the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pollard, Carl, and Ivan, Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pollock, J. -Y. 1989. Verb movement, UG, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Poulin, Christine, and Miller, Christopher. 1995. On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy, 117–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Prillwitz, Sigmund. 1989. HamNoSys: Version 2.0; Hamburg Notational System for Sign Languages. An Introductory Guide. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the deaf 5. Hamburg: Signum.
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms. New Brunswick and Boulder.
Prince, E. 1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open propositions. Chicago Linguistic Society 22: 208–222.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de. 1995. As categorias vazias pronominais: uma análise alternativa com base na língua de sinais brasileira e reflexos no processo de aquisição. MA thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de.1999. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.
Quadros, Ronice Müller, and Karnopp, Lodenir B. 2004. Língua de sinais brasileira: estudos lingüísticos. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2000. A little change goes a long way: capturing structural differences between Brazilian Sign Language and American Sign Language. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Amsterdam.
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Lillo-Martin, Diane, and Chen Pichler, Deborah.2004. Clause structure in LSB and ASL. Paper presented at the 26. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Mainz, Germany.
Quer, Josep. 2003. Operadores negativos en Lengua de Signos Catalana (LSC) (Negative operators in LSC): Presented at the Jornadas del Comahue de Lingüística de Lenguas de Señas, San Martin de los Andes, Argentina, March 2003.
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. The optionality of agreement phrase: evidence from signed languages. MA report, University of Texas.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 1999. The linguistic status of joint-based constraints in signed languages. Paper presented at The 35th Annual Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting.
Rathmann, Christian, and Mathur, Gaurav. 2002. Is verb agreement the same cross-modally? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, eds. Meier, Richard P., Cormier, Kersy, and Quinto-Pozos, David, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly, Judy S., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1996. Competition on the face: affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23.
Reilly, Judy S., and McIntire, Marina L. 1991. where shoe: the acquisition of wh-questions in American Sign Language. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 30: 104–111.
Reilly, Judy S., McIntire, Marina L., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1990a. The acquisition of conditionals in American Sign Language: grammaticized facial expressions. Applied Psycholinguistics 11: 369–392.
Reilly, Judy S., McIntire, Marina L., and Bellugi, Ursula. 1990b. Faces: the relationship between language and affect. In From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, eds. Volterra, Virginia and Erting, Carol J., 128–141. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. The syntactic domain of anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
Reinhart, Tanya, and Reuland, Eric J. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
Reuland, Eric J., and Everaert, Martin. 2001. Deconstructing binding. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris, 634–669. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? PhD dissertation, MIT.
Riemsdijk, Henk, and Williams, Edwin. 1986. Introduction to the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi.1991. Residual verb second and the WH-criterion. Ms., Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics. Faculté des Lettres, University of Geneva.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, ed. Haegeman, L., 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rochemont, M. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Romano, Christine. 1991. Mixed headedness in American Sign Language: evidence from functional categories. In Papers from the Third Student Conference in Linguistics, 1991, eds. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Bures, Tony, 241–254. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Rosen, Sara Thomas. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: a lexical analysis. Language 65: 294–317.
Rosenstein, Ofra. 2001. ISL as a topic prominent language. MA thesis, University of Haifa.
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple WH fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.
Sagey, Elizabeth. 1986. The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saito, Mamoru. 1985. Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sandler, Wendy. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50: 1–28.
Sandler, Wendy. 1987a. Assimilation and feature hierarchy in American Sign Language. In Papers from the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, 266–278. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Sandler, Wendy.1987b. Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sandler, Wendy. 1990. Temporal aspect and American Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, eds. Fischer, S. and Siple, P., 103–129. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sandler, Wendy. 1993a. Hand in hand: the roles of the non-dominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 10: 337–390.
Sandler, Wendy. 1993b. Linearization of phonological tiers in American Sign Language. In Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 3: Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, G.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Sandler, Wendy. 1993c. Sign language and modularity. Lingua 89: 315–351.
Sandler, Wendy. 1993d. A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology 10: 243–279.
Sandler, Wendy. 1995a. One phonology or two? Sign language and phonological theory. GLOT International 1. Reprinted in The GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 349–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (2000).
Sandler, Wendy. 1995b. Phonological characteristics of sign languages: Similarities and differences. Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 18–37.
Sandler, Wendy. 1995c. Markedness in the handshapes of signs: a componential analysis. In Leiden in Last: Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Papers, eds. Weijer, Jeroen and Hulst, Harry, 369–399. The Hague: Holland Academie Graphics.
Sandler, Wendy. 1996a. Representing handshapes. International Review of Sign Linguistics 1: 115–158.
Sandler, Wendy. 1996b. Phonological features and feature classes: the case of movements in sign language. Lingua 98: 197–220.
Sandler, Wendy.1996c. A negative suffix in ASL. Ms.
Sandler, Wendy. 1999a. Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech 42: 127–142.
Sandler, Wendy. 1999b. Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Studies on the Phonological Word, eds. Hall, T. and Kleinhenz, U., 223–254. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sandler, Wendy. 1999c. The medium and the message: prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 187–216.
Sandler, Wendy. 2003. On the complementarity of signed and spoken languages. In Language Competence across Populations, eds. Levy, Y. and Schaeffer, J., 383–409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sandler, Wendy. In press. Phonology, phonetics, and the non-dominant hand. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Varieties of Phonological Competence, eds. Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Douglas, and Best, Catherine. Berlin: Mouton-deGruyter.
Sandler, Wendy, and Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2004. Superarticulation in Israeli Sign Language: the grammar of the face. Ms.
Sandler, Wendy, and Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2001. Natural sign languages. In The Handbook of Linguistics, eds. Aronoff, Mark and Rees-Miller, Jamie, 533–562. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sandler, Wendy, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, and Aronoff, Mark. 2005. The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102.7: 2661–2665.
Sauvageot, S. 1967. Note sur la classification nominale en Bainouk. In La classification nominales dans les langues Négro-Africaines, 225–236. Paris: CNRS.
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking “classifiers” in signed languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. Emmorey, Karen, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schick, Brenda S. 1987. The acquisition of classifier predicates in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
Schick, Brenda S. 1990. Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1: 15–40.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–479.
Senft, Gunter, ed. 2000a. Systems of Nominal Classification: Language, Culture, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Senft, Gunter, 2000b. What do we really know about nominal classification systems? In Systems of Nominal Classification, ed. Senft, Gunter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children's contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Senghas, Ann. 2000. The development of early spatial morphology in Nicaraguan Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, eds. Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. and Keith-Lucas, T., 696–707. Boston: Cascadilla Press.
Shepard-Kegl, Judy. 1985. Locative relations in ASL word formation, syntax and discourse. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76: 383–408.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 443–468.
Siedlecki, Theodore, and Bonvillian, John D. 1993. Phonological deletion revisited: errors in young children's two-handed signs. Sign Language Studies 80: 223–242.
Siedlecki, Theodore, and Bonvillian, John D. 1997. Young children's acquisition of the handshape aspect of American Sign Language signs: parental report findings. Applied Psycholinguistics 18: 17–39.
Siple, Patricia. 1978. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 7: 95–110.
Skorik, I. P. 1977. Grammatike Cukotskogo Jazyka. Tom 2 [A Grammar of Chukchee Volume 2, Russian]. Moscow: Izdatel'stro Akademii Nauk.
Slobin, Dan, Hoiting, Nini, Kuntze, Marlon, Lindert, Reyna B., Weinberg, Amy M., Pyers, Jennie E., Thumann, Helen, and Biederman, Yael. 2003. A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Language, ed. Karen, Emmorey, 271–296. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Volume 1: Linguistics, eds. Fischer, Susan D. and Siple, Patricia, 211–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Snyder, William. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77: 324–342.
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stack, Kelly. 1988. Tiers and syllable structure: evidence from phonotactics. MA thesis, University of California.
Stevens, Kenneth, and Keyser, Samuel. 1989. Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 65: 81–106.
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. In Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.
Stokoe, William C., Casterline, Dorethy, and Croneberg, Carl. 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press. [Reprinted in 1976 by Linstok Press.]
Stowell, Timothy. 1991. Determiners in NP and DP. In Views on Phrase Structure, eds. Leffel, K. and Bouchard, D., 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. Craig, Collette, 181–214. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Supalla, Ted.1998. Reconstructing early ASL grammar through historic films. Ms.
Supalla, Ted, and Newport, Elissa. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Understanding Language Through Sign Language Research, ed. Siple, P., 91–132. New York: Academic Press.
Supalla, Ted, and Webb, Rebecca. 1995. The grammar of international sign: a new look at pidgin languages. In Language, Gesture, and Space (International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research), eds. Emmorey, Karen and Reilly, Judy S., 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel. 2000. Aspects of BSL poetry: a social and linguistic analysis of the poetry of Dorothy Miles. Sign Language & Linguistics 3: 79–100.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel, and Woll, Bencie. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swart, Henriette de. 1995. Topic and focus. Glot International 1. Reprinted in The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book, eds. L. Cheng and R. Sybesma, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2000.
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 27: The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, eds. Kiefer, F. and Kiss, K. É., 179–274. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Takahashi, Daiko. 1993. Movement of wh-phrase in Japanese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11: 655–678.
Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language: a neural model. Language & Linguistics 4.2: 207–250.
Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Teervort, B. 1973. Could there be a human sign language?Semiotica 9: 347–382.
Thompson, Henry. 1977. The lack of subordination in American Sign Language. In On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, ed. Friedman, Lynn, 181–195. New York: Academic Press.
Thompson, Lawrence C. 1965. A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Previously published as Mon-Khymer studies XIII–XIV [1965]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Thompson, Robin, and Emmorey, Karen. 2003. The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: an eye-tracking study. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. On the (non-)universality of functional categories. Ms. Harvard University / University of Iceland.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris, 148–202. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Torigoe, Takashi. 1994. Resumptive X structures in Japanese Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Volume 1, eds. Ahlgren, Inger, Bergman, Brita, and Brennan, Mary, 187–198. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. Syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.
Tuller, Laurice. 1992. The syntax of postverbal focus constructions in Chadic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 303–334.
Uyechi, Linda. 1996 [1994]. The Geometry of Visual Phonology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. (Originally distributed as PhD dissertation, Stanford University.)
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland.
Vallduví, Enric, and Engdahl, Elisabet. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519.
Valli, Clayton, and Lucas, Ceil. 1992. Linguistics of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Hoek, Karen. 1992. Conceptual spaces and pronominal reference in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15: 183–200.
Veinberg, Silvana C., and Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1990. A linguistic analysis of the negative headshake in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 68: 217–244.
Wallin, Lars. 1983. Compounds in Swedish Sign Language in historical perspective. In Language in Sign: An International Perspective on Sign Language. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Sign Language Research in Bristol, UK in July 1981, eds. Kyle, Jim and Woll, Bencie, 56–68. London: Croom Helm.
Wallin, Lars.1994. Polysyntetiska tecken i svenska teckenspråket. [Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language]. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholms Universitet.
Wallin, Lars. 1996. Polysynthetic signs in Swedish Sign Language (English edition). Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
Watanabe, Akira. 2001. Wh-in-situ languages. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, eds. Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris, 203–225. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Webelhuth, Gert. 1995. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Whittemore, Greg. 1986. The production of ASL signs. PhD dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1979. American Sign Language and Sign Systems: Research and Application. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1982. A multi-tiered theory of syllable structure for American Sign language. Ms.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1987. American Sign Language: Linguistic and Applied Dimensions. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1991. Intonation and focus in American Sign Language. Paper presented at ESCOL ‘90: the Seventh Eastern States Conference on Linguistics.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1993. Syllables and segments: hold the movement and move the holds! In Current Issues in ASL Phonology, ed. Coulter, Geoffrey R., 135–168. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1994a. Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 647–672.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1994b. Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies 84: 221–240.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995a. What the morphology of operators looks like: a formal analysis of ASL brow-raise. In FLSM VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Volume 2: Syntax II and Semantics/Pragmatics, eds. Gabriele, L., Hardison, D. and Westmoreland, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1995b. Why so-called “rhetorical questions” (RHQs) are neither rhetorical nor questions. In Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, eds. Bos, Heleen and Schermer, Trude, 149–169. Hamburg: Signum.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1996. Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, eds. Edmondson, William H. and Wilbur, Ronnie B., 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1997. A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Constructions of Meaning, eds. Vespoor, Marjolijn, Lee, Kee Dong, and Sweetser, Eve, 89–104. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999a. Stress in ASL: empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 42: 229–250.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999b. A functional journey with a formal ending: what do brow raises do in American Sign Language? In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Volume 2: Case Studies, eds. Moravcsik, E., Newmeyer, F., Noonan, M., and Wheatley, K., 295–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. Phonological and prosodic layering of non-manuals in American Sign Language. In The Signs of Language Revisited, eds. Emmorey, K. and Lane, H., 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2002. Phrase structure in ASL and ÖGS. In Progress In Sign Language Research: in Honor of Sigmund Prillwitz, eds. Schulmeister, Rolf and Reinitzer, Honour, 235–247 Signum.
Wilbur, Ronnie B., Klima, Ed, and Bellugi, Ursula. 1983. Roots: on the search for the origins of signs in ASL. In Proceedings of CLS 19: The Chicago Linguistic Society Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, eds. Richardson, J., Marks, M., and Chukerman, A., 314–336: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Patschke, Cynthia. 1998. Body leans and marking contrast in ASL. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 275–303.
Wilbur, Ronnie B. and Patschke, Cynthia. 1999. Syntactic correlates of brow raise in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 2: 3–30.
Wilbur, Ronnie B., and Schick, Brenda. 1987. The effects of linguistic stress on sign movement in ASL. Language and Speech 30: 301–323.
Wilbur, Ronnie B., and Zelaznik, H. N. 1997. Kinematic correlates of stress and position in ASL. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.
Wilcox, Phyllis. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Wilson, M., and Emmorey, Karen. 1997. A visual-spatial “phonological loop” in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language. Memory and Cognition 25: 313–320.
Woll, Bencie. 1990. International perspectives on sign language communication. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1.2: 107–120.
Woll, Bencie. 2002. The sign that dares to speak its name: echo phonology in British Sign Language (BSL). In The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages, eds. Boyes-Braem, P. and Sutton-Spence, R., 87–98. Hamburg: Signum.
Wood, Sandra K. 1999. Semantic and syntactic aspects of negation in ASL. MA thesis, Purdue University.
Woodward, James. 1974. Implicational variation in American Sign Language: negative incorporation. Sign Language Studies 3: 20–30.
Woodward, James 1978. All in the family: kinship lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies 7: 121–138.
Woodward, James C. Jr. and Erting, Carol. 1975. Synchronic variation and historical change in American Sign Language. Language Sciences 37: 9–12.
Zanuttini, R. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zec, Draga, and Inkelas, Sharon. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In Phonology-Syntax Connection, eds. Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga, 365–378. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80: 7–39.
Zimmer, June, and Patschke, Cynthia. 1990. A class of determiners in ASL. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. Lucas, Ceil, 201–210. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zwicky, A. M., and Pullum, G. K. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language 59: 502–513.
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2003. Classifying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.