Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 314
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, Aurélie and Emmanuel, Bertin 2018. From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 326.

    Ardalan, Kavous 2018. Case Method and Pluralist Economics. p. 141.

    Wannagat, Wienke Waizenegger, Gesine Hauf, Juliane and Nieding, Gerhild 2018. Mental Representations of the Text Surface, the Text Base, and the Situation Model in Auditory and Audiovisual Texts in 7-, 9-, and 11-Year-Olds. Discourse Processes, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 290.

    Podschuweit, Sören and Bernholt, Sascha 2018. Composition-Effects of Context-based Learning Opportunities on Students’ Understanding of Energy. Research in Science Education, Vol. 48, Issue. 4, p. 717.

    Markman, Arthur B. 2018. Advances in Culturally-Aware Intelligent Systems and in Cross-Cultural Psychological Studies. Vol. 134, Issue. , p. 433.

    Avgerinos, Emmanouil and Gokpinar, Bilal 2018. Task Variety in Professional Service Work: When It Helps and When It Hurts. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 27, Issue. 7, p. 1368.

    Kristayulita, K Nusantara, T As’ari, A R and Sa’dijah, C 2018. Identification of Students Errors in Solving Indirect Analogical Problems Based on Analogical Reasoning Components. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1028, Issue. , p. 012154.

    Strouse, Gabrielle A. Nyhout, Angela and Ganea, Patricia A. 2018. The Role of Book Features in Young Children's Transfer of Information from Picture Books to Real-World Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Li, Jiansheng Zhang, Xiaozhen Zheng, Hao Lu, Qingqiu and Fan, Gang 2018. Global Processing Styles Facilitate the Discovery of Structural Similarity. Psychological Reports, p. 003329411878749.

    LaDue, Nicole D. and Shipley, Thomas F. 2018. Click-On-Diagram Questions: a New Tool to Study Conceptions Using Classroom Response Systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology,

    Gilon, Karni Chan, Joel Ng, Felicia Y. Liifshitz-Assaf, Hila Kittur, Aniket and Shahaf, Dafna 2018. Analogy Mining for Specific Design Needs. p. 1.

    Lohrmann, Katrin Groß Ophoff, Jana and Hartinger, Andreas 2018. Analoges Enkodieren und die Fähigkeit zum Transfer im naturwissenschaftlichen Sachunterricht. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung,

    Shepherd, Dean A. and Patzelt, Holger 2018. Entrepreneurial Cognition. p. 7.

    Ervas, Francesca Gola, Elisabetta and Rossi, Maria Grazia 2018. Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Vol. 32, Issue. , p. 153.

    Emmons, Natalie Lees, Kristin and Kelemen, Deborah 2018. Young children's near and far transfer of the basic theory of natural selection: An analogical storybook intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 55, Issue. 3, p. 321.

    Palma, Héctor A. 2018. Philosophical Perceptions on Logic and Order. p. 242.

    Bauer, Patricia J. and Larkina, Marina 2017. Realizing Relevance: The Influence of Domain-Specific Information on Generation of New Knowledge Through Integration in 4- to 8-Year-Old Children. Child Development, Vol. 88, Issue. 1, p. 247.

    Loewenstein, Jeffrey 2017. Structure Mapping and Vocabularies for Thinking. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 842.

    Mose Biskjaer, Michael Dalsgaard, Peter and Halskov, Kim 2017. Understanding Creativity Methods in Design. p. 839.

    Kokkonen, Tommi 2017. Models as Relational Categories. Science & Education, Vol. 26, Issue. 7-9, p. 777.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1989
  • Online publication date: October 2009

7 - The mechanisms of analogical learning

Summary

It is widely accepted that similarity is a key determinant of transfer. In this chapter I suggest that both of these venerable terms – similarity and transfer – refer to complex notions that require further differentiation. I approach the problem by a double decomposition: decomposing similarity into finer subclasses and decomposing learning by similarity and analogy into a set of component subprocesses.

One thing reminds us of another. Mental experience is full of moments in which a current situation reminds us of some prior experience stored in memory. Sometimes such remindings lead to a change in the way we think about one or both of the situations. Here is an example reported by Dan Slobin (personal communication, April 1986). His daughter, Heida, had traveled quite a bit by the age of 3. One day in Turkey she heard a dog barking and remarked, “Dogs in Turkey make the same sound as dogs in America.… Maybe all dogs do. Do dogs in India sound the same?” Where did this question come from? According to Slobin's notebook, “She apparently noticed that while the people sounded different from country to country, the dogs did not.” The fact that only humans speak different languages may seem obvious to an adult, but for Heida to arrive at it by observation must have required a series of insights. She had to compare people from different countries and note that they typically sound different.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
  • Online ISBN: 9780511529863
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×