Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T18:26:15.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix C - Sampling Technique and Transitional Justice Survey Questionnaire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Monika Nalepa
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

The Transitional Justice Survey (TJS) was written and administrated by the author. It was based on 3,057 face-to-face interviews conducted in December 2004 by the Pentor Survey Research Company in Poland, Hoffman Research International in Hungary, and the Opinion Window Research International in the Czech Republic. In this appendix, I use Poland to describe the specific sampling technique used in the Transitional Justice Survey. I use the Hungarian version of the question-naire.

The Sampling Technique

The Polish part of the survey was conducted using the omnibus technique with direct, face-to-face interviews of 1,006 persons representative of a random sample of the population aged fifteen and older. As a result, only two-thirds of the samples included citizens who at the time of the survey were at least twenty years old. However, when the samples were split into those respondents who at the time of the survey were younger than thirty-five and those who were older than thirty-five, the between-group differences in the dependent variable and independent variables of interest were not sensitive to age (even in variables such as involvement in the secret police and opposition networks) and were insignificant at the 90 percent confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, in Poland, the younger cohort showed a higher average number of persons known in both the secret police and opposition networks. In all three countries, average transitional justice (TJ) demand was higher among the younger cohort, although at the 90 percent level, insignificantly so.

Type
Chapter
Information
Skeletons in the Closet
Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe
, pp. 245 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×