Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Piccoli, Vanessa Ursi, Biagio Colón de Carvajal, I. and Maitre, J.-P. 2015. Le projetPetits Films : du retour aux participants à la valorisation des données. SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 20, Issue. , p. 01019.

    Morita, Emi 2015. “Say [x]”: A Device for Securing Conversational Footing in the Talk of Young Children. Discourse Processes, Vol. 52, Issue. 4, p. 290.

    GOODY, ESTHER N. 2012. Co-operation and the origins of spoken language. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 461.

    Lepper, Georgia 2009. The pragmatics of therapeutic interaction: An empirical study. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 90, Issue. 5, p. 1075.

    Haugh, Michael 2009. Intention(ality) and the Conceptualization of Communication in Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 91.

    Chevalier, Fabienne H. G. 2008. Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: How Context Matters. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Shaw, Rebecca and Kitzinger, Celia 2007. Memory in Interaction: An Analysis of Repeat Calls to a Home Birth Helpline. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 117.

    Davenport, Elisabeth and Snyder, Herbert W. 2006. Managing social capital. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 515.

    Curl, Traci S. 2005. Practices in Other-Initiated Repair Resolution: The Phonetic Differentiation of 'Repetitions'. Discourse Processes, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Goody, Esther 2005. 'STONE AGE SOCIOLOGY'- OR SOCIOLOGY OF EARLY LANGUAGE-USING SOCIETY?. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 585.

    Leudar, Ivan and Costall, Alan 2004. On the Persistence of the ‘Problem of Other Minds’ in Psychology. Theory & Psychology, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, p. 601.

    Potter, Jonathan and Hepburn, Alexa 2003. "I'm a Bit Concerned"--Early Actions and Psychological Constructions in a Child Protection Helpline. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 197.

    Mets, Boris and van den Hauwe, Jo 2003. Masked heterogeneity in a multilingual classroom. Linguistics and Education, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 51.

    Rae, John 2001. Organizing Participation in Interaction: Doing Participation Framework. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 253.

    Potter, Jonathan 1999. Beyond Cognitivism. Research on Language & Social Interaction, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 119.

    1995. The Discourse of Negotiation. p. 399.

  • Print publication year: 1995
  • Online publication date: January 2010

5 - Interaction sequences and anticipatory interactive planning


In this chapter I shall consider some relationships between sequential patterns or organizations in talk-in-interaction, notably in conversation, and that aspect of social intelligence which Goody has termed ‘anticipatory interactive planning’ (hereafter AIP). Social intelligence consists, in part anyway, of cognitive models of action which might underlie the production and interpretation of ‘meaningful’ communicative behaviour among social beings (humans, and possibly some primates; see Byrne, Chapter 1, this volume). AIP highlights the reciprocity of communication in social relations, incorporating as it does the mental representation of alter's responses to ego's actions (Goody, Introduction to this volume). Goody is thereby suggesting that AIP concerns the possibility that, via their cognitive models of action, interactants have ways of predicting that if they make a given verbal ‘move’ (and from now on I shall refer exclusively to those actions which are verbal), this will engender or facilitate a subsequent verbal action by either themselves or their recipients. The predictability of some contingent subsequent action(s) is part of ‘mentally modelling’ the likely behaviour/responses of their cointeractants, which hence underpins the strategic nature of selecting a current action.

The ability to anticipate subsequent verbal actions, performed in turns at talk, and to select or design a current action (turn) accordingly, would seem to rest on the cognitive representation of sequences of actions. I mean by ‘sequences of actions’ the discernible shapes, patterns, organizations or regularities which may be associated with, or which may be the products of, the progressivity of participants' decisions about ‘what to say next’ in response to what was just said.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Social Intelligence and Interaction
  • Online ISBN: 9780511621710
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *