Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Tong, Chau
Winckler, Haley
and
Rojas, Hernando
2021.
La conexión entre las percepciones de sesgos mediáticos y su influencia en la polarización afectiva: un examen en Brasil, México y Estados Unidos.
Revista de Comunicación Política,
Vol. 3,
Issue. ,
Reddi, Madhavi
Kuo, Rachel
and
Kreiss, Daniel
2021.
Identity propaganda: Racial narratives and disinformation.
New Media & Society,
p.
146144482110292.
Van Bavel, Jay J.
Harris, Elizabeth A.
Pärnamets, Philip
Rathje, Steve
Doell, Kimberly C.
and
Tucker, Joshua A.
2021.
Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing.
Social Issues and Policy Review,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
84.
Admati, Anat R
2021.
Capitalism, laws, and the need for trustworthy institutions.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
678.
Saurwein, Florian
and
Spencer-Smith, Charlotte
2021.
Automated Trouble: The Role of Algorithmic Selection in Harms on Social Media Platforms.
Media and Communication,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 4,
p.
222.
Asimovic, Nejla
Nagler, Jonathan
Bonneau, Richard
and
Tucker, Joshua A.
2021.
Testing the effects of Facebook usage in an ethnically polarized setting.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 25,
Rathje, Steve
Van Bavel, Jay J.
and
van der Linden, Sander
2021.
Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 26,
Foa, Roberto Stefan
and
Mounk, Yascha
2021.
America after Trump: from “clean” to “dirty” democracy?.
Policy Studies,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 5-6,
p.
455.
Matias, J. Nathan
Munger, Kevin
Le Quere, Marianne Aubin
and
Ebersole, Charles
2021.
The Upworthy Research Archive, a time series of 32,487 experiments in U.S. media.
Scientific Data,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
Gilardi, Fabrizio
Gessler, Theresa
Kubli, Maël
and
Müller, Stefan
2021.
Social Media and Policy Responses to the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Switzerland.
Swiss Political Science Review,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
243.
Jacobides, Michael G
and
Lianos, Ioannis
2021.
Regulating platforms and ecosystems: an introduction.
Industrial and Corporate Change,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1131.
Nonnecke, Brandie
and
Carlton, Camille
2022.
EU and US legislation seek to open up digital platform data.
Science,
Vol. 375,
Issue. 6581,
p.
610.
Malin, Joel R.
and
Hornbeck, Dustin
2022.
Historical knowledge mobilisation in a post-factual era in the United States.
Evidence & Policy,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
502.
Druckman, James N.
2022.
A Framework for the Study of Persuasion.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Gilardi, Fabrizio
2022.
Digital Technology, Politics, and Policy-Making.
Wojcieszak, Magdalena
Casas, Andreu
Yu, Xudong
Nagler, Jonathan
and
Tucker, Joshua A.
2022.
Most users do not follow political elites on Twitter; those who do show overwhelming preferences for ideological congruity.
Science Advances,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 39,
Matsilele, Trust
2022.
Social Media and Digital Dissidence in Zimbabwe.
p.
131.
Hietanen, Mika
and
Eddebo, Johan
2022.
Towards a Definition of Hate Speech—With a Focus on Online Contexts.
Journal of Communication Inquiry,
p.
019685992211243.
Atik, Deniz
Cavusoglu, Lena
Ozdamar Ertekin, Zeynep
and
Fırat, A. Fuat
2022.
Fashion, consumer markets, and democratization.
Journal of Consumer Behaviour,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 5,
p.
1135.
König, Tim
Schünemann, Wolf J.
Brand, Alexander
Freyberg, Julian
and
Gertz, Michael
2022.
The EPINetz Twitter Politicians Dataset 2021. A New Resource for the Study of the German Twittersphere and Its Application for the 2021 Federal Elections.
Politische Vierteljahresschrift,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
529.