Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:05:16.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John Gerring
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

The scene is an inn. Pickwick and some young friends are dining when Editor Pott comes upon them. Some preliminary chatter of a delightful sort and Pott is convinced that Pickwick's young friends are waverers – they do not follow the blue. To set their opinion on solid foundations, he urges them to read a series of articles that appeared in his paper in the form of a review of Chinese metaphysics. “An abstruse subject,” says Pickwick. “Very,” says Pott, but my writer “crammed for it … he read up for the subject, at my desire, in the Encyclopaedia Britannica.” “I was not aware that this valuable work carried anything on Chinese metaphysics,” responds Pickwick. “He read, Sir,” rejoins Pott, looking round with a smile of intellectual superiority, “He read for metaphysics under the letter M and for China under the letter C, and combined his information, Sir.”

–Martin Landau/Charles Dickens

A good research design, I have argued, is characterized by plenitude, boundedness, comparability, independence, representativeness, variation, analytic utility, replicability, mechanism, and causal comparison. To the extent that we can draw accurate conclusions about causal relationships in the sphere of human actions we do so with studies that embody these ten features. This is the simplest and most parsimonious way of summarizing the complex task of research design in causal analysis.

As we have already noted, these criteria are often in conflict with one another, such that we cannot fulfill all ten (at least not to an equal degree).

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Science Methodology
A Criterial Framework
, pp. 200 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Methods
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Social Science Methodology
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815492.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Methods
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Social Science Methodology
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815492.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Methods
  • John Gerring, Boston University
  • Book: Social Science Methodology
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815492.010
Available formats
×