Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
Academic and professional knowledge have dominated the history of social work research and practice. As a result, new knowledge has been grafted predominantly onto an existing base of professional authority and expertise. Arts-based research is emerging as an alternative approach to knowledge production, broadening the understanding of how scientific evidence is created and who is in the position to create it (Boydell et al., 2012). It is intended to open space for deliberately engaging with voices from the margin, hence rendering it a meaningful approach to advance social inclusion and social justice in and through social work research. In this chapter, we draw on our experience with arts-based research projects to contemplate this potential and to contribute to a critical dialogue regarding the impact of arts-based research on power relations and structures in social work academia and practice. We start by briefly introducing our research collective, explaining our rationale for working with arts-based methods, and describing two projects in which visual arts were used. We continue this chapter by elaborating on the merits and challenges of this methodology in relation to co-creating knowledge and altering power relations, derived from our own experiences in relation to the strand of literature on artsbased research.
Introduction
Background of the research collective and arts-based research projects
EQUALITY//ResearchCollective, embedded in Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, member of the Ghent University Association (AU GENT) seeks to respond to social inequality and exclusion by initiating research from within a human rights and quality of life framework. Specific attention is directed towards involving people in socially vulnerable situations and their perspectives, as well as to establishing participatory approaches whereby co-creation with participants is key to addressing power relations in society. In several projects we employ arts-based methodology to pursue this objective.
This choice is grounded in the understanding that research plays a crucial part in knowledge production and dissemination, but also risks being an elitist structure in which social inequalities and (mis)representations are (re)produced by voices from the centre. The experiences and stories of citizens living in socially vulnerable situations are rarely sought in research, hence excluding their perspectives from knowledge frameworks (Mizock et al., 2014).
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.