Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Voigt, Rob Eckert, Penelope Jurafsky, Dan and Podesva, Robert J. 2016. Cans and cants: Computational potentials for multimodality with a case study in head position. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. 677.

    Eckert, Penelope and Labov, William 2017. Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 467.

    D'Onofrio, Annette 2018. Personae and phonetic detail in sociolinguistic signs. Language in Society, Vol. 47, Issue. 04, p. 513.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: June 2016

3 - Variation, meaning and social change

from Part I - Theorising social meaning

Summary

Introduction

The perspective that I will develop in these pages, what has come to be referred to as the “Third Wave” approach to variation, takes as basic that the meaningfulness of sociolinguistic variation is not incidental, not a by-product of social stratification, but a design feature of language. Sociolinguistic variation constitutes a system of signs that enables the nonpropositional expression of social concerns as they unfold in interaction. It allows people to say things without putting them into words, making it essential to social life and part of the pragmatics that link speech to the wider social system. I will argue further that language is not just a system that happens to change, but a system whose change is central to its semiotic function. Variation is a system of signs that enact a continually changing social world, and it is the potential for change in the meanings of these signs that makes language viable for human life.

This perspective appears to conflict with some of the basic tenets of the view of variation that emerged from work in the First Wave and that endure in much current work in variation. To some extent, this is because the First Wave grew out of the structuralist study of sound change and is primarily concerned with presocial cognitive forces giving rise to change and with macrosocial patterns of variation as structuring the regular social contact that accounts for the spread of change. This limits the view of social meaning to forces deriving from the macrostructure of society, hence external to language. My argument will be that social meaning in variation is an integral part of language and that macrosocial patterns of variation are at once the product of, and a constraint on, a complex system of meaning.

Three waves real quick

The First Wave of survey studies found a robust and repeated pattern of variation correlating with macrosociological categories, showing that change enters communities at the lower end of the socioeconomic hierarchy, and spreads upward. According to the model that emerged in the First Wave, sound change is presocial, originating in the most unconscious and systematic reaches of the speaker's linguistic system and emerging in the speaker's most unmonitored speech, the vernacular.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Sociolinguistics
  • Online ISBN: 9781107449787
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Acton, E. 2014. Pragmatics and the social meaning of determiners. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Agha, A. 2003. The social life of a cultural value. Language and Communication 23: 231–273.
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Holquist, Michael (ed.), Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (trans.) Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, M. 1999. You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3 (4): 443–460.
Buchstaller, I. 2006. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behavior: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10: 3–30.
Campbell-Kibler, K. 2008. I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37: 637–659.
Carter, Phillip M. 2005. Prosodic variation in SLA: Rhythm in an urban North Carolina Hispanic community. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 2: 59–71.
Cheshire, Jenny. 2005. Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social class variation in the use of discourse-new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9, 4: 479–508.
Coupland, Nikolas. 1983. Patterns of encounter management: Further arguments for discourse variables. Language in Society 12: 459–476.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (eds.), Stylistic Variation in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–210.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2014. Language change, social change, sociolinguistic change: A meta-commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18, 2: 277–286.
D'Onofrio, A. 2014. Sociolinguistic knowledge of a sound change in progress: Perceptions of California TRAP backing. Paper presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Minneapolis, MN.
D'Onofrio, A. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19 (2): 241–256.
Eckert, P. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.
Eckert, P. 1996. Vowels and nailpolish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In Ahlers, J., Bilmes, L., Chen, M., Oliver, M., Warner, N., and Werhteim, S. (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Eckert, P. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 3: 453–476.
Eckert, P. 2011a. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86, 1: 85–97.
Eckert, P. 2011b. Where does the social stop? In Parrott, J. (ed.), Language Variation: European Perspectives III. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13–30.
Eckert, P. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.
Ehrlich, S. 1998. The discursive reconstruction of sexual consent. Discourse and Society 9: 149–171.
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1972. On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 213–250.
Gagné, I. 2008. Urban princesses: Performance and “women's language” in Japan's Gothic/Lolita subculture. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 18, 1: 130–150.
Gardner, Matt Hunt, and Tagliamonte, Sali. 2015. The bike, the back, and the boyfriend: Confronting the “definite article conspiracy” in Canadian and British English. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, OR.
Geenberg, K. 2010. “Poor baby, you got a boo-boo!”: Sound symbolism in adult baby talk. Talk delivered at NWAV 39, San Antonio, TX.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradition in Social Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Guy, G., Horvath, B., Vonwiller, J., Daisley, E., and Rogers, I.. 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15: 23–52.
Haeri, Niloofar. 1994. A linguistic innovation of women in Cairo. Language Variation and Change. 6: 87–112.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Hay, J., and Drager, K.. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48, 4: 269–285.
Hebdige, D. 1984. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Methuen.
Hodder, I. 1982. The Present Past. London: Batsford.
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J., and Danielson, A. E.. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.”Journal of English Linguistics 34: 77–104.
Kroch, A. S. 1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7: 17–36.
Labov, W. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 18: 1–42.
Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, W. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1, 1: 97–120.
Labov, W. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden MA. and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Labov, W. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Labov, W., and Weiner, E. J.. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19: 29–58.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1967. The Savage Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McConnell-Ginet, S. 1984. The origins of sexist language in discourse. In White, S. J. and Teller, V. (eds.), Discourses in Reading and Linguistics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 433, 123–135.
Melnick, R., and Acton, E.. 2015. Function words, power, and opposition: A socio-pragmatic “deep” corpus study. Poster presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland, OR.
Miller, L. 2004. Those naughty teenage girls: Japanese Kogals, slang, and media assessments. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14, 2: 225–247.
Nygaard, L. C., and Lunders, E. R.. 2002. Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory and Cognition 30, 4: 583–593.
Ohala, J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, L., Nichola, J., and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, 325–347.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, vols. 1-6. Eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A.W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Podesva, R. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11, 4: 478–504.
Podesva, Robert J., and Van Hofwegen, Janneke. Forthcoming. On the complementarity of the three waves: The acoustic realization of /s/ in inland California.
Rickford, J., and McNair-Knox, F.. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, 235–276.
Romaine, S. 1984. On the problem of syntactic varation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18: 409–437.
Sankoff, D., and Laberge, S.. 1978. The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods. New York: Academic Press, 239–250.
Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, K. H. and Selby, H. A. (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.
Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23, 3–4: 193–229.
Trudgill, P. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–195.
Trudgill, P. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37: 241–280.
Trudgill, P. 2014. Diffusion, drift, and the irrelevance of media influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18: 214–222.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2005.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, M.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–188.