Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Towards a ‘central theory’: the scope and relevance of the sociology of Norbert Elias
- Part I Sociology as a human science: Norbert Elias and the sociology of knowledge
- 2 From distance to detachment: knowledge and self-knowledge in Elias's theory of involvement and detachment
- 3 Ecology, ‘human nature’ and civilizing processes: biology and sociology in the work of Norbert Elias
- 4 Between the real and the reified: Elias on time
- Part II Processes of stratification: figurations of race, class and gender
- Part III The formation of individuals and states
- Part IV Religion and civilizing processes: Weber and Elias compared
- Index
- References
2 - From distance to detachment: knowledge and self-knowledge in Elias's theory of involvement and detachment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Towards a ‘central theory’: the scope and relevance of the sociology of Norbert Elias
- Part I Sociology as a human science: Norbert Elias and the sociology of knowledge
- 2 From distance to detachment: knowledge and self-knowledge in Elias's theory of involvement and detachment
- 3 Ecology, ‘human nature’ and civilizing processes: biology and sociology in the work of Norbert Elias
- 4 Between the real and the reified: Elias on time
- Part II Processes of stratification: figurations of race, class and gender
- Part III The formation of individuals and states
- Part IV Religion and civilizing processes: Weber and Elias compared
- Index
- References
Summary
‘Detachment’ and ‘involvement’ belong to the not very large group of specialized concepts referring to the whole human person.
(Norbert Elias 1987: xxxii)Introduction: after Weber
Max Weber famously declared that the vocation of sociology requires that sociologists should suspend certain values in the pursuit of the ideal of ‘value-freedom’. It is obvious reading Elias's first systematic statement of his theory of involvement and detachment (Elias 1956) with Weber in mind, that on the subject of science and values, although he departs from Weber in significant ways he, too, must have been stimulated by Weber's observations. In common with many other social scientists outside Marxist circles in Weimar Germany, early in his career Elias probably acquiesced in the all-pervasive Weberian position on value-freedom (or some version of it) as a set of working principles for social-scientific work. Indeed, it was partly this broad orientation which set the sociology department of Mannheim and Elias in Frankfurt apart from the subsequently more famous ‘Frankfurt School’ of Adorno and Horkheimer with whom they shared a building (Shils 1970; Bogner 1987; Mennell 1998: 15). In a Marxian manner the latter group emphatically rejected value-freedom in any form because they saw it as part of a positivistic ideology in social science that excluded partisanship on behalf of the underprivileged (Kilminster 1979: 195–201).
I think it is possible to breathe further life into this venerable subject of value-freedom through understanding how Elias took the Weberian model as a point of departure.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Sociology of Norbert Elias , pp. 25 - 41Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Bauman, Zygmunt 1993, Postmodern Ethics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Beck, Ulrich 1992, The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications
Berger, Peter and Kellner, Hansfried 1981, Sociology Reinterpreted: An Essay on Method and Vocation, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
1987, ‘Elias and the Frankfurt School’, Theory, Culture & Society 4 (2–3): 249–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987, ‘Norbert Elias in Leicester: some recollections’, Theory, Culture & Society 4 (2–3): 533–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1912–13, ‘Psychical distance as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle’, British Journal of Psychology 5: 1912–13Google Scholar
De Swaan, Abram 1990, The Management of Normality: Critical Essays in Health and Welfare, London: Routledge
Devereux, George 1967, From Anxiety to Method in the Behavioral Sciences, The Hague: Mouton
Dunning, Eric 1986, ‘Preface’, to Norbert Elias and Eric Dunning, Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Elias, Norbert 2000 [1939], The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, trans. Edmund Jephcott, rev. edn, eds. Eric Dunning, Johan Goudsblom and Stephen Mennell, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
1956, ‘Problems of involvement and detachment’, British Journal of Sociology 7 (3): 226–52 (also in Involvement and Detachment 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971, ‘The sociology of knowledge: new perspectives’, Sociology 5, 2 (3): 149–68, 355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert 1976, ‘Introduction: a theoretical essay on established and outsider relations’, in Norbert Elias and John L. Scotson 1994, The Established and the Outsiders, 2nd edn, London: Sage
Elias, Norbert 1978, What is Sociology?, London: Hutchinson
Elias, Norbert 1984, ‘Knowledge and power: an interview by Peter Ludes’, in Nico Stehr and Volker Meja, eds., Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives on the Sociology of Knowledge, New Brunswick/London: Transaction Books
Elias, Norbert 1987a, Involvement and Detachment, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
1987b, ‘The retreat of the sociologists into the present’, Theory, Culture & Society 4 (2–3): 223–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert 1993, Mozart: Portrait of a Genius, ed. Michael Schröter, trans. Edmund Jephcott, Cambridge: Polity Press
Elias, Norbert (with Dunning, Eric) 1986, Quest for Excitement: Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Frisby, David 1976, ‘Introduction to the English translation’, in Theodor Adorno, Hans Albert, et al., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. Glyn Adey and David Frisby, London: Heinemann
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1985, Philosophical Apprenticeships, trans. Robert R. Sullivan, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Gay, Peter 1973, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation: Volume Two, The Science of Freedom, London: Wildwood House
Giddens, Anthony 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press
Hunt, Jennifer C. 1989, Psychoanalytic Aspects of Fieldwork, London: Sage
Kilminster, Richard 1979, Praxis and Method: A Sociological Dialogue with Lukács, Gramsci and the Early Frankfurt School, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
1993, ‘Norbert Elias and Karl Mannheim: closeness and distance’, Theory, Culture & Society 10 (3): 81–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilminster, Richard 1998, The Sociological Revolution: From the Enlightenment to the Global Age, London: Routledge (paperback 2002)
and 1995, ‘From philosophy to sociology: Elias and the neo-Kantians: a response to Benjo Maso’, Theory, Culture & Society 12 (3): 81–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kris, Ernst 1936, ‘Comments on spontaneous artistic creations by psychotics’, in Kris 1964, Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art, New York: Schocken Books (fourth printing 1974)
Kilminster, Richard 1948, ‘Aesthetic ambiguity’, in Kris 1964, Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art, New York: Schocken Books (fourth printing 1974)
Kuzmics, Helmut 2001, ‘On the relationship between literature and sociology in the work of Norbert Elias’, in Thomas Salumets (ed.), Norbert Elias and Human Interdependencies, Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press
Lassman, Peter, Velody, Irving and Martins, Herminio (eds.) 1989, Max Weber's ‘Science as a Vocation’, London: Unwin Hyman
Mannheim, Karl 1933, ‘The democratization of culture’, in Mannheim 1956, Essays on the Sociology of Culture, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
May, Tim 1996, Situating Social Theory, Buckingham: Open University Press
May, Tim 2001, Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, Cambridge: Polity Press
Mennell, Stephen 1998, Norbert Elias: An Introduction, Dublin: University College Dublin Press
Merton, Robert K. 1968, Social Theory and Social Structure, London: Collier Macmillan
1962, ‘Sociology and psychoanalysis on trial: an epilogue’, Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Review 49 (2): 144–60Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred 1932, The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert, London: Heinemann, 1972
Schutz, Alfred 1940, ‘Phenomenology and the social sciences’, in Farber, Marvin (ed.), Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, London: Greenwood Press, reprinted 1968
Seidman, Steven 1998, Contested Knowledge: Social Theory in the Postmodern Era, 2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Shils, Edward A. 1970, ‘Tradition, ecology and institution in the history of sociology’, Daedalus 99(ii) (also in his The Constitution of Society, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1982)
1984, ‘Sociogenesis versus psychogenesis: the unique sociology of Norbert Elias’, Mid-American Review of Sociology 9 (1): 49–78Google Scholar
Waldhoff, Hans-Peter 1994, ‘On secondary involvement and the perception of strangers’, Paper presented to the Ad hoc Sessions on Figurational Sociology, XIII ISA World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, 18–23 July
Waldhoff, Hans-Peter 1995, Fremde und Zivilisierung. Wissensoziologische Studien über der Verarbeiten von Gefühlen der Fremdheit. Probleme der modernen Peripheri-Zentrums-Migration am türkisch-deutschen Beispiel, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
Wouters, Cas 1977, ‘Informalization and the civilizing process’, in Peter Gleichmann, Johan Goudsblom and Hermann Korte, Human Figurations: Essays for Norbert Elias, Amsterdam: Sociologisch Tijdschrift
1986, ‘Formalization and informalization: changing tension balances in civilizing processes’, Theory, Culture & Society 3 (2): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987, ‘Developments in the behavioural codes between the sexes: the formalization of informalization in The Netherlands, 1930–85’, Theory, Culture and Society 4 (2–3): 405–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998, ‘How strange our feelings of superiority and inferiority to ourselves?’, Theory, Culture & Society 15 (1), FebruaryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 19
- Cited by