Genes, identity and the ‘expressivist critique’

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511545573.010

9 - Genes, identity and the ‘expressivist critique’

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2009

Rob Sparrow

Edited by

Loane Skene and

Janna Thompson

Show author details

Loane Skene: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Janna Thompson: Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Technologies such as prenatal testing, combined with the option of abortion, and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis now give prospective parents unprecedented power to choose the genetics of their children. In effect, they allow parents to sort embryos according to whether they have desirable or undesirable genes. A society in which such technologies become widespread – as they have in many industrialized nations already – might be thought of as a ‘sorting society’. This description, however, immediately draws attention to another, more disturbing, potential in these technologies. Critics of the sorting society worry that it involves choosing between different ‘sorts’ of people, deciding who will be born on the basis of a belief that some sorts of people are better than others.

The shameful historical legacy of racial eugenics has meant that there is little open enthusiasm for using modern technologies of genetic selection to select for (supposed) racial traits. While technologies enabling sex selection have been widely adopted to that purpose, their use in this fashion has, I think, at least as many critics as admirers amongst those writing about the ethics of this practice. Instead, these sorting technologies have been taken up and defended most enthusiastically in the service of the goal of preventing the birth of children who might suffer from various disabilities. As a result, it has been critics from within the disability community who have thought hardest about – and have raised some of the most forceful objections to – the development of the sorting society.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Sorting Society
The Ethics of Genetic Screening and Therapy
, pp. 111 - 132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545573.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Asch, A., ‘Reproductive technology and disability’ in Cohen, S. and Taub, N. (eds.), Reproductive Laws for the 1990s (Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1988) 69–124Google Scholar

Asch, A., ‘Why I haven't changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: reflections and refinements’ in Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000) 234–58.Google Scholar

Wendell, S., The Rejected Body (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Saxton, M., ‘Disability rights and selective abortion’ in Solinger, R. (ed.), Abortion Wars: A Half Century of Struggle (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1997) 374–95.Google Scholar

Kaplan, D., ‘Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities’ (1993) 36(3) Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology605–12.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buchanan, A., ‘Choosing who will be disabled: genetic intervention and the morality of inclusion’ (1996) 13(1) Social Philosophy and Policy18–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Stainton, T., ‘Identity, difference and the ethical politics of prenatal testing’ (2003) 47(7) Journal of Intellectual Disability Research533–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Daniels, N. and Wikler, D., From Chance to Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) 265.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, A., ‘Women with disabilities: abortion and liberation’ (1987) 2(3) Disability, Handicap & Society275–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinbock, B., ‘Disability, prenatal testing, and selective abortion’ in Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000) 108–23.Google Scholar

Agar, N., Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Nelson, J. L., ‘Prenatal diagnosis, personal identity, and disability’ (2000) 10(3 (September)) Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal213–28CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Savulescu, J., ‘Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children’ (2001) 15(5) Bioethics413–26.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Harris, J., Clones, Genes and Immortality: Ethics and the Genetic Revolution. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998) Chapter 3Google Scholar

Zohar, N. J., ‘Prospects for “genetic therapy” – can a person benefit from being altered?’ (1991) 5(4) Bioethics275–88.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nelson, J. L., ‘The meaning of the act: reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies’ (1998) 8(2) Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal165–82CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds.), Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000) 215.Google Scholar

Baily, M. A., ‘Why I had amniocentesis’ in Parens, E. and Asch, A. (eds.) Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000) 66.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P., The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996) Chapter 11Google Scholar

Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Oomman, N. and Ganatra, B. R., ‘Sex selection: the systematic elimination of girls’ (2002) 10(19) Reproductive Health Matters184–8.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Asch, A. and Geller, G., ‘Feminism, bioethics, and genetics’ in Wolf, S. (ed.), Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996) 325.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.