Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:24:03.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - Object updating: a force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision

from Part V - Space–time and awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

By
James T. Enns ,
Alejandro Lleras  and
Cathleen M. Moore
Edited by
Romi Nijhawan  and
Beena Khurana
Romi Nijhawan
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Beena Khurana
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Summary

How does the visual system provide us with the perception of a continuous and stable world in the face of the spatial–temporal chaos that characterizes its input? In this chapter we summarize several programs of research that all point to a solution we refer to as object updating. We use this phrase because perceptual continuity seems to occur at an object level (as opposed to an image level or a higher conceptual level) and because our research suggests that the visual system makes a sharp distinction between the formation of new object representations versus the updating of existing object representations. We summarize the research that led us to this view in the areas of masking by object substitution, the flash-lag illusion, response priming, and an illusion of perceptual asynchrony.

Introduction

Biological vision is the marvelous ability of an organism to be informed about its surroundings at a distance and with a high degree of spatial and temporal resolution. This ability allows us to know where things are, what shape and color they are, and equally importantly, when they are there, so that we may interact with them appropriately. Yet, contrary to many people's implicit understanding of how biological vision is accomplished, it is not a process by which light, reflected from surfaces in the three-dimensional world, is recorded faithfully by the brain in order to reconstruct the nature of the surfaces that gave rise to the recorded pattern of light.

Type
Chapter
Information
Space and Time in Perception and Action , pp. 503 - 520
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J Exp Psychol Gen 129: 481–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036–2038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 1737–1747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enns, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Res 44: 1321–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychol Sci 8: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends Cogn Sci 4: 345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M., & Humphreys, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition 67: 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2004). The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. H., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Asymmetric object substitution masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(4): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klapp, S. T., & Hinkley, L. B. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. J Exp Psychol Gen 131: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Res 40: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science 284: 1165–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lleras, A., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. J Exp Psychol Gen 133: 475–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29: 106–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181: 507–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, C. M., & Enns, J. T. (2004). Object updating and the flash-lag effect. Psychol Sci 15: 866–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31: 1171–1180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997a). A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264: 393–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moutoussis, K., & Zeki, S. (1997b). Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264: 1407–1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370: 256–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 387–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oriet, C., & Enns, J. T. (under review). The perceptual asynchrony illusion: object updating and unbinding take time. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform.
Schlag, J., & Schlag-Rey, M. (2002). Through the eye, slowly: delays and localization errors in the visual system. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekuler, A. B., & Bennett, P. J. (2001). Generalized common fate: grouping by common luminance changes. Psychol Sci 12: 437–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsotsos, J. (1990). Analyzing vision at the complexity level, Behav Brain Sci 13: 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M., & Donnelly, N. (1998). Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature 394: 179–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 92–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, D. (2002). The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1: 656–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, D., Murakami, I., & Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res 40: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S., & Bartels, A. (1998). The asynchrony of consciousness. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265: 1583–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×