Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:40:45.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Sterilization and Murder in Nazi Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Randall Hansen
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Desmond King
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

Many countries had powerful eugenics movements, most eugenicists lobbied and argued for coerced sterilization, and politicians in many countries heeded the eugenicist call. Only one country, however, took eugenics to its murderous extreme. That it turned out so would not have been predicted in the early or even the late 1920s.

Germany was a latecomer to coerced sterilization: such policies had already been adopted in Canada, Denmark, Switzerland, and the United States. There had been discussion of eugenic sterilization since Alfred Ploetz, the key figure of German eugenics, published Die Tüchtigkeit unserer Rasse (The Efficiency of Our Race), but all legislative proposals had come to nothing. Sterilization bills died before the Prussian legislature in 1903, the national Reichstag in 1907, the Saxon legislature in 1923, and the Reichstag again in 1925. Interestingly, studies in the 1920s cited Germany as a country notable for its reluctance to adopt a sterilization law. In this context, the fate of Gustav Boeters is instructive. Boeters was a sort of Saxon Hoyt Pilcher. He worked as a district physician in Zwickau and lobbied for sterilization by instigating and advertising illegal sterilizations carried out by Heinrich Braun, a surgeon. In May 1923, he sent a report to the government of Saxony in which he demanded compulsory sterilization for the hereditarily blind and deaf, the mentally handicapped, the mentally ill, “perverts,” and fathers with two or more illegitimate children. The “Lex Zwickau” (named after the Saxon town in which he lived) was his model law, but it received little support from the German government. On October 5, 1928, a frustrated Boeters penned a letter to the well-meaning but probably dim American philanthropist, E. S. Gosney.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sterilized by the State
Eugenics, Race, and the Population Scare in Twentieth-Century North America
, pp. 141 - 162
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frank, Sigwart, Praktische Erfahrungen mit Kastration und Sterilisation psychisch Defekter in der Schweiz [inaugural dissertation for the Doctorate of Medicine, University of Zurich, 1925] (Berlin, 1925), 2Google Scholar
Nowak, Kurt, Geschichte des Christentums in Deutschland (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1995)Google Scholar
Burleigh, Michael, The Third Reich: A New History (London: Macmillan, 2000), 353–4Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J., Coming of the Third Reich (London: Allen Lane, 2003)Google Scholar
Evans, , The Third Reich in Power (London: Allen Lane, 2005)Google Scholar
Berlin, ,” ARGB Bd. 27, Heft 4 (1933): 419
Lenz, Fritz, “Alfred Ploetz zum 70. Geburtstag am 22. Aug. 1930,ARGB Bd. , Heft 1 (1930): xivGoogle Scholar
Haffner, Sebastian, Geschichte eines Deutschen: die Erinnerungen 1914–1933 (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2000)Google Scholar
Snyder, Timothy, Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin (New York: Basic Books, 2010)Google Scholar
Bessel, Richard, Germany 1945: From War to Peace (New York: Harper, 2009)Google Scholar
Kopp’s 1934 book, Birth Control in Practice; Analysis of Ten Thousand Case Histories of the Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau, was reissued by Arno Press in 1972.
Sieveking, G. Herman, “Sterilisierungsgesetze des Auslandes,” Deutsches Ärzteblatt 35, no. 64 (August 25, 1934): 830Google Scholar
Laughlin, Harry H., “The Legal, Legislative and Administrative Aspects of Sterilization,” Report of the Committee to Study and to Report on the Best Practical Means of Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the American Population, Bulletin No. 10B (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Eugenic Records Office, February 1914).Google Scholar
King, and Hansen, , “Experts at Work: State Autonomy, Social Learning and Eugenic Sterilisation in 1930s Britain,” British Journal of Political Science 29, no. 1 (1999): 77–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyiszli, Miklos, Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account (New York: Fell, 1960).Google Scholar
Vertriebene Wissenschaft,” Neue Zeitung 35 (May 3, 1946)
Münstersche Stadtanzeiger, February 26, 1965

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×