Improvising within the System

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511997105.005

4 - Improvising within the System

Creating New Teacher Performances in Inner-City Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Carrie Lobman

Edited by

R. Keith Sawyer

Show author details

Carrie Lobman: Affiliation:
Rutgers Graduate School of Education
R. Keith Sawyer: Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Teachers’ lives are dominated by scripts: the overt scripts of the curriculum, the “hidden” scripts of race, class, language, and culture, and the societal scripts of how teachers and students are supposed to relate to each other. All of these, however, are informed by the meta-script that the primary job of the teacher is to help children acquire knowledge and skills – a deeply embedded cultural model of teaching and learning that has been referred to as instructionism (Papert, 1994), as transmission and acquisition (Rogoff, 1990; Sfard, 1998), or as the banking model (Freire, 1994). Teachers are supposed to find the best techniques for helping children learn more so that they can know more. Reform efforts that aim at addressing the current problems in education generally attempt to make such learning more efficient, equitable, or accountable through smaller classes, culturally relevant pedagogy, and a major focus on testing and assessment. By many accounts (Darling-Hammond, 2007; Kohn, 2004; Kozol, 2005; Meier & Wood, 2004; Sizer, 2004), these efforts are not succeeding.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching , pp. 73 - 93

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997105.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker-Sennett, J. & Matusov, E. (1997). School “performances”: Improvisational processes in development and education. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 197–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Berger, K. (2009). The developing person through childhood and adolescence. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

Berk, L. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood learning. Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar

Bodrova, E. & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–162). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1999). Cultural psychology: Some general principles and a concrete example. In Engeström, Y. & Punamaki, R. L. (Eds.), Perspective on activity theory (pp. 87–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. & The Distributed Literacy Consortium. (Ed.). (2006). The Fifth Dimension. An after-school program built on diversity. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Comer, J. P. & Gates, H. L. (2004). Leave no child behind: Preparing today’s youth for tomorrow’s world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Evaluating no child left behind. Retrieved March 27, 2009 from

Davis, J. (2005). Framing education as art: The octopus has a good day. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. (1998). The kind of schools we need. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Eisner, E. (2005). Re-imagining schools: The selected works of Eliot Eisner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Farmer, E. (2008). From passive objects to active subjects: Young people, performance and possibility. Journal of the Community Development Society, 39(2), 60–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar

Fulani, L. & Kurlander, G. (2009). Development gap or achievement gap? Outliers and outsiders reconsider an old problem. New York: All Stars Project.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goldstein, L. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the construction of the mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 647–673.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gordon, E., Bowman, C. & Mejia, B. (2003). changing the script for youth development: An evaluation of the all stars talent show network and the Joseph A. Forgione development school for youth. New York: Institute for Urban and Minority Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Greene, M. (1988). The dialectics of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Heath, S. (2000). Making learning work. Afterschool Matters, 1(1), 33–45.Google Scholar

Holzman, L. (1997). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Holzman, L. (2000). Performative psychology: An untapped resource for educators. Educational and Child Psychology, 17(3), 86–103.Google Scholar

Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnstone, K. (1981). Impro: Improvisation and the theater. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Karliner, S. & Holzman, L. (2005). Developing a psychology that builds community and respects diversity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Kohn, A. (2004). NCLB and the effort to privatize public education. In Meier, D. & Kozol, G. (Eds.). (2005), The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar

Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Lobman, C. (2005). Yes and: The uses of improvisation for early childhood teacher development. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(3), 305–319.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lobman, C. & Lundquist, M . (2007). Unscripted learning: Using improv activities across the K-8 curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Meier, D. & Wood, G. (2004). Many children left behind: How the no child left behind act is damaging our children and our schools. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Moll, L. (1992). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nachmanovich, S. (1990). Free play: Improvisation in life and art. New York: Penguin/Putnam.Google Scholar

Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1996). Unscientific psychology: A cultural-performatory approach to understanding human life. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1997). The end of knowing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Noddings, N. (2005). What does it take to educate the whole child?Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8–13.Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1994). The children’s machine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. & Gardner, W . (1984). Guidance in cognitive development: An examination of mother-child instruction. In Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sawyer, K. (1997a). Improvisational theater: An ethnotheory of conversational practice. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 171–193). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Sawyer, K. (1997b). Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Sawyer, K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sizer, T. (2004). Preamble: A reminder for Americans. In Meier, D. & Wood, G. (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the no child left behind act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. xvii–xxii). New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, P. (2007). Vygotsky and the social dynamics of classrooms. English Journal, 97(2), 61–66.Google Scholar

Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theater (3rd ed.). Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Yinger, R. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80, 107–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yinger, R. (1987). By the seat of your pants: An inquiry into improvisation and teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.