Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:30:26.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Assessment of Fallopian Tube Patency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2019

Jane A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Get access

Summary

Fallopian tubes make vital portals for the transfer of gametes and the early conceptus, and were named after Gabrielis Fallopius (Italy, 1423–1562) who first described the structures. Reinier De Graaf (1641–1673), however, was the first to understand the function of the Fallopian tubes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Swart, P, Mol, BW, van der Veen, F, van Beurden, M, Redekop, WK, et al. (1995) The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 64: 486491.Google Scholar
Sulak, PJ, Letterie, GS, Coddington, CC, Hayslip, CC, Woodward, JE, et al. (1987) Histology of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril 48: 437440.Google Scholar
Collins, J (1988) Diagnostic assessment of the infertile female partner. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil: 6–42.Google Scholar
Mohiyiddeen, L, Hardiman, A, Fitzgerald, C, Hughes, E, Mol, BW, et al. (2015) Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Issue 5. Art. No.: CD003718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, FW, Kapiteyn, K, Trimbos-Kemper, T, Hermans, J, Trimbos, JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104: 595600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkman, AB, Mol, BW, van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM, Hogerzeil, HV (2000) Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility? Eur J Radiol 35: 4448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spalding, H, Martikainen, H, Tekay, A, Jouppila, P (1999) Transvaginal salpingosonography for assessing tubal patency in women previously treated for pelvic inflammatory disease and benign ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 14: 205209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Kroon, CD, de Bock, GH, Dieben, SW, Jansen, FW (2003) Saline contrast hysterosonography in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 110: 938947.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility: Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. NICE Clinical Guideline CG156. Published February 2013. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/resources/fertility-problems-assessment-and-treatment-pdf-35109634660549Google Scholar
Watrelot, A, Nisolle, M, Chelli, H, Hocke, C, Rongieres, C, et al. (2003) Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the ‘FLY’ (Fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study. Hum Reprod 18: 834839.Google Scholar
Gordts, S, Watrelot, A, Campo, R, Brosens, I (2001) Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil Steril 76: 12381241.Google Scholar
Dechaud, H, Daures, JP, Hedon, B (1998) Prospective evaluation of falloposcopy. Hum Reprod 13: 18151818.Google Scholar
Rimbach, S, Bastert, G, Wallwiener, D (2001) Technical results of falloposcopy for infertility diagnosis in a large multicentre study. Hum Reprod 16: 925930.Google Scholar
Mol, BW, Dijkman, B, Wertheim, P, Lijmer, J, van der Veen, F, et al. (1997) The accuracy of serum chlamydial antibodies in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 67: 10311037.Google Scholar
Broeze, KA, Opmeer, BC, Coppus, SF, Van Geloven, N, Alves, MF, et al. (2011) Chlamydia antibody testing and diagnosing tubal pathology in subfertile women: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 17: 301310.Google Scholar
Cook, RL, Hutchison, SL, Ostergaard, L, Braithwaite, RS, Ness, RB (2005) Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ann Intern Med 142: 914925.Google Scholar
Land, JA, Van Bergen, JE, Morre, SA, Postma, MJ (2010) Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Hum Reprod Update 16: 189204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×