Audouin, M., & de Wet, B. (2012). Sustainability thinking in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.742695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audouin, M., Burns, M., Weaver, A., et al. (2015). An introduction to sustainability science and its links to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 321–348.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002.Google Scholar

Binder, C.R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Pope, J. (2012). Sustainability assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 53–62.Google Scholar

Bond, A., Pope, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2015). Introducing the roots, evolution and effectiveness of sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In Jarrett, H (ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Christen, M., & Schmidt, S. (2012). A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability: A theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518.Google Scholar

Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. In Burns, M & Weaver, A (eds.), Exploring Sustainability Science: A Southern African Perspective. Stellenbosch, South Africa: African Sun Media, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar

Fanon, F. (1965). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessment: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). For the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.Google Scholar

Gasparatos, A., & Scolobig, A. (2012). Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics, 80, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. B. (2016a). Foundations: Sustainability and the requirements for getting there. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. B. (2016b). Applications: From generic criteria to assessments in particular places and cases. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2013). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Grace, W., & Pope, J. (2015). A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 285–320.Google Scholar

Grober, U. (2007). Deep roots: A conceptual history of ‘sustainable development’ (Nachhaltigkeit) (Discussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2007-002). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH.Google Scholar

Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.Google Scholar

Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: Interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187–198.Google Scholar

International Association for Impact Assessment (2012). Impact Assessment. www.iaia.org/news-details.php?ID=30 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar

Jabbour, J., Keita-Ouane, F., Hunsberger, C., et al. (2012). Internationally agreed environmental goals: A critical evaluation of progress. Environmental Development, 3, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.05.002.Google Scholar

James, P. (2014). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19449–19450. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. London: Earth Island.Google Scholar

Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Meirelles, J., Pagani, , A., Athanassiadis, A., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability issues in urban systems from a metabolic perspective. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.Google Scholar

Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001.Google Scholar

Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A. E., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872841.Google Scholar

Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60, 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.Google Scholar

Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Osorio, L. A. R., Lobato, M. O., & Del Castillo, X. Á. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: A proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500902760571.¹CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, M., McDonald, G., & Hardy, D. (2017). Is there more in common than we think? Convergence of ecological footprinting, energy analysis, life cycle assessment and other methods of environmental accounting. Ecological Modelling, 362, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.022.Google Scholar

Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Phillis, Y. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Verdugo, C. (2017). Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.001.Google Scholar

Pope, J., Bond, A., Hugé, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.Google Scholar

Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, , et al. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232.Google Scholar

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar

Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902864145.Google Scholar

Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar

Science for Environment Policy. (2018). Indicators for Sustainable Cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol.Google Scholar

Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.Google Scholar

Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shen, L. Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.Google Scholar

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.Google Scholar

Slaper, T., & Hall, T. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86, 4–8.Google Scholar

Stagl, S. (2012). Value articulating institutions and changing social preferences. In Brousseau, E, Dedeurwaerdere, T, & Siebenhüner, B, eds., Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225–240. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017244.003.0237.Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.Google Scholar

Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.008.Google Scholar

Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984.Google Scholar

UN. (2017). Sustainable Development Goal 11. Make Cities and Human Settlements Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar

Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512–5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512.Google Scholar

Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird’s eye view. Sustainability, 3(12), 1637–1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637.Google Scholar

Webb, R., Rissik, D., Petheram, L., Beh, J. L., & Stafford Smith, M. (2018). Co-designing adaptation decision support: Meeting common and differentiated needs. Climatic Change, 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2165-7.Google Scholar

White, M. A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.020.Google Scholar

Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.Google Scholar

Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F. S., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7 (S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y.Google Scholar

Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., et al. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39.Google Scholar

Adams, K., Hester, P., Bradley, J., T. J., Meyers, & Keating, C. (2014). Systems theory as the foundation for understanding systems. Systems Engineering, 17(1). DOI:http://10.1002/sys.21255.Google Scholar

Adetunji, I. O., Price, A. D. F., Fleming, P. R., & Kemp, P. (2003). The application of systems thinking to the concept of sustainability. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/19873.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . (2002). Metaphysics, Book H: Form and being at work, J. Sachs, Trans., 2nd edition. Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.Google Scholar

Ashby, W. R. (1947). Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. The Journal of General Psychology, 37(2), 125–128. DOI:http://10.1080/00221309.1947.9918144.Google Scholar

Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar

Audouin, M., & de Wet, B. (2012). Sustainability thinking in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 264–274. DOI:http://10.1080/14615517.2012.742695.Google Scholar

Aulin‐Ahmavaara, A. (1979). The law of requisite hierarchy. Kybernetes, 8(4), 259–266.Google Scholar

Baccini, P., & Bader, H.-P. (1996). Regionaler Stoffhaushalt. Heidelberg7 Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. www.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/tocs/48751952.pdf.Google Scholar

Basile, P. S., Agnew, M., Hölzl, A., et al. (1980). The IIASA set of energy models: Its design and application. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/12459/.Google Scholar

Batty, M. (2009). Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. In Meyers, R. A. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Complexity and Systems Science. New York: Springer, pp. 1041–1071. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69.Google Scholar

Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1949). General systems theory. Biologia Generalis, 19(1), 114–129.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1962). Modern Theories of Development: An Introduction to Theoretical Biology, J. H. Woodger, Trans. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, revised ed. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar

Bettencourt, L. (2013). The kind of problem a city is (Working Paper 2013–03-008). Santa Fe, USA: Santa Fe Institute. www.santafe.edu/research/results/working-papers/the-kind-of-problem-a-city-is.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Baldi, M. G., Gex, B., & Massaro, E. (2020b). The sustainability solution space. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–208.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Mühlemeier, S., & Wyss, R. (2017). An indicator-based approach for analyzing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part I: Theoretical and conceptual considerations. Energies, 10(1), 36. DOI:http://10.3390/en10010036.Google Scholar

Blackmore, C., Reynolds, M., Ison, R., & Lane, A. (2015). Embedding sustainability through systems thinking in practice: some experiences from the Open University. In Wyness, L (ed.), Education for Sustainable Development Pedagogy: Criticality, Creativity, and Collaboration. Pedrio Occasional Paper 8, pp. 32–35.Google Scholar

Boesch, A., & de Montmollin, A. (2020). Indicators for assessing the sustainability of cities. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–331.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. (1928). The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature, 121(3050), 580–590.Google Scholar

Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. A report to the Balaton Group, International Institute for Sustainable Development. www.ulb.ac.be/ceese/STAFF/Tom/bossel.pdf.Google Scholar

Bossel, H. (2003). Assessing viability and sustainability: A systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conservation Ecology, 5(2). DOI:http://10.5751/ES-00332-050212.Google Scholar

Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3) 197–208. DOI:http://10.1287/mnsc.2.3.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Impact of the Social Sciences. Bombay: Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private.Google Scholar

Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Oxford, UK: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. (1997). Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4), 410–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunge, M. (2004). How does it work?: The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 182–210. DOI:http://10.1177/004839319702700402.Google Scholar

Cannon, W. B. (1929). Organisation for physiological homeostasis. Physiological Reviews, 9(3), 399–431. DOI:http://10.1152/physrev.1929.9.3.399.Google Scholar

Checkland, P. B. (1993). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cherns, A. (1976). The principles of sociotechnical design. Human Relations, 29(8), 783–792. DOI:http://10.1177/001872677602900806.Google Scholar

Cherns, A. (1987). Principles of sociotechnical design revisited. Human Relations, 40(3), 153–161. DOI:http://10.1177/001872678704000303.Google Scholar

Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cilliers, P. (2005). Complexity, deconstruction and relativism. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 255–267. DOI:http://10.1177/0263276405058052.Google Scholar

Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. Exploring Sustainable Science: A South African Perspective, 39–57.Google Scholar

Clark, W. C., Jones, D. D., & Holling, C. (1979). Lessons for ecological policy design: a case study of ecosystem management. Ecological Modelling, 7(1), 1–53.Google Scholar

Costanza, R. (2014). A theory of socio-ecological system change. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(1), 39–44.Google Scholar

Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach: Building on the Human-Scale Development paradigm. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2021–2030.Google Scholar

d’Alembert, J. le R. (1743). Traité de l’équilibre et du mouvement des fluids. Librarie David, l’aîné: Paris.Google Scholar

Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(2), 14–21.Google Scholar

Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar

Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Forrester, J. W. (1969). Urban Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Forrester, J. W. (1971). World Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Future Earth. (2014). Future Earth Strategic Research Agenda 2014: Priorities for a global sustainability research agenda. Science Committee and Interim Engagement Committee. www.futureearth.org/sites/default/files/strategic_research_agenda_2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Gallopín, G. (2003). A Systems Approach to Sustainability and Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar

Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 245–256.Google Scholar

Gorddard, R., Colloff, M. J., Wise, R. M., Ware, D., & Dunlop, M. (2016). Values, rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 60–69.Google Scholar

Grace, W., & Pope, J. (2015). A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A. (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 285–320. DOI:http://10.4337/9781783471379.Google Scholar

Graf, R. (2014). Öl und Souveränität: Petroknowledge und Energiepolitik in den USA und Westeuropa in den 1970er Jahren. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Grimm, N. B., Cook, E. M., Hale, R. L., & Iwaniec, D. M. (2015). A Broader Framing of Ecosystem Services in Cities. Routledge Handbooks Online. DOI:10.4324/9781315849256.ch14.Google Scholar

Häfele, W. (1974). Future Energy Resources. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/74/1/RR-74-020.pdf.Google Scholar

Häfele, W. (1976). Second Status Report of the IIASA Project on Energy Systems. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/542/.Google Scholar

Halla, P., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar

Hammond, D. (2002). Exploring the genealogy of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(5), 429–439. DOI:http://10.1002/sres.499.Google Scholar

Hammond, D. (2003). The Science of Synthesis: Exploring the Social Implications of General Systems Theory. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar

Helmer, O. (1967). Memorandum M-2027 15 March 1967. Sent to Tom Brown, Herbert Coldhamer, Oleg Hoeffding, Arnold Horelick, Roger Levien, Richard Nelson, Ed Quade, Harry Rowen, Sid Winter, Albert Wholstetter, and Charles Wolf, “Addendum to my previous Memo M-1929, On the East-West Center.” Ford Foundation Archive.Google Scholar

Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2017). Systemic Decision Making:Fundamentals for Understanding Problems and Messes, 2nd ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Hieronymi, A. (2013). Understanding Systems Science: A Visual and Integrative Approach. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(5), 580–595.Google Scholar

Hitch, C. (1953). Sub-optimization in operations problems. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1(3), 87–99. DOI:http://10.1287/opre.1.3.87.Google Scholar

Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In Schulze, P., ed., Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington DC: National Academies Press, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar

Hunt, P. (1975). Funds position: Keystone in financial planning. Harvard Business Review, 53(3), 106–115.Google Scholar

IAEA Archives. (1975). Letter from Jan M. Døderlein, Director Safety Dept., Institut for Atomeneri, Kjeller, Norway to Otway. 16.12.1975, IAEA/IIASA Joint Cooperation.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1973). IIASA Annual Report 1973. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1974). IIASA Annual Report 1974. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1975). IIASA Annual Report 1975. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1976). IIASA Annual Report 1976. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1977). IIASA Annual Report 1977. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1978). IIASA Annual Report 1978. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

IIASA. (1979). IIASA Annual Report 1979. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar

Ison, R. (1999). Applying systems thinking to higher education. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 16(2), 107–112. DOI:http://10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199903/04)16:2<07::aid-sres278>3.0.CO;2-E.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119.Google Scholar

Kaplan, M. M. (1976). 26th Pugwash Conference Mühlhausen, Report of the Director-General. In Leo Szilard Papers, California Digital Library. https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb7578448 h.Google Scholar

Kauffman, S. A. (1990). The Sciences of Complexity and “Origins of Order.” In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Chicago: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 299–322.Google Scholar

Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7), 721–742.Google Scholar

Keppie, D. M. (2006). Context, emergence, and research design. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34(1), 242–246.Google Scholar

Klir, G. J. (1968). An Approach to General Systems Theory. Princeton, NJ: Nostrand.Google Scholar

Korzybski, A. (1994). Science and Sanity: an Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, 5th edition. Englewood, NJ: Institute of General Semantics.Google Scholar

Lambert, J. H. (1782). Logische und philosophische Abhandlungen, vol. 1. Berlin/Dessau/Leipzig.Google Scholar

Laszlo, E. (1972). Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Towards a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. New York: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Laszlo, E. (1975). The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in the Sciences. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Levai, A. (1977). 27th Pugwash Conference Munich, FRG- – Where lies the real danger of nuclear power? In Leo Szilard Papers, California Digital Library. https://library.ucsd.edu/dc/object/bb0138107 n.Google Scholar

Levien, R. E. (2000). RAND, IIASA, and the conduct of systems analysis. In Hughes, A. C. & Hughes, T. P. (eds.), Systems, Experts, and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Linton, J. D., Klassen, R., & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075–1082.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems (Bednarz, J. trans., Baecker, D. ed.). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Maiteny, P., & Ison, R. (1997).“Learner-Centred Evaluation of Systems, Systems Courses, and Future Needs in Systems Learning. In Stowell, Frank A., Ison, Ray L., Armson, Rosalind, Holloway, Jacky, Jackson, Sue, & McRobb, Steve (eds.), Systems for Sustainability. Boston: Springer, pp. 257–262.Google Scholar

Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 65–86).Google Scholar

Max-Neef, M. A., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar

McCulloch, W. S., Arbib, M. A., Lettvin, J. Y., & Papert, S. A. (1959). Embodiments of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N. B., et al. (2016). Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience, 66(3), 198–212.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H. (1998). Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development: A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, VT: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar

Mesarovic, M. D. (1967). General systems theory and its mathematical foundation. In Record of the IEEE Systems Science and Cybernetics Conference, vol. 3. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, pp.1–22.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. DOI:http://10.1037/h0043158.Google Scholar

Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

M’Pherson, P. K. (1974). A perspective on systems science and systems philosophy. Futures, 6(3), 219–239.Google Scholar

Newman, M. E. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323–351. DOI:http://10.1080/00107510500052444.Google Scholar

Odum, E. P. (1977). The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science, 195(4284), 1289–1293.Google Scholar

Ossimitz, G., & Lapp, C. (2006). Das Metanoia-Prinzip: eine Einführung in systemisches Denken und Handeln. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.Google Scholar

Otway, H. J. (1975). Risk Assessment and Societal Choices (IIASA Research Memorandum). Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/514/.Google Scholar

Otway, H. J., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Public Attitudes and Decision Making. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/761/.Google Scholar

Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2011). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 3rd edition. Darmstadt: Springer.Google Scholar

Pareto, V. (1896). Cours d’économie politique. Lausanne: Rouge.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1970). On building social system theory: A personal history. Daedalus, 99(4), 826–881. DOI:http://10.2307/20023975.Google Scholar

Pattee, H. H. (1973). Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar

Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(7), e01229.Google Scholar

Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110–122.Google Scholar

Portugali, J., Meyer, H., Stolk, E., & Tan, E. (Eds.). (2012). Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642245435.Google Scholar

Rindzevičiūtė, E. (2016). The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened up the Cold War World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of Socio-Technical Systems. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 4(3), 186–194. DOI:http://10.5840/techne19994311.Google Scholar

Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.Google Scholar

Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325.Google Scholar

Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C.R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar

Scholz, R., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. DOI:http://10.4135/9781412984027.Google Scholar

Seefried, E. (2015). Zukünfte: Aufstieg und Krise der Zukunftsforschung 1945–1980, vol. 106. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. (1948a). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Part 1. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E. (1948b). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Part 2. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 623–656.Google Scholar

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. DOI:http://10.2307/1884852.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. DOI:http://10.1037/h0042769.Google Scholar

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.Google Scholar

Smuts, J. C. (1926). Holism and Evolution. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.Google Scholar

Straussfogel, D., & Von Schilling, C. (2009). Systems theory. In Kitchin, R & Thrift., N (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier, pp.151–158.Google Scholar

The Ecological Sequestration Trust. (2013). Review of Current Advanced Integrated Models for City-Regions, Presented at the Technology Strategy Board’s Future Cities Catapult, London, UK. https://ecosequestrust.org/latest/publications/review-of-current-advanced-integrated-models-for-city-regions/.Google Scholar

Ukidwe, N. U., & Bakshi, B. R. (2008). Resource intensities of chemical industry sectors in the United States via input–output network models. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 32(9), 2050–2064.Google Scholar

United Cities and Local Governments. (2015). The Sustainable Development Goals: What Local Governments Need to Know. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments.Google Scholar

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, USA. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.Google Scholar

Vester, F. (1988). The bio cybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment. Systems Practice, 1(4), 399–413.Google Scholar

Waltner-Toews, D., & Kay, J. (2005). The evolution of an ecosystem approach: The diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecology and Society, 10(1). DOI:http://10.5751/ES-01214-100138.Google Scholar

Webb, R., Bai, X., Smith, M. S., & Thomson, G. (2018a). Sustainable urban systems: Co-design and framing for transformation. Ambio, 47(1), 57–77.Google Scholar

Webb, R., Rissik, D., Petheram, L., Beh, J.-L., & Smith, M. S. (2018b). Co-designing adaptation decision support: meeting common and differentiated needs. Climatic Change, 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2165-7.Google Scholar

Wedding, G. C., & Crawford-Brown, D. (2007). Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 483–495.Google Scholar

Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. Scientific American, 179(5), 14–19.Google Scholar

Wilber, K. (2011). The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion. New York: Random House Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (2013). Carbon Dioxide, Climate and Society: Proceedings of a IIASA Workshop cosponsored by WMO, UNEP, and SCOPE, February 21–24, 1978. Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Stafford Smith, M., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change, 28, 325–336.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wymore, W. (1967). A Mathematical Theory of Systems Engineering: The Elements. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Wymore, W. (1993). Model-Based Systems Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Wynne, B. (1984). The institutional context of science, models, and policy: The IIASA Energy Study. Policy Sciences, 17(3), 277–320.Google Scholar

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2005). Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Fischer.Google Scholar

Blythe, J., Silver, J., Evans, L., et al. (2018). The dark side of transformation: Latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode, 50(5), 1206–1223.Google Scholar

Bradbury, H. (2015). The Sage Handbook of Action Research. New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Brown, C. S. (1995). Anthropocentrism and ecocentrism: The quest for a new worldview. The Midwest Quarterly, 36(2), 191.Google Scholar

Bryant, R. L. (2015). The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar

Büscher, B. (2012). Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 10(1), 29–41.Google Scholar

Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar

Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation biology, 6(1), 37–46.Google Scholar

Daily, G. C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., et al. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395–396.Google Scholar

Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., et al. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21–28.Google Scholar

Davydova, I., & Sharrock, W. (2003). The rise and fall of the fact/value distinction. The Sociological Review, 51(3), 357–375.Google Scholar

Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., et al. (2018). Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science, 359 (6373), 270–272. DOI:10.1126/science.aap8826.http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6373/270.Google Scholar

EEA. (2015). The European Environment: State and Outlook 2015: Synthesis Report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar

Farrell, K. N. (2011). Snow White and the wicked problems of the west: A look at the lines between empirical description and normative prescription. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(3), 334–361.Google Scholar

Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society’s metabolism. Journal of industrial ecology, 2(1), 61–78.Google Scholar

Fleck, L. (2012). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., & Büscher, B. (2015). Nature^{T M} Inc.: Nature as a neoliberal capitalist imaginary. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 359–372.Google Scholar

Foster, J. B. (2009). The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225–241.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, vol. 15. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25 (7), 739–755.Google Scholar

Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1–2), 150–167.Google Scholar

Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Winiwarter, V. (2011). A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development, 19(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns., Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hayward, T. (2007). Human rights versus emissions rights: Climate justice and the equitable distribution of ecological space. Ethics & International Affairs, 21(4), 431–450.Google Scholar

Healy, H., Martinez-Alier, J., & Kallis, G. (2015). From ecological modernization to socially sustainable economic degrowth: Lessons from ecological economics. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 577–590.Google Scholar

Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological economics, 60(1), 119–128.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (2003). A Treatise of Human Nature. North Chelmsforth:Courier Corporation.Google Scholar

Imran, S., Alam, K., & Beaumont, N. (2014). Reinterpreting the definition of sustainable development for a more ecocentric reorientation. Sustainable Development, 22 (2), 134–144.Google Scholar

IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Incheon: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In Jasanoff, S (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaiser, M. (2015). Ethics of science and a new social contract for knowledge. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, & Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 153–178.Google Scholar

Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873–880.Google Scholar

Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Environment, 47(3), 8.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: How to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 3(2).Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1997). Politiques de la nature: Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Leff, E. (2002). Die Geopolitik nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Ökonomisierung des Klimas, Rationalisierung der Umwelt und die gesellschaftliche Wiederaneignung der Natur. In Görg, C and Brand, U (eds.), Mythen globalen Umweltmanagements: Rio + 10. Munster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, pp. 92–117.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. (2013). One Dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2(1).Google Scholar

Martinez-Alier, J., & Muradian, R. (2015). Handbook of Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1968). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band 1: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1983). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Band 3: Der Gesamtprozess der kapitalistischen Produktion. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar

Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York and London: The Apex Press.Google Scholar

McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Environmental management, 33(3), 294–305.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. (1990). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. (2006). The scientific revolution and The Death of Nature. Isis, 97(3), 513–533.Google Scholar

Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 181–205.Google Scholar

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M., and Scott, P. B. (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

OECD. (2012). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar

Okereke, C. (2010). Climate justice and the international regime. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 462–474.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (2008). Happiness and the good life. Environmental Values, 17(2), 125–144.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J., and Uebel, T. (2015). Analytical philosophy and ecological economics. In Handbook of Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 48–78.Google Scholar

Pielke, J., and Roger, A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Potthast, T. (2015). Ethics in the sciences beyond Hume, Moore and Weber: Taking epistemic-moral hybrids seriously. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, and Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 129–152.Google Scholar

Putnam, H., et al. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., and Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development: Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 61–70.Google Scholar

Rao, N. D., and Min, J. (2017). Decent living standards: Material prerequisites for human wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 138(1), 225–244.Google Scholar

Ravetz, J., and Funtowicz, S. (2015). Post-normal science. In Meisch, S, Lundershausen, J, Bossert, L, and Rockoff, M (eds.), Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 101–112.Google Scholar

Reynaud, J.-D., and Richebé, N. (2009). Rules, conventions and values: A plea in favor of ordinary normativity. Revue Française de Sociologie, 50(5), 3–35.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.Google Scholar

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2).Google Scholar

Rutgers, M. R. (2012). A pantheon of public values: A historical and conceptual approach to the normativity of facts and values. A paper presented at The Public Values Consortium Biennial Workshop, Chicago, IL. www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai: uva. nl, volume 376695.Google Scholar

Saito, K. (2016). Natur gegen Kapital: Marx’ Ökologie in seiner unvollendeten Kritik des Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Salleh, A. (2015). Neoliberalism, scientism and earth system governance. In Bryant, R. L. (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar, pp. 432–446.Google Scholar

Schneidewind, U. (2013). Transformative literacy: Gesellschaftliche ver¨anderungsprozesse verstehen und gestalten. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 82–86.Google Scholar

Schneidewind, U. (2015). Transformative Wissenschaft-Motor fu¨r gute Wissenschaft und lebendige Demokratie. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(2), 88–91.Google Scholar

Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.Google Scholar

Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 813–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanuro, D. (2012). L’impossible capitalisme vert. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

van der Hel, S. (2018). Science for change: A survey on the normative and political dimensions of global sustainability research. Global Environmental Change, 52: 248–258.Google Scholar

Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., and Lopes, R. (2010). A participatory modelling approach to support integrated sustainability assessment processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 446–460.Google Scholar

Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., et al. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512–5534.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, J. (1968). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Heidelberg: Mohr.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

WWF. (2016). Living Planet Report 2016. Risk and Resilience in a New Era. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.Google Scholar

Ziegler, R., and Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7(1), 31–44.Google Scholar

Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2015). Sustainability assessment at the policy level. In Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham & Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 103–124.Google Scholar

Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking power. Hypatia, 13(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. San Diego, New York, London: Harcourt Brace jovanovich.Google Scholar

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar

Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 505–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777.Google Scholar

Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 947–995.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41.Google Scholar

Beierle, T. C. (1999). Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Review of Policy Research, 16(3–4), 75–103.Google Scholar

Bell, S., Morse, S., & Shah, R. A. (2012). Understanding stakeholder participation in research as part of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, 101, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.004.Google Scholar

Berg, M., & Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: A deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Baldi, M. G., Gex, B., & Massaro, E. (2020b). The sustainability solution space. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 181–208).Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81.Google Scholar

Blok, A. (2007). Experts on public trial: On democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 163–182.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C., & Munton, R. (1998). Deliberative and inclusionary processes: Their contributions to environmental governance. ESRC DIPs in Environmental Decision-Making, 17.Google Scholar

Brand, U. (2016). “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy: The strategic use of the term “transformation” does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 23–27.Google Scholar

Burton, B., & Rowell, A. (2002). British American tobacco’s socially responsible smoke screen. PR Watch, 9(4), 6–12.Google Scholar

Button, M., & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31(4), 609–637.Google Scholar

Cashmore, M., & Richardson, T. (2013). Power and environmental assessment: Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.002.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).Google Scholar

Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2015). Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abington and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Claudel, M., Massaro, E., Santi, P., Murray, F., & Ratti, C. (2017). An exploration of collaborative scientific production at MIT through spatial organization and institutional affiliation. PloS one, 12(6), e0179334.Google Scholar

Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.Google Scholar

Cook, B. R., Kesby, M., Fazey, I., & Spray, C. (2013). The persistence of “normal” catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference. Social Studies of Science, 43(5), 754–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713478670.Google Scholar

Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In Hickey, S & Mohan, G (eds.), Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010.Google Scholar

Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, vol. 4. Zed Books.Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.Google Scholar

Digeser, P. (1992). The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54(4), 977–1007.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (1993). Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. In Fischer, F & Forester, J (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, J., & Pickering, J. (2017). Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353–360.Google Scholar

Eyben, R., Harris, C., & Pettit, J. (2006). Introduction: exploring power for change. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 1–10.Google Scholar

Farrell, K. N. (2011). Snow White and the wicked problems of the west: A look at the lines between empirical description and normative prescription. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(3), 334–361.Google Scholar

Felt, U. (2009). Knowing and living in academic research: Convergences and heterogeneity in research cultures in the European context. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar

Fiorino, D. J. (1989). Environmental risk and democratic process: A critical review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14, 501.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 225–241.Google Scholar

Fritz, L. (2018). (De-)constructing participation in transdisciplinary sustainability research: A critical review of key concepts. In Engelschalt, J, Maibaum, A, Engels, F, & Odenwald, J (eds.), Schafft Wissen–Gemeinsames und geteiltes Wissen in Wissenschaft und Technik (SSOAR). München: SSOAR, pp. 106–124.Google Scholar

Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2018). Participation as relational space: A critical approach to analysing participation in sustainability research. Sustainability, 10(8), 2853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082853.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In Von Schomberg, R (ed.), Science, Politics and Morality. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 85–123.Google Scholar

Garmendia, E., & Stagl, S. (2010). Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1712–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.027.Google Scholar

Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33.Google Scholar

Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In Reason, P & Bradbury, H (eds.), Handbook of Action Research, Concise Paperback Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, pp. 72–81.Google Scholar

Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Power and knowledge. In Reason, P & Bradbury, H (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, pp. 172–189.Google Scholar

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Gibson, B., Hassan, S., & Tansey, J. (2013 ). Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Glass, J. H., Scott, A. J., & Price, M. F. (2013). The power of the process: Co-producing a sustainability assessment toolkit for upland estate management in Scotland. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.024.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. H. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hage, M., Leroy, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2010). Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production. Futures, 42(3), 254–264.Google Scholar

Halla, P. & Binder, C. R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C.R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 7–29).Google Scholar

Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2006). Some dare call it power. In Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C, Lawrence, T. B. & Nord, W. R. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, pp. 754–775.Google Scholar

Hartz-Karp, J., Pope, J., & Petrova, S. (2015). A deliberative collaborative governance approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment, Cheltenham and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 375–402.Google Scholar

Haugaard, M. (2002). Power: A Reader. Manchester Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Haugaard, M. (2003). Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(1), 87–113.Google Scholar

Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54.Google Scholar

Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-facing Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegger, D., & Dieperink, C. (2015). Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: What is in it for science? Ecology and Society, 20(4). www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art1/.Google Scholar

Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002.Google Scholar

Holmes, T. (2001). A participatory approach in practice: Understanding fieldworkers’ use of participatory rural appraisal in ActionAid The Gambia. IDS Working Papers, 123.Google Scholar

Holmes, T., & Scoones, I. (2000). Participatory environmental policy processes: Experiences from North and South. IDS Working Paper, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Brighton.Google Scholar

Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: From “speaking truth to power” to “making sense together.” Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482.Google Scholar

Igelsböck, J. (2016). Designing “integration machines.” In Krings, B-J, Rodríguez, H, & Schleisiek, A (eds.), Scientific Knowledge and the Transgression of Boundaries. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp.133–160.Google Scholar

Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making institutions. Valuing Nature, 211–231.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223–244.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kallis, G., Hatzilacou, D., Mexa, A., Coccossis, H., & Svoronou, E. (2009). Beyond the manual: Practicing deliberative visioning in a Greek island. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 979–989.Google Scholar

Kallis, G., Videira, N., Antunes, P., et al. (2006). Participatory methods for water resources planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(2), 215–234.Google Scholar

Kasemir, B. (2003). Public Participation in Sustainability Science: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642.Google Scholar

Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: How to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 3(2), 5–14.Google Scholar

Klenk, N., & Meehan, K. (2015). Climate change and transdisciplinary science: Problematizing the integration imperative. Environmental Science & Policy, 54(Supplement C), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017.Google Scholar

Klenk, N., Reed, M. G., Lidestav, G., & Carlsson, J. (2013). Models of representation and participation in model forests: Dilemmas and implications for networked forms of environmental governance involving indigenous people. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(3), 161–176.Google Scholar

Kothari, U., & Cooke, B. (Eds.) (2001). Participatory development: Power, knowledge and social control. In Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books, pp. 139–152.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, M., & Bloch-Poulsen, J. (2013). Participatory knowledge production and power. In Phillips, L, Kristiansen, M, Vehviläinen, M, & Gunnarsson, E (eds.), Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. Taylor & Francis, pp. 193–212.Google Scholar

Kropp, C. (2013). Demokratische Planung der Klimaanpassung? Über die Fallstricke partizipativer Verfahren im expertokratischen Staat. In Knierim, A, Baasch, S, & Gottschick, M (eds.), Partizipation und Klimawandel–Ansprüche, Konzepte und Umsetzung München: Oekonom, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, D. P. (2013). Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems and Contemporary Challenges. Wiley Online Library. DOI 10.1002/9781118678381.Google Scholar

Leeuwis, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: Towards a negotiation approach. Development and Change, 31(5), 931–959.Google Scholar

Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2013). Bringing governmentality to the study of global climate governance. In Stripple, J & Bulkeley, H (eds.), Governing the Climate: New Approaches to Rationality, Power and Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277–286.Google Scholar

McCool, S. F., & Stankey, G. H. (2004). Indicators of sustainability: Challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental Management, 33(3), 294–305.Google Scholar

McCullum, C., Pelletier, D., Barr, D., Wilkins, J., & Habicht, J.-P. (2004). Mechanisms of power within a community-based food security planning process. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 206–222.Google Scholar

Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 65–86).Google Scholar

Merino-Saum, A. (2020). Assessing sustainability through participatory multi-criteria approaches (PMCAs): An updated comparative analysis. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, (pp. X–X).Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mielke, J., Vermassen, H., Ellenbeck, S., Milan, B. F., & Jaeger, C. (2016). Stakeholder involvement in sustainability science: A critical view. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 71–81.Google Scholar

Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Towards sustainability assessment follow-up. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 38–45.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy, 23(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.012.Google Scholar

Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 325–344.Google Scholar

O’Brien, F., & Meadows, M. (2001). How to develop visions: A literature review, and a revised CHOICES approach for an uncertain world. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 14(4), 495–515.Google Scholar

Partzsch, L. (2015). Kein Wandel ohne Macht: Nachhaltigkeitsforschung braucht ein mehrdimensionales Machtverständnis. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(1), 48–56.Google Scholar

Pellizzoni, L. (2003). Uncertainty and participatory democracy. Environmental Values, 12(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/0.3197/096327103129341298.Google Scholar

Pellow, D. N. (1999). Negotiation and confrontation: Environmental policymaking through consensus. Society & Natural Resources, 12(3), 189–203.Google Scholar

Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D. A., Munda, G., & Vreeker, R. (2006). Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B, 1(2), 181–193.Google Scholar

Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45–56.Google Scholar

Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Raik, D. B., Wilson, A. L., & Decker, D. J. (2008). Power in natural resources management: An application of theory. Society and Natural Resources, 21(8), 729–739.Google Scholar

Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., & Frederiksen, P. (2011). Sustainability indicator development: Science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators, 11(1), 61–70.Google Scholar

Rauschmayer, F., van den Hove, S., & Koetz, T. (2009). Participation in EU biodiversity governance: How far beyond rhetoric? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 42–58.Google Scholar

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.Google Scholar

Renn, O., & Schweizer, P.-J. (2009). Inclusive risk governance: concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.507.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.Google Scholar

Rosendahl, J., Zanella, M. A., Rist, S., & Weigelt, J. (2015). Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.011.Google Scholar

Rubio, F. D., & Baert, P. (2012). The politics of knowledge: An introduction. In Rubio, F.D. & Baert, P (eds.), The Politics of Knowledge. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar

Sanderson, I. (1999). Participation and democratic renewal: from ‘instrumental’ to ‘communicative rationality’? Policy & Politics, 27(3), 325–341.Google Scholar

Santos, R., Antunes, P., Baptista, G., Mateus, P., & Madruga, L. (2006). Stakeholder participation in the design of environmental policy mixes. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 100–110.Google Scholar

Schikowitz, A. (2016). Choreographies of togetherness: Re-ordering collectivity and individuality in transdisciplinary sustainability research in Austria (Doctoral thesis). Wien.Google Scholar

Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C.R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar

Schneider, F. (2020). A mixed-method, dialogue based approach to sustainability assessments: Fostering learning towards sustainable development. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–160.Google Scholar

Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2015). Assessing the sustainability of water governance systems: The sustainability wheel. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(9), 1577–1600.Google Scholar

Schneider, F., & Buser, T. (2018). Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0507-4.Google Scholar

Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 73–87.Google Scholar

Siew, T. F., Aenis, T., Spangenberg, J. H., et al. (2016). Transdisciplinary research in support of land and water management in China and Southeast Asia: Evaluation of four research projects. Sustainability Science, 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0378-0.Google Scholar

Sinclair, A. J., Diduck, A. P., Vespa, M., Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., & Bond, A. (2015). Public participation in sustainability assessment: Essential elements, practical challenges and emerging directions. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Camberley: Edward Elgar, pp. 349–375.Google Scholar