Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:52:51.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Making Trade-offs without Assessing Probabilities

The Costs and Benefits of Vague Information in National Security Decision Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2017

Dan Reiter
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Sword's Other Edge
Trade-offs in the Pursuit of Military Effectiveness
, pp. 227 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheson, Dean. 1969. Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Agrell, Wilhelm, and Treverton, Gregory. 2015. Intelligence and Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Alan. 2016. Making Intelligence Analysis More Intelligent: Using Numeric Probabilities. Intelligence and National Security 31: 327344.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 1982. Surprise Attack. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 2000. Is Strategy an Illusion? International Security 25: 550.Google Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 2006. Enemies of Intelligence: Knowledge and Power in American National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Beyerchen, Alan. 1993–1993. Clausewitz, Nonlinearity, and the Unpredictability of War. International Security 17: 5990.Google Scholar
Beyth-Merom, Ruth. 1982. How Probable Is Probable? A Numerical Translation of Verbal Probability Expressions. Journal of Forecasting 1: 257269.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl. 1976. On War. Trans. Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMISAF [Commander, International Security Assistance Force-Afghanistan]. 2009. COMISAF Initial Assessment. Kabul: Headquarters ISAF.Google Scholar
Connable, Ben. 2012. Embracing the Fog of War: Assessment and Metrics in Counterinsurgency. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Davidson, Janine. 2013. Civil-Military Friction and Presidential Decision Making: Explaining the Broken Dialogue. Presidential Studies Quarterly 1: 129145.Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Javonovich.Google Scholar
Defense Intelligence Agency. 2015. Expressing Analytic Uncertainty. Tradecraft Note 01-15. January.Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K. 2013. Understanding and Communicating Uncertainty in Intelligence Analysis. London: Report Prepared for H.M. Government.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Nathan F., Slovic, Paul, and Peters, Ellen M.. 2009. The Use of Narrative Evidence and Explicit Likelihood by Decisionmakers Varying in Numeracy. Risk Analysis 29: 14731488.Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel. 1961. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643669.Google Scholar
Erev, Ido, Bornstein, Gary, and Wallsten, Thomas S. 1993. The Negative Effect of Probability Assessments on Decision Quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making 55: 7894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingar, Thomas. 2011. Reducing Uncertainty: Intelligence Analysis and National Security. Stanford, CA: Stanford Security Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey A., Baker, Joshua D., Mellers, Barbara A., Tetlock, Philip E., and Zeckhauser, Richard. Forthcoming. The Value of Precision in Probability Assessment: Evidence from a Large-Scale Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament. International Studies Quarterly.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey A., Lerner, Jennifer S., and Zeckhauser, Richard. Forthcoming. Behavioral Consequences of Probabilistic Precision: Experimental Evidence from National Security Officials. International Organization.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey A., and Zeckhauser, Richard. 2012. Assessing Uncertainty in Intelligence. Intelligence and National Security 27: 824847.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey A., and Zeckhauser, Richard. 2015. Handling and Mishandling Estimative Probability: Likelihood, Confidence, and the Search for Bin Laden. Intelligence and National Security 30: 7799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey A., and Zeckhauser, Richard. 2016. Why Evaluating Estimative Accuracy Is Feasible and Desirable. Intelligence and National Security 31: 178200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Leslie H., and Betts, Richard. 1971. Vietnam: The System Worked. Foreign Policy 3: 140167.Google Scholar
Gelb, Leslie H., and Betts, Richard. 1979. The Irony of Vietnam: The System Worked. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2002. Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Vallejo, Claudia C., Erev, Ido, and Wallsten, Thomas S.. 1994. Do Decision Quality and Preference Order Depend on Whether Probabilities Are Verbal or Numerical? American Journal of Psychology 107: 157172.Google Scholar
Goodpaster Report. 1965. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968. Vol. III, Doc. 69.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Haggard, Stephan, Lake, David A., and Victor, David G.. 2017. The Behavioral Revolution and the Study of International Relations. International Organization 71: S1S31.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Hughes, Alex, and Victor, David G.. 2013. The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics 11: 368386.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2015. Experiments in International Relations: Lab, Survey, and Field. Annual Review of Political Science 18: 403424.Google Scholar
Janis, Irving. 1972. Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 2011. Why Intelligence Fails. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D. P. 2004. Overconfidence in War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Sherman. 1964. Words of Estimative Probability. Studies in Intelligence 8: 4965.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen-Foon. 1992. Analogies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lanir, Zvi, and Kahneman, Daniel. 2006. An Experiment in Decision Analysis in Israel in 1975. Studies in Intelligence 50. www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol50no4/an-experiment-in-decision-analysis-in-israel-in-1975.html.Google Scholar
Lave, Lester B. 1987. Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions. Science 236: 291295.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125: 255275.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2013. Psychology and Foreign Policy Decision-Making. In Huddy, Leonie, Sears, David O., and Levy, Jack S. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2nd ed., 301333. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Logevall, Fredrik. 1999. Choosing War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, David R., and Barnes, Alan. 2014. Accuracy of Forecasts in Strategic Intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 1098410989.Google Scholar
Marchio, James. 2014. “If the Weatherman Can …”: The Intelligence Community's Struggle to Express Analytic Uncertainty in the 1970s. Studies in Intelligence 58: 3142.Google Scholar
Marsh, Kevin. 2014. Obama's Surge: A Bureaucratic Politics Analysis of the Decision to Order a Troop Surge in the Afghanistan War. Foreign Policy Analysis 10: 265288.Google Scholar
Mattis, James N. 2008. USFJCOM Commander's Guidance for Effects-Based Operations. Parameters 38: 1825.Google Scholar
McChrystal, Stanley. 2013. My Share of the Task. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S., with VanDeMark, Brian. 1995. In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Mintz, Alex, and Wayne, Carly. 2016. The Polythink Syndrome. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosteller, Frederick, and Youtz, Cleo. 1990. Quantifying Probabilistic Expressions. Statistical Science 5: 212.Google Scholar
National Intelligence Council. 2007. National Intelligence Estimate, Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities. www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Press%20Releases/2007%20Press%20Releases/20071203_release.pdf.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1981. The Handling of Risk Assessments in NRC Reports. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., Jr. 1994. Peering into the Future. Foreign Affairs 73: 8293.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2013. Procedures for Approving Direct Action against Terrorist Targets Located Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities. Presidential Policy Guidance, May 22.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A. 1997–1998. The Air Force Strikes Back. Security Studies 7: 191214.Google Scholar
Piercey, David M. 2009. Motivated Reasoning and Verbal vs. Numerical Probability Assessment: Evidence from an Accounting Context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 108: 330341.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Canice. 1993. A Theory of “Yes Men.” American Economic Review 83: 757770.Google Scholar
Preston, Andrew. 2006. McGeorge Bundy, the NSC, and Vietnam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rapport, Aaron. 2015. Waging War, Planning Peace: US Noncombat Operations and Major Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, Richard. 1993. President Kennedy: Profile of Power. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Renshon, Stanley A., and Larson, Deborah Welch, eds. 2003. Good Judgment in Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rovner, Joshua. 2011. Fixing the Facts: National Security and the Politics of Intelligence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Leonard J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Schafer, Mark, and Crichlow, Scott. 2010. Groupthink versus High-Quality Decision Making in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schrage, Michael. 2005. What Percent Is Slam Dunk? Washington Post, February 20.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2012. The Signal and the Noise. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2014. Valuing Life: Humanizing the Regulatory State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 2005. Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Do We Know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 2009. Reading Tarot on K Street. The National Interest 103: 5767.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Gardner, Daniel. 2015. Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Mellers, Barbara A.. 2011. Intelligent Management of Intelligence Agencies: Beyond Accountability Ping-Pong. American Psychologist 66: 542554.Google Scholar
Tillers, Peter, and Gottfried, Jonathan. 2006. Case Comment – United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): A Collateral Attack on the Legal Maxim That Proof beyond a Reasonable Doubt Is Unquantifiable? Law, Probability, and Risk 5: 135157.Google Scholar
US Army. 2006. Composite Risk Management. Field Manual 5-19.Google Scholar
US Army. 2008. Operations. Field Manual 3-0.Google Scholar
US Army. 2010. The Operations Process. Field Manual 5-0.Google Scholar
US Marine Corps. 1997. Warfighting. Doctrinal Publication 1.Google Scholar
Van Riper, Paul K. 2009. EBO: There Was No Baby in the Bathwater. Joint Forces Quarterly 52: 8285.Google Scholar
Wallsten, Thomas. 1990. The Costs and Benefits of Vague Information. In Hogarth, Robin M., ed., Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, 28-43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Barry D. 2004. Clausewitzian Friction and Future War. Rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Defense University.Google Scholar
Weiss, Charles. 2008. Communicating Uncertainty in Intelligence and Other Professions. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 1: 5785.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Kristan J. 2012. The Revolution Begins on Page Five: The Changing Nature of NIEs. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 25: 330349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White House. 2005. National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 2010. Obama's Wars. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wyden, Peter H. 1979. Bay of Pigs: The Untold Story. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2014. Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×