Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:48:23.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Jason Harding
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crawford, Robert. The Savage and the City in the Work of T. S. Eliot. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Holt, Earl K.William Greenleaf Eliot: Conservative Radical. St Louis, MO: First Unitarian Church of St Louis Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Howarth, Herbert. Notes on some Figures behind T. S. Eliot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.Google Scholar
Howe, D. W.The Unitarian Conscience: Harvard Moral Philosophy, 1805–1861. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Olney, James. ‘T. S. Eliot Memorial Lecture’, The Placing of T. S. Eliot, ed. Jewel, Spears Brooker. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1991 [60–76].Google Scholar
Reavis, U. L. St Louis: The Future Great City of the World. St Louis: C. R. Barnes, 1876.Google Scholar
Bush, Ronald. T. S. Eliot: A Study in Character and Style. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Crawford, Robert. The Savage and the City in the Work of T. S. Eliot. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Howarth, Herbert. Notes on some Figures behind T. S. Eliot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.Google Scholar
Miller, James E. T. S. Eliot: The Making of an American Poet, 1888–1922. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Oser, Lee. T. S. Eliot and American Poetry. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sigg, Eric. The American T. S. Eliot. Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Edward J. H.T. S. Eliot et la France. Paris: Boivin, 1951.Google Scholar
Grogin, Robert C. The Bergsonian Controversy in France: 1900–1914. University of Calgary Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hargrove, Nancy Duvall. T. S. Eliot's Parisian Year. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, William. Naissance de la critique moderne: la littérature selon Eliot et Valéry, 1889–1945. Arras: Artois Presses Université, 2002.Google Scholar
Pondrom, Cyrena N. The Road from Paris: French Influence of English Poetry, 1900–1920. Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Brooker, Peter. Bohemia in London: The Social Scene of Early Modernism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Robert. The Savage and the City in the Work of T. S. Eliot. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Rainey, Lawrence. The Annotated Waste Land with Eliot's Contemporary Prose. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. T. S. Eliot and Prejudice. London: Faber & Faber, 1988.Google Scholar
Zwerdling, Alex. Improvised Europeans: American Literary Expatriates and the Siege of London. New York: Basic Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Colls, Robert and Philip, Dodd. Eds. Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880–1920. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
Ellis, Steve. The English Eliot: Design, Language and Landscape in ‘Four Quartets’. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Gervais, David. Literary Englands: Versions of ‘Englishness’ in Modern Writing. Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Judy and Tim, Middleton. Eds. Writing Englishness 1900–1950: An Introductory Sourcebook on National Identity. London: Routledge, 1995.CrossRef
Gray, Piers. Marginal Men: Edward Thomas, Ivor Gurney, J. R. Ackerley. London: Macmillan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimble, Simon. Landscape, Writing and the ‘Condition of England’ 1878–1917: Ruskin to Modernism. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Däumer, Elisabeth and Shyamal, Bagchee. Eds. The International Reception of T. S. Eliot. London: Continuum, 2007.
Harding, Jason. The ‘Criterion’: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Inter-War Britain. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Howarth, Herbert. Notes on some Figures behind T. S. Eliot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.Google Scholar
Vanheste, Jeroen. Guardians of the Humanist Legacy: The Classicism of T. S. Eliot's ‘Criterion’ Network and its Relevance to our Postmodern World. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Asher, Kenneth. T. S. Eliot and Ideology. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Goldie, David. A Critical Difference: T. S. Eliot and John Middleton Murry in English Literary Criticism, 1918–1928. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harding, Jason. The ‘Criterion’: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Inter-War Britain. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kojecký, Roger. T. S. Eliot's Social Criticism. London: Faber & Faber, 1971.Google Scholar
Du Sautoy, Peter. ‘T. S. Eliot: Personal Reminiscences’. Southern Review (autumn 1985) [947–56].
Mairet, Philip. ‘Memories of T. S. E.’. T. S. Eliot: A Symposium for his Seventieth Birthday, ed. Neville, Braybrooke. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1958 [36–44].Google Scholar
Morley, F. V.‘T. S. Eliot as Publisher’. T. S. Eliot: A Symposium, ed. Richard, March and Tambimuttu, . London: Editions Poetry London, 1948 [60–70].Google Scholar
O'Donovan, Brigid. ‘The Love Song of T. S. Eliot's Secretary’. Confrontation (fall/winter 1975) [3–8].
Ridler, Anne. ‘Working for T. S. Eliot: A Personal Reminiscence’. Poetry Review (March 1983) [46–9].
Schuchard, Ronald. ‘T. S. Eliot at Fabers: Book Reports, Blurbs, Young Poets’. Areté (summer/autumn 2007) [63–87].
Grazia, Edward. Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law of Obscenity and the Assault on Genius. London: Constable, 1992.Google Scholar
Ernst, Morris L. and William, Seagle. To the Pure … A Study of Obscenity and the Censor. London: Jonathan Cape, 1929.Google Scholar
Lewis, Felice Flanery. Literature, Obscenity and the Law. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Rolph, C. H. Ed. The Trial of Lady Chatterley: Regina v. Penguin Books Limited. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961.
Thomas, Donald. A Long Time Burning: The History of Literary Censorship in England. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
Vanderham, Paul. James Joyce and Censorship: The Trials of ‘Ulysses’. London: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, David. A Critical Difference: T. S. Eliot and John Middleton Murry in English Literary Criticism, 1918–1928. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harding, Jason. The ‘Criterion’: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Interwar Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Harding, Jason. ‘Tradition and Egoism: T. S. Eliot and the Egoist’. T. S. Eliot and the Concept of Tradition, ed. Giovanni, Cianci and Jason, Harding. Cambridge University Press, 2007 [90–102].Google Scholar
Sullivan, Hannah. ‘“But we must learn to take literature seriously”: T. S. Eliot and the Little Magazines of Modernism, 1917–1920’. Critical Quarterly (summer 2004) [63–90].
Vanheste, Jeroen. Guardians of the Humanist Legacy: The Classicism of T. S. Eliot's ‘Criterion’ Network and its Relevance to our Postmodern World. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
White, Peter. ‘New Light on The Sacred Wood’. Review of English Studies (September 2003) [497–515].
Altieri, Charles. Painterly Abstraction in Modernist American Poetry. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Altieri, Charles. ‘“Preludes” as Prelude: In Defense of Eliot as Symboliste’. T. S. Eliot, a Voice Descanting: Centenary Essays, ed. Shyamal, Bagchee. London: Macmillan, 1990 [1–27].Google Scholar
Cameron, Sharon. Impersonality: Seven Essays. Chicago University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cianci, Giovanni. ‘Reading T. S. Eliot Visually: Tradition in the Context of Modernist Art’. T. S. Eliot and the Concept of Tradition, ed. Giovanni, Cianci and Jason, Harding. Cambridge University Press, 2007 [119–30].Google Scholar
Materer, Timothy. Vortex: Pound, Eliot, Lewis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Trotter, David. ‘T. S. Eliot and Cinema’. Modernism/Modernity (April 2006) [237–65].
Bernstein, David. ‘The Story of Vaslav Nijinsky as a Source for T. S. Eliot's “The Death of Saint Narcissus”’. Hebrew University Studies in Literature (1976) [71–104].
Hargrove, Nancy Duvall. ‘T. S. Eliot and the Dance’. Journal of Modern Literature (fall 1997) [61–88].
Koritz, Amy. Gendering Bodies/Performing Art. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mester, Terri. Movement and Modernism: Yeats, Eliot, Lawrence, Williams and Early Twentieth-Century Dance. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. Eliot's Dark Angel: Intersections of Life and Art. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Seymour-Jones, Carole. Painted Shadow: A Life of Vivienne Eliot. London: Constable, 2001.Google Scholar
Badenhausen, Richard. T. S. Eliot and the Art of Collaboration. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, E.Martin. The Making of T. S. Eliot's Plays. Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Chinitz, David. T. S. Eliot and the Cultural Divide. University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Malamud, Randy. T. S. Eliot's Drama: A Research and Production Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sherek, Henry. Not in Front of the Children. London: Heinemann, 1959.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Michael J.Dances of Death: The Group Theatre of London in the Thirties. London: Faber & Faber, 1984.Google Scholar
Acquisto, Joseph. French Symbolist Poetry and the Idea of Music. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Alldritt, Keith. Eliot's ‘Four Quartets’: Poetry as Chamber Music. London: Woburn Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Cluck, Nancy Anne. Ed. Literature and Music: Essays on Form. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1981.
Cooper, John Xiros. Ed. T. S. Eliot's Orchestra: Critical Essays on Poetry and Music. New York: Garland, 2000.
Howarth, Herbert. Notes on some Figures behind T. S. Eliot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.Google Scholar
Avery, Todd. Radio Modernism: Literature, Ethics and the BBC, 1922–1938. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. The Birth of Modern Broadcasting 1896–1927. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Chinitz, David. T. S. Eliot and the Cultural Divide. University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Cohen, Debra Rae, Michael, Coyle and Jane, Lewty. Eds. Broadcasting Modernism. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2009.CrossRef
Coyle, Michael. Ezra Pound, Popular Genres and the Discourse of Culture. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Coyle, Michael. ‘The Radio Broadcasts of T. S. Eliot, 1929–1963’. T. S. Eliot and our Turning World, ed. Jewel, Spears Brooker. London: Macmillan, 1997 [203–13].Google Scholar
Bush, Ronald. T. S. Eliot: A Study in Character and Style. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Litz, A. Walton. ‘The Allusive Poet: Eliot and his Sources’. T. S. Eliot: The Modernist in History, ed. Ronald, Bush. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Longenbach, James. ‘“Mature Poets Steal”: Eliot's Allusive Practice’. The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot, ed. Moody, A. D.. Cambridge University Press, 1994 [176–88].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. Allusion to the Poets. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Riquelme, John Paul. ‘“Withered Stumps of Time”: Allusion, Reading, and Writing in The Waste Land’. Denver Quarterly (1981) [90–110].
Smith, Grover. T. S. Eliot's Poetry and Plays. University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Southam, B. C.A Student's Guide to the ‘Selected Poems of T. S Eliot’. London: Faber & Faber, 1981.Google Scholar
Highet, Gilbert Arthur. The Classical Tradition: Greek and Roman Influences on Western Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Howarth, Herbert. Notes on some Figures behind T. S. Eliot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. The Classic. London: Faber & Faber, 1975.Google Scholar
Reeves, Gareth. T. S. Eliot: A Virgilian Poet. London: Macmillan, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Vincent. The Great War and the Language of Modernism. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bullaro, John J.‘The Dante of T. S. Eliot’. A Dante Profile, ed. Franca, Schettino. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 1967 [27–37].Google Scholar
Charity, A. C.‘T. S. Eliot: The Dantean Recognitions’. The Waste Land in Several Voices, ed. Moody, A. D.. London: Edward Arnold, 1974.Google Scholar
Gervais, David. ‘Eliot's Shakespeare and Eliot's Dante’. T. S. Eliot and Our Turning World, ed. Jewel, Spears Brooker. London: Macmillan, 2001 [114–24].Google Scholar
Litz, A. Walton. ‘Dante, Pound, Eliot: The Visionary Company’. Dante e Pound, ed. Maria, Luisa Ardizzone. Ravenna: Longo, 1998 [39–45].Google Scholar
Manganiello, Dominic. T. S. Eliot and Dante. London: Macmillan, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praz, Mario. ‘T. S. Eliot and Dante’. The Flaming Heart. New York: Doubleday, 1958 [348–74].Google Scholar
Brooks, Harold F. T. S. Eliot as Literary Critic. London: Cecil Woolf, 1987.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Peter. ‘Taking Liberties: Eliot's Donne’. Critical Survey (1993) [278–88].
Empson, William. Argufying: Essays on Literature and Culture, ed. John, Haffenden. University of Iowa Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. The Invisible Poet: T. S. Eliot. London: W. H. Allen, 1960.Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. Decisions and Revisions in T. S. Eliot: The Panizzi Lectures 2002. London: British Library, 2003.Google Scholar
Baker, Carlos. The Echoing Green: Romanticism, Modernism, and the Phenomena of Transference in Poetry. Princeton University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, George.Transformations of Romanticism in Yeats, Eliot, and Stevens. Chicago University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank. Romantic Image. London: Routledge, 1957.Google Scholar
Lobb, Edward. T. S. Eliot and the Romantic Critical Tradition. London: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Michael. The All-Sustaining Air: Romantic Legacies and Renewals in British, American, and Irish Poetry since 1900. Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raine, Craig. T. S. Eliot. London: Faber & Faber, 2006.Google Scholar
Bush, Ronald. T. S. Eliot: A Study in Character and Style. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Davie, Donald. The Poet in the Imaginary Museum. Manchester: Carcanet, 1977.Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. The Pound Era. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Marx, William. Naissance de la critique moderne: la littérature selon Eliot et Valéry, 1889–1945. Arras: Artois Presses Université, 2002.Google Scholar
Moody, A. D.T. S. Eliot: Poet. Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. Eliot's Dark Angel: Intersections of Life and Art. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Davie, Donald. Thomas Hardy and British Poetry. London: Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar
Hibberd, Dominic. Harold Monro: Poet of the New Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, Peter. British Poetry in the Age of Modernism. Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Philip. Required Writing. London: Faber & Faber, 1983.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert H. The Georgian Revolt. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Stead, C. K.The New Poetic: Yeats to Eliot. London: Hutchinson, 1964.Google Scholar
Bell, Quentin. Bloomsbury. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968.Google Scholar
Edel, Leon. Bloomsbury: A House of Lions. London: Hogarth Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Holroyd, Michael. Lytton Strachey. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar
Hussey, Mark. Ed. Virginia Woolf A to Z. Oxford University Press, 1996.
Lee, Hermione. Virginia Woolf. London: Vintage, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, S. P. Ed. The Bloomsbury Group. Toronto University Press, 1975.
Bush, Ronald. T. S. Eliot: A Study in Character and Style. Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Davie, Donald. Modernist Essays: Yeats, Pound, Eliot. Manchester: Carcanet, 2004.Google Scholar
Gallup, Donald. ‘T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound: Collaborators in Letters’. Atlantic Monthly (January 1970) [48–62].
Kenner, Hugh. The Pound Era. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Praz, Mario. The Flaming Heart. New York: Doubleday, 1958.Google Scholar
Stough, Christina. ‘The Skirmish of Pound and Eliot in The New English Weekly’. Journal of Modern Literature (1983) [231–46].
Bürger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde, trans. Michael, Shaw. Manchester University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Duchamp, Marcel. The Essential Writings of Marcel Duchamp, ed. Michel, Sanouillet and Elmer, Peterson.London: Thames & Hudson, 1975.Google Scholar
Levenson, Michael. A Genealogy of Modernism: A Study of English Literary Doctrine, 1908–1922. Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Perloff, Marjorie. 21st-Century Modernism: The ‘New Poetics’. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
Stead, C. K.The New Poetic. London: Hutchinson, 1964.Google Scholar
Asher, Kenneth. T. S. Eliot and Ideology. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chace, William. The Political Identities of Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot. Stanford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Kojecký, Roger. T. S. Eliot's Social Criticism. London: Faber & Faber, 1971.Google Scholar
Levenson, Michael. ‘Politics’. A Companion to T. S. Eliot, ed. David, Chinitz. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 [376–87].Google Scholar
North, Michael. The Political Aesthetic of Yeats, Eliot and Pound. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Tratner, Michael. Modernism and Mass Politics: Joyce, Woolf, Eliot, Yeats. Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Alford, B. W. E.Britain in the World Economy since 1880. London: Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David. ‘T. S. Eliot and the Major’. Times Literary Supplement (5 July 1996) [14–16].
Bush, Ronald. ‘Eliot and Ruskin: Second Thoughts’. Ruskin and Modernism, ed. Giovanni, Cianci and Peter, Nicholls. New York: Palgrave, 2001 [155–64].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John Xiros. Modernism and the Culture of Market Society. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Jason. The ‘Criterion’: Cultural Politics and Periodical Networks in Inter-War Britain. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Stough, Christina. ‘The Skirmish of Pound and Eliot in The New English Weekly’. Journal of Modern Literature (1983) [231–46].
Julius, Anthony. T. S. Eliot, Anti-Semitism, and Literary Form. London: Thames & Hudson, 2003.Google Scholar
Omer-Sherman, Ranen. ‘Rethinking Eliot, Jewish Identity, and Cultural Pluralism’. Modernism/Modernity (September 2003) [439–45].
Paulin, Tom. ‘T. S. Eliot and Anti-Semitism’. Writing to the Moment. London: Faber & Faber, 1996.Google Scholar
Raine, Craig. T. S. Eliot. London: Faber & Faber, 2006.Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. T. S. Eliot and Prejudice. London: Faber & Faber, 1988.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. ‘Burbank with a Baedeker, Eliot with a Cigar: American Intellectuals, Anti-Semitism, and the Idea of Culture’. Modernism/Modernity (January 2003) [1–26].
DuPlessis, Rachel Blau. Genders, Races, and Religious Cultures in Modern American Poetry, 1908–1934. Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellmann, Maud. The Poetics of Impersonality: T. S. Eliot and Ezra Pound. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1987.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lyndall. T. S. Eliot: An Imperfect Life. New York: W. W. Norton, 1999.Google Scholar
Laity, Cassandra and Nancy, K. Gish. Eds. Gender, Desire and Sexuality in T. S. Eliot. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef
Lamos, Colleen. Deviant Modernism: Sexual and Textual Errancy in T. S. Eliot, James Joyce and Marcel Proust. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Gail. Learning to be Modern: Pound, Eliot, and the American University. Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Davie, Donald. ‘Anglican Eliot’. Eliot in his Time, ed. Walton Litz, A.. Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Denis. Words Alone: The Poet T. S. Eliot. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Gardner, Helen. The Art of T. S. Eliot. London: Cresset, 1949.Google Scholar
Kirk, Russell. Eliot and his Age: T. S. Eliot's Moral Imagination in the Twentieth Century. Wilmington: ISI Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Schuchard, Ronald. Eliot's Dark Angel: Intersections of Life and Art. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Spurr, Barry. ‘Anglo-Catholic in Religion’: T. S. Eliot and Christianity. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Childs, Donald. From Philosophy to Poetry: T. S. Eliot's Study of Knowledge and Experience. London: Athlone Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gray, Piers. T. S. Eliot's Intellectual and Poetic Development. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1982.Google Scholar
Habib, M. A. R. The Early T. S. Eliot and Western Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 199.
Jain, Manju. T. S. Eliot and American Philosophy: The Harvard Years. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Perl, Jeffrey. Skepticism and Modern Enmity: Before and After Eliot. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. T. S. Eliot and the Philosophy of Criticism. London: Duckworth, 1988.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Robert. The Myth and Ritual School: J. G. Frazer and the Cambridge Ritualists. New York: Garland, 1991.Google Scholar
Brooker, Jewel Spears. Mastery and Escape: T. S. Eliot and the Dialectic of Modernism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bush, Ronald. ‘The Presence of the Past: Ethnographic Thinking/Literary Politics’. Prehistories of the Future: The Primitivist Project and the Culture of Modernism, ed. Elazar, Barkan and Ronald, Bush. Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Crawford, Robert. The Savage and the City in the Work of T. S. Eliot. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Harmon, William. ‘T. S. Eliot, Anthropologist and Primitive’. American Anthropologist (December 1976) [797–811].
Manganaro, Marc. Myth, Rhetoric and the Voice of Authority: A Critique of Frazer, Eliot, Frye and Campbell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Daniel. Quantum Poetics: Yeats, Pound, Eliot and the Science of Modernism. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Costello, Harry T.Josiah Royce's Seminar, 1913–14, ed. Grover, Smith. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Marion. ‘Eliot and the Particle Physicist’. Southern Review (July 1974) [583–9].
Whitworth, Michael H. Einstein's Wake: Relativity, Metaphor, and Modernist Literature. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Whitworth, Michael H. ‘Pièces d'identité: T. S. Eliot, J. W. N. Sullivan and Poetic Impersonality’. English Literature in Transition (1996) [149–70].
Brooker, Jewel Spears. Ed. T. S. Eliot: The Contemporary Reviews. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef
Clarke, Graham. Ed. T. S. Eliot: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. London: Croom Helm, 1990.
Grant, Michael. Ed. T. S. Eliot: The Critical Heritage. 2 vols. London: Routledge, 1982.
Harding, Jason. ‘Prufrock and Prejudice’. Times Literary Supplement (22 October 2004) [24].
Corcoran, Neil. English Poetry since 1940. London: Longman, 1993.Google Scholar
Däumer, Elisabeth and Shyamal, Bagchee. Eds. The International Reception of T. S. Eliot. London: Continuum, 2007.
Heaney, Seamus. Finders Keepers: Selected Prose 1971–2001. London: Faber & Faber, 2002.Google Scholar
Hughes, Ted. A Dancer to God: Tributes to T. S. Eliot. London: Faber & Faber, 1992.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.New Bearings in English Poetry. London: Chatto & Windus, 1950.Google Scholar
Wilmer, Clive. ‘The Later Fortunes of Impersonality: “Tradition and the Individual Talent” and Postwar Poetry’. T. S. Eliot and the Concept of Tradition, ed. Giovanni, Cianci and Jason, Harding. Cambridge University Press, 2007 [58–71].Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. Ed. T. S. Eliot: Modern Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House, 1985.
Brooker, Jewel Spears. ‘Eliot Studies: A Review and a Select Booklist’. The Cambridge Companion to T. S. Eliot, ed. Moody, A. D.. Cambridge University Press, 1994 [236–44].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Graham. Ed. T. S. Eliot: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. London: Croom Helm, 1990.
Knowles, Sebastian D. G. and Scott, A. Leonard. Eds. An Annotated Bibliography of a Decade of T. S. Eliot Criticism: 1977–1986. Orono: National Poetry Foundation, 1992.
Martin, Mildred. Ed. A Half-Century of Eliot Criticism. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1972.
Ricks, Beatrice. Ed. T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography of Secondary Works. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, 1980.
The Newsletter of the T. S. Eliot Society publishes an annual bibliography of secondary criticism on T. S. Eliot.
Baldick, Chris. The Social Mission of English Criticism, 1848–1932. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Harwood, John. Eliot to Derrida: The Poverty of Interpretation. London: Macmillan, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobb, Edward. T. S. Eliot and the Romantic Critical Tradition. London: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar
Shusterman, Richard. T. S. Eliot and the Philosophy of Criticism. London: Duckworth, 1988.Google Scholar
Waugh, Patricia. Practising Postmodernism/Reading Modernism. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.Google Scholar
Waugh, Patricia. Ed. Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Further reading
  • Edited by Jason Harding, University of Durham
  • Book: T. S. Eliot in Context
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973673.039
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Further reading
  • Edited by Jason Harding, University of Durham
  • Book: T. S. Eliot in Context
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973673.039
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Further reading
  • Edited by Jason Harding, University of Durham
  • Book: T. S. Eliot in Context
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973673.039
Available formats
×