1. , , , et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181–6.
2. . Muscles: effectors of the motor systems. In , , , eds. Principles of Neural Science. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1991; 548.
3. , , . Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 397–406.
4. ., , , et al. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 624–33.
5. , . The relationship of voluntary movement to spasticity in the upper motor neuron syndrome. Ann Neurol 1977; 2: 460–5.
6. , . Weakness in patients with stroke: implications for strength training in neurorehabilitation. Phys Ther Rev 2000; 5: 227–38.
7. , . Weakness in patients with hemiparesis. Am J Occup Ther 1989; 43: 313–19.
8. , . Factors contributing to the regulation and clinical assessment of muscular strength. Phys Ther 1982; 62: 1283–90.
9. , , , et al. Exercise. In , , , et al. eds. Downey and Darling's Physiological Basis of Rehabilitation Medicine. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001; 379–96.
10. , , . Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1983; 338: 37–49.
11. , . Performance and physiologic adaptations to resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: S3–16.
12. , . Isokinetic strength and power deficits in the hand following stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123: 1200–6.
13. , , . Time and magnitude of torque generation is impaired in both arms following stroke. Muscle Nerve 2003; 28: 46–53.
14. , . Distribution of muscle strength impairments following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 79–87.
15. , . The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain 1989; 112: 749–63.
16. , , . Recovery of proximal and distal arm weakness in the ipsilateral upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabilitation 2002; 17: 153–9.
17. , , , et al. Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 300–8.
18. , . Relative shoulder flexor and handgrip strength is related to upper limb function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 215–21.
19. , , , et al. Arm function after stroke: an evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 1267–72.
20. , , . Motor variables correlated with the hand-to-mouth maneuver in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 682–4.
21. , , , et al. Muscle weakness and cocontraction in upper limb hemiparesis: relationship to motor impairment and physical disability. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 241–8.
22. , . Strength training improves upper-limb function in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41: 136–40.
23. , , . Improved force control among patients with sub-acute stroke after constraint-induced therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004; 18: 250–8.
24. . Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment. London: Butterworth–Heinemann, 1990.
25. , . Is there evidence that strength training could help improve muscle function and other outcomes without reinforcing abnormal movement patterns or increasing reflex activity in a man who has had a stroke? Phys Ther 2003; 83: 844–51.
26. , , . et al. Dynamic muscle strength training in stroke patients: effects on knee extension torque, electromyographic activity, and motor function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 419–25.
27. , . Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: effects on function and spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1231–6.
28. , , , et al. Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1211–18.
29. , , , et al. Systematic muscle building exercises in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation, 2002;17: 211–14.
30. , , , et al. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130: 59–68.
31. , , , et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovascul Dis 2013; 22: 364–70.
32. , , , et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–19.
33. , , , et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394–8.
34. , , , et al. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521–4.
35. , , , et al. Acute corticospinal tract Wallerian degeneration is associated with stroke outcome. Stroke 2010; 41: 751–6.
36. , , , et al. Proximal paresis of the upper extremity in patients with stroke. Neurology 2007; 69: 348–55.
37. , , , et al. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy. Stroke 2011; 42: 421–6.
38. . Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1228–32.
39. , , , et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007; 130: 170–80.
40. , , , et al. Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 45–51.
41. , . The validity of computed tomographic scan findings for the localization of cerebral functions: the relationship between computed tomography and hemiparesis. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 328–32.
42. , . Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 107–12.
43. , , , et al. Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol 2009; 65: 596–602.
44. ., , , et al. Activation changes in sensorimotor cortex during improvement due to CIMT in chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2011; 29: 299–310.
45. , , , et al. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 323–31.
46. , , , et al. The rate of recovery from stroke and its measurement. Int Rehabil Med 1981; 3: 155–61.
47. , , , et al. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 357–64.
48. . Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990; 21: 247–51.
49. . The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain 1951; 74: 443–80.
50. , , , et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1629–37.
51. , , , et al. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 1172–7.
52. , , , et al. Active finger extension: a simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 1088–90.
53. , . Absence of a proximal to distal gradient of motor deficits in the upper extremity early after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2074–85.
54. , . Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Stroke 2009; 40: 1772–9.
55. , , Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcomes after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke 2010; 41: 745–50.
56. , , . Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In , , eds. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 9. New York, NY: Elsevier Science BV, 2003; 77–137.
57. , Binder-MacLeod SA.. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1393–403.
58. , , , et al. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 220–6.
59. , , , et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral–physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 267–72.
60. , , , et al. Stroke rehabilitation: three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1233–8.
61. , , , et al. Comparison of two therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of the pure motor hemiparetic stroke patient. J Neurol Rehabil 1995; 9: 191–6.
62. , , , et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550–6.
63. , , , et al. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 364–7.
64. , , , et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369–75.
65. , , , et al. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 20–31.
66. , . Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J Neurol 2002; 249: 518–28.
67. , , , et al. Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke. Stroke 2004; 35: 2537–42.
68. , , , et al. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: S101–14.
69. , , , et al. Early and intensive rehabilitation predicts good functional outcomes in patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 1251–9.
70. , , . Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281–99.
71. , , , et al. Impact of early vs. delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 113–17.
, , . Evidence based review of stroke rehabilitation. Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation
. Available from: http://www.ebrsr.com
[Accessed December 2, 2011
73. , , , et al.Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 579–89.
74. , , , et al. Very early constraint-i induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS): a single-center RCT. Neurology 2009; 73: 195–201.
75. , . Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother 2004; 50: 219–24.
76. , , , et al. The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2010; 8: 60.
77. . Muscular coordination and strength training: implications for rehabilitation. Sports Med 1988; 5: 196–202.
78. , . Strengthening to promote functional recovery poststroke: an evidence-based review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15: 177–99.
79. , , , et al. Combined functional task practice and dynamic high intensity resistance training promotes recovery of upper-extremity motor function in post-stroke hemiparesis: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2006; 30: 99–115.
80. , , , et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 620–8.
81. , , , et al. Stroke program review group: an interim report. Stroke 2008; 39: 1364–70.
82. , . Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In , , , et al., eds. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical, 2009.
83. , . Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 333–44.
84. , , , et al. The influence of functional goals on the kinematics of reaching following stroke. Neuroreport 1995; 19: 11–16.
85. , , , et al. Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 447–56.
86. , , . New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002; 3: 228–36.
87. , , , et al. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist 2002; 8: 325–38.
88. . On “Modified constraint-induced therapy…” Phys Ther 2008; 88: 680–4.
89. ., ., et al. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 2010; 41: 2309–15.
90. , , , et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095–104.
91. , , , et al. Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 137–41.
92. , . The neural basis of constraint-induced movement therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 582–8.
93. , , , et al. Motor cortex activation is related to force of squeezing. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 16: 197–205.
94. , , , et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998; 250: 5–8.
95. , , , et al. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol 2001; 248: 315–21.
96. , , , et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy results in increased motor map area in subjects 3 to 9 months after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 505–13.
97. , , , et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 326–38.
98. , , , et al. Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003; 14: S77–91.
99. , , , et al. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy is independent of infarct location in chronic stroke patients. Stroke 2009; 40: 2468–72.
100. , , , et al. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke 2008; 39: 1520–25.
101. , , , et al. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: Part I. Making sound decisions. J Neurol Phys Ther 2011; 35: 57–64.
103. , , . Prediction of natural history of neuromuscular properties after stroke using Fugl-Meyer scores at 1 month. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 458–68.
104. , , , et al. Arm motor control as predictor for hypertonia after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1411–17.
105. , , , et al. Participant perception of recovery as criterion to establish importance of improvement for constraint-induced movement therapy outcome measures: a preliminary study. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 170–8.
106. , , , et al. Multicenter randomized trial of robot-assisted rehabilitation for chronic stroke: methods and entry characteristics for VA ROBOTICS. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 775–83.
107. , , , et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1772–83.
108. , , , et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 9: CD008349.
109. , , , et al. Effect of gravity on robot-assisted motor training after chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1754–61.
110. , , , et al. A novel adaptive mixed reality system for stroke rehabilitation: principles, proof of concept, and preliminary application in 2 patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011; 18: 212–30.
111. , , , et al. Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, part 1: a unified approach for representing action, quantitative evaluation, and interactive feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 51.