Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bambini, Valentina Arcara, Giorgio Aiachini, Beatrice Cattani, Barbara Dichiarante, Maria Leonilde Moro, Andrea Cappa, Stefano F. and Pistarini, Caterina 2017. Assessing functional communication: validation of the Italian versions of the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scales for speakers and caregivers. Aphasiology, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 332.

  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

Chapter 36 - Rehabilitation for aphasia

from Section 6 - Cognitive rehabilitation
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995590
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


1. Pedersen PM, Joergensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 659–66.
2. Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 196–202.
3. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Gialloreti LE, et al. Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome: the prominent role of neuropsychological disorders. Eur Neurol 1996; 36: 385–90.
4. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Int Med 2004; 249: 413–22.
5. Anderson SW, Damasio H, Tranel D. Neuropsychological impairments associated with lesions caused by tumor or stroke. Arch Neurol 1990;.47: 397–405.
6. Kertesz A, McCabe P. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain 1977; 100: 1–18.
7. Cappa SF. Spontaneous recovery from aphasia. In: Stemmer B, Whitaker HA, eds. Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2008; 535–45.
8. Marcotte K, Adrover-Roig D, Damien B, et al. Therapy-induced neuroplasticity in chronic aphasia. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50: 1776–86.
9. Raymer AM, Beeson P, Holland A, et al. Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: S259–75.
10. Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F. Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia. Nat Rev Neurol 2011; 7: 86–97.
11. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health, 2001. Available from:
12. Springer L. Therapeutic approaches to aphasia rehabilitation. In Stemmer B, Whitaker HA, eds. Handbook of the Neuroscience of Language. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2008; 397–406.
13. Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Incorporating parameters of normal conversation in aphasia. In Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Baltimore, MD: William and Wilkins, 1981; 169–94.
14. Springer L, Huber W, Schlenck KJ, et al. Agrammatism: deficit or compensation? Consequences for aphasia therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2000; 10: 279–309.
15. Thompson CK, Shapiro LP, Kiran S, et al. The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46: 591–607.
16. Goldstein K. Language and Language Disturbances. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton, 1948.
17. Grafman J. Conceptualizing functional neuroplasticity. J Commun Disord 2000; 33: 345–55.
18. Miceli G, Amitrano A, Capasso R, et al. The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: analysis of two cases. Brain Lang 1996; 52: 150–74.
19. Meinzer M, Mohammadi S, Kugel H, et al. Integrity of the hippocampus and surrounding white matter is correlated with language training success in aphasia. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 283–90.
20. Jackson JH. Selected Writings. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1932.
21. Basso A. Aphasia and its Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
22. Weigl E, Kreindler A. [Contributions to the interpretation of aphasic disorders as manifestations of blocking. Temporary deblocking of speech motor reactions by word-reading in motor aphasia.]. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr 1960; 200: 306–23.
23. Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol 1995; 4: 94–8.
24. Collins AM, Loftus EF. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 1975; 82: 407–28.
25. Marcotte K, Ansaldo AI. The neural correlates of semantic feature analysis in chronic aphasia: discordant patterns according to the etiology. Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31: 052–63.
26. Warrington EK, Cipolotti L. Word comprehension. The distinction between refractory and storage impairments. Brain 1996; 119: 611–25.
27. Corbett F, Jefferies E, Ehsan S, et al. Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain. Brain 2009; 132: 2593–608.
28. Caramazza A, Hillis AE. For a theory of remediation of cognitive deficits. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1993; 3: 217–34.
29. Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010; 46: 537–44.
30. Wittenberg GF, Schaechter JD. The neural basis of constraint-induced movement therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 2009; 22: 582–8.
31. Kleim JA, Jones T. Principles of experience-dependent neuroplasticity. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: S225–39.
32. Meinzer M, Rodriguez AD, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. First decade of research on constrained-induced treatment approaches for aphasia rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2012; 93: S35–45.
33. Baddeley AD. Implicit memory and errorless learning. A link between cognitive theory and neuropsychological rehabilitation? In Squire LR, Butters N, eds. Neuropsychology of Memory. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1992; 309–13.
34. Fridriksson J, Holland AL, Beeson P, et al. Spaced retrieval treatment of anomia. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 99–109.
35. McKissock S, Ward J. Do errors matter? Errorless and errorful learning in anomic picture naming. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2007; 17: 355–73.
36. Howard D, Hatfield FM. Aphasia Therapy: Historical and Contemporary Issues. Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1987.
37. Helm-Eastabrooks N, Albert MA. Manual of Aphasia Therapy. 2nd edn. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers, 2001.
38. Hillis AE. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2002.
39. De Partz MP. Re-education of a deep dyslexia patient: rationale of the method and results. Cogn Neuropsychol 1986; 3: 149–77.
40. Friedman RB, Sample DM, Lott SN. The role of level of representation in the use of paired associate learning for rehabilitation of alexia. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 223–34.
41. Hillis AEE. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2002.
42. Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Armstrong E, et al. Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2010; 91: 1814–37.
43. Legg C, Young L, Bryer A. Training sixth-year medical students in obtaining case-history information from adults with aphasia. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 559–75.
44. Pulvermüller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 576–82.
45. Pulvermüller F, Härle M, Hummel F. Walking or talking? Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of action verb processing. Brain Lang 2001; 78: 143–68.
46. Marangolo P, Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, et al. Improving language without words: first evidence from aphasia. Neuropsychologia 2010; 48: 3824–33.
47. Marangolo P, Cipollari S, Fiori V, et al. Walking but not barking improves verb recovery: implications for action observation treatment in aphasia rehabilitation. PloS One 2012; 7: e38610.
48. Corballis MC. Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain Lang 2010; 112: 25–35.
49. Meister IG, Boroojerdi B, Foltys H, et al. Motor cortex hand area and speech: implications for the development of language. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 401–6.
50. Lakoff G. Explaining embodied cognition results. Top Cogn Sci 2012; 4: 773–85.
51. Marcotte K, Perlbarg V, Marrelec G, et al. Default-mode network functional connectivity in aphasia: therapy-induced neuroplasticity. Brain Lang 2013; 124: 45–55.
52. Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 72–8.
53. Mazzocchi F, Vignolo LA. Localisation of lesions in aphasia: clinical-CT scan correlations in stroke patients. Cortex 1979; 15: 627–54.
54. Baldwin K, Orr S, Briand M, et al. Acute ischemic stroke update. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30: 493–514.
55. Feeney DM, Baron JC. Diaschisis. Stroke 1986; 17: 817–30.
56. Noppeney U, Friston KJ, Price CJ. Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions. J Anat 2004; 205: 433–42.
57. Gowers W. Malattie del Sistema Nervoso. Milan: Vallardi, 1895.
58. Heiss WD, Thiel A, Kessler J, et al. Disturbance and recovery of language function: correlates in PET activation studies. Neuroimage 2003; 20: S42–9.
59. Gazzaniga MS. Right hemisphere language following brain bisection. A 20-year perspective. Am Psychol 1983; 38: 525–37.
60. Weiller C, Isensee C, Rijintjes M, et al. Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia–a PET study. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 723–32.
61. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 1371–84.
62. Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Baker JM, et al. Activity in preserved left hemisphere regions predicts anomia severity in aphasia. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 1013–19.
63. Musso M, Moro A, Glauche V, et al. Broca's area and the language instinct. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 74–81.
64. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA. The Token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasia. Brain 1962; 85: 665–78.
65. Crosson B, Moore AB, McGregor KM, et al. Regional changes in word-production laterality after a naming treatment designed to produce a rightward shift in frontal activity. Brain Lang 2009; 111: 73–85.
66. Crosson B, Moore AB, Gopinath K, et al. Role of the right and left hemispheres in recovery of function during treatment of intention in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 392–406.
67. Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, et al. Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology 1996; 47: 1504–11.
68. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Ho M, et al. Research with transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of aphasia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2009; 9: 451–8.
69. Postman-Caucheteux WA, Birn RM, Pursley RH, et al. Single-trial fMRI shows contralesional activity linked to overt naming errors in chronic aphasic patients. J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22: 1299–318.
70. Leger A, Demonet JF, Ruff S, et al. Neural substrates of spoken language rehabilitation in an aphasic patient: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 174–83.
71. Vitali P, Abutalebi J, Tettamanti M, et al. Training-induced brain remapping in chronic aphasia: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 152–60.
72. Marcotte K, Ansaldo AI. The neural correlates of semantic feature analysis in Broca's aphasia: discordant patterns according to etiology. Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31: 52–63.
73. Rochon E, Leonard C, Burianova H, et al. Neural changes after phonological treatment for anomia: an fMRI study. Brain Lang 2011; 114: 164–79.
74. Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 2010; 41: 1229–36.
75. Fiori V, Coccia M, Marinelli CV, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23: 2309–23.
76. Warren JE, Crinion JT, Lambon Ralph MA, et al. Anterior temporal lobe connectivity correlates with functional outcome after aphasic stroke. Brain 2009; 132: 3428–42.
77. Sharp DJ, Turkheimer FE, Bose SK, et al. Increased frontoparietal integration after stroke and cognitive recovery. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 753–6.
78. Vitali P, Tettamanti M, Abutalebi J, et al. Generalization of the effects of phonological training for anomia using structural equation modelling: a multiple single-case study. Neurocase 2010; 16: 93–105.
79. Abutalebi J, Rosa PA, Tettamanti M, et al. Bilingual aphasia and language control: a follow-up fMRI and intrinsic connectivity study. Brain Lang 2009; 109: 141–56.
80. Kelly H, Brady MC, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 2010; 5: CD000425.
81. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2005; 86: 1681–92.
82. Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, et al. Task Force on cognitive rehabilitation. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12: 665–80.
83. Robey RR, Schultz MC, Crawford AB, et al. Single-subject clinical outcome research: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 445–72.
84. Moss A, Nicholas M. Language rehabilitation in chronic aphasia and time postonset: a review of single-subject data. Stroke 2006; 37: 3043–51.
85. Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003; 34: 987–93.
86. Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, et al. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: 1282–99.
87. Shewan CM, Bandur DL. Treatment of Aphasia: A Language Oriented Approach. London: College-Hill Press, 1986.
88. Marshall J. The mapping hypothesis and aphasia therapy. Aphasiology 1995; 9: 517–39.
89. Visch-Brink E, Bajema I, Van de Sandt-Koenderman M. Lexical-semantic therapy: Box. Aphasiology 1997; 11: 1057–78.